[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 fraz...@hotmail.it changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fraz...@hotmail.it -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Luis (lgtso...@yahoo.com.br) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lgtso...@yahoo.com.br --- Comment #88 from Luis (lgtso...@yahoo.com.br) --- I consider this problem serious, I have 2 hard drives that are lost. This error over time only increases the number of lines with this problem, until finally Busybox appears asking to build the shell, where as a lay Linux supporter I don't know what to do! I have 3 machines with Linux, and this appears on all of them from the moment they are installed. I would like to know a solution to solve this and not lose each installed disk! Is there a way to resolve this? APT UPDATE doesn't work! Is this a Mint problem?? Why do I only have this distribution? Does it also occur in Unbutu or elsewhere? Sorry for using Google Translater! -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 paul idle (pid...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pid...@gmx.com --- Comment #87 from paul idle (pid...@gmx.com) --- I'd like to report one more instance of this bug. BUT perhaps more importantly pass on a condition that seems to trigger these ACPI errors at boot time (which you may or may not realize) and which might affect your continued approach to fixing. I use an old Dell t7400 and just recently decided to activate their TPM (trusted platform module) in my bios. I had never received any of these boot ACPI errors until I activated the TPM (which uses the broadcom LAN chip for crypto key generation). Immediately after activation, the ACPI errors unique to my system were reported at boot through dmesg. Upon deactivation AND DISABLING the TPM function (there are 2 distinct steps needed) the boot time ACPI errors cease being reported. === ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU7._PCT.CFGD], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.CPU6._PCT due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU6._PCT.CFGD], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) and repeated for each core to 0 .. ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.CPU0._PCT due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._PCT.CFGD], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) my relevant machine info Kernel: 5.15.0-100-generic x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 11.4.0 Desktop: Cinnamon 6.0.4 tk: GTK 3.24.33 wm: muffin vt: 7 dm: LightDM 1.30.0 Distro: Linux Mint 21.3 Virginia base: Ubuntu 22.04 jammy Machine: Type: Desktop System: Dell product: Precision WorkStation T7400 v: N/A serial: Chassis: type: 7 serial: Mobo: Dell model: 0RW199 serial: BIOS: Dell v: A11 date: 04/30/2012 CPU: Info: 2x 4-core model: Intel Xeon E5450 bits: 64 type: MCP SMP smt: arch: Core Yorkfield rev: A cache: L1: 2x 256 KiB (512 KiB) L2: 2x 12 MiB (24 MiB) Speed (MHz): avg: 2693 high: 3591 min/max: 2000/3000 cores: 1: 3591 2: 2394 3: 2394 4: 2394 5: 3591 6: 2394 7: 2394 8: 2394 bogomips: 57457 Flags: ht lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 ssse3 vmx Network: Device-1: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5754 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express vendor: Dell driver: tg3 v: kernel pcie: speed: 2.5 GT/s lanes: 1 port: N/A bus-ID: 08:00.0 chip-ID: 14e4:167a class-ID: 0200 = I hope this is useful information. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 patrickc...@outlook.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||patrickc...@outlook.com --- Comment #86 from patrickc...@outlook.com --- Also have this bug. Kernel: 5.15.0.91. Cpu: Intel N3530. Kubuntu 5.27.4. Dual-boot laptop with windows 10. First started seeing this with an earlier Kubuntu version but unfortunately don't know which one, it may have been since 2021 or even earlier. Also have intermittent power-offs with no warning, but don't know if that's related/relevant. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Gurenko Alex (agure...@protonmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||agure...@protonmail.com -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Victor Porton (por...@narod.ru) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||por...@narod.ru --- Comment #85 from Victor Porton (por...@narod.ru) --- I have this bug about last 7-10 days (probably, I installed a new kernel version) and also random laptop powerdowns (apparently, especially when under load). ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X515EA $ uname -a Linux victor 5.19.0-40-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Mar 23 21:39:15 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux As a workaround, I try to use Ubuntu settings of reduced power consumption (instead of Balanced performance that I used to use). After I set this setting, still no crashes, but I am not sure. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Thomas Luzat (tho...@luzat.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|tho...@luzat.com| -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Scott (sc...@tnstaafl.net) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sc...@tnstaafl.net --- Comment #84 from Scott (sc...@tnstaafl.net) --- Ubuntu 22.04 Jammy Jellyfish (x86-64) kernel 5.19.0-46-generic Started seeing this error 7/17/2023 Jul 17 15:45:50 scott-Precision-7670 kernel: [5.632255] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_TZ.ETMD], AE_NOT_FOUND (20220331/psargs-330) Jul 17 15:45:50 scott-Precision-7670 kernel: [5.632263] Jul 17 15:45:50 scott-Precision-7670 kernel: [5.632263] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [_OSC] Jul 17 15:45:50 scott-Precision-7670 kernel: [5.632264] Jul 17 15:45:50 scott-Precision-7670 kernel: [5.632264] Initialized Arguments for Method [_OSC]: (4 arguments defined for method invocation) Jul 17 15:45:50 scott-Precision-7670 kernel: [5.632265] Arg0: dc18fbccBuffer(16) 5D A8 3B B2 B7 C8 42 35 Jul 17 15:45:50 scott-Precision-7670 kernel: [5.632270] Arg1: 34c27800Integer 0001 Jul 17 15:45:50 scott-Precision-7670 kernel: [5.632272] Arg2: 0dc8a41aInteger 0002 Jul 17 15:45:50 scott-Precision-7670 kernel: [5.632273] Arg3: 653f1daaBuffer(8) 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 Jul 17 15:45:50 scott-Precision-7670 kernel: [5.632277] Jul 17 15:45:50 scott-Precision-7670 kernel: [5.632278] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.IETM._OSC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20220331/psparse-529) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Michael Z Freeman (temporalcoldwa...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||temporalcoldwa...@gmail.com --- Comment #83 from Michael Z Freeman (temporalcoldwa...