[Vo]:ANPA

[ROGER ANDERTON]

if anyone is interested, this group has relaunched itself on the Internet 


ANPA (Alternative Natural Philosophy Association) Conference 2016 has now 
finished
Next year Conference 2017 is provisionally planned for: Monday 7th – Friday 
11th August 2017 preferred, possibly 1 week earlier.
at: Rowlands Castle, United Kingdom
see: http://anpa.onl/2016/anpa37-2016-conference-details/

contact is: ad...@anpa.onl
ANPA formed 30+ years ago and seem based on aims of scientists like Pierre 
Noyes, see:H. Pierre Noyes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Aim was to have a Paradigm shift in science.
Example of type of talks:
Stephen Fry and Nick Greaves: Duplication theory ANPA 2015

The BiEntropy of Some Knots on the Simple Cubic Lattice -Grenville Croll ANPA 
Aug 2016
|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| The BiEntropy of Some Knots on the Simple Cubic Lattice ... |
|  |
| View on www.youtube.com | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |







   

[Vo]:vision of LENR inspired by image of Mother Nature

[Peter Gluck]

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/08/aug-28-2016-vision-of-lenr-mirrors.html


A good coming week to you all!

Peter

-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

[Jed Rothwell]

a.ashfield  wrote:


> I don't understand how people on this forum like Jed can be so adamant
> that Rossi was a fraud from day one and never produced anomalous heat.  The
> weight of evidence suggests that he has.
>

The photos of the ceiling proves he has not produced anomalous heat. He
would dead if he had.

The unanswered questions in Exhibit 5 and the blatant fraud in JM Chemical
company proves that he is a fraud.

- Jed

[Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

[a.ashfield]

Reviewing Lewan's piece, with the videos by the Greenyer, linked below, 
he makes a good case for process being basically the swap of a nickel's 
electron by a hydrogen ion.

https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/03/07/finally-this-is-possibly-how-the-e-cat-works/

It seems to me this is a good explanation using known physics and 
Greenyer goes into detail of how this might happen.  Axil will be 
pleased to note plasmons are featured.  An electric field's effect 
apparently gets magnified by ten and Rossi has recently commented that 
after the initial warming all that is required is a field.


I don't understand how people on this forum like Jed can be so adamant  
that Rossi was a fraud from day one and never produced anomalous heat.  
The weight of evidence suggests that he has.

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

[Lennart Thornros]

Jed, Nobody has proven anything and you jump to conclusions.

Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros


lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899

Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and
enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM)


On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> a.ashfield  wrote:
>
>
>> I don't understand how people on this forum like Jed can be so adamant
>> that Rossi was a fraud from day one and never produced anomalous heat.  The
>> weight of evidence suggests that he has.
>>
>
> The photos of the ceiling proves he has not produced anomalous heat. He
> would dead if he had.
>
> The unanswered questions in Exhibit 5 and the blatant fraud in JM Chemical
> company proves that he is a fraud.
>
> - Jed
>
>
>
>

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

[Axil Axil]

How could a fraudulent company pass through the OFAC certication process?

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> a.ashfield  wrote:
>
>
>> I don't understand how people on this forum like Jed can be so adamant
>> that Rossi was a fraud from day one and never produced anomalous heat.  The
>> weight of evidence suggests that he has.
>>
>
> The photos of the ceiling proves he has not produced anomalous heat. He
> would dead if he had.
>
> The unanswered questions in Exhibit 5 and the blatant fraud in JM Chemical
> company proves that he is a fraud.
>
> - Jed
>
>
>
>

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

[Eric Walker]

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

How could a fraudulent company pass through the OFAC certication process?
>

How could one conclude that JM obtained OFAC certification?  We go through
this again.

Eric

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

[Axil Axil]

True, the IH/Rossi contrace is contingent upon te certification of the
customer. It would be stupid to misrepresent this certication, but anything
is possible if improbable. Such misrepresentation is a criminal offence.

*How much are the fines for violating these regulations?*
The fines for violations can be substantial. Depending on the program,
criminal penalties for willful violations can include fines ranging up to
$20 million and imprisonment of up to 30 years. Civil penalties for
violations of the Trading With the Enemy Act can range up to $65,000 for
each violation. Civil penalties for violations of the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act can range up to $250,000 or twice the amount
of the underlying transaction for each violation. Civil penalties for
violations of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act can range up to
$1,075,000 for each violation. [10-08-13]

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Eric Walker  wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>
> How could a fraudulent company pass through the OFAC certication process?
>>
>
> How could one conclude that JM obtained OFAC certification?  We go through
> this again.
>
> Eric
>
>

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

[Eric Walker]

There appears to be no OFAC certification in this instance.  There's Henry
Johnson's warranty that JM Chemicals is in compliance with OFAC (p. 25 of
the complaint).  There's no reason to think that JMC was in violation of
OFAC by trading with an enemy of the US.  Presumably what fraud there is
would go back to the individuals named in the lawsuit and countersuit
rather than a shell company.

Eric


On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> True, the IH/Rossi contrace is contingent upon te certification of the
> customer. It would be stupid to misrepresent this certication, but anything
> is possible if improbable. Such misrepresentation is a criminal offence.
>
> *How much are the fines for violating these regulations?*
> The fines for violations can be substantial. Depending on the program,
> criminal penalties for willful violations can include fines ranging up to
> $20 million and imprisonment of up to 30 years. Civil penalties for
> violations of the Trading With the Enemy Act can range up to $65,000 for
> each violation. Civil penalties for violations of the International
> Emergency Economic Powers Act can range up to $250,000 or twice the amount
> of the underlying transaction for each violation. Civil penalties for
> violations of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act can range up to
> $1,075,000 for each violation. [10-08-13]
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Eric Walker 
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>>
>> How could a fraudulent company pass through the OFAC certication process?
>>>
>>
>> How could one conclude that JM obtained OFAC certification?  We go
>> through this again.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>