Re: [Ac100] suspend breakage vs android 2.2 bootloader?
2011/10/2 Jani Monoses j...@ubuntu.com: Should anyone still use this parameter? No, it's read from bootloader's atags (confirmed by marc) I have lp0_vec untouched in my cmdline and have suspend working after downgrading to the 2.1 boot partitions. Resume vector address depends on bootloader's freewill. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : ac100@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ac100] suspend breakage vs android 2.2 bootloader?
Following current discussion in the IRC channel let's see if the two are related I know I upgraded to Android 2.2 before flashing linux and I have non working suspend now. I wonder if others who have suspend/resume broken are in the same situation? This is one of the few things which can be different on two identical installs (userland+kernel) Jani ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : ac100@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ac100] suspend breakage vs android 2.2 bootloader?
I have working suspend with 2.1 bootloader. On Sep 27, 2011 2:05 PM, Jani Monoses jani.mono...@gmail.com wrote: Following current discussion in the IRC channel let's see if the two are related I know I upgraded to Android 2.2 before flashing linux and I have non working suspend now. I wonder if others who have suspend/resume broken are in the same situation? This is one of the few things which can be different on two identical installs (userland+kernel) Jani ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : ac100@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ac100] suspend breakage vs android 2.2 bootloader?
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 15:04, Jani Monoses jani.mono...@gmail.com wrote: Following current discussion in the IRC channel let's see if the two are related I know I upgraded to Android 2.2 before flashing linux and I have non working suspend now. I wonder if others who have suspend/resume broken are in the same situation? This is one of the few things which can be different on two identical installs (userland+kernel) Jani I have non-working suspend with Android 2.2 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : ac100@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Leon Romanovsky | Independent Linux Consultant www.leon.nu | l...@leon.nu ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : ac100@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ac100] suspend breakage vs android 2.2 bootloader?
I reflashed the Android 2.1 boot partitions and suspend works now! Mistery solved but a proper kernel fix is needed imo to cover the bits that may have been set up by 2.1 for free :) This sequence worked after two trials which left the machine non-bootable. I used an explicitly separate step for downloading fastboot, then waited a bit after the last command. sudo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./nvflash --bl fastboot.bin --go sudo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./nvflash --bl ./fastboot.bin --go --rawdevicewrite 0 1536 tac100-part-2.img sudo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./nvflash --bl ./fastboot.bin --go --rawdevicewrite 1536 256 tac100-part-3.img sudo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./nvflash --bl ./fastboot.bin --go --rawdevicewrite 1792 1024 tac100-part-4.img Here's a tarball of these 3 partitions as factory defaults for the 10z model - should be same for all but who knows. http://startx.ro/~jani/bootparts_ac100_z.tgz Jani On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Leon Romanovsky l...@leon.nu wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 15:04, Jani Monoses jani.mono...@gmail.com wrote: Following current discussion in the IRC channel let's see if the two are related I know I upgraded to Android 2.2 before flashing linux and I have non working suspend now. I wonder if others who have suspend/resume broken are in the same situation? This is one of the few things which can be different on two identical installs (userland+kernel) Jani I have non-working suspend with Android 2.2 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : ac100@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Leon Romanovsky | Independent Linux Consultant www.leon.nu | l...@leon.nu ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : ac100@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ac100] suspend breakage vs android 2.2 bootloader?
hi, Am Dienstag, den 27.09.2011, 16:46 +0300 schrieb Leon Romanovsky: Just for the record if your user has permissions to work with USB, you won't need sudo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. prefix. i highly doubt that permissions make ld find the hight libs anyhow ... you will in any case need LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ;) also your user needs *raw* device access to the usb device, not just some top level permission ... ciao oli ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : ac100@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ac100] suspend breakage vs android 2.2 bootloader?
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 17:06, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote: hi, Am Dienstag, den 27.09.2011, 16:46 +0300 schrieb Leon Romanovsky: Just for the record if your user has permissions to work with USB, you won't need sudo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. prefix. i highly doubt that permissions make ld find the hight libs anyhow ... you will in any case need LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ;) You are totally right, there are two issues, I just combined them together: 1) sudo - can be fixed with permissions 2) LD_LIBRARY_PATH - in general you don't need that at all also your user needs *raw* device access to the usb device, not just some top level permission ... Every user who ever connected digital camera via gphoto will have sufficient permissions. http://www.gphoto.org/doc/manual/permissions-usb.html ciao oli ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : ac100@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Leon Romanovsky | Independent Linux Consultant www.leon.nu | l...@leon.nu ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : ac100@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ac100] suspend breakage vs android 2.2 bootloader?
Good catch Jani! On Sep 27, 2011 3:01 PM, Jani Monoses jani.mono...@gmail.com wrote: I reflashed the Android 2.1 boot partitions and suspend works now! Mistery solved but a proper kernel fix is needed imo to cover the bits that may have been set up by 2.1 for free :) This sequence worked after two trials which left the machine non-bootable. I used an explicitly separate step for downloading fastboot, then waited a bit after the last command. sudo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./nvflash --bl fastboot.bin --go sudo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./nvflash --bl ./fastboot.bin --go --rawdevicewrite 0 1536 tac100-part-2.img sudo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./nvflash --bl ./fastboot.bin --go --rawdevicewrite 1536 256 tac100-part-3.img sudo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./nvflash --bl ./fastboot.bin --go --rawdevicewrite 1792 1024 tac100-part-4.img Here's a tarball of these 3 partitions as factory defaults for the 10z model - should be same for all but who knows. http://startx.ro/~jani/bootparts_ac100_z.tgz Jani On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Leon Romanovsky l...@leon.nu wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 15:04, Jani Monoses jani.mono...@gmail.com wrote: Following current discussion in the IRC channel let's see if the two are related I know I upgraded to Android 2.2 before flashing linux and I have non working suspend now. I wonder if others who have suspend/resume broken are in the same situation? This is one of the few things which can be different on two identical installs (userland+kernel) Jani I have non-working suspend with Android 2.2 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : ac100@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Leon Romanovsky | Independent Linux Consultant www.leon.nu | l...@leon.nu ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : ac100@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
