Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] SSH port forwards behind restrictive firewall
Mick wrote: Hi All, I think that I have confused myself with this. I am behind a firewall/http proxy which seems to only allow outbound connections on ports 80 443 for web browsing. This is not enough for me, as I would like to use my mail client to send and receive mail from behind the firewall. I tried connecting to ssh servers which listen on different ports, besides tcp/22 and I was not successful. This is probably an indication that the internet gateway machine only accepts connections for packets that have a destination to ports 80 443. If the above is correct, am I right to assume that to be able to run a tunnel through this internet gateway I should run something like: ssh -L :localhost:443 [EMAIL PROTECTED] or are ssh packets somehow distinguishable by their headers, so that a cleverly crafted firewall will still identify them and drop them? I don't have a direct answer, but it depends on the configuration of the firewall. You can analyze for content and you can also allow all traffic. -- == Nick Stinemates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://nick.stinemates.org AIM: Nick Stinemates MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] == -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with qt? Almost ALL masked or keyworded now.
Dale wrote: Hi, I was planning to install KDE 4.0.1 and finally got it all fetched. Sort of ran into this tho. [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -evp world These are the packages that would be fetched, in order: Calculating world dependencies \ !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy x11-libs/qt have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_rc1 (masked by: package.mask) /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: # Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19 Dec 2007) # Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Mask qt-4.4 package while testing them in portage # Plus packages depending on them - x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - x11-libs/qt-4.3.2-r1 (masked by: ) - x11-libs/qt-4.3.2 (masked by: package.mask) - x11-libs/qt-4.3.1-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - x11-libs/qt-3.3.8-r4 (masked by: package.mask) - x11-libs/qt-3.3.4-r8 (masked by: package.mask) For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. (dependency required by kde-base/arts-3.5.8 [ebuild]) !!! Problem resolving dependencies for kde-base/kpf !!! Depgraph creation failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # This is what qt looks like as to what is available and what is masked: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # equery list -p x11-libs/qt [ Searching for package 'qt' in 'x11-libs' among: ] * installed packages [I--] [M ] x11-libs/qt-3.3.8-r4 (3) [I--] [ ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.2-r1 (4) * Portage tree (/usr/portage) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/kylixlibs3-borqt-3.0 (0) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/kylixlibs3-borqt-3.0-r1 (0) [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-3.3.4-r8 (3) [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.1-r1 (4) [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.2 (4) [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-assistant-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-core-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.8 (3) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-phonon-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-sql-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-svg-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-test-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwt-qt3-5.0.2 (5) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwt-qt3-5.0.2-r1 (5) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwtplot3d-qt3-0.2.7 (0) [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # So even the qt3 that I have installed is masked. What's going on? I have and plan to keep KDE 3.5.8 around for a while so I assume it needs qt3 but yet KDE 4.0 needs qt4 if I understand correctly. What's the best thing to do here? Thanks Dale :-) :-) Are you sure you didn't unmask your qt package using /etc/portage/package.keywords and install the wrong version? -- == Nick Stinemates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://nick.stinemates.org AIM: Nick Stinemates MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] == -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] adding python module
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:50:08AM +, Gavin Seddon wrote: Hi, Can anyone tell me how to add a python module to python, or give me a url telling me how? THANKS GAVIN -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list Not really a gentoo question, but, you have 2 options. Add your modules directory to the $PYTHONPATH. To see what that is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ echo $PYTHONPATH /usr/lib/portage/pym Next option is to put it in /usr/lib/python2.4(or 2.5)/site-packages Last, but certainly not least, put the python module in your python projects root directory -- Nick Stinemates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://nick.stinemates.org -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] dhcpd uses fake MAC address
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 02:07:20AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: My router has big problems assigning the correct IPs to Gentoo boxes. If the NIC in the box has a MAC address of, say, 01:00:12:11:41:49:1e, dhcpd reports something else to router: ff:42:54:59:20:00:1c:21:e0:42:c2 Why is this happening and how do I tell dhcpd not to mess with the MAC address it reports to DHCP servers? Same experience here. I always thought it was a linux/windows compatibility problem since that is where I noticed the problem first.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dhcpd uses fake MAC address
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 01:34:36PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Samstag 25 Oktober 2008, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Nick Stinemates wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 02:07:20AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: My router has big problems assigning the correct IPs to Gentoo boxes. If the NIC in the box has a MAC address of, say, 01:00:12:11:41:49:1e, dhcpd reports something else to router: ff:42:54:59:20:00:1c:21:e0:42:c2 Why is this happening and how do I tell dhcpd not to mess with the MAC address it reports to DHCP servers? Same experience here. I always thought it was a linux/windows compatibility problem since that is where I noticed the problem first. Nope, it only happens with the dhcpd of Gentoo. Other Linux boxes report the correct MAC address. my dhcpd reports the right mac adress (when I try it), so it must be your fault ;) Could it be a /etc/conf.d/net issue? Mind pasting yours?
