[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Jesper Baekdahl j...@gamblify.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@gamblify.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #41 from Martin Mokrejs mmokr...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Martin Mokrejs from comment #39) Just to update my experience. Few months later even my CPU was replaced, because it baked one of my two RAM modules. I did not realize that in august when just the cooller was exchanged and more glue applied. Now, 6 months later I could conclude I just had a bad luck with a bad mobile CPU. It was using the CPU up to its maximum limits and as it was heating a lot, sometimes it tripped over the power limits. Before cooler replacements it tripped over the temperature limits instead. However, I should worried a lot more about the segfaults. Luckily, the CPU was doing worse and worse and the external HDMI output just stopped giving output signal. With the new CPU, they are just gone. Under 3.10.12 which I use currently I got it just once during a long-term CPU intensive job (lasting days). Only these 4 lines in total were logged when CPU was taking a lot of power while still under thermal threshold. A good sign my cooler is doing well. [66841.449507] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [66841.449509] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [66841.450084] CPU0: Package power limit normal [66841.450086] CPU1: Package power limit normal # cat /etc/local.d/baselayout1.start echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/online echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online for CPUFREQ in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor; do [ -f $CPUFREQ ] || continue; echo -n performance $CPUFREQ; done sysctl kernel.sched_child_runs_first=1 cpupower --cpu 0 set -b 0 cpupower --cpu 1 set -b 0 # -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Stefano Cherchi stefano.cher...@wasabipeas.it changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stefano.cherchi@wasabipeas. ||it --- Comment #40 from Stefano Cherchi stefano.cher...@wasabipeas.it --- I think the title of the page is misleading. We're experiencing the issue with Red Hat 6.4, kernel version 2.6.32, on several Dell Poweredge r620 with Sandybridge family processors (various models). No notification with Red Hat 5, kernel version 2.6.18, on the same hardware. So, as far as I can see, the bug has been introduced somewhere between the two versions above. Some additional info: The servers come from Dell with the power management policy set to Performance Per Watt Optimized (DAPC) by default. We managed to fix the kernel notifications issue by setting the BIOS to Performance instead. If you don't mind power consumption it is a quick way to get rid of the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Martin Mokrejs mmokr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmokr...@gmail.com --- Comment #39 from Martin Mokrejs mmokr...@gmail.com --- I landed at this thread because I got this message on 3.10.9. However, I realized during reading this thread it is probably about too many such lines in syslogs, which is NOT my case. However, as it seems the code was almost dropped from the kernel, I would like to add my comments. Seems several reports here are about laptops, actually SandyBridge-based laptops. I have yet another, i7-2640M. I realized that if I disable my hyper-threaded cores: echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/online echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online that my singlethreaded applications run faster (I run two instances just to fill physical cores). Per i7z tools I was reaching temperatures 95-98 oC while with all 4 cores enabled it never reached to those temperatures and processing speed/throughput was lower. disabling the HT-cores had also one other effect. That the physical cores could have ran at higher boosted speeds, which of course heated up more the CPU. I would say, that was the right way to test my cooling. I was glad kernel reported: [ 1092.103952] CPU0: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1) [ 1092.103954] CPU1: Core temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1) [ 1092.103957] CPU1: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1) [ 1092.104931] CPU1: Core temperature/speed normal [ 1092.104933] CPU0: Package temperature/speed normal [ 1092.104936] CPU1: Package temperature/speed normal [ 1201.614297] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged [ 1395.598163] CPU1: Core temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 21680) [ 1395.598169] CPU1: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 22191) [ 1395.598190] CPU0: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 22191) [ 1395.599169] CPU1: Core temperature/speed normal [ 1395.599171] CPU1: Package temperature/speed normal [ 1395.599176] CPU0: Package temperature/speed normal [ 1502.016525] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged [ 1698.841500] CPU1: Core temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 46139) [ 1698.841503] CPU0: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 47504) [ 1698.841506] CPU1: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 47504) [ 1698.842526] CPU0: Package temperature/speed normal [ 1698.842528] CPU1: Core temperature/speed normal [ 1698.842529] CPU1: Package temperature/speed normal [ 