RE: [ActiveDir] AD Test Environment

2006-01-17 Thread Smith, Brad



If you 
do that method then the DC that you have in the test environment will have a 
different name to the ones in Production which may mean that when testing 
solutions (is that why you are doing this?) you will have a different names and 
stuff to worry about. We achieve what you are after here by performing a 
restore to identical hardware in an air gapped network.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony 
MurraySent: 16 January 2006 18:18To: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Test 
Environment

Hi Frank

There's a suggestion on how to do this 
here:

http://www.activedir.org/article.aspx?aid=24#22

Tony


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank 
AbagnaleSent: Tuesday, 17 January 2006 4:07 a.m.To: 
ActiveSubject: [ActiveDir] AD Test Environment

Hi,
Single W2k3 Forest/domain
I am planning on building anexact like for like test environment. 

My initial thought is to add a DC to the domain and then pull this off, do 
a metadata cleanup in live to remove any traces of this DC.
I would like some advice onwhat steps I will need to take in order to 
use this DC in theTest Environment. 
Would I need to do anything with the legacyDC's which are no longer 
available in AD,do I need to clean these up?I assume I will need to 
seize the FSMO's
I use AD Integrated DNS so this is covered, WINS is not too much of a 
problem. I also need to think about Exchange  SUS updates...
Any experience of this would be great
thanks
Frank



Yahoo! Photos  Showcase holiday pictures in hardcoverPhoto 
Books. You design it and well bind it!
This message has been 
scanned for viruses by MailControl
This email and any attached files are confidential and copyright protected. If you are not the addressee, any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. Unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing, nothing stated in this communication shall be legally binding.



RE: [ActiveDir] ADUC updates - Was Expired Accounts

2006-01-17 Thread Douglas M. Long








This may be more of an Exchange management
add-in, but it sure would be nice to be able to go into Exchange Tasks from
ADUC and do an export of a mailboxor is there some exmerge plug-in to do
this








[ActiveDir] OT: Folder password protection

2006-01-17 Thread Mike Williams



Management wants to 
have certain folders on the serverpassword protected. I have access 
limited to the folders already, but they want an extra level of comfort. Does 
anyone do this in their system already, and if so what are suggested 
solutions.

Windows 2003 server 
SP2 in a Win2000 AD environment.

Thanks

Mike (Almost full 
time lurker)

Michael P. Williams Information Technology Carlyle Van Lines (660) 747-8128 X 
3816 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.carlylevanlines.com 



RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Folder password protection

2006-01-17 Thread Rich Milburn








Well one way to do it is set up secondary
accounts, put them in a group, give that group (and that group only) access to
the folders, and assign the secondary accounts to the people who need the
access. 



OR



Try to ascertain what the manager is
trying to accomplish, and see if there is another way to set his/her mind at
rest. Such as, auditing access on the folders, proving only the accounts
specified cannot access the folders, etc. Personally Id try to avoid
secondary accounts for that purpose, or 3rd party solutions, as they
just add more complexity. But thats just my opinion.



Rich 





---
Rich Milburn
MCSE, Microsoft MVP -
Directory Services
Sr Network Analyst, Field Platform Development
Applebee's International, Inc.
4551 W. 107th St
Overland Park, KS 66207
913-967-2819
--
I love the smell
of red herrings in the morning - anonymous











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
9:21 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Folder
password protection







Management wants to have certain folders on the
serverpassword protected. I have access limited to the folders already,
but they want an extra level of comfort. Does anyone do this in their system
already, and if so what are suggested solutions.











Windows 2003 server SP2 in a Win2000 AD environment.











Thanks











Mike (Almost full time lurker)









Michael P. Williams 
Information Technology 
Carlyle
Van Lines 
(660)
747-8128 X 3816 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
www.carlylevanlines.com 











---APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE--- 
PRIVILEGED / 
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be contained in this message or any attachments. 
This information is strictly confidential and may be subject to attorney-client 
privilege. This message is intended only for the use of the named addressee. If 
you are not the intended recipient of this message, unauthorized forwarding, 
printing, copying, distribution, or using such information is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this in error, you should 
kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately destroy this message. 
Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. 
Applebee's International, Inc. reserves the right to monitor and review the 
content of all messages sent to and from this e-mail address. Messages sent to 
or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Applebee's International, Inc. 
e-mail system.








[ActiveDir] Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User

2006-01-17 Thread Justin_Leney

Does anyone know how to stop the Manage
Your Server applet from popping up for new users who login to a Windows
Server 2003 system? 

I am digging thru the registry and not
having much luck identifying which key may control that setting. 

Thanks!

JBL




This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, Inc. (DCI).


RE: [ActiveDir] Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User

2006-01-17 Thread Kelli Driesenga



there should be a checkbox in the lower left hand corner 
that will allow you to turn it off at startup


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:43 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] 
Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User
Does anyone know how to stop the 
"Manage Your Server" applet from popping up for new users who login to a Windows 
Server 2003 system? I am digging 
thru the registry and not having much luck identifying which key may control 
that setting. Thanks!JBL 
This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only for the person or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination or other use of 
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete 
the material from any computer. The contents of this message may contain 
personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, Inc. 
(DCI).