@gmail.com) --- Hi, got this again after a Ubuntu update that overwrote my "acpi=off" grub kernel parameter. For anyone that can't boot into the login screen then adding this is the fix. CPU: Q9650 MB: G41MT-S2PT BTW the last half of the reports below are after I hit the power button to initiate what would normally be an ACPI shut down. I had to keep the power button held down to force power off. Cheers. [ 0.333629] ACPI Error: Aborting method _PR.CPU1.. _PDC due to previous error (AE ALREADY EXISTS) (20221020/psparse-529) [ 0.3336291 ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, SSDT Ox910E80D15200 Table is a ready loaded (20221020/tbdata-548) [ 0.333629] ACPI Error: Aborting method _PR. CPUZ._PDC due to previous error (AE _ALREADY _EXISTS) (20221020/psparse-529) [ 0.3336291 ACPI Error: AF ALREADY_EXISTS, SSDT Ox910E80D14600 Table is a ready loaded (20221020/tbdata-548) г 0.3336291 ACPI Error: Aborting method _PR.CPU3.. _PDC due to previous error (AE_ALREADY _EXISTS) (20221020/psparse-529) 60.8740511 ru: INFO: ru_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: [ 60.8743431 rcu: 01-.. 1: (0 ticks this GP) idle=4a60/0/0x0 softirq=15/15 fqs =0 (false positive?) 60.875?361 rcu: rcu_preempt kthread timer wakeup didn't happen for 15001 jif fies! g-1031 f0x0 RU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) -›state=0x402 [ 60.876242] ru: oFossible timer handling issue on cpu-1 timer-softirg-5 г 60.8765361 rcu: rcu_preempt kthread stared for 15002 jiffies g-1031 fOx0 R CU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) -›state=0x402 ->cpu=1 [ 60.8769991 rcu: Unless ru_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU time, 00M is now expected behauior. [ 60.8773991 ru: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: [ 60.8780471 rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran: -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Bryan Stine (bryan...@southcape.org) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bryan...@southcape.org -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Nidal (nidal.brolwin...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nidal.brolwin...@gmail.com --- Comment #82 from Nidal (nidal.brolwin...@gmail.com) --- Hello, I'm still having a similar problem with Kubuntu 23.04 running kernel 6.2.0-20-generic. This does not prevent the laptop from normally working but I suspect it to play a role in the laptop losing a log of power in sleep mode. My Laptop: VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K513EA My processor (if ever this matters): 8 × 11th Gen Intel® Core™ i7-1165G7 @ 2.80GHz and the error message: [0.166098] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol (\_SB.PC00.TXHC.RHUB, AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/dswload2-162)) [0.166110] ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND , During name lookup/catalog (20210730/psobject-220) [0.166114] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol (\_SB.PC00.TXHC.RHUB.SS01, AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/dswload2-162)) [0.166117] ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND , During name lookup/catalog (20210730/psobject-220) [0.166120] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol (\_SB.PC00.TXHC.RHUB.SS02, AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/dswload2-162)) [0.166123] ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND , During name lookup/catalog (20210730/psobject-220) [0.166126] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol (\_SB.PC00.TXHC.RHUB.SS03, AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/dswload2-162)) [0.166129] ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND , During name lookup/catalog (20210730/psobject-220) [0.166132] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol (\_SB.PC00.TXHC.RHUB.SS04, AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/dswload2-162)) [0.166134] ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND , During name lookup/catalog (20210730/psobject-220) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #81 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- > Thanks for the suggestion. I tried the upstream 5.4.0-144 and also saw > there's a newer version 5.4.0-145, so I tried that one as well, but the issue > still persist. Can you try a newer kernel outside the 5.4 series? Perhaps the latest LTS kernel, 6.1? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #80 from the42...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #79) > > Sorry if I'm posting this wrong, but I get the same error, using Linux Mint > > kernel version 5.4.0-137 on HP Elitebook 745 > > Can you please try with an upstream kernel? Being a distro kernel, it's > very possible they're missing some of these patches. Hi, Thanks for the suggestion. I tried the upstream 5.4.0-144 and also saw there's a newer version 5.4.0-145, so I tried that one as well, but the issue still persist. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #79 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- > Sorry if I'm posting this wrong, but I get the same error, using Linux Mint > kernel version 5.4.0-137 on HP Elitebook 745 Can you please try with an upstream kernel? Being a distro kernel, it's very possible they're missing some of these patches. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 the42...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||the42...@gmail.com --- Comment #78 from the42...@gmail.com --- Hello, Sorry if I'm posting this wrong, but I get the same error, using Linux Mint kernel version 5.4.0-137 on HP Elitebook 745 I installed the latest: 5.4.0-144 and the issue still persists. It's not only that the messages appear on the console, but actually takes several restarts (using the button) to load the system. # dmidecode 3.2 Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs. SMBIOS 3.1.0 present. Handle 0x0011, DMI type 2, 17 bytes Base Board Information Manufacturer: HP Product Name: 83D5 Version: KBC Version 08.61.00 Serial Number: PGWJE00WBCO144 Asset Tag: Features: Board is a hosting board Location In Chassis: Chassis Handle: 0x Type: Motherboard Contained Object Handles: 0 #lscpu Architecture:x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian Address sizes: 43 bits physical, 48 bits virtual CPU(s): 8 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-7 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socket: 4 Socket(s): 1 NUMA node(s):1 Vendor ID: AuthenticAMD CPU family: 23 Model: 17 Model name: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx Stepping:0 Frequency boost: enabled CPU MHz: 1338.250 CPU max MHz: 2000, CPU min MHz: 1600, BogoMIPS:3992.42 Virtualization: AMD-V L1d cache: 128 KiB L1i cache: 256 KiB L2 cache:2 MiB L3 cache:4 MiB NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-7 Vulnerability Itlb multihit: Not affected Vulnerability L1tf: Not affected Vulnerability Mds: Not affected Vulnerability Meltdown: Not affected Vulnerability Mmio stale data: Not affected Vulnerability Retbleed: Vulnerable Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Mitigation; Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl and seccomp Vulnerability Spectre v1:Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization Vulnerability Spectre v2:Mitigation; Retpolines, IBPB conditional, STIBP disabled, RSB filling, PBRSB-eIBRS Not affected Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl nonstop_tsc cpuid extd_apicid ap erfmperf pni pclmulqdq monitor ssse3 fma cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 movbe popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw skinit wdt tce topoext perfctr_core perfctr_nb bpext perfctr_llc mwaitx cpb hw_pstate sme ssbd sev ibpb vmmcall fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 rdseed adx smap clflushopt sha_ni xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves clzero irperf xsaveerp tr arat npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save tsc_scale vmcb_clean flushbyasid decodeassists pausefilter pfthreshold avic v_vmsave_vmload vgif overflow_recov succor smca #Error messages: [0.869289] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Index (0x5) is beyond end of object (length 0x5) (20190816/exoparg2-393) [0.869336] Initialized Local Variables for Method [GETP]: [0.869337] Local0: 1c28015bInteger 0003 [0.869341] Initialized Arguments for Method [GETP]: (2 arguments defined for method invocation) [0.869341] Arg0: 54561fdeInteger 0005 [0.869342] Arg1: 6662f2c4Integer 0003 [0.869345] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_TZ.GETP due to previous error (AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT) (20190816/psparse-529) [0.869378] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_TZ.CHGZ._CRT due to previous error (AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT) (20190816/psparse-529) [0.870179] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Index (0x5) is beyond end of object (length 0x5) (20190816/exoparg2-393) [0.870227] Initialized Local Variables for Method [GTTP]: [0.870227] Local1: d18c83fcInteger 0027 [0.870229] Local2: 5a121952
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #77 from Wolfgang (klein.wo...@web.de) --- Sorry, I forgot to include the exact messages! These are the messages that appear in the systemlog and on the console, interrupting the splash screen: [0.857051] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.HEC.ECAV], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) [0.858519] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_TZ.TZ00._TMP due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) [0.859946] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.HEC.ECAV], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) [0.861572] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_TZ.TZ00._TMP due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) [0.863666] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.HEC.ECAV], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) [0.865063] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_TZ.TZ01._TMP due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) [0.866642] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.HEC.ECAV], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) [0.868458] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_TZ.TZ01._TMP due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Wolfgang (klein.wo...@web.de) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||klein.wo...@web.de --- Comment #76 from Wolfgang (klein.wo...@web.de) --- It is January 2023 now, and this bug is still active in kernel 5.15.86. :( I am running KDE Neon with self compiled kernel 5.15.x (because it is marked as "longterm") on a Fujitsu mainboard, equipped with an Intel Core i5. (See below.) I wouldn't mind having these messages in the systemlog, as they are harmless and the system runs without any quirk. But but they appear on the console as well, even interrupting the splash screen! (Which is a bit of a humiliation, if there's a Windows user looking over your shoulder while your machine is booting...) I know that this is a pure cosmetic complain, but it has been happening for more than a year now, and I really would like to get rid of this annoyance. I tried the usual grub command line options like "loglevel=3" "acpi_osi=! \"acpi_osi=Windows 2015\"" but neither did suppress these console messages. Hardware information: ~$ LC_ALL="C" sudo dmidecode -t 2 # dmidecode 3.3 Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs. SMBIOS 3.0.0 present. Handle 0x0043, DMI type 2, 15 bytes Base Board Information Manufacturer: FUJITSU Product Name: D3431-A1 Version: S26361-D3431-A1 Serial Number: 51857501 Asset Tag: Features: Board is a hosting board Board is replaceable Location In Chassis: Chassis Handle: 0x0003 Type: Motherboard Contained Object Handles: 0 ~$ LC_ALL="C" lscpu Architecture:x86_64 CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit Address sizes: 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual Byte Order:Little Endian CPU(s): 4 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3 Vendor ID: GenuineIntel Model name:Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz CPU family: 6 Model: 94 Thread(s) per core: 1 Core(s) per socket: 4 Socket(s): 1 Stepping:3 CPU max MHz: 3600. CPU min MHz: 800. BogoMIPS:6399.96 Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts ac pi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc art arch_p erfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dte s64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 sdbg fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2 apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefet ch cpuid_fault epb invpcid_single pti ssbd ibrs ibpb stibp tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriorit y ept vpid ept_ad fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid mpx rdseed adx smap clflushopt intel_pt xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves dtherm ida arat pln pts hwp hw p_notify hwp_act_window hwp_epp md_clear flush_l1d arch_capabilities ... -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 strubbl (bugzilla.kernel@linux4tw.de) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla.kernel.org@linux4t ||w.de -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Pascal Schott (pascal.sch...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pascal.sch...@gmail.com -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #75 from Taku (gambanp...@outlook.com) --- The only solution worked for me was to re-install same version of ubuntu into same partition. If you UNCHECK 'Format' option on installation process, your personal files will survive after re-installation. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 tele (swojskichlo...@wp.pl) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||swojskichlo...@wp.pl --- Comment #74 from tele (swojskichlo...@wp.pl) --- I have a similar error " [\_PR.CPU0._CPC], AE_NOT_FOUND ". I don't expect that kernel will always compatible with my ACPI. Because now that's my second array mismatch error. The problem is that, based on the error above, I don't know which module I need disable. At least until the new kernel will updated. I can only off the entire ACPI or ignore the error. Question. - I suppose when I will have old equipment I will have more errors. Can I count on being able to disable what doesn't work with the kernel table in the future? I need an extra message / information on how / what I can turn this off. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Taku (gambanp...@outlook.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gambanp...@outlook.com --- Comment #73 from Taku (gambanp...