1952.545072] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged [ 1999.213823] CPU0: Package temperature/speed normal [ 1999.213826] CPU1: Core temperature/speed normal [ 1999.213829] CPU1: Package temperature/speed normal [ 2102.731048] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged [15125.078769] CPU1: Core temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1015693) [15125.078771] CPU0: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1048803) [15125.078776] CPU1: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1048803) [15125.079794] CPU1: Core temperature/speed normal [15125.079796] CPU0: Package temperature/speed normal [15125.079798] CPU1: Package temperature/speed normal [15425.600586] CPU1: Core temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1041101) [15425.600588] CPU0: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1075009) [15425.600593] CPU1: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1075009) [15425.601591] CPU1: Core temperature/speed normal [15425.601593] CPU0: Package temperature/speed normal [15425.601596] CPU1: Package temperature/speed normal [15725.995979] CPU1: Core temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1064631) [15725.995983] CPU0: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1099299) [15725.995986] CPU1: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1099299) [15725.996987] CPU1: Core temperature/speed normal [15725.996989] CPU0: Package temperature/speed normal [15725.996991] CPU1: Package temperature/speed normal [16301.492089] CPU1: Core temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1066448) [16301.492091] CPU0: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1101154) [16301.492096] CPU1: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1101154) [16301.493096] CPU1: Core temperature/speed normal [16301.493098] CPU0: Package temperature/speed normal
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #35 from Len Brown l...@kernel.org 2013-05-21 16:19:08 --- Created an attachment (id=102161) -- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=102161) [1/2] x86 thermal: Disable power limit notification interrupt by default Power Limit Notification (X86_FEATURE_PLN) was added in Sandy Bridge to give the OS the option of knowing when the package has reached a configured power threshold. Linux-2.6.36 enabled this feature: 0199114c31798af5b83841b21759b64171060d9b (x86, hwmon: Package Level Thermal/Power: power limit) It enabld the interrupt, and the interrupt hander added to the MCE log and printed to the console: printk(KERN_CRIT CPU%d: %s power limit notification (total events = %lu) printk(KERN_INFO CPU%d: %s power limit normal\n However, these events are quite routine on some systems under some conditions, alarming customers and provoking un-necessary customer support calls. So the MCE log entry was deleted in Linux-3.3: 29e9bf1841e4f9df13b4992a716fece7087dd237 (x86, mce, therm_throt: Don't report power limit and package level thermal throttle events in mcelog) Here we delete the corresponding kernel console messages, and then we disable the interrupt by default -- allowing it to be enabled by cmdline for diagnosis purposes. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 This pair of patches applies cleanly back to Linux-3.3. Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 ++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c | 43 ++- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) [1/2] x86 thermal: Disable power limit notification interrupt by default [2/2] x86 thermal: Delete power-limit-notification console messages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Try New Relic Now We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #36 from Len Brown l...@kernel.org 2013-05-21 16:21:55 --- Created an attachment (id=102171) -- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=102171) [PATCH 2/2] x86 thermal: Disable power limit notification interrupt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Try New Relic Now We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Len Brown l...@kernel.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||CODE_FIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Try New Relic Now We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #38 from Bob bobbuechler.concentric...@gmail.com 2013-05-21 19:13:43 --- So just to clarify, the decision was made to disable these event notifications by default, and allow admins to manually enable them for diagnostic purposes. While I understand that addresses the largest contingent of people (those who see the messages but are not experiencing any corresponding performance problems). But I stand by my warning that suppressing these messages by default will lead others to misdiagnose a potentially wide variety of problems that should otherwise be resolved by discovering these these messages, and leading them to properly diagnose CPU power misconfiguration. These event notices are one of the only highly-visible indicators, which makes them very important to those trying to track down this specific problem. I feel the suppression of these notices is merely a band-aid approach to appease those who complain about log clutter. I do sympathize, as I hate log clutter too, but not at the expense of obfuscating problem indicators. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Try New Relic Now We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #31 from Jan jmfa...