Re: Bug#342959: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.4

2005-12-12 Thread Matthias Klose 
Steve M. Robbins writes:
 Howdy,
 
 On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:18:29AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
 
  We will get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the
  g++-3.3 package.
 
 On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:54:22AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
 
  We would like to get rid of g++-3.4 for the etch release, although
  currently not a hard release goal.
  
 
 I completely missed the discussion surrounding removal of gcc 3.3 and
 gcc 3.4.

AFAIK there was none, and I didn't propose this in the bug reports.
Although the release team is eager to minimize the number of versions
for one package.

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#342959: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.4

2005-12-11 Thread Steve M. Robbins 
Howdy,

On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:18:29AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:

 We will get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the
 g++-3.3 package.

On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:54:22AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:

 We would like to get rid of g++-3.4 for the etch release, although
 currently not a hard release goal.
 

I completely missed the discussion surrounding removal of gcc 3.3 and
gcc 3.4.


For the record, ccmalloc builds a stub library for each C++ compiler
shipped.  So the build-dependency can be easily removed as soon as the
compiler is removed.

Cheers,
-Steve


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]