RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking
Title: Message What sort of extension is the file that the user is trying to receive? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ManjeetSent: Monday, June 28, 2004 3:58 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking James, Actually my problem is my company main businness is data conetenting. So we have to send the file with attachment .$$$ to the various customer on dialy basis. Yes we are following the file extension solution as you said, but due this our non technical user and the end customer is not haapy with this. because they are facing problems in renamin and sending and again renaming. and the second thing the cutomer do not want to rename the files which he recieved because the no of file attachment are hundred in no. on daily basis. So i am looking for a permanent solution Regrads Manjeet ginenergy.com.au wrote: Manjeet, Purely from a security perspective I would advise that you leave the default Outlook Level 1 security enabled and train your users to zip (or alternate compression format) or rename the file extensions to an "allowed" format e.g. *.123, you could even remove the file extension temporarily. James From: Caple, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 28 June 2004 3:21 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking Have you tried the registry hack? (Please see: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;829982Product=out2003) Regards, Andrew -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ManjeetSent: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:59 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking Hi, I have this probem. Recently we have upgraded Microsoft Outlook 2000 client to Outlook 2003. Our production need to send the file attachment with the name $$$. But due to outlook local security policy, the recipeitn is not able to opne the sent attachment. I have already tried to to disable the Leve1 1 and Level 2 option recommended by microsoft knowledge base but no successfull results. If you any idea how to disable these file attachment security in outlook 2003 then please hep me. Thanks in advance. Manjeet System admins Innodata India Pvt Ltd. Do you Yahoo!?New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! Do you Yahoo!?New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking
Manjeet, Is the problem definitely at the Outlook level? The below registry entry would allow exe's and mdb's through. Are you running a content control tool or similar on your Exchange box? Are the customers "E-Mail Solutions" deleting the attachment? Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\11.0\Security] Level1Remove=.mdb;.exe James From: Manjeet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 28 June 2004 3:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking James, Actually my problem is my company main businness is data conetenting. So we have to send the file with attachment .$$$ to the various customer on dialy basis. Yes we are following the file extension solution as you said, but due this our non technical user and the end customer is not haapy with this. because they are facing problems in renamin and sending and again renaming. and the second thing the cutomer do not want to rename the files which he recieved because the no of file attachment are hundred in no. on daily basis. So i am looking for a permanent solution Regrads Manjeet ginenergy.com.au wrote: Manjeet, Purely from a security perspective I would advise that you leave the default Outlook Level 1 security enabled and train your users to zip (or alternate compression format) or rename the file extensions to an allowed format e.g. *.123, you could even remove the file extension temporarily. James From: Caple, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 28 June 2004 3:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking Have you tried the registry hack? (Please see: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;829982Product=out2003) Regards, Andrew -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Manjeet Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking Hi, I have this probem. Recently we have upgraded Microsoft Outlook 2000 client to Outlook 2003. Our production need to send the file attachment with the name $$$. But due to outlook local security policy, the recipeitn is not able to opne the sent attachment. I have already tried to to disable the Leve1 1 and Level 2 option recommended by microsoft knowledge base but no successfull results. If you any idea how to disable these file attachment security in outlook 2003 then please hep me. Thanks in advance. Manjeet System admins Innodata India Pvt Ltd. Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking
We want to alow file name with extension $$$"Caple, Andrew" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What sort of extension is the file that the user is trying to receive? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ManjeetSent: Monday, June 28, 2004 3:58 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking James, Actually my problem is my company main businness is data conetenting. So we have to send the file with attachment .$$$ to the various customer on dialy basis. Yes we are following the file extension solution as you said, but due this our non technical user and the end customer is not haapy with this. because they are facing problems in renamin and sending and again renaming. and the second thing the cutomer do not want to rename the files which he recieved because the no of file attachment are hundred in no. on daily basis. So i am looking for a permanent solution Regrads Manjeet ginenergy.com.au wrote: Manjeet, Purely from a security perspective I would advise that you leave the default Outlook Level 1 security enabled and train your users to zip (or alternate compression format) or rename the file extensions to an "allowed" format e.g. *.123, you could even remove the file extension temporarily. James From: Caple, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 28 June 2004 3:21 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking Have you tried the registry hack? (Please see: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;829982Product=out2003) Regards, Andrew -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ManjeetSent: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:59 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking Hi, I have this probem. Recently we have upgraded Microsoft Outlook 2000 client to Outlook 2003. Our production need to send the file attachment with the name $$$. But due to outlook local security policy, the recipeitn is not able to opne the sent attachment. I have already tried to to disable the Leve1 1 and Level 2 option recommended by microsoft knowledge base but no successfull results. If you any idea how to disable these file attachment security in outlook 2003 then please hep me. Thanks in advance. Manjeet System admins Innodata India Pvt Ltd. Do you Yahoo!?New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! Do you Yahoo!?New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking
Hi James, Yes the problem is with outlook level, Because the user having outlook 2000 are able to send the files without any problem. The problem starts coming only after upgradation of some outlook clients from 2000 to outlook 2003. Please not that I want to allow only file with $$$ extension. I have put the $$$ entry in [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\11.0\Security] "Level1Remove"=".$$$" but it did not work. Regrads Manjeet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Manjeet, Is the problem definitely at the Outlook level? The below registry entry would allow exe's and mdb's through. Are you running a content control tool or similar on your Exchange box? Are the customers "E-Mail Solutions" deleting the attachment? Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\11.0\Security] "Level1Remove"=".mdb;.exe" James From: Manjeet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 28 June 2004 3:58 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking James, Actually my problem is my company main businness is data conetenting. So we have to send the file with attachment .$$$ to the various customer on dialy basis. Yes we are following the file extension solution as you said, but due this our non technical user and the end customer is not haapy with this. because they are facing problems in renamin and sending and again renaming. and the second thing the cutomer do not want to rename the files which he recieved because the no of file attachment are hundred in no. on daily basis. So i am looking for a permanent solution Regrads Manjeet ginenergy.com.au wrote: Manjeet, Purely from a security perspective I would advise that you leave the default Outlook Level 1 security enabled and train your users to zip (or alternate compression format) or rename the file extensions to an "allowed" format e.g. *.123, you could even remove the file extension temporarily. James From: Caple, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 28 June 2004 3:21 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking Have you tried the registry hack? (Please see: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;829982Product=out2003) Regards, Andrew -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ManjeetSent: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:59 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking Hi, I have this probem. Recently we have upgraded Microsoft Outlook 2000 client to Outlook 2003. Our production need to send the file attachment with the name $$$. But due to outlook local security policy, the recipeitn is not able to opne the sent attachment. I have already tried to to disable the Leve1 1 and Level 2 option recommended by microsoft knowledge base but no successfull results. If you any idea how to disable these file attachment security in outlook 2003 then please hep me. Thanks in advance. Manjeet System admins Innodata India Pvt Ltd. Do you Yahoo!?New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! Do you Yahoo!?New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking
you might appreciate this little Outlook Attachment Options tool: http://www.pcworld.co.nz/PCWorld/fileworld.nsf/0/1FEB65E47ADDAF37CC256DFE0078B067?OpenDocument /Guido From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ManjeetSent: Montag, 28. Juni 2004 06:59To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking Hi, I have this probem. Recently we have upgraded Microsoft Outlook 2000 client to Outlook 2003. Our production need to send the file attachment with the name $$$. But due to outlook local security policy, the recipeitn is not able to opne the sent attachment. I have already tried to to disable the Leve1 1 and Level 2 option recommended by microsoft knowledge base but no successfull results. If you any idea how to disable these file attachment security in outlook 2003 then please hep me. Thanks in advance. Manjeet System admins Innodata India Pvt Ltd. Do you Yahoo!?New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
RE: [ActiveDir] ScriptLogic
We have about a years experience with SL, managing about 6000 users in one domain, and 1000 in another. I find it to be an extremely useful product. The point of SL isnt that it does anything you cant easily do with other scripting languages (e.g. vbscript or Perl) if you know what youre doing. The point is the ease with which you can do it. Most changes you make to the desktop environment are done by selecting the option in the management console (GUI driven). You can also develop custom scripts (such as to roll out a Microsoft patch). Custom scripts are typically written in KiXtart, although others can be used. What I find to be the most valuable part of the way SL works is the validation logic. If I only want something to apply to Windows 2000 Pro and XP, I only select those in the GUI. If I only want to roll out a change to a specific subnet, I set that. To date, I have never seen this validation logic fail. Forums at both scriptlogic.com and kixtart.org have been among the best community-run support Ive seen anywhere. If I have any complaint, it would be that I have to maintain separate consoles for each of the 2 domains. It would be nice to have a console that starts at the enterprise level, where certain settings could be maintained, and then below that, domain specific settings. I am told that this functionality is in the early planning stages for a future release. mc From: Nathan Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 7:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] ScriptLogic We are migrating from Netware 5.1 to AD and are looking at Scriptlogic to replace our Novell logon scripts. Any opinions about Scriptlogic would be appreciated. Thanks Nathan
RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking
I will assume you are using exchange. Have you installed the Outlook Security Form in the Exchange Public folder tree and set the CheckAdminSettings reg key (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Security\CheckAdminSettings:0x1)? If this is the case, then you need to allow the $$$ file extension in that form. You then need to completely close Outlook (file--Exit, not just X the window) and re-open. See the following link for info on the security settings form: http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/three/ch12/OutG03.htm Paul From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ManjeetSent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:37 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking Hi Andrew, Thx for your prompt response. Yes I have already tried this registery hack but it did not work at all.I have applied both Level 1 and Level2 settings suggested by microsoft in this link. Regrads Manjeet"Caple, Andrew" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you tried the registry hack? (Please see: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;829982Product=out2003) Regards, Andrew -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ManjeetSent: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:59 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Outlook 2003 attachment blocking Hi, I have this probem. Recently we have upgraded Microsoft Outlook 2000 client to Outlook 2003. Our production need to send the file attachment with the name $$$. But due to outlook local security policy, the recipeitn is not able to opne the sent attachment. I have already tried to to disable the Leve1 1 and Level 2 option recommended by microsoft knowledge base but no successfull results. If you any idea how to disable these file attachment security in outlook 2003 then please hep me. Thanks in advance. Manjeet System admins Innodata India Pvt Ltd. Do you Yahoo!?New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! === Important: This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message without making any copies. ===
RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error
hello, I do not think that has any problem because it will give me an IP which is an invalid one the correct gateway and DNS. IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.148.0.11 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.148.0.9 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.148.0.9 every thing seems to be correct. and one interesting thing is that if i connect to that computer with Terminal service every thing is right and works correctly. the active directory is shown and you can work with it. but with on it's own console it says the RPC server can not be found. any help is appriciated. roseta -Original Message- From: Deji Akomolafe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 6/27/2004 12:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error Could you post the output of your IPconfig /all from this server? Sincerely, Dj Akmlf, MCSE MCSA MCP+I Microsoft MVP - Directory Services www.readymaids.com - we know IT www.akomolafe.com Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon _ From: Roseta Radfar Sent: Sat 6/26/2004 8:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error I removed the AD and then installed it again with no error. but the menue to users and computers does not open! i tried to install DNS on this DC but it failed. it seems that RPC service can not be stopped. maybe it has incountered an error! can it be a virus. because i remember that once there was a virus that worked with RPC service long ago! thanks for any idea. roseta. -Original Message- From: Bruce Clingaman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2004/06/24 05:34 . To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error Is DNS integrated in AD? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 8:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error This sounds that ad is not installed (correctly) on the server as you should at least get the local server. Did you get any errors during dcpromo? Verify DNS settings! Have you looked at DNS? Can you ping the other domain controllers from this dc? -Original Message- From: Roseta Radfar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 9:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error hi, I have active directory installed on my DC. but when i click on it . This gives error: The list of domain controllers for domain is unavailable because the RPC server is unavailable. what is this error and how can i correct it? any help is appriciated. roseta .+-wi0g-+YbmPi0-+bf.+-j! 0j!oryIV+v* List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ winmail.dat
RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error
just wanted to add that I have installed DNS which is on AD on this DC and it works perferctly!!! hello, I do not think that has any problem because it will give me an IP which is an invalid one the correct gateway and DNS. IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.148.0.11 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.148.0.9 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.148.0.9 every thing seems to be correct. and one interesting thing is that if i connect to that computer with Terminal service every thing is right and works correctly. the active directory is shown and you can work with it. but with on it's own console it says the RPC server can not be found. any help is appriciated. roseta -Original Message- From: Deji Akomolafe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 6/27/2004 12:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error Could you post the output of your IPconfig /all from this server? Sincerely, Dj Akmlf, MCSE MCSA MCP+I Microsoft MVP - Directory Services www.readymaids.com - we know IT www.akomolafe.com Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon _ From: Roseta Radfar Sent: Sat 6/26/2004 8:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error I removed the AD and then installed it again with no error. but the menue to users and computers does not open! i tried to install DNS on this DC but it failed. it seems that RPC service can not be stopped. maybe it has incountered an error! can it be a virus. because i remember that once there was a virus that worked with RPC service long ago! thanks for any idea. roseta. -Original Message- From: Bruce Clingaman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2004/06/24 05:34 . To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error Is DNS integrated in AD? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 8:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error This sounds that ad is not installed (correctly) on the server as you should at least get the local server. Did you get any errors during dcpromo? Verify DNS settings! Have you looked at DNS? Can you ping the other domain controllers from this dc? -Original Message- From: Roseta Radfar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 9:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error hi, I have active directory installed on my DC. but when i click on it . This gives error: The list of domain controllers for domain is unavailable because the RPC server is unavailable. what is this error and how can i correct it? any help is appriciated. roseta .+-wi0g-+YbmPi0-+bf.+-j! 0j!oryIV+v* List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List
RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error
check the eventlogs. Normally you should get many failures of RPC in such a case. What does the eventlog show? Is the RPC service up and running on your machine? just wanted to add that I have installed DNS which is on AD on this DC and it works perferctly!!! hello, I do not think that has any problem because it will give me an IP which is an invalid one the correct gateway and DNS. IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.148.0.11 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.148.0.9 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.148.0.9 every thing seems to be correct. and one interesting thing is that if i connect to that computer with Terminal service every thing is right and works correctly. the active directory is shown and you can work with it. but with on it's own console it says the RPC server can not be found. any help is appriciated. roseta -Original Message- From: Deji Akomolafe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 6/27/2004 12:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error Could you post the output of your IPconfig /all from this server? Sincerely, Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE MCSA MCP+I Microsoft MVP - Directory Services www.readymaids.com - we know IT www.akomolafe.com Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon _ From: Roseta Radfar Sent: Sat 6/26/2004 8:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error I removed the AD and then installed it again with no error. but the menue to users and computers does not open! i tried to install DNS on this DC but it failed. it seems that RPC service can not be stopped. maybe it has incountered an error! can it be a virus. because i remember that once there was a virus that worked with RPC service long ago! thanks for any idea. roseta. -Original Message- From: Bruce Clingaman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: پنجشنبه 2004/06/24 05:34 ب.ظ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error Is DNS integrated in AD? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 8:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error This sounds that ad is not installed (correctly) on the server as you should at least get the local server. Did you get any errors during dcpromo? Verify DNS settings! Have you looked at DNS? Can you ping the other domain controllers from this dc? -Original Message- From: Roseta Radfar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 9:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Active directory Error hi, I have active directory installed on my DC. but when i click on it . This gives error: The list of domain controllers for domain is unavailable because the RPC server is unavailable. what is this error and how can i correct it? any help is appriciated. roseta .+-wȆi0g-튺+Yb鯲mPiæ0景-튺+b娲ڪf.+-j!硶 0j!岊orà¨yØ«I䚊V+v* List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
[ActiveDir] DNS Records and GC's
I have a quick question. In Windows 2000. If AD-Integrated storage is used for DNS zone data. Is the data indexed in GC's or is it just the zone info? I used LDP to connect to a GC, and I was able to browse the NC of a domain that had AD-Integrated DNS. When it came to looking at the data within the DNS zone it took a while to get that info, leading me to think it might have required a referral to get the extended information. Thanks, Todd List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
[ActiveDir] Effects on Exchange on the move from Mixed to Native
Title: Effects on Exchange on the move from Mixed to Native Hi All, Coming from a domino background. I'm about to move a domain here to native mode. I've performed it before a few time but not with Exchange2000 in the equation. Is their any effect? BR Rob This e-mail and the information it contains are confidential and may be privileged. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. Unless you are the intended recipient, you should not copy this e-mail for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The MCPS-PRS Alliance is not responsible for the completeness or accuracy of this communication as it has been transmitted over a public network. Whilst the MCPS-PRS Alliance monitors all communications for potential viruses, we accept no responsibility for any loss or damage caused by this e-mail and the information it contains.It is the recipient's responsibility to scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. Any e-mails sent to and from the MCPS-PRS Alliance servers may be monitored for quality control and other purposes.The MCPS-PRS Alliance Limited is a limited company registered in England under company number 03444246 whose registered office is at c/o 29-33 Berners Street, London, W1T 3AB.
RE: [ActiveDir] Effects on Exchange on the move from Mixed to Native
Title: Message there even. -Original Message-From: Rutherford, Robert Sent: 28 June 2004 15:55To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Effects on Exchange on the move from Mixed to Native Hi All, Coming from a domino background. I'm about to move a domain here to native mode. I've performed it before a few time but not with Exchange2000 in the equation. Is their any effect? BR Rob This e-mail and the information it contains are confidential and may be privileged. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. Unless you are the intended recipient, you should not copy this e-mail for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The MCPS-PRS Alliance is not responsible for the completeness or accuracy of this communication as it has been transmitted over a public network. Whilst the MCPS-PRS Alliance monitors all communications for potential viruses, we accept no responsibility for any loss or damage caused by this e-mail and the information it contains.It is the recipient's responsibility to scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. Any e-mails sent to and from the MCPS-PRS Alliance servers may be monitored for quality control and other purposes.The MCPS-PRS Alliance Limited is a limited company registered in England under company number 03444246 whose registered office is at c/o 29-33 Berners Street, London, W1T 3AB.This e-mail and the information it contains are confidential and may be privileged. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. Unless you are the intended recipient, you should not copy this e-mail for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The MCPS-PRS Alliance is not responsible for the completeness or accuracy of this communication as it has been transmitted over a public network. Whilst the MCPS-PRS Alliance monitors all communications for potential viruses, we accept no responsibility for any loss or damage caused by this e-mail and the information it contains.It is the recipient's responsibility to scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. Any e-mails sent to and from the MCPS-PRS Alliance servers may be monitored for quality control and other purposes.The MCPS-PRS Alliance Limited is a limited company registered in England under company number 03444246 whose registered office is at c/o 29-33 Berners Street, London, W1T 3AB.
RE: [ActiveDir] Effects on Exchange on the move from Mixed to Nat ive
Title: Effects on Exchange on the move from Mixed to Native On Exchange? Exchange likes native mode. In fact, if you'd been following the recommendations, you'd have put Exchange in a native mode domain already to allow for USG's. Doesn't seem to affect you, but it's one comforting factor :) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rutherford, RobertSent: Monday, June 28, 2004 10:55 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Effects on Exchange on the move from Mixed to Native Hi All, Coming from a domino background I'm about to move a domain here to native mode. I've performed it before a few time but not with Exchange2000 in the equation. Is their any effect? BR Rob This e-mail and the information it contains are confidential and may be privileged. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. Unless you are the intended recipient, you should not copy this e-mail for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The MCPS-PRS Alliance is not responsible for the completeness or accuracy of this communication as it has been transmitted over a public network. Whilst the MCPS-PRS Alliance monitors all communications for potential viruses, we accept no responsibility for any loss or damage caused by this e-mail and the information it contains.It is the recipient's responsibility to scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. Any e-mails sent to and from the MCPS-PRS Alliance servers may be monitored for quality control and other purposes.The MCPS-PRS Alliance Limited is a limited company registered in England under company number 03444246 whose registered office is at c/o 29-33 Berners Street, London, W1T 3AB.
RE: [ActiveDir] Effects on Exchange on the move from Mixed to Nat ive
Title: Message Ahh very... Cheers -Original Message-From: Mulnick, Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 June 2004 16:05To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Effects on Exchange on the move from Mixed to Nat ive On Exchange? Exchange likes native mode. In fact, if you'd been following the recommendations, you'd have put Exchange in a native mode domain already to allow for USG's. Doesn't seem to affect you, but it's one comforting factor :) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rutherford, RobertSent: Monday, June 28, 2004 10:55 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Effects on Exchange on the move from Mixed to Native Hi All, Coming from a domino background I'm about to move a domain here to native mode. I've performed it before a few time but not with Exchange2000 in the equation. Is their any effect? BR Rob This e-mail and the information it contains are confidential and may be privileged. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. Unless you are the intended recipient, you should not copy this e-mail for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The MCPS-PRS Alliance is not responsible for the completeness or accuracy of this communication as it has been transmitted over a public network. Whilst the MCPS-PRS Alliance monitors all communications for potential viruses, we accept no responsibility for any loss or damage caused by this e-mail and the information it contains.It is the recipient's responsibility to scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. Any e-mails sent to and from the MCPS-PRS Alliance servers may be monitored for quality control and other purposes.The MCPS-PRS Alliance Limited is a limited company registered in England under company number 03444246 whose registered office is at c/o 29-33 Berners Street, London, W1T 3AB.This e-mail and the information it contains are confidential and may be privileged. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. Unless you are the intended recipient, you should not copy this e-mail for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The MCPS-PRS Alliance is not responsible for the completeness or accuracy of this communication as it has been transmitted over a public network. Whilst the MCPS-PRS Alliance monitors all communications for potential viruses, we accept no responsibility for any loss or damage caused by this e-mail and the information it contains.It is the recipient's responsibility to scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. Any e-mails sent to and from the MCPS-PRS Alliance servers may be monitored for quality control and other purposes.The MCPS-PRS Alliance Limited is a limited company registered in England under company number 03444246 whose registered office is at c/o 29-33 Berners Street, London, W1T 3AB.