@supersaas.com 2013-05-09 08:16:26 --- @Fenghua: Thanks! adding clearcpuid=299 as a boot option has indeed solved the issue @Bob: I don't see how syslog filling up with garbage on an idle server with a clean Linux install is in any way conducive to troubleshooting. It may actually make you miss important messages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #32 from Michal Petrucha michal.petru...@ksp.sk 2013-05-09 08:36:56 --- Jan: I think everyone agrees that the rate at which the messages appear is just too high, that's why Bob suggested reducing the verbosity (which I understood as reducing the number of messages appearing in the syslog). The main concern raised by Bob is valid, IMO -- completely silencing the messages by default for everyone might not be the best idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #33 from Jan jmfa...@supersaas.com 2013-05-09 09:36:36 --- Michal: OK, but I'm not sure there is a half-way house here. If I understand power stepping correctly then this will naturally occur each time the load on the system ramps up or down, so even if it is less verbose you would see lots of messages. By the way, I'm also not sure I understand how these messages would help in diagnosing a problem: power stepping, when operating correctly, should not have adverse affects. But apparently Bob's experience with java is different (although, as the Dell white paper shows, switching off power stepping will make power consumption jump from 150W to 300W so switching it off is not really a solution for most people anyway). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #34 from Bob bobbuechler.concentric...@gmail.com 2013-05-09 17:26:37 --- It's certainly not an optimal solution for us either, but it's the only one we have in lieu of some kind of added latency tolerance from java, I'd guess. I completely agree, that on a stock-installed OS with no performance problems, those log entries are pure clutter that should be suppressed. But that should be an active decision because of how necessary they end up being during troubleshooting. I know my idea of increasing/decreasing verbosity on stepping actions is likely not possible because of the nature of the activity. Perhaps something like a single line: CPU power was adjusted X times in the past hour. Then at least you're only dealing with a max of 24 such lines per day. Still clutter, but far fewer than what we have now, without completely silencing them. Just thinking out loud, so I'm certain there's probably a better way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 thebg1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thebg1...@gmail.com --- Comment #24 from thebg1...@gmail.com 2013-05-08 17:17:00 --- I am having the same problem with a brand new R420 with 2x E5-2430's running RHEL 6.2 I don't see any issues using the iDRAC card that would cause this. Is there no way to turn these alerts off? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #25 from Jan jmfa...@supersaas.com 2013-05-08 18:43:10 --- I found a solution in another thread to edit /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf and add blacklist sb_edac and blacklist i7core_edac and that made the errors go away. I'm not sure if that has any adverse side effects, but so far it seems to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #26 from Fenghua Yu fenghua...@intel.com 2013-05-08 18:57:51 --- RHEL6.4, 3.6.6 haven't picked up the upstream fix: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=29e9bf1841e4f9df13b4992a716fece7087dd237 Please check if your kernel have the fix. If possible, you can apply the fix in your kernel. I'm working with RH and stable kernel maintainers to put the fix in their kernels. In the meantime, you can workaround the issue with kernel parameter clearcpuid=229 which disables Power Limit Notificaion (PLN) feature in cpu flags. Disabling sb_edac or i7core_edac are too intrusive and may cause other unexpected behaviors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #27 from Bob bobbuechler.concentric...@gmail.com 2013-05-08 20:58:52 --- Hi Fenghua (and all): For the record, my personal recommendation would be to only disregard or blacklist these log entries only if you're certain you're not experiencing any performance degradation, or if you are, it is acceptable to you. In the case of running java applications, more than one person has encountered severe performance problems, which were only actually solved by disabling a variety of EIST functionality in BIOS. To be clear: without these notice messages showing up in the logs, there would have been virtually no way to diagnose this issue. My feeling is, while these messages are innocuous (ie. there is no error condition, they are merely logging CPU stepping activity), seeing these log entries is very necessary so that you can discover the existence of CPU stepping. That is a crucial troubleshooting component to diagnosing the root cause of java application performance degradation when running this family of hardware. Rather than working with RH to silence the notifications, it would be much better to find and fix the root cause of the performance problems (in the case of java), and then add some sort of normal logging parameter that would allow for a graceful silencing of these messages when performance problems are not involved. That said, java may simply fall into Dell's High Performance Computing category, where even they suggest disabling CPU stepping (see pages 13 14): http://www.dellhpcsolutions.com/dellhpcsolutions/assets/Optimal_BIOS_HPC_Dell_12G.v1.0.pdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #28 from Fenghua Yu fenghua...