[ATrpms-users] Re: FC4 mythtv support?
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:52:30PM -0700, Jarod Wilson wrote: On Saturday 17 September 2005 04:28, Axel Thimm wrote: [...] there are about 3.5MB diff in the pngs as compared to the 0.18.1 release. Is that intended? OK, that was the diff against release-0-18-1, which isn't what it should be, e.g. != mythtv-0.18.1. :/ The diff between the released tarball and the fixes branch is much smaller indeed. But there are still some binary picture bits modified, e.g. themes/G.A.N.T./bkg/grey.jpeg programs/mythfrontend/mythfrontend.icns trans-pbb_back copy.png Hrm, not sure what's going on there... I do recall we had to do some work on some of the graphics to get the right svn property tags on them, which could account for the images supposedly being different... But I haven't altered any graphics beyond that, just code. Perhaps you missed the above few? They are different than what the tarballs contain. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpPLqyDk2v9d.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
[ATrpms-users] bmp/xmms hanging w/ samba
When attempting to play mp3's from my samba share (samba-3.0.14a-2 on FC4) with xmms or bmp, after about a minute or so of playing the player stops, as if I had hit pause. If I hit pause twice, it starts up again where it left off. This behavior does not happen with mpg123 is being used to play the same mp3s over the same share. No error messages show up in dmesg in the client, nor in the logs on the samba server. xmms-1.2.10-15.99_2.rhfc4.at (from atrpms) bmp-0.9.7-10.fc4 (from extras) Are these lists the proper places to report these issues? I don't see a bugzilla for either repo. If any more info is needed, let me know. -- Mike Perry Mad Computer Scientist fscked.org evil labs ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
[ATrpms-users] Re: libelf
On Sunday 18 September 2005 11:26, Axel Thimm wrote: Since it looks like the latter will just lead to a system with the same dependency issues, I'd opt for the first. OTOH smart fix will have fixed all dependency issues now ... I'm first trying to fix it via the rescue mode. It won't take that long and certainly is less work than reinstalling my whole box. I hope smart did a good job, but I didn't see anything regarding the medley and atrpms package config conflict getting resolved. Anyway, I'll see how things go within an hour or so. If it won't work by than, I'll start to reinstall the whole box. thanks, Marcel ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
[ATrpms-users] Re: Funny behaviour with smart and yum
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote: Hi all, My nightly check4updates (with only yum enabled due to x86_64) tells me that I have ... libglib-2.0_0.x86_64 2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at atrpms libgmodule-2.0_0.x86_64 2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at atrpms libgobject-2.0_0.x86_64 2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at atrpms libgthread-2.0_0.x86_64 2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at atrpms Available. i386 versions were downloaded and installed. Smart does not even show them as available. When I use yum to do an upgrade, it tells me that the gpg key for these is not in the database. I have all keys in the database and other atrpms rpms download fine. I suspect the gpg check is keeping smart from even showing it to me. What is the solution? The i386 and x86_64 packages have the same signatures: # rpm -qip libgthread-2.0_0-2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at.*|grep Sign Signature : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 09:52:35 PM CEST, Key ID 508ce5e666534c2b Signature : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 11:12:52 PM CEST, Key ID 508ce5e666534c2b I suspect that ATrpms' key has been removed from your rpm database. I've recently heard of another such case, where suddenly the ATrpms key was missing, so perhaps some repo is removing all gpg keys but some, or explicitely some keys including ATrpms'?/paranoia Try rpm -q gpg-pubkey-66534c2b -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpl8KiuVQ0Ts.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
Re: [ATrpms-users] Re: libelf