[ActiveDir] Unresolved SIDs in ACL

2006-01-17 Thread neil.ruston
Title: Unresolved SIDs in ACL






I have a script, which creates a pre-defined OU structure, creates groups and permissions the OUs with these groups. The script performs these steps in the order given.

I have 2 test environments and have executed the script in each.


In one environment (all w2k3 sp1 DCs, dfl and ffl=2), the script works fine and all OUs and ACEs/ACLs are correct.


In the other environment (also w2k3 sp1 DCs and dfl/ffl=2) the script works fine but all new ACEs are shown as SIDs when viewed thru the ACL editor. Eventually, these unresolved SIDs are shown as 'account unknown'. I have used sidtoname (thanks joe!) and that shows that the SID cannot be resolved to a name (as expected, I guess).

I'm sure someone must have seen this strange behaviour before and has some suggestions. I would suspect the latter environment to be at blame, but it was only built very recently and is still pristine.

All suggestions very welcome.


Thanks,

neil



___
Neil Ruston
Global Technology Infrastructure
Nomura International plc



PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and

intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended

recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your

copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further

action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and

Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,

accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,

or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling

code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this

email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated

this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,

investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of

the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended

for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or

offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments.  NIplc

does not provide investment services to private customers.  Authorised and

regulated by the Financial Services Authority.  Registered in England

no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35.  Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,

London, EC1A 4NP.  A member of the Nomura group of companies.





RE: [ActiveDir] Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User

2006-01-17 Thread Brian Desmond








Theres a GP for it  Admin Templates/Windows Components
somewhere probably. Check the GP master spreadsheet





Thanks,
Brian Desmond

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



c -
312.731.3132

















From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
10:43 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Manage Your
Server - Removing from Default User






Does anyone know how to stop the Manage Your
Server applet from popping up for new users who login to a Windows Server
2003 system? 

I
am digging thru the registry and not having much luck identifying which key may
control that setting. 

Thanks!

JBL







This
e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination or other use of this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete
the material from any computer. The contents of this message may contain
personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, Inc. (DCI).










RE: [ActiveDir] Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User

2006-01-17 Thread Justin_Leney

Kelli, thanks for the feedback. 

Clicking the checkbox will only affect
the currently logged in user. 

Basically, I am looking around for something
system-wide, so that everyone who logs in does not recieve the Manage
Your Server applet. 











Kelli Driesenga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/17/2006 10:50 AM



Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org





To
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org


cc



Subject
RE: [ActiveDir] Manage Your
Server - Removing from Default User








there should be a checkbox in
the lower left hand corner that will allow you to turn it off at startup


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:43 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User


Does anyone know how to stop the Manage Your Server applet
from popping up for new users who login to a Windows Server 2003 system?


I am digging thru the registry and not having much luck identifying which
key may control that setting. 

Thanks!

JBL 






This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination or other
use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact
the sender and delete the material from any computer. The contents of this
message may contain personal views which are not the views of Discovery
Communications, Inc. (DCI).
This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, Inc. (DCI).


[ActiveDir] FYI: W2K3 SP1 VMWARE issue

2006-01-17 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
Title: FYI: W2K3 SP1  VMWARE issue






Hi Everyone,


As you all may know a few months ago I posted two issues with Vmware and W2K3SP1 DCs. The issues described are:

* Adding additional W2K3SP1 DCs to the forest

* Creating trusts from a W2K3SP1 forest to another forest (does not matter which OS)


Both the issues are described here:

http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2005/11/14/60.aspx

http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2005/12/18/297.aspx

http://www.activedir.org/article.aspx?aid=75


This time a was setting up an environment with a w2k forest and a w2k3 sp1 forest. When setting up the trust I received the error we discussed a while ago (see articles above). A few days ago someone posted which component caused this issue. The component in error seems to be the Shared Folder component from Vmware (at least in Vmware Workstation). This time instead of changing the password of the administrator account, I deinstalled the Shared Folder component and rebooted the DC. After that I was able to create the trust without any problem.

So, the Shared Folder component from Vmware does seem to be the root cause of this.


Cheers,

Jorge


Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,


Jorge de Almeida Pinto

Infrastructure Consultant

BLOG  http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx

__






LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU SD/AT)

Division Industry, Distribution and Transport (IDT)

Kennedyplein 248, 5611 ZT, Eindhoven

. Postbus 7089

 5605 JB Eindhoven

( Tel  : +31-(0)40-29.57.777

2 Fax : +31-(0)40-29.57.709

( Mobile : +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80

* E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 http://www.logicacmg.com/ - Solutions that matter -



This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.



RE: [ActiveDir] Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User

2006-01-17 Thread Kelli Driesenga



why are you having multiple people log into your 
server? We only allow Admin access and there are only two people with that 
kind of access. 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:06 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] 
Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User
Kelli, thanks for the feedback. 
Clicking the checkbox will only 
affect the currently logged in user. Basically, I am looking around for something system-wide, so that 
everyone who logs in does not recieve the "Manage Your Server" applet. 