@outlook.com) --- Model Name: ASUS ZenBook13 UX325J BIOS Version: 311 CPU: Intel Core(TM) i7-10 65G7 CPU @ 1.30GHz GPU: Intel Iris(R) Plus Graphics OS: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS (GNU/Linux 5.15.0-48-generic x86_64) / Windows 11 I made 'sudo apt-get dist-upgrade' on 22-Sep-2022, followed by I lost an access to Ubuntu GUI. Everytime I try to login, following error message is shown and only tty access is available. -- Error message -- [ 0.076056] x86/cpu: SGX disabled by BIOS. [ 0.130860] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCIO.I2CO.TPDO], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/dswload2-162) [ 0.130868] ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20210730/psobject-220) [ 0.130895] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCIO.I2C1.TPL1], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/dswload2-162) [ 0.130898] ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20210730/psobject-220) [ 0.561376] pci :00:07.0: DPC: RP PI0 log size 0 is invalid [ 0.563606] pci :00:07.1: DPC: RP PI0 log size 0 is invalid /dev/nvme0n1p4: clean, 604301/22405120 files, 35951873/89599744 blocks [ 1.862340] mtd device must be supplied (device name is empty) [ 2.167925] mtd device must be supplied (device name is empty) [ 2.369446] mtd device must be supplied (device name is empty) [ 4.033184] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: PPN init failed (-110) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Grzegorz Alibożek (grzegorz.alibo...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||grzegorz.alibo...@gmail.com -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #72 from arthur (arthur.widetsc...@gmail.com) --- @mario, thanks for your answer. i opened an new issue: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216390 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #71 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- Arthur your issues are different. Open your own issue and be sure to attach a full log and details of the regression: which BIOS or which kernel introduced it If it's not a regression you should report it to Lenovo. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 arthur (arthur.widetsc...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arthur.widetsc...@gmail.com --- Comment #70 from arthur (arthur.widetsc...@gmail.com) --- Lenovo Thinkpad P14s AMD Gen2 still errors here: [0.449031] ACPI BIOS Error (Bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0.AC._PSR.AFN4], AE_NOT_FOUND (20220331/psargs-330) [0.449046] ACPI Error: Abotrting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0.AC._PSR due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20220331/psparse-529) Kernel: Linux 5.19.2-arch1-1 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 PaX Team (pagee...@freemail.hu) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pagee...@freemail.hu -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #69 from EdiD (debian.e...@gmail.com) --- Looks like it is fixed. These errors: ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.PR00._CPC], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.PR01._CPC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.PR00._CPC], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.PR02._CPC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) (..) are gone on intel platform with kernel 5.18.14 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 spark...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spark...@gmx.de --- Comment #68 from spark...@gmx.de --- here the same [0.332185] ACPI: button: Power Button [PWRF] [0.332299] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) [0.332308] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [_CPC] [0.332310] No Arguments are initialized for method [_CPC] [0.332311] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.CPU1._CPC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) [0.332344] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) [0.332349] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [_CPC] [0.332350] No Arguments are initialized for method [_CPC] [0.332352] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.CPU2._CPC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) [0.332389] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) [0.332394] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [_CPC] [0.332395] No Arguments are initialized for method [_CPC] [0.332397] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.CPU3._CPC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) [0.332848] thermal LNXTHERM:00: registered as thermal_zone0 Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS 5.15.0-41-generic MSI Z270 SLI Plus Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7600 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 debian.e...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian.e...@gmail.com --- Comment #67 from debian.e...@gmail.com --- On intel platform with upstream 5.15.55 kernel and distro 5.18.5 kernel: ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.PR00._CPC], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.PR01._CPC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.PR00._CPC], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.PR02._CPC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) (..) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #66 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- All the known issues from CPPC and _OSC with AMD should be fixed for 5.19-rc8. If you still have one with Zen open a new issue. The remaining issue is that reportedly from this thread a number of Intel systems the firmware will mask the _OSC during negotiation. When the _OSC is masked a dynamic SSDT doesn't get loaded. Someone needs to confirm if: * This is intended behavior that firmware masks the _OSC (and thus CPPC v2 shouldn't be used on these systems). or * This is purely a firmware bug and CPPC v2 should be used and that should be quirked when the _OSC is evaluated on the affected systems (or later so the SSDT still loads). -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #65 from neog...@gmail.com --- Just to add that I have a Z270 Tomahawk MB with an Intel® Core™ i7-10510Y Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.50 GHz). -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023
--- Comment #64 from Manuel Lauss (manuel.la...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Manuel Lauss from comment #63)
> This patch also disables CPPC support on a few of my relatively recent AMD
> Zen Desktop systems. The issue is that the ACPI _OSC method supports ONLY
> the UUID of the "PCI root bridge device", but not any other, but linux is
> looking for CPPC support with the "Platform-Wide OSPM Capabilities" uuid,
> which does not
> exist anywhere in the firmware. bios engineers told me that this is all
> part of AMDs AGESA thingie, and they won't be able to add support for this,
> at least
> on current (i.e. zen3-supporting) platforms.
>
> Could this be worked around, by first checking whether any _CPC objects
> exist, and maybe a matching PCC entry?
Oh I see this was fixed recently with
fbd74d16 ("ACPI: CPPC: Fix enabling CPPC on AMD systems with shared memory").
