Time for Apache httpd 2.4.3 ??
I'd like to propose an Apache httpd 2.4.3 release RSN... I'll RM.
Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, Daniel Gruno wrote: [ ] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs [ ] 0: I don't care [ ] -1: Don't adopt the system, because I am +1 in principle, providing that some issues are fixed: Currently, it is possible to make comments.a.o send mail to arbitrary recipients because the email addresses are not verified. IMHO comments.a.o should only send mail to addresses that have been verified. This would mean that the email notification service would require an account. Also, it may be problematic that URLs that lack the protocol part (e.g. www.spam-now.com) are accepted. But it may be enough if such spam comments are removed by the moderators (at least if the mail address problem is solved). Cheers, Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs
On 07/10/2012 11:14 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, Daniel Gruno wrote: [ ] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs [ ] 0: I don't care [ ] -1: Don't adopt the system, because I am +1 in principle, providing that some issues are fixed: Currently, it is possible to make comments.a.o send mail to arbitrary recipients because the email addresses are not verified. IMHO comments.a.o should only send mail to addresses that have been verified. This would mean that the email notification service would require an account. Also, it may be problematic that URLs that lack the protocol part (e.g. www.spam-now.com) are accepted. But it may be enough if such spam comments are removed by the moderators (at least if the mail address problem is solved). Cheers, Stefan Thanks for your input, Stefan. I've added a check that will only allow registered users to be notified when someone replies to their comments. We also discussed email confirmation checks on IRC, and I will look into that tomorrow, as well as probably start a new thread on the ML for future suggestions to the comments system. We can enable/disable these features at any point in the future, if it becomes a hassle or any such thing. With regards, Daniel.
Re: Time for Apache httpd 2.4.3 ??
On 2012-07-10 16:16, Jim Jagielski wrote: I'd like to propose an Apache httpd 2.4.3 release RSN... I'll RM. Would be awesome to get https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292 into both trunk and 2.4.*... Best regards, Julian
Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs
[ x ] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs [ ] 0: I don't care [ ] -1: Don't adopt the system, because -- Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com
Re: Time for Apache httpd 2.4.3 ??
Just how supported and standard is this? Chrome seems to use it for something else: http://code.google.com/p/gears/wiki/ResumableHttpRequestsProposal On Jul 10, 2012, at 6:14 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: On 2012-07-10 16:16, Jim Jagielski wrote: I'd like to propose an Apache httpd 2.4.3 release RSN... I'll RM. Would be awesome to get https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292 into both trunk and 2.4.*... Best regards, Julian