  
  
"Kelli Driesenga" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  01/17/2006 10:50 AM 
  


  
Please respond 
toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

  


  
To
  ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org 

  
cc
  

  
Subject
  RE: [ActiveDir] Manage 
Your Server - Removing from Default User
  


  
  there should be a checkbox in the lower left hand corner that 
will allow you to turn it off at startup 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:43 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] 
Manage Your Server - Removing from Default UserDoes anyone know how to 
stop the "Manage Your Server" applet from popping up for new users who login to 
a Windows Server 2003 system? I am digging thru the registry and not having much 
luck identifying which key may control that setting. Thanks!JBL 
This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only 
for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination 
or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete the material from any computer. The contents of this message 
may contain personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, 
Inc. (DCI). This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only for the person or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination or other use of 
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete 
the material from any computer. The contents of this message may contain 
personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, Inc. 
(DCI).


RE: [ActiveDir] Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User

2006-01-17 Thread Darren Mar-Elia



Interestingly, this particular option is not in Group 
Policy. However, a quick check with Regmon points out the registry value in 
question and so I whipped up a quick custom ADM that should handle 
this:

CLASS USER

CATEGORY "My Custom Settings"

POLICY "Show Manage Your Server Screen"KEYNAME 
"Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\srvWiz"VALUENAME ""VALUEON 
NUMERIC 1VALUEOFF NUMERIC 0END POLICYEND 
CATEGORY


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:06 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] 
Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User
Kelli, thanks for the feedback. 
Clicking the checkbox will only 
affect the currently logged in user. Basically, I am looking around for something system-wide, so that 
everyone who logs in does not recieve the "Manage Your Server" applet. 


  
  
"Kelli Driesenga" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  01/17/2006 10:50 AM 
  


  
Please respond 
toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

  


  
To
  ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org 

  
cc
  

  
Subject
  RE: [ActiveDir] Manage 
Your Server - Removing from Default User
  


  
  there should be a checkbox in the lower left hand corner that 
will allow you to turn it off at startup 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:43 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] 
Manage Your Server - Removing from Default UserDoes anyone know how to 
stop the "Manage Your Server" applet from popping up for new users who login to 
a Windows Server 2003 system? I am digging thru the registry and not having much 
luck identifying which key may control that setting. Thanks!JBL 
This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only 
for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination 
or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete the material from any computer. The contents of this message 
may contain personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, 
Inc. (DCI). This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only for the person or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination or other use of 
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete 
the material from any computer. The contents of this message may contain 
personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, Inc. 
(DCI).


SV: [ActiveDir] configure port exceptions in windows xp firewall via gpo

2006-01-17 Thread Peter Jakobsson
Ok, thanks i guess =)

Is there another way of achieving this goal, without buying certain hardware or 
expensive licenses? Or is ipsec policies the best/only way to go?


-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Darren Mar-Elia
Skickat: den 16 januari 2006 21:43
Till: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Ämne: RE: [ActiveDir] configure port exceptions in windows xp firewall via gpo

Right, not only can you not specify port ranges as you have done, but
you can not specify subnet ranges as you have done. You can specific an
address, a subnet or * but not ranges of a subnet. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 10:56 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] configure port exceptions in windows xp
firewall via gpo

Looking at the docs, I would say that you can only specify a specific
port as that field is defined as Port where Port is a decimal
number. 

You could try putting in a * as a wildcard and see if that works. If
not, you may consider using ipsec policies instead. 
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Jakobsson
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 10:48 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] configure port exceptions in windows xp firewall
via gpo

Hello,

I am trying to configure the Windows firewall:define port exceptions
policy on my clients (xpsp2). 

What I want is to block the communication from clients on all ports; and
enable the servers (win2k3), printers and gateways to communicate with
the clients (on all ports)

I have been using strings looking like

1-65536:tcp:192.19.100.101-192.19.100.200/24:disable:disable client
communication 1-65536:tcp:192.19.100.1-192.19.100.40/24:enable:enable
server and printer communication
1-65536:tcp:192.19.100.250-192.19.100.254/24:enable:enable gateway
communication


(You could say that the disable client communication string works
since the clients are inaccessible, however you cannot access them from
the server either, so...) =)

   
Perhaps you cannot specify multiple ports the way I did or is there
something else wrong with my strings. Suggestions? 

Regards
Peter
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


RE: [ActiveDir] Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User

2006-01-17 Thread neil.ruston



Imagine an environment where servers are built on a daily 
basis - there is a need to stop the 'manage your server' page from appearing on 
all servers.

It can be done as follows:
Computer config / admin templates / system / "do not 
display manage your server at logon"

neil

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelli 
DriesengaSent: 17 January 2006 16:19To: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Manage Your 
Server - Removing from Default User

why are you having multiple people log into your 
server? We only allow Admin access and there are only two people with that 
kind of access. 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:06 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] 
Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User
Kelli, thanks for the feedback. 
Clicking the checkbox will only 
affect the currently logged in user. Basically, I am looking around for something system-wide, so that 
everyone who logs in does not recieve the "Manage Your Server" applet. 