@intel.com 2013-05-08 21:25:35 --- To be clear: without these notice messages showing up in the logs, there would have been virtually no way to diagnose this issue. The fix patch in https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=29e9bf1841e4f9df13b4992a716fece7087dd237 does record the events in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu#/thermal_throttle/core_power_limit_count or package_power_limit_count Tools can monitor the counters to know the power limit notification events. What the fix patch doesn't show is the message in log_buf and mce log which are annoying according to user's feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #29 from Bob bobbuechler.concentric...@gmail.com 2013-05-08 21:54:33 --- Good to know. Thank you for that information. From a troubleshooting perspective, those messages are often the only initial clues to investigating the CPU/BIOS configuration as a potential cause of performance problems. This is why I argue that they should remain visible in logs unless the user makes a conscious decision to mute them. It's highly valuable that the events are still getting recorded somewhere else, but without these log entries, it's not likely an administrator would necessarily know to go find and review those events in connection with seemingly unconnected problems. After all, performance problems like these are so often the cause of something else up in higher layers. Without log entries to indicate otherwise, prematurely silencing them to solve an annoyance problem may further hamper troubleshooting and lead to misdiagnoses. Perhaps this might be helped by decreasing verbosity of these events by default? (rather than an all-on or all-off approach). This would still trigger the user to investigate the messages, without all the day-to-day sifting of clutter. Of course, having a method for increasing or decreasing the verbosity of power limit event log entries as needed would also be valuable. I totally understand the annoyance factor, but since I just got done relying on them to lead me to a proper diagnosis, I also see their value. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #30 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2013-05-09 02:03:16 --- Hi, Fenghua, can you please help propose a fix patch for the warning messages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Jan jmfa...@supersaas.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmfa...@supersaas.com --- Comment #23 from Jan jmfa...@supersaas.com 2013-05-07 16:47:50 --- Same here on a brand new R620, ubuntu 12.10 (Linux 3.5.0-27) Is there a way to at least filter these from the logs so they don't crowd out other messages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 bobbuechler.concentric...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bobbuechler.concentricsky@g ||mail.com --- Comment #22 from bobbuechler.concentric...@gmail.com 2013-05-03 19:36:16 --- Comment #17 fits our situation exactly, with the exception that we are running a Dell R420 with 2x E5-2430 CPUs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #20 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2013-04-15 07:20:23 --- (In reply to comment #14) Fenghua, the commit in comment #12 shipped in Linux-3.3, but the complaint in comment #13 includes Linux-3.5.4. This is still an open issue? Hi, Fenghua, any update on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use our toolset for easy data analysis visualization. Get a free account! http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #21 from Steffen Weber steffen.we...@gmail.com 2013-04-15 07:23:46 --- Issue still exists for me in Linux 3.8.5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use our toolset for easy data analysis visualization. Get a free account! http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Wolfram Schlich wschl...@gentoo.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschl...@gentoo.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use our toolset for easy data analysis visualization. Get a free account! http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Len Brown l...@kernel.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Other |Thermal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 RJ rjo...@gannett.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@gannett.com --- Comment #19 from RJ rjo...@gannett.com 2012-12-13 00:42:44 --- Hi everybody. I think I might be having the same problem with a brand new Dell R520 which has Xeon E5 2440 2.4GHz processors. Is there anything I can do to help contribute to fixing this? It's brand new hardware, can't imagine there being anything wrong with it already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Lance Grover la...@groverfamily.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||la...@groverfamily.org --- Comment #17 from Lance Grover la...@groverfamily.org 2012-12-05 14:59:26 --- I was seeing this same kernel logging events on a dell powerEdge R320 with an Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2470 0 @ 2.30GHz. It was causing me issues running some java applications. I went into the Bios and discovered that the CPU power stepping was turned on, I changed that to Performance so the system would not do the CPU dynamic power stepping and the errors went away, and the java applications no longer had issues. I hope that information helps, could someone else try that same setting to see if the issue goes away for them as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #18 from Steffen Weber steffen.we...@gmail.com 2012-12-05 17:40:57 --- Lance, now your power consumption is probably much higher. Maybe you can check this in the DRAC web interface? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Markus Rathgeb maggu2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maggu2...@gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Markus Rathgeb maggu2...@gmail.com 2012-11-23 13:11:13 --- Are there any news or progress? Nov 23 11:00:04 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 4332) Nov 23 11:00:04 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 4333) Nov 23 11:00:04 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 4334) Nov 23 11:00:04 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 4334) Nov 23 11:00:04 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:00:04 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:00:04 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:00:04 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:13:50 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 4349) Nov 23 11:13:50 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 4351) Nov 23 11:13:50 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 4350) Nov 23 11:13:50 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 4351) Nov 23 11:13:50 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:13:50 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:13:50 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:13:50 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:20:48 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 4355) Nov 23 11:20:48 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 4354) Nov 23 11:20:48 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 4355) Nov 23 11:20:48 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 4353) Nov 23 11:20:48 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:20:48 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:20:48 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:20:48 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:52:15 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 4397) Nov 23 11:52:15 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 4396) Nov 23 11:52:15 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 4395) Nov 23 11:52:15 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 4397) Nov 23 11:52:15 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:52:15 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:52:15 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:52:15 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:57:39 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 4429) Nov 23 11:57:39 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 4429) Nov 23 11:57:39 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 4427) Nov 23 11:57:39 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 4428) Nov 23 11:57:39 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:57:39 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:57:39 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit normal Nov 23 11:57:39 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit normal Nov 23 12:07:44 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 4566) Nov 23 12:07:44 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 4567) Nov 23 12:07:44 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 4565) Nov 23 12:07:44 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 4567) Nov 23 12:07:44 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit normal Nov 23 12:07:44 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit normal Nov 23 12:07:44 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit normal Nov 23 12:07:44 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit normal Nov 23 13:21:40 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 4569) Nov 23 13:21:40 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 4569) Nov 23 13:21:40 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 4568) Nov 23 13:21:40 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 4567) Nov 23 13:21:40 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit normal Nov 23 13:21:40 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit normal Nov 23 13:21:40 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit normal Nov 23 13:21:40 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit normal Nov 23 13:26:41 pc88 kernel: CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 4584) Nov 23 13:26:41 pc88 kernel: CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 4586) Nov 23 13:26:41 pc88 kernel: CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 4585) Nov 23 13:26:41 pc88 kernel: CPU0: Package power limit
