https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
--- Comment #9 from Paul Donohue ---
popt ticket requesting a solution in popt itself:
http://rpm5.org/cvs/tktview?tn=98
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
--- Comment #8 from Paul Donohue ---
I agree with the general philosophy that it isn't rsync's problem to secure the
command line. However, I don't see any good way that sudo can secure the rsync
command line unless rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Korb ---
I have been thinking about this a bit and I believe it is a sudo problem and
not an rsync problem. It is not rsync's job to secure the command line. Plus
rsync is far from the only program
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
--- Comment #6 from Paul Donohue ---
This all makes sense, I appreciate the suggestions, and I may actually
implement some of this.
However, the existence of this rrsync solution doesn't change the fact that
there exists
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
--- Comment #5 from Karl O. Pinc ---
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:18:35 +
samba-b...@samba.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
>
> --- Comment #4 from Paul Donohue ---
> That's an
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:18:35 +
samba-b...@samba.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
>
> --- Comment #4 from Paul Donohue ---
> That's an interesting solution, but it doesn't really work well for
> my use case. I would like my users to be
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
--- Comment #4 from Paul Donohue ---
That's an interesting solution, but it doesn't really work well for my use
case. I would like my users to be able to maintain their own SSH keys (this
solution would require me to manage
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Korb ---
There is no reason to involve rsyncd (or even sudo). See the rrsync script in
the support directory.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
--- Comment #2 from Paul Donohue ---
Created attachment 12916
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=12916=edit
Add a new --no-popt-aliases option to explicitly disable popt aliases
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
--- Comment #1 from Paul Donohue ---
Created attachment 12915
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=12915=edit
Do not enable popt aliases if --server or --daemon is specified
--
You are receiving this mail
12 matches
Mail list logo