  
  
"Kelli Driesenga" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  01/17/2006 10:50 AM 
  


  
Please respond 
toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

  


  
To
  ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org 

  
cc
  

  
Subject
  RE: [ActiveDir] Manage 
Your Server - Removing from Default 
  User
  


  
  there should be a checkbox in the lower left hand 
corner that will allow you to turn it off at startup 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:43 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] 
Manage Your Server - Removing from Default UserDoes anyone know how to 
stop the "Manage Your Server" applet from popping up for new users who login to 
a Windows Server 2003 system? I am digging thru the registry and not having much 
luck identifying which key may control that setting. Thanks!JBL 
This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only 
for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination 
or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete the material from any computer. The contents of this message 
may contain personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, 
Inc. (DCI). This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only for the person or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination or other use of 
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete 
the material from any computer. The contents of this message may contain 
personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, Inc. 
(DCI).PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and

intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended

recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your

copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further

action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and

Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,

accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,

or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling

code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this

email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated

this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,

investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of

the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended

for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or

offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments.  NIplc

does not provide investment services to private customers.  Authorised and

regulated by the Financial Services Authority.  Registered in England

no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35.  Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,

London, EC1A 4NP.  A member of the Nomura group of companies.





RE: [ActiveDir] Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User

2006-01-17 Thread Darren Mar-Elia



Ha. Thanks Neil. And I wasted a perfectly good 5 minutes 
creating a custom ADM because I didn't bother to look under Computer 
Config


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:45 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] 
Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User

Imagine an environment where servers are built on a daily 
basis - there is a need to stop the 'manage your server' page from appearing on 
all servers.

It can be done as follows:
Computer config / admin templates / system / "do not 
display manage your server at logon"

neil 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelli 
DriesengaSent: 17 January 2006 16:19To: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Manage Your 
Server - Removing from Default User

why are you having multiple people log into your 
server? We only allow Admin access and there are only two people with that 
kind of access. 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:06 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] 
Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User
Kelli, thanks for the feedback. 
Clicking the checkbox will only 
affect the currently logged in user. Basically, I am looking around for something system-wide, so that 
everyone who logs in does not recieve the "Manage Your Server" applet. 


  
  
"Kelli Driesenga" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  01/17/2006 10:50 AM 
  


  
Please respond 
toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

  


  
To
  ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org 

  
cc
  

  
Subject
  RE: [ActiveDir] Manage 
Your Server - Removing from Default 
  User
  


  
  there should be a checkbox in the lower left hand 
corner that will allow you to turn it off at startup 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:43 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] 
Manage Your Server - Removing from Default UserDoes anyone know how to 
stop the "Manage Your Server" applet from popping up for new users who login to 
a Windows Server 2003 system? I am digging thru the registry and not having much 
luck identifying which key may control that setting. Thanks!JBL 
This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only 
for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination 
or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete the material from any computer. The contents of this message 
may contain personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, 
Inc. (DCI). This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only for the person or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination or other use of 
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete 
the material from any computer. The contents of this message may contain 
personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, Inc. 
(DCI).
PLEASE READ: The 
information contained in this email is confidential and 
intended for the 
named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended 
recipient of this 
email please notify the sender immediately and delete your 
copy from your 
system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further 
action in reliance 
on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and 
Nomura International 
plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law, 
accept 
responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of, 

or (b) the presence 
of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling 
code in, this 
message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this 
email is sought then 
please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated 
this email: (1) is 
not, and should not be treated or relied upon as, 
investment research; 
(2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of 
the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended 
for informational 
purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or 
offer to buy or sell 
securities or related financial instruments. NIplc 
does not provide 
investment services to private customers. Authorised and 
regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority. Registered in England 
no. 1550505 VAT 

RE: [ActiveDir] Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User

2006-01-17 Thread neil.ruston



The padawan teaches the teacher :)


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren 
Mar-EliaSent: 17 January 2006 17:01To: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Manage Your 
Server - Removing from Default User

Ha. Thanks Neil. And I wasted a perfectly good 5 minutes 
creating a custom ADM because I didn't bother to look under Computer 
Config


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:45 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] 
Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User

Imagine an environment where servers are built on a daily 
basis - there is a need to stop the 'manage your server' page from appearing on 
all servers.

It can be done as follows:
Computer config / admin templates / system / "do not 
display manage your server at logon"

neil 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelli 
DriesengaSent: 17 January 2006 16:19To: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Manage Your 
Server - Removing from Default User

why are you having multiple people log into your 
server? We only allow Admin access and there are only two people with that 
kind of access. 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:06 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] 
Manage Your Server - Removing from Default User
Kelli, thanks for the feedback. 
Clicking the checkbox will only 
affect the currently logged in user. Basically, I am looking around for something system-wide, so that 
everyone who logs in does not recieve the "Manage Your Server" applet. 


