I posted the originating message for the thread. My focus has been redirected for a couple of days, so I missed the question below.
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Brodbeck DavidB at mail.interclean.com > > What are the details on this? I thought I'd been > carefully watching the release announcements for > anything ACL-related, but I apparently missed this > one. In short, an upgrade from 3.0.5 to 3.0.8 (now 3.0.9) broke Access database sharing. The cause is unknown but the second and subsequent Access clients to attempt an open of the database complain that the file doesn't exist. My apologies for the length of this post. Here's the log (log level 10) from a client being refused access to the file... [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(474) size=124 smb_com=0xa2 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=24 smb_flg2=51207 smb_tid=1 smb_pid=1268 smb_uid=100 smb_mid=2048 smt_wct=24 smb_vwv[ 0]= 255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[ 1]=57054 (0xDEDE) smb_vwv[ 2]= 9728 (0x2600) smb_vwv[ 3]= 5632 (0x1600) smb_vwv[ 4]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 5]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 6]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 7]=35072 (0x8900) smb_vwv[ 8]= 512 (0x200) smb_vwv[ 9]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[11]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[12]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[13]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[14]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[15]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[16]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[17]= 256 (0x100) smb_vwv[18]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[19]=16384 (0x4000) smb_vwv[20]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[21]= 512 (0x200) smb_vwv[22]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[23]= 768 (0x300) smb_bcc=41 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1977) [000] 00 5C 00 46 00 6F 00 72 00 6D 00 73 00 5C 00 44 .\.F.o.r .m.s.\.D [010] 00 61 00 74 00 61 00 5C 00 73 00 6D 00 63 00 2E .a.t.a.\ .s.m.c.. [020] 00 6D 00 64 00 62 00 00 00 .m.d.b.. . [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(886) switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 2218) conn 0x8389de8 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (1081, 100) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_nt_user_token(491) NT user token of user S-1-5-21-1901413937-2006929789-925700815-1233 contains 6 SIDs SID[ 0]: S-1-5-21-1901413937-2006929789-925700815-1233 SID[ 1]: S-1-5-21-1901413937-2006929789-925700815-513 SID[ 2]: S-1-1-0 SID[ 3]: S-1-5-2 SID[ 4]: S-1-5-11 SID[ 5]: S-1-5-21-2802411879-2074512950-1258234877-1201 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_unix_user_token(505) UNIX token of user 1081 Primary group is 100 and contains 1 supplementary groups Group[ 0]: 100 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_user(281) change_to_user uid=(1081,1081) gid=(0,100) [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 10] smbd/nttrans.c:reply_ntcreate_and_X(607) reply_ntcreateX: flags = 0x16, desired_access = 0x20089 file_attributes = 0x0, share_access = 0x0, create_disposition = 0x1 create_options = 0x40 root_dir _fid = 0x0 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 10] smbd/nttrans.c:map_create_disposition(341) map_create_disposition: Mapped create_disposition 0x1 to 0x1 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 10] smbd/nttrans.c:map_share_mode(480) map_share_mode: Mapped desired access 0x20089, share access 0x0, file attributes 0x0 to open_mode 0x10 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(108) unix_convert called on file "Forms/Data/smc.mdb" [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 10] smbd/statcache.c:stat_cache_lookup(243) stat_cache_lookup: lookup succeeded for name [FORMS/DATA/SMC.MDB] -> [Forms/Data/smc.mdb] [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(Forms/Data/smc.mdb) returning 0766 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 10] smbd/process.c:remove_sharing_violation_open_smb_message(160) remove_sharing_violation_open_smb_message: deleting mid 2048 len 128 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 10] locking/locking.c:get_deferred_opens(992) get_deferred_opens: deferred_open_entry[0]: pid = 2218, mid = 2048, dev = 0x901, inode = 386338064, port = 32788, time = [1103304067.249679] [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 10] locking/locking.c:delete_deferred_open_entry(1084) delete_deferred_open_entry: num_deferred_open_entries = 1 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 10] locking/locking.c:delete_deferred_open_entry(1089) delete_deferred_open_entry: deleted deferred_open_entry[0]: pid = 2218, mid = 2048, dev = 0x901, inode = 386338064, port = 32788, time = [1103304067.24967 9] [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 10] locking/locking.c:delete_deferred_open_entry(1098) delete_deferred_open_entry: deleting entry 0 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 10] locking/locking.c:delete_deferred_open_entry(1120) delete_deferred_open_entry: Remaining table. [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 10] smbd/trans2.c:set_bad_path_error(2234) set_bad_path_error: err = 2 bad_path = 0 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(105) error string = No such file or directory [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(129) error packet at smbd/trans2.c(2240) cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(464) [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(474) size=35 smb_com=0xa2 smb_rcls=52 smb_reh=0 smb_err=49152 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=51201 smb_tid=1 smb_pid=1268 smb_uid=100 smb_mid=2048 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(449) write_socket(5,39) [2004/12/17 12:21:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(452) write_socket(5,39) wrote 39 Note the error message NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND. Can someone more familiar with the log content help me understand why Samba is refusing to acknowledge the file's existence to its users? Thanks, Lane Beneke __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba