Re: MUSCLE Re: 61 XX

[Anna Erika Suortti]

On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 09:19:53 +0200 Laurent Boulard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> David Corcoran wrote:
> 
> >Hello,
> >
> >Points well taken.  It seems unanimous that the driver should take care
> of
> >Get Response.  I shall update the IFD Handler documentation to
> reflect
> >this.  Thank you so much for your suggestions.
> >
> Jim rees said:
> 
>       I agree that the application should not have to deal with this.
>       But I don't think the driver should either.  Anything that every
>       driver must do in the same way really belongs at a higher level,
>       in pc/sc.
> 
> And I quite agree with him. The GET RESPONSE must be handle at a higher
> 
> level between the driver and the application.
> -- 
> Laurent Boulard

  I don't think that the handling should be done in the driver, either. In our
implementation GET RESPONSE is done in the ICC Service Provider functions, where
I think it fits best.  

  Erika Suortti 
  Computing Centre 
  Helsinki University of Technology
***************************************************************
Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
(Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
http://www.linuxnet.com/
To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe sclinux
***************************************************************