to interpret. Consider a more direct approach.
Frank
--
From: bbslover dlu...@yeah.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 11:28 PM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] variable selectin---reduce the numbers of initial
variable
thank you . I
--
From: Frank E Harrell Jr f.harr...@vanderbilt.edu
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 4:12 PM
To: Ricardo Gonçalves Silva ricard...@terra.com.br
Cc: bbslover dlu...@yeah.net; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] variable selectin---reduce the numbers of initial variable
Ricardo
Subject: Re: [R] variable selectin---reduce the numbers of initial
variable
Ricardo Gonçalves Silva wrote:
Yes, right. But I still prefer using BMA.
Best,
Rick
If you are entertaining only one model family, them BMA is a long,
tedious, complex way to obtain shrinkage and the resulting
hello,
my problem is like this: now after processing the varibles, the remaining
160 varibles(independent) and a dependent y. when I used PLS method, with 10
components, the good r2 can be obtained. but I donot know how can I express
my equation with the less varibles and the y. It is better to
.
HTH
Rick
--
From: bbslover dlu...@yeah.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:23 AM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] variable selectin---reduce the numbers of initial variable
hello,
my problem is like this: now after processing
--
From: bbslover dlu...@yeah.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:23 AM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] variable selectin---reduce the numbers of initial variable
hello,
my problem is like this: now after processing the varibles
6 matches
Mail list logo