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Manuel Lauss (manuel.la...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manuel.la...@gmail.com --- Comment #63 from Manuel Lauss (manuel.la...@gmail.com) --- This patch also disables CPPC support on a few of my relatively recent AMD Zen Desktop systems. The issue is that the ACPI _OSC method supports ONLY the UUID of the "PCI root bridge device", but not any other, but linux is looking for CPPC support with the "Platform-Wide OSPM Capabilities" uuid, which does not exist anywhere in the firmware. bios engineers told me that this is all part of AMDs AGESA thingie, and they won't be able to add support for this, at least on current (i.e. zen3-supporting) platforms. Could this be worked around, by first checking whether any _CPC objects exist, and maybe a matching PCC entry? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 neog...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neog...@gmail.com --- Comment #62 from neog...@gmail.com --- Hi, the same problem here. Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS with kernel 5.15.0-41-generic. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #61 from Takehiko Abe (abetakeh...@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #58) > Are you sure it actually worked before? The firmware masking it does not > give me confidence it really worked. I run the system with 5.18.10 with the original patch (the reverted one) applied. It has /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc entry. But, no, I am not sure if CPPCv2 is actually working or not. ouch. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #60 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- > Is there anything I can do to test if CPPCv2 works on old kernels? Maybe Rui can comment on that question. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #59 from CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Takehiko Abe from comment #57) > "Enable/Disable Intel Speed Shift Technology support. Enabling will expose > the CPPC v2 interface to allow for hardware controlled P-sates." > > When I first got the error messages with 5.12.6 last year, I confirmed that > the error messages disappears with CPPC v2 option disabled. But disabling > CPPC v2 support is not a way to go, I guess? > > I believe ASRock B460M also supports CPPCv2. I mentioned the same observation in Bug 216070 that acpi_cppc interface is gone. I just looked my ASRock B460M-ITX's firmware settings. You are right, the option "Enable/Disable Intel Speed Shift Technology support" has the same help message. But I don't know if the bug / current fix disables any function that had worked before. Based on various online resources, my understanding is "Intel Speed Shift" = HWP (Hardware P-state) in Linux, and I can see kernel message say it always works (intel_pstate: HWP enabled). (In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #58) > Are you sure it actually worked before? The firmware masking it does not > give me confidence it really worked. I can confirm /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/acpi_cppc/ exists before 5.17.2 when the error hadn't been introduced. But I don't know if things in it were actually usable. Is there anything I can do to test if CPPCv2 works on old kernels? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #58 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- Are you sure it actually worked before? The firmware masking it does not give me confidence it really worked. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Takehiko Abe (abetakeh...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abetakeh...@gmail.com --- Comment #57 from Takehiko Abe (abetakeh...@gmail.com) --- This is not good. The patch does eliminate the error messages for me, but it also disables CPPC on my system. My board is ASRock H470 Phantom Gaming 4, BIOS L1.12 12/04/2020. The board bios has a config for "Intel Speed Shift Technology". The user manual says this about it: "Enable/Disable Intel Speed Shift Technology support. Enabling will expose the CPPC v2 interface to allow for hardware controlled P-sates." When I first got the error messages with 5.12.6 last year, I confirmed that the error messages disappears with CPPC v2 option disabled. But disabling CPPC v2 support is not a way to go, I guess? I believe ASRock B460M also supports CPPCv2. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #56 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- Thanks. I've submitted a cleaned up version as https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20220701022529.2134-1-mario.limoncie...@amd.com/T/#m1315cf888451d63578a40bedfae687e419b6bb56 If you can test that final version and leave a Tested-by tag, would be appreciated. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #55 from CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #54) > Try this updated patch which won't let it probe _CPC further in that > specific case. Yeah I confirm the latest patch makes my errors go away. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #301313|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #54 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- Created attachment 301317 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=301317=edit patch with potential fix: Only let cppc_acpi run if CPPCv2 was not masked OK, it looks like the SSDT only loads if CPPCv2 was acked, which in your system only CPPCv1 was acked. >>> result = 59 >>> result & OSC_SB_CPCV2_SUPPORT 0 >>> result & OSC_SB_CPC_SUPPORT 32 Try this updated patch which won't let it probe _CPC further in that specific case. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #301297|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #53 from CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 301316 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=301316=edit My acpidump & kernel messages (ASRock B460M-ITX/ac (P1.60 BIOS) motherboard + Intel Core i7-10700K CPU) (In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #52) > Here is another stab at a patch. Hopefully this fixes the problem, but it > also has a bunch of debugging messages. Anyone who tries it, please share a > full dmesg (failure or not). Still doesn't fix my errors. My acpidump & kernel messages (with vanilla 5.19.0-rc4 kernel and patched one) are attached. It looks like the only relevant log is: `ACPI: Negotiated _OSC: 59` -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #52 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- Created attachment 301313 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=301313=edit patch with potential fix + more debugging messages Here is another stab at a patch. Hopefully this fixes the problem, but it also has a bunch of debugging messages. Anyone who tries it, please share a full dmesg (failure or not). -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #51 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- OK thanks for trying it. Can you please provide your acpidump? I would like to see two acpidumps - one reproducing the issue, and one reverting the revert commit. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #50 from CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #49) > Can someone affected see if below makes the error "go away" on top of > 5.19-rcX? > I observed the same error message after applying the patch on top of 5.19-rc4. (Note that I came from Bug 216070 so the errors are kind of different from this thread). -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|x86-64 |All -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023
--- Comment #49 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
Can someone affected see if below makes the error "go away" on top of 5.19-rcX?
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
index 86fa61a21826..94c72e342297 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -358,11 +358,6 @@ static void acpi_bus_osc_negotiate_platform_control(void)
return;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB
- osc_sb_cppc_not_supported = !(capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] &
- (OSC_SB_CPC_SUPPORT | OSC_SB_CPCV2_SUPPORT));
-#endif
-
/*
* Now run _OSC again with query flag clear and with the caps
* supported by both the OS and the platform.
