Am Mittwoch den, 1. Mai 2002, um 20:42, schrieb Joe:
> The TFTP service isn't very reliable, and it falls over with > 32
> nodes all requesting
> kernels/ramdisks at the same time. HTTP is much more scalable, and
> load can be balanced
> much more easily.
load balancing is easy, when using
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 02:40:36PM -0500, Joe wrote:
> I'll give it a try. In the past when we've tried other tftp servers,
> they haven't worked with pxe.
Look for atftp. Or use Intel's mtftp (multicast tftp) along with
atftp. I've not gotten atftp's mtftp support to work yet.
Cheers,
Matt
I'll give it a try. In the past when we've tried other tftp servers,
they haven't worked with pxe.
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 02:34 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> At Wed, 1 May 2002 13:42:45 -0500,
> Joe wrote:
>> The TFTP service isn't very reliable, and it falls over with > 32
>> node
At Wed, 1 May 2002 13:42:45 -0500,
Joe wrote:
> The TFTP service isn't very reliable, and it falls over with > 32 nodes
> all requesting
> kernels/ramdisks at the same time. HTTP is much more scalable, and load
> can be balanced
> much more easily.
If your problem is only on the load, using a
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 19:36, Mario Klebsch wrote:
> Am Mittwoch den, 1. Mai 2002, um 19:13, schrieb Alex Thiel:
> > On Wednesday 01 May 2002 18:26, Mario Klebsch wrote:
> >> You have to implement TCP for it. Since TCP is not that easy to
> >> implement, I would suspect, is is easier to go for N
The TFTP service isn't very reliable, and it falls over with > 32 nodes
all requesting
kernels/ramdisks at the same time. HTTP is much more scalable, and load
can be balanced
much more easily.
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 01:37 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> At Wed, 1 May 2002 10:30:02 -0
At Wed, 1 May 2002 10:30:02 -0500,
Joe wrote:
> Our tftp server is falling over with multiple machines trying to tftp
> kernels and ramdisks to boot,
> and an http-get function would easily solve this problem. How hard
> would this be to implement?
Can you explain why does switching from TFTP
Am Mittwoch den, 1. Mai 2002, um 19:13, schrieb Alex Thiel:
> On Wednesday 01 May 2002 18:26, Mario Klebsch wrote:
>> You have to implement TCP for it. Since TCP is not that easy to
>> implement, I would suspect, is is easier to go for NFS, because it only
>> needs UDP, which is already implement
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 18:26, Mario Klebsch wrote:
> Am Mittwoch den, 1. Mai 2002, um 17:30, schrieb Joe:
> > What are the chances of being able to get kernels/ramdisks over http
> > with grub?
> > Our tftp server is falling over with multiple machines trying to tftp
> > kernels and ramdisks to
Am Mittwoch den, 1. Mai 2002, um 17:30, schrieb Joe:
> What are the chances of being able to get kernels/ramdisks over http
> with grub?
> Our tftp server is falling over with multiple machines trying to tftp
> kernels and ramdisks to boot,
> and an http-get function would easily solve this pro
What are the chances of being able to get kernels/ramdisks over http
with grub?
Our tftp server is falling over with multiple machines trying to tftp
kernels and ramdisks to boot,
and an http-get function would easily solve this problem. How hard
would this be to implement?
Joe
11 matches
Mail list logo