  
  
"Kelli Driesenga" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  01/17/2006 10:50 AM 
  


  
Please respond 
toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

  


  
To
  ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org 

  
cc
  

  
Subject
  RE: [ActiveDir] Manage 
Your Server - Removing from Default 
  User
  


  
  there should be a checkbox in the lower left hand 
corner that will allow you to turn it off at startup 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:43 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] 
Manage Your Server - Removing from Default UserDoes anyone know how to 
stop the "Manage Your Server" applet from popping up for new users who login to 
a Windows Server 2003 system? I am digging thru the registry and not having much 
luck identifying which key may control that setting. Thanks!JBL 
This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only 
for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination 
or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete the material from any computer. The contents of this message 
may contain personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, 
Inc. (DCI). This e-mail, and any attachment, is intended only for the person or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
material. Any review, re-transmission, copying, dissemination or other use of 
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete 
the material from any computer. The contents of this message may contain 
personal views which are not the views of Discovery Communications, Inc. 
(DCI).
PLEASE READ: The 
information contained in this email is confidential and 
intended for the 
named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended 
recipient of this 
email please notify the sender immediately and delete your 
copy from your 
system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further 
action in reliance 
on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and 
Nomura International 
plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law, 
accept 
responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of, 

or (b) the presence 
of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling 
code in, this 
message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this 
email is sought then 
please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated 
this email: (1) is 
not, and should not be treated or relied upon as, 
investment research; 
(2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of 
the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended 
for informational 
purposes only and is not a recommendation, 

RE: [ActiveDir] FYI: W2K3 SP1 VMWARE issue

2006-01-17 Thread Tony Murray
Title: FYI: W2K3 SP1 & VMWARE issue



scratches head

That was unexpected. Good result though. Thanks 
for posting the info Jorge.

Tony


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto, 
Jorge deSent: Wednesday, 18 January 2006 5:16 a.m.To: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] FYI: W2K3 SP1  
VMWARE issue

Hi Everyone, 
As you all may know a few months ago 
I posted two issues with Vmware and W2K3SP1 DCs. The issues described 
are: * Adding additional 
W2K3SP1 DCs to the forest * 
Creating trusts from a W2K3SP1 forest to another forest (does not matter which 
OS) 
Both the issues are described 
here: http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2005/11/14/60.aspx 
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2005/12/18/297.aspx 
http://www.activedir.org/article.aspx?aid=75 
This time a was setting up an 
environment with a w2k forest and a w2k3 sp1 forest. When setting up the trust I 
received the error we discussed a while ago (see articles above). A few days ago 
someone posted which component caused this issue. The component in error seems 
to be the "Shared Folder" component from Vmware (at least in Vmware 
Workstation). This time instead of changing the password of the administrator 
account, I deinstalled the "Shared Folder" component and rebooted the DC. After 
that I was able to create the trust without any problem.
So, the "Shared Folder" component 
from Vmware does seem to be the root cause of this. 
Cheers, Jorge 
Met vriendelijke groet 
/ Kind regards, 
Jorge de Almeida 
Pinto Infrastructure Consultant 
BLOG  http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx __ 
 
LogicaCMG 
Nederland B.V. (BU SD/AT) Division Industry, Distribution and Transport 
(IDT) Kennedyplein 248, 5611 ZT, Eindhoven . Postbus 7089 
 5605 JB Eindhoven 
( Tel 
 : +31-(0)40-29.57.777 
2 Fax : 
+31-(0)40-29.57.709 ( Mobile : 
+31-(0)6-26.26.62.80 
* E-mail : 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" http://www.logicacmg.com/ - Solutions that matter - 

This e-mail and any 
attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may 
contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to 
legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any 
other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete 
this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank 
you.


[ActiveDir] Migrate domain to separate forest

2006-01-17 Thread Larry Wahlers
Hello, colleagues,

One of our organizations is in their own domain, a child domain of our
root. They want to be in their own forest. Are there tools to migrate
them to their own separate forest, or will I need to build the forest
first, presumably with 2 new DC's, and then make all their servers join
the new forest? And, of course, they have about 140 users.

Thanks, folks.

-- 
Larry Wahlers
Concordia Technologies
The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
direct office line: (314) 996-1876
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Folder password protection

2006-01-17 Thread Steve Rochford



This might be the problem that people can see a folder 
exists and don't understand that the permissions will stop "bad guys" getting 
into it. 

With 2003 you can set things so that if they don't have 
rights to read the folder then they don't see the folder - this list has 
discussed "access based enumeration" before and there's lots to be 
googled!

Another way might be some obfuscation - if you don't use 
folders called things like "finance director - top secret" but just stuff like 
"folder 1", "folder 2" then it's less obvious what's going on. Normal users will 
see "folder 1" but if they try to look in then they won't find anything there 
(assuming permissions are correct!) The FD will look in "folder 1" and find "top 
secret" etc as a folder in there.

Steve


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich 
MilburnSent: 17 January 2006 15:40To: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Folder 
password protection


Well one way to do it 
is set up secondary accounts, put them in a group, give that group (and that 
group only) access to the folders, and assign the secondary accounts to the 
people who need the access. 

OR

Try to ascertain what 
the manager is trying to accomplish, and see if there is another way to set 
his/her mind at rest. Such as, auditing access on the folders, proving 
only the accounts specified cannot access the folders, etc. Personally Id 
try to avoid secondary accounts for that purpose, or 3rd party 
solutions, as they just add more complexity. But thats just my 
opinion.