RE: [ActiveDir] 3rd Party AD Management
Well I have used NetIQ Security Administration Suite. Im not sure of the pricing but I can recommend the product. It works really well in an AD environment covering all sorts of functionality such as distributed, delegated administration, enforcement of corporate standards etc. Offers a granular admin model with a far easier implementation than native AD tools Regards Peter Johnson From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Arezina Sent: 27 June 2004 23:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] 3rd Party AD Management Hi folks, Does anyone know or can anyone recommend any third party active directory management tools, please try to include a price range. Cheers, George
[ActiveDir] Inter-Site Transports
It has been a while so I am asking for a little refresh. What is the different between an IP Inter-Site Transports and a SMTP Inter-Site Transports? When would you use the SMTP one? Justin A. Salandra, MCSE Senior Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare System 212.752.7300 - office 917.455.0110 - cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
[ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
Dear friends, Does anyone knows any tools to diagnose problems on AD ? Thanks, Elton Pimentel. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] Inter-Site Transports
The IP transports use RPC. The SMTP transport can only be used if the two DCs that use it are in different domains AND different sites. See: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/technologie s/activedirectory/deploy/confeat/ntopt11.mspx -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 8:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Inter-Site Transports It has been a while so I am asking for a little refresh. What is the different between an IP Inter-Site Transports and a SMTP Inter-Site Transports? When would you use the SMTP one? Justin A. Salandra, MCSE Senior Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare System 212.752.7300 - office 917.455.0110 - cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Records and GC's
Todd I don't think the delay would be an LDAP referral (although I've been known to be wrong before!). The GC contains all the DNS zone objects and DNS node objects in the forest. The GC doesn't show the more interesting attributes. Neither dnsProperty (for dnsZone objects) nor dnsRecord (for dnsNode objects) are part of the Partial Attribute Set. It appears that the basic info is indeed in the GC, but it's not really that helpful. Tony -- Original Message -- Wrom: XISHJEXXIMQZUIVOTQNQEMSFDULHPQQWOYIYZUNNYCGPKYL Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:47:26 -0400 I have a quick question. In Windows 2000. If AD-Integrated storage is used for DNS zone data. Is the data indexed in GC's or is it just the zone info? I used LDP to connect to a GC, and I was able to browse the NC of a domain that had AD-Integrated DNS. When it came to looking at the data within the DNS zone it took a while to get that info, leading me to think it might have required a referral to get the extended information. Thanks, Todd List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
There are many but the main tools I use are. There are also many 3rd party support tools available on the internet. Replmon.exe (Res Kit) Dcdiag.exe (Support Tools) netdiag.exe (Support Tools) Regards, Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Elton Gouvêa Pimentel Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools Dear friends, Does anyone knows any tools to diagnose problems on AD ? Thanks, Elton Pimentel. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are confidential. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this e-mail communication by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by returning this message to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] Inter-Site Transports
You would use SMTP if you had an unreliable connection or a slow connection where RPC traffic would drop. Also, if replication wasn't required to be timely. RPC traffic is highly effected by latency. SMTP replication would work better on slower or unstable link since SMTP doesn't care about latency, if it fails it will just retry. This is a very basic description on why you would use one over the other. Regards, Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Inter-Site Transports It has been a while so I am asking for a little refresh. What is the different between an IP Inter-Site Transports and a SMTP Inter-Site Transports? When would you use the SMTP one? Justin A. Salandra, MCSE Senior Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare System 212.752.7300 - office 917.455.0110 - cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are confidential. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this e-mail communication by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by returning this message to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
AD Tools -Original Message- From: Elton Gouvêa Pimentel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools Dear friends, Does anyone knows any tools to diagnose problems on AD ? Thanks, Elton Pimentel. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RES: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
Ok. I know the ones you have listed. However what I really want is a tool that will analyse my entire AD and will point out any errors. I am having problems to promote Windows 2003 servers on my Windows 2000 farm. I have already looked at the adprep logs and they have no error messages. As a matter of fact the Windows 2003 is promoted, but it does not work fine. It gets unstable and some services stop to initialize after a second boot. Thanks, Elton Pimentel. -Mensagem original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Chianese, David P. Enviada em: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:35 PM Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: RE: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools There are many but the main tools I use are. There are also many 3rd party support tools available on the internet. Replmon.exe (Res Kit) Dcdiag.exe (Support Tools) netdiag.exe (Support Tools) Regards, Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Elton Gouvêa Pimentel Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools Dear friends, Does anyone knows any tools to diagnose problems on AD ? Thanks, Elton Pimentel. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are confidential. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this e-mail communication by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by returning this message to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RES: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
Title: Mensagem I have already tried this one. It does not run on my Windows 2003 DC. It keeps reporting erros on the .vbs file. Thanks anyway. Elton Pimentel. -Mensagem original-De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Ellis, DebbieEnviada em: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:45 PMPara: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Assunto: RE: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools AD Tools -Original Message-From: Elton Gouvêa Pimentel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:25 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools Dear friends, Does anyone knows any tools to diagnose problems on AD ? Thanks, Elton Pimentel. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RES: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
Return Receipt Your RES: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools document : was Justin Leney/US/DCI received by: at: 06/28/2004 02:08:36 PM List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
I think you're looking for Microsoft Consulting Services. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Elton Gouvêa Pimentel Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RES: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools Ok. I know the ones you have listed. However what I really want is a tool that will analyse my entire AD and will point out any errors. I am having problems to promote Windows 2003 servers on my Windows 2000 farm. I have already looked at the adprep logs and they have no error messages. As a matter of fact the Windows 2003 is promoted, but it does not work fine. It gets unstable and some services stop to initialize after a second boot. Thanks, Elton Pimentel. -Mensagem original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Chianese, David P. Enviada em: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:35 PM Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: RE: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools There are many but the main tools I use are. There are also many 3rd party support tools available on the internet. Replmon.exe (Res Kit) Dcdiag.exe (Support Tools) netdiag.exe (Support Tools) Regards, Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Elton Gouvêa Pimentel Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools Dear friends, Does anyone knows any tools to diagnose problems on AD ? Thanks, Elton Pimentel. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are confidential. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this e-mail communication by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by returning this message to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
