Re: [abcusers] www.geocities.com/SoHo/9618/, www.celticmusic.co.nz

2001-06-04 Thread Phil Taylor

Frank Nordberg wrote:

So John hasn't got my last message either then...

It's a rather special document containing ABC transcriptions of a
privately owned late 18th/ealry 19th Century tune book. Definitely not
something you'll find mirrored all over the web.

I got your first message, and sent Mark Fitzsimons' email address to John
off-list.  I got your repeat message, but not the message describing the
document.  It's been very quiet on the list for a while now - is that
because it's summer/exam season or because a lot of messages have got
lost?

Phil Taylor
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] www.geocities.com/SoHo/9618/, www.celticmusic.co.nz

2001-06-04 Thread Richard Robinson

On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Frank Nordberg wrote:
 John Chambers wrote: 
  
 | One document - http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/9618/winder.html - with 
 | 144 tunes is missing, though. Maybe I should post the tunes at Musica 
 | Viva. Does anybody know anything about copyright laws for that kind
of things? 
  
  Probably not much different for  you  than  for  the  original  site,
  unless some of the tunes were written by the site's owner.
 
 So John hasn't got my last message either then...
 
 It's a rather special document containing ABC transcriptions of a
 privately owned late 18th/ealry 19th Century tune book. Definitely not
 something you'll find mirrored all over the web.

I'm intrigued. There are Winders with manuscripts in Wyresdale, just down
the way from Lancaster. Is this a copy of the one I typed up
(http://www.leeds.ac.uk/music/Info/RRTuneBk/Winder/Winder.abc) or a copy
of the Village Music Project's more complete version of the earliest
stuff, or is it a third thing (_was_ it. Damn. perhaps we'll never know)
?

-- 
Richard Robinson
The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes - S. Lem


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] www.geocities.com/SoHo/9618/, www.celticmusic.co.nz

2001-06-04 Thread John Chambers

Frank Nordberg  writes:
| So John hasn't got my last message either then...
|
| It's a rather special document containing ABC transcriptions of a
| privately owned late 18th/ealry 19th Century tune book. Definitely not
| something you'll find mirrored all over the web.

Nope; I don't seem to have any such message.   This  sounds
like  something that might be better on your web site, with
just the URL posted to the list.  Do  you  know  about  the
tradtunes list?

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



[abcusers] %%MIDI program/channel questions

2001-06-04 Thread Jean-Francois Moine


Hello,

Trying to have an organ on my PC computer, I have some questions about
the %%MIDI pseudo-comments:

- in abc2midi, the documentation says the MIDI program is in the range
  1..128, while it seems to be in the range 0..127. Where is the truth?

- setting the channel in the '%%MIDI program', does it also set the
  channel of the current voice, or does it set only the specified
  channel?

  Example:
X:1
K:C
V:1
%%MIDI program 1 12
%%MIDI program 2 0
...
V:2
...
   (what are the channels of each voice, and what are their presets?)

- my sound card accepts many MIDI banks. How could I specify them?
  One solution is to have 'program = (bank * 128) + preset',
  the other one is to have an extension of the '%%MIDI program' to include
  the bank as a prefix in the preset:

%%MIDI program [channel] [bank-]program

  Example:
%%MIDI program 1-12

- as I told above, I'm trying to have a pipe organ on my computer, and
  such instruments play many channels at the same time. Is there any
  problem to have many channels in the '%%MIDI channel' pseudo-comment?

  Example:
X:1
...
% Jeux14.sf2 definitions
%%MIDI program 1 0  % Montre 8
%%MIDI program 2 1  % Prestant 4
%%MIDI program 3 2  % Doublette 2
K:C
V:1
%%MIDI channel 1 2 3
...

-- 
Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
|   http://moinejf.free.fr/
Pépé Jef|mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (job)


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] abc2midi - a useful mod.

2001-06-04 Thread Jean-Francois Moine


[EMAIL PROTECTED]  a skrivas:
[snip]
 I DO have the latest abcm2ps but have yet to look at it, as there are
 several other things  (like non appearence  of 5/8 time sigs.) which
 do not work in my existing version. Maybe fixed in the new one?
 If not, then I guess they will be  :)

I did not find such a problem. Do you have any example to send to me?

-- 
Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
|   http://moinejf.free.fr/
Pépé Jef|mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (job)


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] %%MIDI program/channel questions

2001-06-04 Thread Frank Nordberg



Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 Trying to have an organ on my PC computer, I have some questions about
 the %%MIDI pseudo-comments:
 
 - in abc2midi, the documentation says the MIDI program is in the range
   1..128, while it seems to be in the range 0..127. Where is the truth?