Rich 



---Rich 
MilburnMCSE, Microsoft MVP - 
Directory ServicesSr 
Network Analyst, Field Platform DevelopmentApplebee's International, 
Inc.4551 
W. 107th 
StOverland 
Park, 
KS 66207913-967-2819--I love the smell of 
red herrings in the morning - 
anonymous




From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Mike 
WilliamsSent: Tuesday, January 
17, 2006 9:21 AMTo: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] OT: Folder password 
protection


Management wants to have certain 
folders on the serverpassword protected. I have access limited to the 
folders already, but they want an extra level of comfort. Does anyone do this in 
their system already, and if so what are suggested 
solutions.



Windows 2003 server SP2 in a Win2000 
AD environment.



Thanks



Mike (Almost full time 
lurker)


Michael P. 
Williams Information 
Technology Carlyle Van Lines 
(660) 747-8128 X 3816 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
www.carlylevanlines.com 







---APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE--- 
PRIVILEGED / CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be contained in this message or 
any attachments. This information is strictly confidential and may be subject to 
attorney-client privilege. This message is intended only for the use of the 
named addressee. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, 
unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or using such 
information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received 
this in error, you should kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail and 
immediately destroy this message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a 
violation of federal criminal law. Applebee's International, Inc. reserves the 
right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to and from this 
e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on 
the Applebee's International, Inc. e-mail system.






RE: [ActiveDir] Migrate domain to separate forest

2006-01-17 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
If they need their own forest you need to create it first. But even before you 
create it, design it. First setup what the requirement should be and then 
design it to meet the requirements.
 
Migration high level steps are:
* Make sure the AD has been configured (sites, subnets, replication, OUs, GPOs, 
delegations, DNS, WINS, DHCP, etc.)
* Setup name resolution (WINS or DNS) between source and target domain/forest
* Setup trusts (if an external trust is configured and sidhistory is used, 
disable sid filtering)
* Install and configure migration tooling
* Migrate groups, user accounts with passwords and group memberships (with 
sidhistory)
* Migrate clients from the source domain to the target domain, translate 
security on the client, and translate profiles (at this moment users start 
logging on with their new AD account on the migrated clients that have been 
migrated previously to the w2k3 domain)
* Migrate mailboxes if needed
* Migrate servers to the new domain or migrate data to new servers
* Translate security (Re-ACL) of the data from source security principals to 
target security principals (replace the security descriptors from the old 
domain with the security descriptors from the new domain )
* Cleanup temporary configurations
* Cleanup sidhistory (recommended!). sIDHistory is used to access resources 
while those resources still have security descriptors from the old domain. As 
soon as all data (file, folders, mailboxes, etc.) have been re-ACL-ed 
sIDHistory can be cleaned. Sidhistory should only be used temporary for 
migration purposes!
* Remove trusts
* Decommission old domain(s)

For more info on migrating to an AD domain also see: 
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/deploy/cookbook/default.mspx
ADMTv3 has been out for a while, so be sure to use that version. 
(http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=6F86937B-533A-466D-A8E8-AFF85AD3D212displaylang=en)
 
If you have exchange you need to setup the target Exchange organization and 
perform an inter-org migration
 
Cheers,
jorge



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Larry Wahlers
Sent: Tue 2006-01-17 19:28
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Migrate domain to separate forest



Hello, colleagues,

One of our organizations is in their own domain, a child domain of our
root. They want to be in their own forest. Are there tools to migrate
them to their own separate forest, or will I need to build the forest
first, presumably with 2 new DC's, and then make all their servers join
the new forest? And, of course, they have about 140 users.

Thanks, folks.

--
Larry Wahlers
Concordia Technologies
The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
direct office line: (314) 996-1876
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/




This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended 
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential 
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, 
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended 
recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all 
copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
winmail.dat

RE: [ActiveDir] Migrate domain to separate forest

2006-01-17 Thread Larry Wahlers
Title: [ActiveDir] Migrate domain to separate forest



Many thanks, Jorge. And I hear congratulations on your MVP 
status are in order. Congrats!

--Larry WahlersConcordia TechnologiesThe Lutheran 
Church - Missouri Synodmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]direct 
office line: (314) 996-1876


  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto, 
  Jorge deSent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:27 PMTo: 
  ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Migrate domain 
  to separate forest
  
  
  If they need their own 
  forest you need to create it first. But even before you create it, design it. 
  First setup what the requirement should be and then design it to meet the 
  requirements.
  
  Migration high level steps are:* Make sure the AD has been 
  configured (sites, subnets, replication, OUs, GPOs, delegations, DNS, WINS, 
  DHCP, etc.)
  * Setup name resolution (WINS or DNS) between source and target 
  domain/forest
  * Setup trusts (if an external trust is configured and sidhistory 
  is used, disable sid filtering)
  * Install and configure migration tooling* Migrate groups, 
  user accounts with passwords and group memberships (with sidhistory)* 
  Migrate clients from the source domain to the target domain, translate 
  security on the client, and translate profiles (at this moment users start 
  logging on with their new AD account on the migrated clients that have been 
  migrated previously to the w2k3 domain)* Migrate mailboxes if needed* 
  Migrate servers to the new domain or migrate data to new servers* 
  Translate security (Re-ACL) of the data from source security principals to 
  target security principals (replace the security descriptors from the old 
  domain with the security descriptors from the new domain )* Cleanup 
  temporary configurations* Cleanup sidhistory (recommended!). sIDHistory is 
  used to access resources while those resources still have security descriptors 
  from the old domain. As soon as all data (file, folders, mailboxes, etc.) have 
  been re-ACL-ed sIDHistory can be cleaned. Sidhistory should only be used 
  temporary for migration purposes!* Remove trusts* Decommission old 
  domain(s)
  For more info on migrating to an AD domain also see: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/deploy/cookbook/default.mspx
  ADMTv3 has been out for a while, so be sure to use that version. 
  (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=6F86937B-533A-466D-A8E8-AFF85AD3D212displaylang=en)
  
