Yes. I guess this is a question about whether share-wise security models can be specified.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 October 2010 19:36, Madhusudan Singh <singh.madhusu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Ok. > > > > In my mind, guest access should be just that - no authentication. > > Well, I believe that it is. But that you need to enable the Guest > account in AD for it to be allowed. > > I might be wrong, of course, but I think that's how it works. > > What you want to do is bypass AD for one print share. Maybe that's > possible, but I don't know. > > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On 21 October 2010 20:54, Madhusudan Singh <singh.madhusu...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > I have no control over the active directory. I just authenticate a > subset > >> of > >> > its members to give them access to the fileserver. > >> > > >> > Does this mean that there is no true guest access when using ADS ? > >> > >> I do not know enough about AD to answer your question. > > -- > Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba