On 7 June 2010 07:58, Steve Purcell wrote:
> On 7 Jun 2010, at 04:28, Dave Pawson wrote:
>
>> On 6 June 2010 13:35, Moritz Ulrich wrote:
>>> Note the "Added in Clojure version 1.2" in the documentation of numerator
>>> ;-)
>>
>>
>> Not until I'd blown up the text.
>> Don't expect text that size
On 7 Jun 2010, at 04:28, Dave Pawson wrote:
> On 6 June 2010 13:35, Moritz Ulrich wrote:
>> Note the "Added in Clojure version 1.2" in the documentation of numerator ;-)
>
>
> Not until I'd blown up the text.
> Don't expect text that size to be read by everyone?
If the text is illegible to yo
On 6 June 2010 13:35, Moritz Ulrich wrote:
> On Sunday, June 6, 2010, Dave Pawson wrote:
>> On 6 June 2010 11:00, Kevin Downey wrote:
>>> numerator is added after 1.1.0 was released
>>
>> Thanks Kevin.
>> documentation ahead of software! Nice change.. if confusing!
>
> Note the "Added in Clojure
On Sunday, June 6, 2010, Dave Pawson wrote:
> On 6 June 2010 11:00, Kevin Downey wrote:
>> numerator is added after 1.1.0 was released
>
> Thanks Kevin.
> documentation ahead of software! Nice change.. if confusing!
Note the "Added in Clojure version 1.2" in the documentation of numerator ;-)
-
Hi,
Am 06.06.2010 um 12:15 schrieb Dave Pawson:
> On 6 June 2010 11:00, Kevin Downey wrote:
>> numerator is added after 1.1.0 was released
>
> Thanks Kevin.
> documentation ahead of software! Nice change.. if confusing!
Note the small branch links on the left hand side:
http://richhickey.git
On 6 June 2010 11:00, Kevin Downey wrote:
> numerator is added after 1.1.0 was released
Thanks Kevin.
documentation ahead of software! Nice change.. if confusing!
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
You received this message because you are subscr
numerator is added after 1.1.0 was released
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> On 6 June 2010 10:48, Kevin Downey wrote:
>> http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/commit/5293929c99c7e1b1b3bcdea3d451108c5774b3d1
>>
>> vs.
>>
>> http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/commit/5772be9fc
On 6 June 2010 10:48, Kevin Downey wrote:
> http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/commit/5293929c99c7e1b1b3bcdea3d451108c5774b3d1
>
> vs.
>
> http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/commit/5772be9fc5ac9ddf92b727908c20b9aab971224a
Have no meaning to me. sorry.
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docb
http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/commit/5293929c99c7e1b1b3bcdea3d451108c5774b3d1
vs.
http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/commit/5772be9fc5ac9ddf92b727908c20b9aab971224a
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> On 6 June 2010 10:37, Kevin Downey wrote:
>> what version of clojur
On 6 June 2010 10:37, Kevin Downey wrote:
> what version of clojure are you using?
---
Clojure 1.1.0
user=>
>
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
>> user=> (def pie 22/7)
>> #'user/pie
>> user=> (class pie)
>> clojure.lan
what version of clojure are you using?
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> user=> (def pie 22/7)
> #'user/pie
> user=> (class pie)
> clojure.lang.Ratio
> user=> (numerator pie)
> java.lang.Exception: Unable to resolve symbol: numerator in this
> context (NO_SOURCE_FILE:19)
>
> An
user=> (def pie 22/7)
#'user/pie
user=> (class pie)
clojure.lang.Ratio
user=> (numerator pie)
java.lang.Exception: Unable to resolve symbol: numerator in this
context (NO_SOURCE_FILE:19)
Any idea why please?
Should return 22?
http://richhickey.github.com/clojure/clojure.core-api.html#clojure.core/
12 matches
Mail list logo