  If you have exchange you need to setup the target Exchange 
  organization and perform an inter-org migration
  
  Cheers,
  jorge
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 
  behalf of Larry WahlersSent: Tue 2006-01-17 19:28To: 
  ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] Migrate domain to 
  separate forest
  
  Hello, colleagues,One of our organizations is in their 
  own domain, a child domain of ourroot. They want to be in their own 
  forest. Are there tools to migratethem to their own separate forest, or 
  will I need to build the forestfirst, presumably with 2 new DC's, and then 
  make all their servers jointhe new forest? And, of course, they have about 
  140 users.Thanks, folks.--Larry WahlersConcordia 
  TechnologiesThe Lutheran Church - Missouri Synodmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]direct 
  office line: (314) 996-1876List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspxList 
  FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspxList 
  archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Folder password protection

2006-01-17 Thread Rich Milburn








Ah every time that comes up I recall the bank
I worked for a while back, and the new server they named



CASHVAULT



Nothing to see here people, move along,
nothing to see here





---
Rich Milburn
MCSE, Microsoft MVP -
Directory Services
Sr Network Analyst, Field Platform Development
Applebee's International, Inc.
4551 W. 107th St
Overland Park, KS 66207
913-967-2819
--
I love the smell
of red herrings in the morning - anonymous











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Rochford
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
12:34 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:
Folder password protection





This might be the problem that people can
see a folder exists and don't understand that the permissions will stop
bad guys getting into it. 



With 2003 you can set things so that if
they don't have rights to read the folder then they don't see the folder - this
list has discussed access based enumeration before and there's lots
to be googled!



Another way might be some obfuscation - if
you don't use folders called things like finance director - top
secret but just stuff like folder 1, folder 2
then it's less obvious what's going on. Normal users will see folder
1 but if they try to look in then they won't find anything there
(assuming permissions are correct!) The FD will look in folder 1
and find top secret etc as a folder in there.



Steve









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn
Sent: 17 January 2006 15:40
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:
Folder password protection

Well one way to do it is set up secondary
accounts, put them in a group, give that group (and that group only) access to
the folders, and assign the secondary accounts to the people who need the
access. 



OR



Try to ascertain what the manager is
trying to accomplish, and see if there is another way to set his/her mind at
rest. Such as, auditing access on the folders, proving only the accounts
specified cannot access the folders, etc. Personally Id try to
avoid secondary accounts for that purpose, or 3rd party solutions,
as they just add more complexity. But thats just my opinion.



Rich 





---
Rich Milburn
MCSE, Microsoft MVP -
Directory Services
Sr Network Analyst, Field Platform Development
Applebee's International, Inc.
4551 W. 107th St
Overland Park, KS 66207
913-967-2819
--
I love the smell
of red herrings in the morning - anonymous











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
9:21 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Folder
password protection







Management wants to have certain folders on the
serverpassword protected. I have access limited to the folders already,
but they want an extra level of comfort. Does anyone do this in their system
already, and if so what are suggested solutions.











Windows 2003 server SP2 in a Win2000 AD environment.











Thanks











Mike (Almost full time lurker)









Michael P. Williams 
Information Technology 
Carlyle
Van Lines 
(660)
747-8128 X 3816 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
www.carlylevanlines.com 















---APPLEBEE'S
INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE--- 
PRIVILEGED /
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be contained in this message or any attachments.
This information is strictly confidential and may be subject to attorney-client
privilege. This message is intended only for the use of the named addressee. If
you are not the intended recipient of this message, unauthorized forwarding,
printing, copying, distribution, or using such information is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this in error, you should
kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately destroy this message.
Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal
law. Applebee's International, Inc. reserves the right to monitor and review
the content of all messages sent to and from this e-mail address. Messages sent
to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Applebee's International,
Inc. e-mail system. 













---APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE--- 
PRIVILEGED / 
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be contained in this message or any attachments. 
This information is strictly confidential and may be subject to attorney-client 
privilege. This message is intended only for the use of the named addressee. If 
you are not the intended recipient of this message, unauthorized forwarding, 
printing, copying, distribution, or using such information is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have 

RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook Exchange

2006-01-17 Thread Active Directory
Title: Outlook Exchange



Just to add... You need to set the client Mail Account to 
DELIVER TO PST.
TOOLS | EMAIL ACCOUNTS | View Existing
Notice near the bottom of the window where it is 
titled:
 "Deliver new e-mail to the following 
location:
You can create a PST here and then point the delivery to 
the PST.