@@ -376,6 +371,10 @@ static void acpi_bus_osc_negotiate_platform_control(void)
capbuf_ret = context.ret.pointer;
if (context.ret.length > OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB
+ osc_sb_cppc_not_supported = !(capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] &
+ (OSC_SB_CPC_SUPPORT | OSC_SB_CPCV2_SUPPORT));
+#endif
osc_sb_apei_support_acked =
capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] & OSC_SB_APEI_SUPPORT;
osc_pc_lpi_support_confirmed =
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cuihao@gmail.com --- Comment #48 from CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 301297 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=301297=edit acpidump, ASRock B460M-ITX/ac (P1.60 BIOS) motherboard + Intel Core i7-10700K CPU Redirected to this issue from Bug 216070. Confirmed that c42fa24b44751c62c86e98430ef915c0609a2ab8 doesn't fix my errors. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Guillermo M. (guillermo@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guillermo@gmail.com -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||galaxyking0...@gmail.com --- Comment #47 from Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) --- *** Bug 216070 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||garystephenwri...@gmail.com --- Comment #46 from Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) --- *** Bug 216169 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC||rui.zh...@intel.com Resolution|CODE_FIX|--- --- Comment #45 from Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) --- please confirm applying the commit in comment #42 on top of 5.17 kernel fix the problem. please confirm the problem doesn't exist in the latest upstream kernel. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #44 from Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) --- *** Bug 215830 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #43 from MB (b...@unity-mail.de) --- (In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #42) > Can you please try to cherry-pick > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/ > c42fa24b44751c62c86e98430ef915c0609a2ab8 into your 5.17.x based kernel? Just for info, the kernel 5.17 is EOL since 14.06.22. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.limoncie...@amd.com --- Comment #42 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- Can you please try to cherry-pick https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/c42fa24b44751c62c86e98430ef915c0609a2ab8 into your 5.17.x based kernel? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Thomas Luzat (tho...@luzat.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tho...@luzat.com -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 cftyn1+ker...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cftyn1+ker...@gmail.com -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Max (maxim.novozhi...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maxim.novozhi...@gmail.com --- Comment #41 from Max (maxim.novozhi...@gmail.com) --- Same here: ``` [0.767033] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.PR01._CPC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20211217/psparse-529) [0.767180] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.PR00._CPC], AE_NOT_FOUND (20211217/psargs-330) ``` Kernel 5.17.5 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Lethe (lethe.t...@protonmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lethe.t...@protonmail.com --- Comment #40 from Lethe (lethe.t...@protonmail.com) --- Created attachment 300819 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=300819=edit acpidump + dmesg - 5.17.4 Added acpidump && dmesg | grep -i acpi for Kaby Lake CPU on Intel B250 booting 5.17.4 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Takashi Iwai (ti...@suse.de) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ti...@suse.de --- Comment #39 from Takashi Iwai (ti...@suse.de) --- The fix was reverted recently in the upstream commit 2ca8e6285250 (which was backported to stable trees, too), hence the problem resurfaced. That said, we came back to square. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #38 from MB (b...@unity-mail.de) --- Dear Maintainer, The error is unfortunately back with kernel 5.15.33. Was something changed in this version? After applying the patch, the error has disappeared. I ask the maintainer to check. Best regards MB -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #37 from firediregymnas...@protonmail.com --- Created attachment 300560 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=300560=edit T440s dmesg If you need anything else, I'll be glad to upload it. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 firediregymnas...@protonmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||firediregymnastic@protonmai ||l.com --- Comment #36 from firediregymnas...@protonmail.com --- Apparently, the bug still persists for me. Using vanilla linux kernel 5.15.12 compiled from source on my Gentoo on Thinkpad T440s. The problem emerges when I try to hibernate my laptop: it attempts to, but ends up rebooting itself with the following errors in dmesg. I might be mistaking this for a different bug altogether or my misconfiguration of the kernel, but I'd really like if somebody were to assess the problem. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |CODE_FIX --- Comment #35 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- Thank you for testing, the latest version of the patch has been accepted by Rafael (the ACPI subsystem maintainer) and should show up in a 5.13-rc# release soon, once it hits 5.13-rc# and it should get cherry picked into a 5.12.y stable release soon after that, closing this. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #34 from MB (b...@unity-mail.de) --- (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #33) >This last one should be the final patch, assuming it does indeed fix things. Even with the latest patch, the error no longer occurs. regards MB -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #297231|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #33 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- Created attachment 297241 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=297241=edit [PATCH] ACPI: Pass the same capabilities to the _OSC regardless of the query flag Thank you for testing my patch and for confirming that the new version fixes things. Discussion with the upstream ACPI maintainers has resulted in a different approach / patch which should also fix this. I'm attaching a new patch using this new approach, can you please give this new patch a try ? Sorry for all the different patches / all the testing requests. This last one should be the final patch, assuming it does indeed fix things. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #32 from MB (b...@unity-mail.de) --- (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #31) > Here is a new patch for 5.12 / 5.13 which should fix this, please give this > patch a try and let me know if this fixes things. Yes, now the error is gone. Thank you very much and regards MB -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #297195|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #31 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- Created attachment 297231 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=297231=edit [PATCH] ACPI: Only run _OSC without the query flag on machines with native USB4 support Everyone, thank you for all the testing. Here is a new patch for 5.12 / 5.13 which should fix this, please give this patch a try and let me know if this fixes things. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Joey Lee (j...@suse.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@suse.com -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #30 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- sander44, have you also tried using my patch instead of reverting the changes from 719e1f561afbe020ed175825a9bd25ed62ed1697 ? And if not can you give this a try please ? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #29 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- (In reply to sander44 from comment #28) > My fix working with 5.10 branch: I assume you mean the 5.12 branch, the code which your patch is removing does not exist in the 5.10 branch. This is basically the earlier mentioned revert of commit 5a6a2c0f0f43676df27632d657a3f18b151a7ef8 and commit 719e1f561afbe020ed175825a9bd25ed62ed1697. Thank you for confirming that undoing the changes from 719e1f561afbe020ed175825a9bd25ed62ed1697 fixes the "[\_PR.CPU0._CPC], AE_NOT_FOUND" errors. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023
--- Comment #28 from sander44 (ionut_n2...@yahoo.com) ---
My fix working with 5.10 branch:
index c49b35e30..cdff9cb03 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -332,39 +332,22 @@ static void acpi_bus_osc_negotiate_platform_control(void)
if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_handle(NULL, "\\_SB", )))
return;
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_run_osc(handle, )))
- return;
-
- capbuf_ret = context.ret.pointer;
- if (context.ret.length <= OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD) {
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_run_osc(handle, ))) {
+ capbuf_ret = context.ret.pointer;
+ if (context.ret.length > OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD) {
+ osc_sb_apei_support_acked =
+ capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] &
OSC_SB_APEI_SUPPORT;
+ osc_pc_lpi_support_confirmed =
+ capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] &
OSC_SB_PCLPI_SUPPORT;
+ osc_sb_native_usb4_support_confirmed =
+ capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] &
OSC_SB_NATIVE_USB4_SUPPORT;
+ }
kfree(context.ret.pointer);
- return;
- }
-
- /*
-* Now run _OSC again with query flag clean and with the caps
-* both platform and OS supports.