You're talking General midi here. The midi standard itself neithere
specifies or limits the number of programs.
Technically the General Midi programs are numbered 0-127, but many
instruments and computer programs use the numbering 1-128 instead (or
even 00-7F). You're definitwely not the only one who's confused about
this ;-)

There's a list of all the general midi programs at
http://www.musicaviva.com/encyclopedia/g/general-midi.html


Frank Nordberg
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] www.geocities.com/SoHo/9618/, www.celticmusic.co.nz

2001-06-04 Thread Frank Nordberg



Richard Robinson wrote:
 
 I'm intrigued. There are Winders with manuscripts in Wyresdale, just down
 the way from Lancaster. Is this a copy of the one I typed up
 (http://www.leeds.ac.uk/music/Info/RRTuneBk/Winder/Winder.abc)...

That's the one. I didn't realize it came from you site, Richard. The way
it was presented at the Geocities web site made it look like an original
for that site.

Anyways, seems there's no real problem after all then. Everything at the
SoHo/9618/ site is present elsewhere on the web.

 ...or a copy
 of the Village Music Project's more complete version of the earliest
 stuff,

actually it's a less complete copy, just 144 tunes while you have 147.

 or is it a third thing (_was_ it. Damn. perhaps we'll never know)

Yes we do know. I have a copy of the entire page - even tried to post
the damn thing at abcusers.

---

John Chambers wrote:
 
 Nope; I don't seem to have any such message.   This  sounds
 like  something that might be better on your web site, with
 just the URL posted to the list.

Well it's not that important after all, since it turns out Richard's
already got it.


 Do  you  know  about  the tradtunes list?

No, I don't. Should I?


Frank Nordberg

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] www.geocities.com/SoHo/9618/, www.celticmusic.co.nz

2001-06-04 Thread Richard Robinson

On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Frank Nordberg wrote:
 Richard Robinson wrote:
  
  I'm intrigued. There are Winders with manuscripts in Wyresdale, just down
  the way from Lancaster. Is this a copy of the one I typed up
  (http://www.leeds.ac.uk/music/Info/RRTuneBk/Winder/Winder.abc)...
 
 That's the one. I didn't realize it came from you site, Richard. The way
 it was presented at the Geocities web site made it look like an original
 for that site.
 
 Anyways, seems there's no real problem after all then. Everything at the
 SoHo/9618/ site is present elsewhere on the web.
 
  ...or a copy
  of the Village Music Project's more complete version of the earliest
  stuff,
 
 actually it's a less complete copy, just 144 tunes while you have 147.


The usual unfortunate combination. Grab a copy, don't check for updates,
and fail to attribute so that anybody who copies from that site can't
check for themselves. It's several years since the last 3 tunes were
added.

-- 
Richard Robinson
The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes - S. Lem


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] www.geocities.com/SoHo/9618/, www.celticmusic.co.

2001-06-04 Thread Johnny Adams

 Date:  Mon, 04 Jun 2001 21:47:42 +0200
 From:  Frank Nordberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:   Re: [abcusers] www.geocities.com/SoHo/9618/, www.celticmusic.co.nz
 Reply-to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
 
 Richard Robinson wrote:
  
  I'm intrigued. There are Winders with manuscripts in Wyresdale, just down
  the way from Lancaster. Is this a copy of the one I typed up
  (http://www.leeds.ac.uk/music/Info/RRTuneBk/Winder/Winder.abc)...
 
 
  ...or a copy
  of the Village Music Project's more complete version of the earliest
  stuff,
 
 actually it's a less complete copy, just 144 tunes while you have 147.
 

Oh bugger! I've lost three tunes! I'll go through the original 
manuscript and check.

John Adams - Village Music Project

http://www.performance.salford.ac.uk/research/vmp/index.htm
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] www.geocities.com/SoHo/9618/, www.celticmusic.co.

2001-06-04 Thread Johnny Adams

 Date:  Mon, 4 Jun 2001 21:59:23 +0100 (BST)
 From:  Richard Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:   Re: [abcusers] www.geocities.com/SoHo/9618/, www.celticmusic.co.nz
 Reply-to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Frank Nordberg wrote:
  Richard Robinson wrote:
   
   I'm intrigued. There are Winders with manuscripts in Wyresdale, just down
   the way from Lancaster. Is this a copy of the one I typed up
   (http://www.leeds.ac.uk/music/Info/RRTuneBk/Winder/Winder.abc)...
  
  That's the one. I didn't realize it came from you site, Richard. The way
  it was presented at the Geocities web site made it look like an original
  for that site.
  