There is also: repadmin.exe (Resource Kit) adsiedit.exe (Support Tools) nltest.exe (Resource Kit) ldp.exe (Support Tools) gpresult.exe (Resource Kit) ntdsutil.exe (an absolute must if you're going to work with the NTDS.DIT file) Another recommendation is Full Armor's 'GPO Repository'. This is one of the most indispensable tools I've ever used. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chianese, David P. Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools There are many but the main tools I use are. There are also many 3rd party support tools available on the internet. Replmon.exe (Res Kit) Dcdiag.exe (Support Tools) netdiag.exe (Support Tools) Regards, Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Elton Gouvêa Pimentel Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools Dear friends, Does anyone knows any tools to diagnose problems on AD ? Thanks, Elton Pimentel. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are confidential. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this e-mail communication by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by returning this message to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Records and GC's
Thanks for the second set of eyes. I have an Exchange guy that is trying to argue against the inclusion of AD Integrated DNS zones, because in his POV the number of changes to DNS records would incur would cause the GC's replicate like crazy. I haven't heard anyone really complain to loudly about AD Integrated DNS cause huge problems, and actually the benefit of AD Integrated DNS is the ability to ride on top of AD replication, instead of having a dozen different replication architectures. If you call can't tell as of late, I am catering to a couple of Chicken Little in the office, with all my request for additional information. Todd -Original Message- From: Tony Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Records and GC's Todd I don't think the delay would be an LDAP referral (although I've been known to be wrong before!). The GC contains all the DNS zone objects and DNS node objects in the forest. The GC doesn't show the more interesting attributes. Neither dnsProperty (for dnsZone objects) nor dnsRecord (for dnsNode objects) are part of the Partial Attribute Set. It appears that the basic info is indeed in the GC, but it's not really that helpful. Tony -- Original Message -- Wrom: XISHJEXXIMQZUIVOTQNQEMSFDULHPQQWOYIYZUNNYCGPKYL Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:47:26 -0400 I have a quick question. In Windows 2000. If AD-Integrated storage is used for DNS zone data. Is the data indexed in GC's or is it just the zone info? I used LDP to connect to a GC, and I was able to browse the NC of a domain that had AD-Integrated DNS. When it came to looking at the data within the DNS zone it took a while to get that info, leading me to think it might have required a referral to get the extended information. Thanks, Todd List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Records and GC's
Man after reading my response, I am starting to thing I regressed in my ability to communicate clearly. I apologize for all the bad grammar. Todd -Original Message- From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Records and GC's Thanks for the second set of eyes. I have an Exchange guy that is trying to argue against the inclusion of AD Integrated DNS zones, because in his POV the number of changes to DNS records would incur would cause the GC's replicate like crazy. I haven't heard anyone really complain to loudly about AD Integrated DNS cause huge problems, and actually the benefit of AD Integrated DNS is the ability to ride on top of AD replication, instead of having a dozen different replication architectures. If you call can't tell as of late, I am catering to a couple of Chicken Little in the office, with all my request for additional information. Todd -Original Message- From: Tony Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Records and GC's Todd I don't think the delay would be an LDAP referral (although I've been known to be wrong before!). The GC contains all the DNS zone objects and DNS node objects in the forest. The GC doesn't show the more interesting attributes. Neither dnsProperty (for dnsZone objects) nor dnsRecord (for dnsNode objects) are part of the Partial Attribute Set. It appears that the basic info is indeed in the GC, but it's not really that helpful. Tony -- Original Message -- Wrom: XISHJEXXIMQZUIVOTQNQEMSFDULHPQQWOYIYZUNNYCGPKYL Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:47:26 -0400 I have a quick question. In Windows 2000. If AD-Integrated storage is used for DNS zone data. Is the data indexed in GC's or is it just the zone info? I used LDP to connect to a GC, and I was able to browse the NC of a domain that had AD-Integrated DNS. When it came to looking at the data within the DNS zone it took a while to get that info, leading me to think it might have required a referral to get the extended information. Thanks, Todd List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] Inter-Site Transports
You don't need to have the SMTP protocol installed through IIS on those domain controllers replicating data on these links do you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chianese, David P. Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Inter-Site Transports You would use SMTP if you had an unreliable connection or a slow connection where RPC traffic would drop. Also, if replication wasn't required to be timely. RPC traffic is highly effected by latency. SMTP replication would work better on slower or unstable link since SMTP doesn't care about latency, if it fails it will just retry. This is a very basic description on why you would use one over the other. Regards, Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Inter-Site Transports It has been a while so I am asking for a little refresh. What is the different between an IP Inter-Site Transports and a SMTP Inter-Site Transports? When would you use the SMTP one? Justin A. Salandra, MCSE Senior Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare System 212.752.7300 - office 917.455.0110 - cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are confidential. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this e-mail communication by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by returning this message to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
[ActiveDir] FRS EventID 13568
Hy, Any have idea or it happened ? resolveNTFS USN journal truncated ? The Server is Windows 2000 SP4. Thanks. Event Type:ErrorEvent Source:NtFrsEvent Category:NoneUser:N/AComputer:SERVERNAMEDescription:The File Replication Service has detected that the replica set "DOMAIN SYSTEM VOLUME (SYSVOL SHARE)" is in JRNL_WRAP_ERROR. Replica set name is : "DOMAIN SYSTEM VOLUME (SYSVOL SHARE)" Replica root path is : "c:\winnt\sysvol\domain" Replica root volume is : "\\.\C:" A Replica set hits JRNL_WRAP_ERROR when the record that it is trying to read from the NTFS USN journal is not found. This can occur because of one of the following reasons. [1] Volume "\\.\C:" has been formatted. [2] The NTFS USN journal on volume "\\.\C:" has been deleted. [3] The NTFS USN journal on volume "\\.\C:" has been truncated. Chkdsk can truncate the journal if it finds corrupt entries at the end of the journal. [4] File Replication Service was not running on this computer for a long time. [5] File Replication Service could not keep up with the rate of Disk IO activity on "\\.\C:". Setting the "Enable Journal Wrap Automatic Restore" registry parameter to 1 will cause the following recovery steps to be taken to automatically recover from this error state. [1] At the first poll, which will occur in 5 minutes, this computer will be deleted from the replica set. If you do not want to wait 5 minutes, then run "net stop ntfrs" followed by "net start ntfrs" to restart the File Replication Service. [2] At the poll following the deletion this computer will be re-added to the replica set. The re-addition will trigger a full tree sync for the replica set.AVISO LEGAL:Esta informacion es privada y confidencial y esta dirigida unicamente a su destinatario. Si usted no es el destinatario original de este mensaje y por este medio pudo acceder a dicha informacion por favor elimine el mensaje. La distribucion o copia de este mensaje esta estrictamente prohibida. Esta comunicacion es solo para propositos de informacion y no debe ser considerada como propuesta, aceptacion ni como una declaracion de voluntad oficial de REPSOL YPF S.A. y/o subsidiarias y/o afiliadas. La transmision de e-mails no garantiza que el correo electronico sea seguro o libre de error. Por consiguiente, no manifestamos que esta informacion sea completa o precisa. Toda informacion esta sujeta a alterarse sin previo aviso. This information is private and confidential and intended for the recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, disseminastribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and shall not be regarded neither as a proposal, acceptance nor as a statement of will or official statement from REPSOL YPF S.A. and/or subsidiaries and/or affiliates. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice.