Hi Frank, I am wondering if perhaps using yum and up2date has somehow caused the problem. Perhaps they cannot be used interchangably. It should be possible to use both, but I also fear my system got messed up by doing just that. I now found that also my laptop has got a strange configuration. It's upgraded from FC3 to FC4-test3 and after that to FC4. I still find a lot of fc3 packages on the system for which already newer packages exist. Even smart doesn't upgrade those for some reason. On my fresh installed system smart seems to the job very well now and I have to agree with Axel that this seems the real next thing in package managers. It's very smooth and much more intuitive to use. Also the downloads go in parallel, which speeds up things a lot. This is still a fairly new intallation of FC4. I dont have much time invested in it, so a new, clean reinstallation would not be a big deal. However, since I dont know what happened, I cant do anything to prevent it happening again. Exactly that is what I felt too. If I would know what went wrong or why I couldn't resolve the issues, things would be better to accept. Now I still fear that some day it will break again although I'm nearly certain that in my case it came mostly from upgrading from FC4-test3 to FC4 and the struggle I had with yum getting things done on my new 64bit system at that time. I know this is a pretty general description of the problem. Not enough specifics to allow real diagnosis. I am mainly after some help in uderstanding this problem. Was it caused, or could it have been caused by using both yum and up2date? If so which is better to use. Or is there some other software that is better? I tested smart today and I do believe this to be much better already than yum and apt. I'll certainly keep using it. Regards, Marcel ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
[ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics-switch and GLX
Hi, Today I reinstalled my FC4 box and using smart I must say that things worked out very well. I got everything up and running again and didn't loose any valuable stuff along the way. One thing I found during the install about the nvidia drivers. Although I use the nvidia-graphics-switch utility I still had a problem with loading of GLX. I finally fixed that by renaming /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a It seemed that Xorg loaded this instead of the nvidia one for some reason. Anyway, I'm happy to get everything done and thanks to smart it went also very fast. Axel, thanks for the suggestion to use smart. It has very much improved since I used it more than half a year ago. Regards, Marcel ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
[ATrpms-users] Re: nvidia-graphics-switch and GLX
Hi, On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 09:07:50PM +0200, Marcel Janssen wrote: Hi, Today I reinstalled my FC4 box and using smart I must say that things worked out very well. I got everything up and running again and didn't loose any valuable stuff along the way. One thing I found during the install about the nvidia drivers. Although I use the nvidia-graphics-switch utility I still had a problem with loading of GLX. I finally fixed that by renaming /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a It seemed that Xorg loaded this instead of the nvidia one for some reason. you need to use /etc/X11/xorg.conf.nvidia as a template for /etc/X11/xorg.conf (or just copy it over). This could had been done automatically, but in ancient times, when people where using rpm -Uhv on all ATrpms' packages it happened often that ATI users would not recover from an automated installation. So for better or worse the config file still needs manual renaming to activate the driver. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpF1hQHqs2ue.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
[ATrpms-users] Re: bmp/xmms hanging w/ samba
Thus spake Axel Thimm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I think the issue is probably that mpg123 is caching away the network outages. Is this wireless? Either wired or wireless. 802.11g or 100Mbit. Same LAN. On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:44:34AM -0500, Mike Perry wrote: Of course, right after I sent the email I began to notice skipping with mpg123 (mpg321-0.2.10.3-0.lvn.1.4) and the error messages ALSA: underrun, at least 0ms. Interestingly enough, increasing the ALSA buffer and the mp3 streaming buffer seem to make the problem worse for xmms and bmp. mpg123 seems to have no buffering options. Perhaps your network connection is really that bad, that even mp3 streams outperform its bandwidth? Doubtful. I get around 2MBytes/sec off of the samba share over wireless, and around 4 over wired.. I just tried NFS, and the problem took much longer to reproduce, but it did eventually crap out over both the wired and the wireless networks. Think I should also file the bugs with xmms and bmp upstream? Any other suggestions? -- Mike Perry Mad Computer Scientist fscked.org evil labs ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
[ATrpms-users] Re: nvidia-graphics-switch and GLX
On Monday 19 September 2005 00:32, Axel Thimm wrote: you need to use /etc/X11/xorg.conf.nvidia as a template for /etc/X11/xorg.conf (or just copy it over). Didn't know that. I had a xorg.conf from my previous installation that worked for my dual head setup, so I used that one instead. I see that the Module path is specified in your template. It's a somewhat nicer solution, so I will do that too. Thanks, Marcel ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