  Anyways, seems there's no real problem after all then. Everything at the
  SoHo/9618/ site is present elsewhere on the web.
  
   ...or a copy
   of the Village Music Project's more complete version of the earliest
   stuff,
  
  actually it's a less complete copy, just 144 tunes while you have 147.
 
 
 The usual unfortunate combination. Grab a copy, don't check for updates,
 and fail to attribute so that anybody who copies from that site can't
 check for themselves. It's several years since the last 3 tunes were
 added.
 
 -- 
 Richard Robinson

I don't know what you mean by this - VMP hasn't grabbed anybody's 
copy - we work from originals only and I have  copies of the 
originals here by my computer. Are we talking about John Winder 
(1789) or Edward and John Winder (1835-41)?


John Adams - Village Music Project

http://www.performance.salford.ac.uk/research/vmp/index.htm
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] www.geocities.com/SoHo/9618/, www.celticmusic.co.

2001-06-04 Thread Richard Robinson

On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Johnny Adams wrote:
  On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Frank Nordberg wrote:
   Richard Robinson wrote:

I'm intrigued. There are Winders with manuscripts in Wyresdale, just down
the way from Lancaster. Is this a copy of the one I typed up
(http://www.leeds.ac.uk/music/Info/RRTuneBk/Winder/Winder.abc)...
   
   That's the one. I didn't realize it came from you site, Richard. The way
   it was presented at the Geocities web site made it look like an original
   for that site.
   
   Anyways, seems there's no real problem after all then. Everything at the
   SoHo/9618/ site is present elsewhere on the web.
   
...or a copy
of the Village Music Project's more complete version of the earliest
stuff,
   
   actually it's a less complete copy, just 144 tunes while you have 147.
  
  
  The usual unfortunate combination. Grab a copy, don't check for updates,
  and fail to attribute so that anybody who copies from that site can't
  check for themselves. It's several years since the last 3 tunes were
  added.
 
 I don't know what you mean by this - VMP hasn't grabbed anybody's 
 copy - we work from originals only and I have  copies of the 
 originals here by my computer. Are we talking about John Winder 
 (1789) or Edward and John Winder (1835-41)?

No indeed, you haven't grabbed anything, and I'm sorry if what I said
looked like I meant that. We were talking about a Geocities site that used
to have a file winder.abc which has now gone missing; Frank was
concerned that it might have been unique, that tunes might have
disappeared from the 'net : but it looks as though it was a copy (old) of
my file from the www.leeds.ac.uk site.

[ re your other post - my copy of the VMP John Winder (1789) file has 53
tunes, have you added loads more ? ;) ]


This update issue is beginning to annoy me. People occasionally ask if
they can put up copies of my stuff, and from time to time I become aware
that a lot more people are doing it without asking, and I've always taken
the attitude that once I've put something up in public I can't control
what happens, so why not just be cheerful about it ? But I wonder what
it's all about, really.  People seem to think they're doing the Web a
service by making more copies available. Mirrors are good, yes, but a
5-year-old file with no clue as to where it came from, it seems to me, is
likely to head people off from any updated version. Which isn't too
helpful. 

I suppose what's bugging me is that, prompted by discussion here, the most
recent update of my Tunebook (last autumn) included hrefs to the source
site in every tune, so I'm noticing how many copies there are of previous
versions, which don't include that. The cost of not getting it right first
time :-/

-- 
Richard Robinson
The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes - S. Lem


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] www.geocities.com/SoHo/9618/, www.celticmusic.co.

2001-06-04 Thread Mickey Sadler

snip

This update issue is beginning to annoy me. People occasionally ask if
they can put up copies of my stuff, and from time to time I become aware
that a lot more people are doing it without asking, and I've always taken
the attitude that once I've put something up in public I can't control
what happens, so why not just be cheerful about it ? But I wonder what
it's all about, really.  People seem to think they're doing the Web a
service by making more copies available. Mirrors are good, yes, but a
5-year-old file with no clue as to where it came from, it seems to me, is
likely to head people off from any updated version. Which isn't too
helpful.

I suppose what's bugging me is that, prompted by discussion here, the most
recent update of my Tunebook (last autumn) included hrefs to the source
site in every tune, so I'm noticing how many copies there are of previous
versions, which don't include that. The cost of not getting it right first
time :-/

--
Richard Robinson
The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes - S. Lem


A lot of people, when asked about mirroring their sites, will have 
the requester put a link to the original site (sometimes with a 
graphic or button) stating that because of frequent updates a link is 
preferable. They also request the same from a mirror site if they 
find the site is mirroring without asking. Might be worth a try.

Mickey
-- 
Mickey E. Sadler, Dublin, Ohio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html