On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 19:51 -0400, simo wrote: > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 00:32 +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote: > > Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > > [SNIP] > > > > > > > > Test using a modern (i.e. much later than 3.0.33) smbclient. > > > > > > > To back that up he is using CentOS 5, so there is no excuse for using > > such an old version. Needs to switch to the samba3x packages that have > > been present since CentOS 5.5 asap. From recollection it is getting on > > now for a year since CentOS 5.5 came out which gave you version 3.3.8 in > > the samba3x packages and CentOS 5.6 bumped that to 3.5.4, which has been > > out for several months now. > > > > For those that say upgrade to CentOS 6, you won't get any newer samba as > > the samba3x packages in CentOS 5.6 are at the same level as the samba > > packages in CentOS 6. > > FWIW RHEL 6.1 has a newer version with a ton of patches on top. >
Indeed you make the massive jump to 3.5.6 :-) Compared to moving off 3.0.33 this is small and I would expect RHEL/CentOS 5.7 to switch to this version as well when it is released. I would note however that all the RHEL/CentOS versions of Samba have a bunch of patches over the official releases. JAB. -- Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk Fife, United Kingdom. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba