Try removing the existing kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-78.0.13  with
yum remove kernel-module-openafs.
(you will have to tempoararily stop AFS).
Then install it again afterwards.
(If yum remove doesn't work you could try a rpm -e kernel-module-openafs---)

Steve Timm


On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Winnie Lacesso wrote:

Dear SL gurus,

Our SL4 AFS clients are unable to update to latest kernel, the error is

Transaction Check Error:   package
kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-78.0.13.EL-1.4.7-68.2.SL4 (which is newer than
kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-78.0.13.EL-1.4.7-68.SL4) is already installed
 package kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-78.0.13.ELsmp-1.4.7-68.2.SL4 (which is
 newer than kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-78.0.13.ELsmp-1.4.7-68.SL4) is
 already installed

Can someone advise on the fix?
I've tried yum clean all; yum update - same error (wasn't likely to work,
but -)

Also tried change /etc/yum.repos.d/sl-errata.repo & sl.repo to point from our
SL4.4 & 4.5 mirror to using SL's own repos (in case the problem is our
mirror server), yum clean all, yum update - same error

On one SL4.4 afs client (where it isn't critical that AFS works), openafs was
removed, then yum update worked, but now can't reinstall openafs - it wants
kernel 2.6.9-11 installed! Why??

r...@bsesrv3> yum install openafs-client
Loading "kernel-module" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
Resolving Dependencies
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Package openafs-client.x86_64 0:1.4.7-68.2.SL4 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: openafs = 1.4.7 for package: openafs-client
--> Processing Dependency: openafs-kernel for package: openafs-client
--> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes.
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Package openafs.x86_64 0:1.4.7-68.2.SL4 set to be updated
---> Package kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-11.EL.x86_64 0:1.4.7-68.2.SL4 set to 
be updated
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: kernel-x86_64 = 2.6.9-11.EL for package: 
kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-11.EL
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Beginning Kernel Module Plugin
---> Package kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-78.0.17.ELsmp.x86_64 0:1.4.7-68.2.SL4 
set to be installed
---> Package kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-78.0.22.ELsmp.x86_64 0:1.4.7-68.2.SL4 
set to be installed
---> Package kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-89.0.3.ELsmp.x86_64 0:1.4.7-68.2.SL4 
set to be installed
---> Package kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-78.0.13.ELsmp.x86_64 0:1.4.7-68.SL4 
set to be installed
---> Package kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-78.0.22.EL.x86_64 0:1.4.7-68.2.SL4 set 
to be installed
---> Package kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-89.0.3.EL.x86_64 0:1.4.7-68.2.SL4 set 
to be installed
---> Package kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-78.0.13.EL.x86_64 0:1.4.7-68.SL4 set 
to be installed
---> Package kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-78.0.17.EL.x86_64 0:1.4.7-68.2.SL4 set 
to be installed
Finished Kernel Module Plugin
Error: Missing Dependency: kernel-x86_64 = 2.6.9-11.EL is needed by package 
kernel-module-openafs-2.6.9-11.EL

r...@bsesrv3> rpm -qa | grep 2.6.9-11
/*  nothing */
r...@bsesrv3> rpm -qa | grep ^kernel | sort
kernel-2.6.9-78.0.13.EL.x86_64
kernel-2.6.9-78.0.17.EL.x86_64
kernel-2.6.9-78.0.22.EL.x86_64
kernel-2.6.9-89.0.3.EL.x86_64
kernel-smp-2.6.9-78.0.13.EL.x86_64
kernel-smp-2.6.9-78.0.17.EL.x86_64
kernel-smp-2.6.9-78.0.22.EL.x86_64
kernel-smp-2.6.9-89.0.3.EL.x86_64
kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-78.0.13.EL.x86_64
kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-78.0.17.EL.x86_64
kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-78.0.22.EL.x86_64
kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-89.0.3.EL.x86_64
kernel-utils-2.4-14.1.117.2.1.x86_64

Can anyone advise on a fix.
Please + thank you very much!


--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven C. Timm, Ph.D  (630) 840-8525
t...@fnal.gov  http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
Fermilab Computing Division, Scientific Computing Facilities,
Grid Facilities Department, FermiGrid Services Group, Assistant Group Leader.

Reply via email to