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #15 from Steffen Weber steffen.we...@gmail.com 2012-10-30 08:31:40 --- Yes, I'm still seeing this issue on Linux 3.6.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #14 from Len Brown l...@kernel.org 2012-10-30 02:04:17 --- Fenghua, the commit in comment #12 shipped in Linux-3.3, but the complaint in comment #13 includes Linux-3.5.4. This is still an open issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #13 from Steffen Weber steffen.we...@gmail.com 2012-09-17 06:02:39 --- I'm getting tons of these messages on a Xeon E5-2430 (cpu family 6, model 45, stepping 7). Last Friday the total events counter got close to 2^32 and the whole system came to a halt. Upgrading from Linux 3.4.11 to 3.5.4 did not help. Someone mentioned buggy firmware above. Might a microcode update help? http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=YDwnldID=21385 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Steffen Weber steffen.we...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steffen.we...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Alan a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED CC||a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Kernel Version|2.6.39 |3.3.4 --- Comment #11 from Alan a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk 2012-06-14 17:57:40 --- Several of the very thin laptops seem to report these, should we be logging these so loudly in the non machine check case ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #12 from Fenghua Yu fenghua...@intel.com 2012-06-14 18:11:23 --- This issue is fixed in upstream in commit 29e9bf1841e4f9df13b4992a716fece7087dd237 Date: Fri Nov 4 13:31:23 2011 -0700 x86, mce, therm_throt: Don't report power limit and package level thermal throttle events in Thermal throttle and power limit events are not defined as MCE errors in x86 architecture and should not generate MCE errors in mcelog. Current kernel generates fake software defined MCE errors for these events. This may confuse users because they may think the machine has real MCE errors while actually only thermal throttle or power limit events happen. To make it worse, buggy firmware on some platforms may falsely generate the events. Therefore, kernel reports MCE errors which users think as real hardware errors. Although the firmware bugs should be fixed, on the other hand, kernel should not report MCE errors either. So mcelog is not a good mechanism to report these events. To report the events, we count the package_power_limit_count, core_throttle_count, and package_throttle_count) in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu#/thermal_throttle/. Users can check the counters for each event on each CPU. Please note that all CPU's on one package report duplicate counters. It's user application's responsibity to retrieve a package level counter for one package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Michal Petrucha michal.petru...@ksp.sk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michal.petru...@ksp.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 James Ettle theholyet...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||theholyet...@googlemail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #10 from James Ettle theholyet...@googlemail.com 2012-05-05 13:24:18 --- (Is this bug still being attended to?) Just seen this on a new notebook with an i7-2760QM processor, while doing make -j8 on an ffmpeg build, kernel 3.3.4-3.fc17.x86_64. [ 5363.846647] CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 5363.846651] CPU6: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 5363.846655] CPU4: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 5363.846660] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 5363.846664] CPU7: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 5363.846668] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 5363.846672] CPU5: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 5363.846675] CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 5363.847031] CPU3: Package power limit normal [ 5363.847034] CPU5: Package power limit normal [ 5363.847037] CPU7: Package power limit normal [ 5363.847040] CPU0: Package power limit normal [ 5363.847043] CPU1: Package power limit normal [ 5363.847046] CPU6: Package power limit normal [ 5363.847049] CPU2: Package power limit normal [ 5363.847052] CPU4: Package power limit normal Machine doesn't seem any worse off for it, and no MCEs got logged. Perhaps some tuning of the performance governors needs tweaking? Would attaching my machines acpidump help here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Pierre Ossman pierre-bugzi...@ossman.eu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pierre-bugzi...@ossman.eu --- Comment #9 from Pierre Ossman pierre-bugzi...@ossman.eu 2012-03-07 06:52:53 --- Got these on my Thinkpad 420s: [11036.192232] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 304) [11036.192237] CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 304) [11036.192240] CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 304) [11036.192243] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 304) [11036.192368] CPU2: Package power limit normal [11036.192370] CPU3: Package power limit normal [11036.192372] CPU1: Package power limit normal [11036.192374] CPU0: Package power limit normal [7.102093] [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged [11344.643133] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 354) [11344.643138] CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 354) [11344.643141] CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 354) [11344.643144] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 354) [11344.643537] CPU2: Package power limit normal [11344.643539] CPU3: Package power limit normal [11344.643542] CPU1: Package power limit normal [11344.643544] CPU0: Package power limit normal [11416.428190] [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Virtualization Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #6 from aaron...