-*/
- capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = 0;
- capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD];
- kfree(context.ret.pointer);
-
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_run_osc(handle, )))
- return;
-
- capbuf_ret = context.ret.pointer;
- if (context.ret.length > OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD) {
- osc_sb_apei_support_acked =
- capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] & OSC_SB_APEI_SUPPORT;
- osc_pc_lpi_support_confirmed =
- capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] & OSC_SB_PCLPI_SUPPORT;
- osc_sb_native_usb4_support_confirmed =
- capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] &
OSC_SB_NATIVE_USB4_SUPPORT;
}
-
- kfree(context.ret.pointer);
+ /* do we need to check other returned cap? Sounds no */
}
+
/*
* Native control of USB4 capabilities. If any of the tunneling bits is
* set it means OS is in control and we use software based connection
--
2.30.2
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #27 from MB (b...@unity-mail.de) --- (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #26) > > Please test a 5.12 kernel with the patch which I've just attached. > No, with the patch the error is unfortunately still present. > If this patch does *not* help, then please let me know if reverting commit > 719e1f561afb helps. Please send the complete download link to the commit. regards MB -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023
--- Comment #26 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) ---
Created attachment 297195
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=297195=edit
[PATCH] ACPI: Use _OSC query results to determine caps rather then the commit
results
I've taken a quick look at commit 719e1f561afb ("ACPI: Execute platform _OSC
also with query bit clear") and I think I may have found the problem.
Please test a 5.12 kernel with the patch which I've just attached.
If this patch does *not* help, then please let me know if reverting commit
719e1f561afb helps.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #25 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- Note as mentioned in the quoted comment to revert 719e1f561afbe020ed175825a9bd25ed62ed1697 you first need to revert 5a6a2c0f0f43676df27632d657a3f18b151a7ef8 So after doing a clean checkout of the 5.12.y branch you need to run: git revert 5a6a2c0f0f43676df27632d657a3f18b151a7ef8 git revert 719e1f561afbe020ed175825a9bd25ed62ed1697 And then build + install the kernel after that. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #24 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- Good news, a very similar bug is being tracked here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963717 And one of the reporters there has done a git bisect and has found the commit which is causing the problem for them: """ git-bisect points to 719e1f561afbe020ed175825a9bd25ed62ed1697 : "ACPI: Execute platform _OSC also with query bit clear". Tested 5.12.9 kernel with the commit reverted, and confirmed that the error messages are gone. (I had to revert 5a6a2c0f0f43676df27632d657a3f18b151a7ef8 for dependency too.) It also brings back the /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc which is absent in the stable 5.12.x Hope this helps """ Can some one seeing the "Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]" error try building a 5.12 kernel with the 719e1f561afbe020ed175825a9bd25ed62ed1697 commit reverted and see of that helps please? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #22 from MB (b...@unity-mail.de) --- (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #17) > A suspect that this may have something to do with these 2 commits: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/ > ?id=6998a8800d73116187aad542391ce3b2dd0f9e30 > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/ > ?id=1a1c130ab7575498eed5bcf7220037ae09cd1f8a > > Can someone who is seeing this try building a 5.12 kernel with these 2 > commits reverted please? Note you should revert the 6998a8800d73116187aad > commit first. The same error with both commits and 5.12.9 too. The LTS 5.10.42 works ok without ACPI errors. regards MB -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #23 from Paulo Marcos de Souza Arruda do Nascimento (contato-mygh...@protonmail.com) --- I tried to compile and install the linux (git, since these commits are for 5.13-rc5 kernel) with these commits reversed, but I had no success while installing it (make modules_install was complaining about missing stuff, even if I install without the patches), so I coudn't test it. But anyway I tried the latest LTS and stable kernels (5.10.42 and 5.12.9) and the stable one tells me the same ACPI errors, while LTS don't. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #21 from Paulo Marcos de Souza Arruda do Nascimento (contato-mygh...@protonmail.com) --- (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #17) > sander44: > > I reproduced this issue with 5.10.35. > > So you mean you are seeing the "Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]" > errors with 5.10.35, correct ? That is interesting because for Paulo Marcos > these errors are no happening with 5.10.38 . Can you perhaps give 5.10.38 a > try ? > > A suspect that this may have something to do with these 2 commits: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/ > ?id=6998a8800d73116187aad542391ce3b2dd0f9e30 > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/ > ?id=1a1c130ab7575498eed5bcf7220037ae09cd1f8a > > Can someone who is seeing this try building a 5.12 kernel with these 2 > commits reverted please? Note you should revert the 6998a8800d73116187aad > commit first. If I apply one patch, the other one refuses to apply itself. I'm applying the first one to see if there's any difference -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Nicholas D. Fish (ker...@seaofdirac.net) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ker...@seaofdirac.net -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #20 from sander44 (ionut_n2...@yahoo.com) --- Hi @all, I recompile kernel version 5.10.35 vanilla and not observe this issue. This issue is view in 5.12 branch. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #19 from Paulo Marcos de Souza Arruda do Nascimento (contato-mygh...@protonmail.com) --- but first I will figure out how to revert these commits. I will probably take a little bit longer to show some results -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #18 from Paulo Marcos de Souza Arruda do Nascimento (contato-mygh...