RE: [ActiveDir] FRS EventID 13568
FRS determines what it needs to replicate based on the NTFS journal. If FRS is offline for a period of time, it's possible that the NTFS journal has wrapped (been overwritten by newer stuff). If the journal has overwritten itself while FRS is offline, it won't know of any changes in the files that it might need to replicate. Because of this, an error is recorded showing that Journal Wrap occurred. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:18 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] FRS EventID 13568Sensitivity: Private Hy, Any have idea or it happened ? resolveNTFS USN journal truncated ? The Server is Windows 2000 SP4. Thanks. Event Type:ErrorEvent Source:NtFrsEvent Category:NoneUser:N/AComputer:SERVERNAMEDescription:The File Replication Service has detected that the replica set "DOMAIN SYSTEM VOLUME (SYSVOL SHARE)" is in JRNL_WRAP_ERROR. Replica set name is : "DOMAIN SYSTEM VOLUME (SYSVOL SHARE)" Replica root path is : "c:\winnt\sysvol\domain" Replica root volume is : "\\.\C:" A Replica set hits JRNL_WRAP_ERROR when the record that it is trying to read from the NTFS USN journal is not found. This can occur because of one of the following reasons. [1] Volume "\\.\C:" has been formatted. [2] The NTFS USN journal on volume "\\.\C:" has been deleted. [3] The NTFS USN journal on volume "\\.\C:" has been truncated. Chkdsk can truncate the journal if it finds corrupt entries at the end of the journal. [4] File Replication Service was not running on this computer for a long time. [5] File Replication Service could not keep up with the rate of Disk IO activity on "\\.\C:". Setting the "Enable Journal Wrap Automatic Restore" registry parameter to 1 will cause the following recovery steps to be taken to automatically recover from this error state. [1] At the first poll, which will occur in 5 minutes, this computer will be deleted from the replica set. If you do not want to wait 5 minutes, then run "net stop ntfrs" followed by "net start ntfrs" to restart the File Replication Service. [2] At the poll following the deletion this computer will be re-added to the replica set. The re-addition will trigger a full tree sync for the replica set. AVISO LEGAL:Esta informacion es privada y confidencial y esta dirigida unicamente a su destinatario. Si usted no es el destinatario original de este mensaje y por este medio pudo acceder a dicha informacion por favor elimine el mensaje. La distribucion o copia de este mensaje esta estrictamente prohibida. Esta comunicacion es solo para propositos de informacion y no debe ser considerada como propuesta, aceptacion ni como una declaracion de voluntad oficial de REPSOL YPF S.A. y/o subsidiarias y/o afiliadas. La transmision de e-mails no garantiza que el correo electronico sea seguro o libre de error. Por consiguiente, no manifestamos que esta informacion sea completa o precisa. Toda informacion esta sujeta a alterarse sin previo aviso.This information is private and confidential and intended for the recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, disseminastribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and shall not be regarded neither as a proposal, acceptance nor as a statement of will or official statement from REPSOL YPF S.A. and/or subsidiaries and/or affiliates. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice.