@gmx.net 2012-01-21 19:27:23 --- The issue still persists for me in kernel 3.2.1. The very first message still appears on startup of the xserver, like this example: [ 41.158389] CPU6: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 41.158393] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 41.158397] CPU4: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 41.158401] CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 41.158404] CPU5: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 41.158407] CPU7: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 41.158411] CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 41.158414] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 41.169230] CPU6: Package power limit normal [ 41.169233] CPU4: Package power limit normal [ 41.169236] CPU1: Package power limit normal [ 41.169239] CPU3: Package power limit normal [ 41.169242] CPU7: Package power limit normal [ 41.169245] CPU5: Package power limit normal [ 41.169247] CPU2: Package power limit normal [ 41.169250] CPU0: Package power limit normal After running nexuiz for about 5-6 minutes this is what I found in my log: [ 350.536528] CPU6: Package power limit notification (total events = 4) [ 350.536532] CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 4) [ 350.536536] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 4) [ 350.536539] CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 4) [ 350.536543] CPU7: Package power limit notification (total events = 4) [ 350.536546] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 4) [ 350.536553] CPU4: Package power limit notification (total events = 4) [ 350.536555] CPU5: Package power limit notification (total events = 4) [ 350.547453] CPU1: Package power limit normal [ 350.547458] CPU0: Package power limit normal [ 350.547465] CPU2: Package power limit normal [ 350.547470] CPU3: Package power limit normal [ 350.547477] CPU5: Package power limit normal [ 350.547483] CPU4: Package power limit normal [ 350.547490] CPU7: Package power limit normal [ 350.547495] CPU6: Package power limit normal So the situation somewhat improved compared to the previous situation. Doing something CPU intensive (like compiling chromium) has a much worse result on the system. Initially it still looks just fine: [ 650.270344] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 1835) [ 650.270349] CPU4: Package power limit notification (total events = 1835) [ 650.270354] CPU7: Package power limit notification (total events = 1835) [ 650.270358] CPU5: Package power limit notification (total events = 1835) [ 650.270362] CPU6: Package power limit notification (total events = 1835) [ 650.270367] CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 1835) [ 650.270371] CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 1835) [ 650.270375] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 1835) [ 650.281316] CPU1: Package power limit normal [ 650.281320] CPU7: Package power limit normal [ 650.281324] CPU2: Package power limit normal [ 650.281327] CPU6: Package power limit normal [ 650.281331] CPU3: Package power limit normal [ 650.281335] CPU5: Package power limit normal [ 650.281338] CPU4: Package power limit normal [ 650.281341] CPU0: Package power limit normal But the event counts (and the CPU temperature) start increasing to a scary level: [ 952.896326] CPU5: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 101649) [ 952.896331] CPU4: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 101649) [ 952.896337] CPU0: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 101649) [ 952.896343] CPU3: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 101649) [ 952.896349] CPU1: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 101649) [ 952.896354] CPU2: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 101649) [ 952.896359] CPU6: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 101649) [ 952.896364] CPU7: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 101649) [ 952.897330] CPU1: Package temperature/speed normal [ 952.897335] CPU7: Package temperature/speed normal [ 952.897339] CPU5: Package temperature/speed normal [ 952.897343] CPU6: Package temperature/speed normal [ 952.897346] CPU4: Package temperature/speed normal [ 952.897350] CPU2: Package temperature/speed normal [ 952.897354] CPU3: Package temperature/speed normal [ 952.897357] CPU0: Package temperature/speed normal [ 1252.565089] CPU1: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 203131) [ 1252.565095] CPU7: Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 203131) [