@protonmail.com) --- (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #17) > sander44: > > I reproduced this issue with 5.10.35. > > So you mean you are seeing the "Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]" > errors with 5.10.35, correct ? That is interesting because for Paulo Marcos > these errors are no happening with 5.10.38 . Can you perhaps give 5.10.38 a > try ? > > A suspect that this may have something to do with these 2 commits: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/ > ?id=6998a8800d73116187aad542391ce3b2dd0f9e30 > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/ > ?id=1a1c130ab7575498eed5bcf7220037ae09cd1f8a > > Can someone who is seeing this try building a 5.12 kernel with these 2 > commits reverted please? Note you should revert the 6998a8800d73116187aad > commit first. I will compile this kernel right now by installing linux-git package (arch linux) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #17 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- sander44: > I reproduced this issue with 5.10.35. So you mean you are seeing the "Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]" errors with 5.10.35, correct ? That is interesting because for Paulo Marcos these errors are no happening with 5.10.38 . Can you perhaps give 5.10.38 a try ? A suspect that this may have something to do with these 2 commits: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6998a8800d73116187aad542391ce3b2dd0f9e30 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=1a1c130ab7575498eed5bcf7220037ae09cd1f8a Can someone who is seeing this try building a 5.12 kernel with these 2 commits reverted please? Note you should revert the 6998a8800d73116187aad commit first. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #16 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- Ok, so I've removed the timestamps from the 2 dmesg logs attached by Paulo Marcos and then ran a diff -u, after that I edited out some (non-relevant) memory-address differences and did a second diff -u, this results in this: --- dmesg_5.10.38-1-lts 2021-06-03 16:29:41.372922210 +0200 +++ dmesg_linux-5.12.5-arch1-1 2021-06-03 16:30:01.013031634 +0200 @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ ACPI: IRQ9 used by override. Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information ACPI: HPET id: 0x8086a201 base: 0xfed0 -ACPI: Core revision 20200925 +ACPI: Core revision 20210105 PM: Registering ACPI NVS region [mem 0x7156c000-0x7156cfff] (4096 bytes) PM: Registering ACPI NVS region [mem 0x8a88f000-0x8af7efff] (7274496 bytes) ACPI FADT declares the system doesn't support PCIe ASPM, so disable it @@ -113,10 +113,6 @@ ACPI: Dynamic OEM Table Load: ACPI: SSDT 0x... 0003FF (v02 PmRef Cpu0Cst 3001 INTL 20160527) ACPI: Dynamic OEM Table Load: -ACPI: SSDT 0x... BA (v02 PmRef Cpu0Hwp 3000 INTL 20160527) -ACPI: Dynamic OEM Table Load: -ACPI: SSDT 0x... 000628 (v02 PmRef HwpLvt 3000 INTL 20160527) -ACPI: Dynamic OEM Table Load: ACPI: SSDT 0x... 000D14 (v02 PmRef ApIst3000 INTL 20160527) ACPI: Dynamic OEM Table Load: ACPI: SSDT 0x... 000317 (v02 PmRef ApHwp3000 INTL 20160527) (there are other differences later during boots, but these are the ones which count). So for some reason the kernel is no longer loading the Cpu0Hwp and HwpLvt SSDT-s, and that is causing these errors. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #15 from Juhász Péter Károly (st...@midway.hu) --- Created attachment 297135 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=297135=edit MSI MPG Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon acpidump -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Juhász Péter Károly (st...@midway.hu) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||st...@midway.hu --- Comment #14 from Juhász Péter Károly (st...@midway.hu) --- Same here: MSI MPG Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #13 from Paulo Marcos de Souza Arruda do Nascimento (contato-mygh...@protonmail.com) --- On my desktop with ryzen 1600AF + asus ex-a320m-gaming, these acpi errors didn't appear, but on my work computer it does too. both my laptop and work computer shows these acpi errors and those have intel CPU's. maybe it's an intel-related stuff -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #12 from MB (b...@unity-mail.de) --- (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #8) > These kind of errors typically indicate that there is a bug in your ACPI > tables (so this is a BIOS bug not a Linux bug). This is also why there are > prefixed with: "ACPI BIOS Error (bug)". Yes, that is known. But nevertheless there must be a difference in the query to kernel 5.11.x, because there this error message is not present. regards MB -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #11 from sander44 (ionut_n2...@yahoo.com) --- Created attachment 296919 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=296919=edit acpidump-5.10.35-1.zip - acpidump -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #10 from sander44 (ionut_n2...@yahoo.com) --- Hi MB and all, I reproduced this issue with 5.10.35. Attached my acpidump zipfile on this ticket. >> acpidump-5.10.35-1.zip Thanks. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #9 from Paulo Marcos de Souza Arruda do Nascimento (contato-mygh...@protonmail.com) --- Created attachment 296905 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=296905=edit ACPIDUMP + DMESG outputs for linux and linux-lts I am now providing ACPIDUMP and the output of 'sudo dmesg | grep ACPI > file' for both LTS and mainstream kernels, with latest updates from Arch Linux stable. Why did I provided two ACPIDUMP's? for some reason, the output of acpidump command is different between these kernels. Since there's 4 files, i'm creating a .zip containing everything. The laptop is an Acer Aspire 5 A515-51-51UX. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- These kind of errors typically indicate that there is a bug in your ACPI tables (so this is a BIOS bug not a Linux bug). This is also why there are prefixed with: "ACPI BIOS Error (bug)". Can people who are seeing this please attach an acpidump of their system here ? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Frank Kruger (fkrue...@mailbox.org) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwrdego...@fedoraproject.or ||g --- Comment #7 from Frank Kruger (fkrue...@mailbox.org) --- Maybe the linux-kernel list is more appropriate: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=1=202105=2. Anyway, cc'ing Hans de Goede (@redhat), who might have an idea what's going on here. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #6 from MB (b...@unity-mail.de) --- As long as no kernel maintainer answers, our confirmations are not of much use. Because it concerns acpi, it is probably ignored. Only version 5.11.xx is not affected yet. Maybe there will be a patch after all. In 5.12.5 from 19.05.21 is still the same error. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #5 from Paulo Marcos de Souza Arruda do Nascimento (contato-mygh...@protonmail.com) --- (In reply to Frank Kruger from comment #2) > (In reply to Paulo Marcos de Souza Arruda do Nascimento from comment #1) > > I'm having the exact same problem with Acer Aspire 5 A515-51-51UX, and the > > problem just appears with the latest kernel. > Do you mean latest stable kernel 5.12.4? yes the latest stable kernel. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #4 from sander44 (ionut_n2...@yahoo.com) --- This issue is reproduced with branch 5.10, version 5.10.32. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 MB (b...@unity-mail.de) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b...@unity-mail.de --- Comment #3 from MB (b...@unity-mail.de) --- Dear Maintainer, also here the same error message since kernel 5.12.0 to 5.12.4 Debian Sid and Machine: Type: Desktop Mobo: ASRock model: KBL-NUC serial: N/A UEFI: American Megatrends v: P1.40B date: 12/15/2016 CPU: Info: Dual Core model: Intel Core i3-7100U bits: 64 type: MT MCP L2 cache: 3 MiB -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