Re: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
You should look at netpro's directory troubleshooter. I am surprised Gil hasn't already been on this thread ; ) From: Elton Gouvêa Pimentel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:24:48 -0300 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools Dear friends, Does anyone knows any tools to diagnose problems on AD ? Thanks, Elton Pimentel. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Records and GC's
Easy to fix this. Tell your Exchange guy to show you the Matrix he's looking at to draw his replicate like crazy conclusion. Then tell him that AD-intg can easily be reversed IF crazy things start happening. From where I'm standing, AD-intg does not induce crazy behaviors. Oftentime, when you get crazy behaviors, it will be caused by something else. There are attributes that are not indexed by design, and there are occassion for referrals and Exchange (or more accurately, Outlook) will sometimes complain during referral chasing. But, these have nothing to do with your DNS. Sincerely, Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE MCSA MCP+I Microsoft MVP - Directory Services www.readymaids.com - we know IT www.akomolafe.com Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) Sent: Mon 6/28/2004 11:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Records and GC's Thanks for the second set of eyes. I have an Exchange guy that is trying to argue against the inclusion of AD Integrated DNS zones, because in his POV the number of changes to DNS records would incur would cause the GC's replicate like crazy. I haven't heard anyone really complain to loudly about AD Integrated DNS cause huge problems, and actually the benefit of AD Integrated DNS is the ability to ride on top of AD replication, instead of having a dozen different replication architectures. If you call can't tell as of late, I am catering to a couple of Chicken Little in the office, with all my request for additional information. Todd -Original Message- From: Tony Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Records and GC's Todd I don't think the delay would be an LDAP referral (although I've been known to be wrong before!). The GC contains all the DNS zone objects and DNS node objects in the forest. The GC doesn't show the more interesting attributes. Neither dnsProperty (for dnsZone objects) nor dnsRecord (for dnsNode objects) are part of the Partial Attribute Set. It appears that the basic info is indeed in the GC, but it's not really that helpful. Tony -- Original Message -- Wrom: XISHJEXXIMQZUIVOTQNQEMSFDULHPQQWOYIYZUNNYCGPKYL Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:47:26 -0400 I have a quick question. In Windows 2000. If AD-Integrated storage is used for DNS zone data. Is the data indexed in GC's or is it just the zone info? I used LDP to connect to a GC, and I was able to browse the NC of a domain that had AD-Integrated DNS. When it came to looking at the data within the DNS zone it took a while to get that info, leading me to think it might have required a referral to get the extended information. Thanks, Todd List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] FRS EventID 13568
You most likely want to perform a non-authoritative restore of FRS on the DC that's in journal wrap. This shouldn't be confused with a non-authoritative restore of DS. Basically, you set the Burflags value to D2 on the DC in journal wrap. The DC will then pull in (from a replication partner) the contents of SYSVOL. Check out the article below for details. Also, I would not use the Enable Journal Wrap Automatic Restore Registry value mentioned in the Event Log entry. I think it would perform an automatic D2, which may not always be what you want, or at least you may want to have more control of when it occurs. How to Rebuild SYSVOL and Its Content in a Domain http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;315457 Troubleshooting journal_wrap errors on Sysvol and DFS replica sets http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;292438 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 14:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] FRS EventID 13568 Sensitivity: Private Hy, Any have idea or it happened ? resolve NTFS USN journal truncated ? The Server is Windows 2000 SP4. Thanks. Event Type: Error Event Source: NtFrs Event Category: None User: N/A Computer: SERVERNAME Description: The File Replication Service has detected that the replica set DOMAIN SYSTEM VOLUME (SYSVOL SHARE) is in JRNL_WRAP_ERROR. Replica set name is: DOMAIN SYSTEM VOLUME (SYSVOL SHARE) Replica root path is : c:\winnt\sysvol\domain Replica root volume is : \\.\C file://\\.\C : A Replica set hits JRNL_WRAP_ERROR when the record that it is trying to read from the NTFS USN journal is not found. This can occur because of one of the following reasons. [1] Volume \\.\C file://\\.\C : has been formatted. [2] The NTFS USN journal on volume \\.\C file://\\.\C : has been deleted. [3] The NTFS USN journal on volume \\.\C file://\\.\C : has been truncated. Chkdsk can truncate the journal if it finds corrupt entries at the end of the journal. [4] File Replication Service was not running on this computer for a long time. [5] File Replication Service could not keep up with the rate of Disk IO activity on \\.\C file://\\.\C :. Setting the Enable Journal Wrap Automatic Restore registry parameter to 1 will cause the following recovery steps to be taken to automatically recover from this error state. [1] At the first poll, which will occur in 5 minutes, this computer will be deleted from the replica set. If you do not want to wait 5 minutes, then run net stop ntfrs followed by net start ntfrs to restart the File Replication Service. [2] At the poll following the deletion this computer will be re-added to the replica set. The re-addition will trigger a full tree sync for the replica set. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] How to change the computer name of a Domain contr oller
Title: Message I did this recently in a lab environment. DNS is left dirty after the process. Sort of a good/bad thing. Both names can be resolved to the same IP (old/new). Some cleanup will be in order eventually. Definitely suggest testing in a lab first. -Al -Original Message- From: Michael Wassell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 5:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] How to change the computer name of a Domain contr oller Just thought I'd chime in. I have accomplished doing this only by first demoting the DC, forcing a domain sync, renaming (I chose to rebuild, as opposed to rename), and promoting afterwards with the new name. From what I read MS doesn't support renaming a DC, only renaming the domain. Not sure if this would apply, but, I think MS released a tool that modifies all of the registry/schema entries for Exchange after a server has been renamed, if it were me I wouldn't mess with it, but pick your poison. I renamed an Exchange server as well and I just ended up rebuilding/patching the server and the IS mounted fine afterwards. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Manbinder Pal Singh Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 8:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] How to change the computer name of a Domain contr oller I have to still try what others told me on this alias. BTW its rename of host and not the rename of domain. Both are different. Thank You Manbinder From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kemokai, Saffa Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 5:21 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] How to change the computer name of a Domain contr oller Yes but on W2K3 server as far as I know. Google for domainrename tool. If you can't find it, I can send it to you! /Saffa/ -Original Message- From: Manbinder Pal Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 2:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] How to change the computer name of a Domain controller How to change the computer name of a Domain controller? Is it possible to change? If yes then is there any tool or step by step guide to do that? Is the process different if DC is on w2k or w2k3? Thank You Manbinder
RE: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
And at the risk of shameless self-promotion, there's Quest's Spotlight on Active Directory... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Westmoreland Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools You should look at netpro's directory troubleshooter. I am surprised Gil hasn't already been on this thread ; ) From: Elton Gouvêa Pimentel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:24:48 -0300 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools Dear friends, Does anyone knows any tools to diagnose problems on AD ? Thanks, Elton Pimentel. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