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #7 from aaron...@gmx.net 2012-01-21 20:18:41 --- An interesing sidenote: The above scenario was compiling chromium in the Konsole Terminal Emulator on KDE 4.7.4. The CPU temperature spiked to almost 100°C and (under such conditions) the warnings on throttling was to be expected and to be considered a good and healthy decision. Out of curiosity I now started another run of compiling chromium on the system console - and all of a sudden CPU temperature doesn't exceed 95°C anymore. Additionally there aren't any warnings about Package temperature or Core temperature - and only about 20 Package power limit notifications. So maybe extensive logging on the Konsole Terminal Emulator is the culprit? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #8 from Waldo vva...@gmail.com 2012-01-21 21:36:09 --- Well FWIW, I'll confirm-- I still see similar messages on my Thinkpad w520. Almost identical to the above. ubuntu's 3.2.0 RC7 I get those warnings mostly when compiling and not even exceeding temps over 90 (never hit 100), but sometimes I'll see them when it's at a cool 60 or so and not doing much at all. It doesn't seem to happen with every time I build-- I'm compiling a kernel now and dont see them. So it's weird. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO CC||rui.zh...@intel.com --- Comment #5 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2012-01-18 05:18:15 --- It's great that the kernel bugzilla is back. Can you please verify if the problem still exists in the latest upstream kernel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Anders Aagaard aagaa...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aagaa...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Mar 27 - Feb 2 Save $400 by Jan. 27 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-08 09:10:51 --- I also see the unhandled thinkpad_acpi events from comment #1, when pluggin in or out the power cord. Without a battery installed, I also have the THERMAL EVENT issues from comment #0, with a battery installed, they are gone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! And you'll get a free Love Thy Logs t-shirt when you download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Nikolay Rysev mad.f...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mad.f...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2 ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Paul Gideon Dann pdgiddie+ker...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pdgiddie+ker...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #2 from Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl 2011-07-10 20:19:55 --- On Sunday, July 10, 2011, Olaf Freyer wrote: This issue is still worth listing, as it isn't resolved yet. Jesse Barnes already tracked down the cause to commit ccab5c82759e2ace74b2e84f82d1e0eedd932571 - but what to do now remains unclear to me. With the patch reverted, I get down to 1 warning per workday - without reverting it I'm at 70-90k warnings per workday. Am 10.07.2011 12:58, schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.38 and 2.6.39. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.38 and 2.6.39. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Subject : Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39 Submitter : Olaf Freyer aaron...@gmx.net Date: 2011-05-22 13:01 (50 days old) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 --- Comment #3 from Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl 2011-07-10 20:20:28 --- First-Bad-Commit : ccab5c82759e2ace74b2e84f82d1e0eedd932571 commit ccab5c82759e2ace74b2e84f82d1e0eedd932571 Author: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org Date: Tue Jan 18 15:49:25 2011 -0800 drm/i915: tune Sandy Bridge DRPS constants These make us increase our frequency much more readily, and decrease them only after significant idle time, resulting in a 20% performance increase for nexuiz. Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Waldo vva...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vva...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Waldo vva...@gmail.com 2011-06-30 19:36:31 --- I am still seeing power limit notifications in kernel 3.0rc5 (ubuntu) on a Thinkpad w520 (bios 1.24). They look like this: Jun 30 12:24:30 laptop kernel: [33700.013916] CPU6: Package power limit notification (total events = 5929) Followed shortly thereafter with: Jun 30 12:24:30 laptop kernel: [33700.014719] CPU6: Package power limit normal On earlier kernels the error appeared as a hardware error (THERMAL). These errors show up when the CPU, in my case a i7-2820QM, starts to warm up, such as when compiling. The temps never exceed 75C, which is well within safe specs.. Don't know if it's related, but I also see this: Jun 30 12:03:42 laptop kernel: [32453.647044] thinkpad_acpi: THERMAL ALERT: unknown thermal alarm received Jun 30 12:03:42 laptop kernel: [32453.647059] thinkpad_acpi: unhandled HKEY event 0x6040 Jun 30 12:03:42 laptop kernel: [32453.647066] thinkpad_acpi: please report the conditions when this event happened to ibm-acpi-de...@lists.sourceforge.net Jun 30 12:03:42 laptop kernel: [32453.648022] thinkpad_acpi: EC reports that Thermal Table has changed I may try to reproduce and send to the ibm list, but did want to confirm this issue persists into 3.0 linux as of now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Damien Gombault desint...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||desint...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Thilo-Alexander Ginkel th...@ginkel.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||th...@ginkel.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 Len Brown l...@kernel.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourcef ||orge.net, l...@kernel.org AssignedTo|power-management_other@kern |fenghua...@intel.com |el-bugs.osdl.org| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
