Re: TreatFileJob
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 11:21:02PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: TreatCurrent(d,fi); - return PRF_LATER; + if(session-IsOpen()) +return PRF_LATER; } int res=session-Done(); if(res==FA::IN_PROGRESS) Is that return needed at all? Can a session ever be in progress but not open? I added that conditional to streamline find, but everything seems to work fine without that return at all. (I find the difference between open/closed and in progress slightly confusing.) Close'd session is always Done (==OK). I have removed the return. -- Alexander.
Re: transfer continue with fish://
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 04:52:50PM +0200, Holger Paschke wrote: Hi, talking about the fish protocol... I still have no success using that on OpenSSH systems. Do you have yourself setup with password-less login to the remote system (e.g. ssh remote requires no password)? This seems to be a requirement for using fish:// . You can do this by placing the contents of your public key file (e.g. ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 on the remote system; you can put it in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys if the server is running openssh 3.0 or later). -- Caleb Epstein | bklyn . org | Forecast, n.: cae at| Brooklyn Dust | A prediction of the future, based on bklyn dot org | Bunny Mfg. | the past, for which the forecaster | | demands payment in the present.
Re: transfer continue with fish://
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:48:03AM -0400, Caleb Epstein wrote: On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 04:52:50PM +0200, Holger Paschke wrote: Hi, talking about the fish protocol... I still have no success using that on OpenSSH systems. Do you have yourself setup with password-less login to the remote system (e.g. ssh remote requires no password)? This seems to be a requirement for using fish:// . You can do this by placing the contents of your public key file (e.g. ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 on the remote system; you can put it in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys if the server is running openssh 3.0 or later). Wow, it really works on key-authentificated servers. I am only wondering, why I haven't tested this simple case first... Thanks Holger -- Holger Paschke @ Lycos Europe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: transfer continue with fish://
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 10:42:00AM +0300, Hannu Liljemark wrote: I was wondering about continuing cancelled transfers when using fish://. It is not supported yet. -- Alexander.
