Hi,

Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 
>>> Micah Cowan wrote:
>>>> To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
>>>> sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
>>> Come to think of it, that functionality more-or-less already exists;
>>> "M-x term" within Emacs pretty much fits the bill.
>> 
>> Only a dumb terminal, though :(
>
> Nope. M-x terminal is the dumb terminal. M-x term gives a fully-emulated
> terminal ("eterm").

Awesome, did not know at all!  Thanks for the hinter!

        Hannes


_______________________________________________
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users

Reply via email to