This is assuming you are using Outlook 
2003.

Nikki Peterson


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
patrickSent: Friday, January 13, 2006 10:33 AMTo: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook 
Exchange


NOBODY???





From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of patrickSent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:20 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] Outlook 
Exchange

Could someone please 
expand 
on how to setup a PST and how to get it to download to the pst so as not to stay 
on the email server?
Thanks


[ActiveDir] ADPrep Version Questions

2006-01-17 Thread Noah Eiger








Hi-



I am
preparing to upgrade a W2k domain to W2k3. I want to use the latest version of
ADPrep. I have found the following info and am confused:



For
ADPrep on the following -

From Windows Server 2003 CD:  5.2.3790.0 July
22, 2004, 9:07:08 AM

from WindowsServer2003-KB889101-SP1-x86-ENU.exe: 5.2.3790.1830 November 07, 2005,
5:48:59 PM

listed
in MSKB / Hotfix 3243925.2.3790.196 July 23, 2004,
9:04



Am I
reading that correctly: the one from SP1 is a lower version and later date than
the one in the hotfix? Which one is the latest?



Thanks.



--
nme








--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006
 


RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version Questions

2006-01-17 Thread joe



Are you asking if 1830  196 ?



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah 
EigerSent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 6:44 PMTo: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version 
Questions


Hi-

I am 
preparing to upgrade a W2k domain to W2k3. I want to use the latest version of 
ADPrep. I have found the following info and am 
confused:

For 
ADPrep on the following -
From 
Windows Server 2003 CD: 
 
5.2.3790.0 
July 22, 2004, 9:07:08 AM
from 
WindowsServer2003-KB889101-SP1-x86-ENU.exe: 
5.2.3790.1830 
November 07, 2005, 5:48:59 PM
listed 
in MSKB / Hotfix 324392  
 
 
5.2.3790.196 
July 23, 2004, 9:04

Am I 
reading that correctly: the one from SP1 is a lower version and later date than 
the one in the hotfix? Which one is the latest?

Thanks.

-- 
nme
--No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG 
Free Edition.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release 
Date: 1/16/2006


RE: [ActiveDir] Unresolved SIDs in ACL

2006-01-17 Thread joe
Title: Unresolved SIDs in ACL



Do the SIDs at least have the Domain portion of the SID 
correct? How far off are they from the real SID of the 
groups?


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:55 
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] 
Unresolved SIDs in ACL

I have a script, which creates a pre-defined OU 
structure, creates groups and permissions the OUs with these groups. The script 
performs these steps in the order given.
I have 2 test environments and have executed the 
script in each. 
In one environment (all w2k3 sp1 DCs, dfl and ffl=2), 
the script works fine and all OUs and ACEs/ACLs are correct. 
In the other environment (also w2k3 sp1 DCs and 
dfl/ffl=2) the script works fine but all new ACEs are shown as SIDs when viewed 
thru the ACL editor. Eventually, these unresolved SIDs are shown as 'account 
unknown'. I have used sidtoname (thanks joe!) and that shows that the SID cannot 
be resolved to a name (as expected, I guess).
I'm sure someone must have seen this strange 
behaviour before and has some suggestions. I would suspect the latter 
environment to be at blame, but it was only built very recently and is still 
pristine.
All suggestions very welcome. 
Thanks, neil 
___Neil RustonGlobal Technology 
InfrastructureNomura 
International plc
PLEASE READ: The 
information contained in this email is confidential and 
intended for the 
named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended 
recipient of this 
email please notify the sender immediately and delete your 
copy from your 
system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further 
action in reliance 
on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and 
Nomura International 
plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law, 
accept 
responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of, 

or (b) the presence 
of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling 
code in, this 
message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this 
email is sought then 
please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated 
this email: (1) is 
not, and should not be treated or relied upon as, 
investment research; 
(2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of 
the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended 
for informational 
purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or 
offer to buy or sell 
securities or related financial instruments. NIplc 
does not provide 
investment services to private customers. Authorised and 
regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority. Registered in England 
no. 1550505 VAT No. 
447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand, 
London, EC1A 4NP. A 
member of the Nomura group of companies. 


RE: [ActiveDir] Migrate domain to separate forest

2006-01-17 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
Just out of curiosity, why do they think they want their own forest?

In any case, there's no way that I'm aware of to carve off a domain and
make it a new forest root... I think you'll have to create the forest
and migrate the users and resources.

ADMT would seem to be a reasonable way to go. Or one of the commercial
migration products.

-g

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Wahlers
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:28 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Migrate domain to separate forest

Hello, colleagues,

One of our organizations is in their own domain, a child domain of our
root. They want to be in their own forest. Are there tools to migrate
them to their own separate forest, or will I need to build the forest
first, presumably with 2 new DC's, and then make all their servers join
the new forest? And, of course, they have about 140 users.

Thanks, folks.

-- 
Larry Wahlers
Concordia Technologies
The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
direct office line: (314) 996-1876
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


RE: [ActiveDir] LDAPS SRV Records?

2006-01-17 Thread joe



On the DNS server option, a couple of interesting things 
when I relooked at the API (on a lunch break this time Deji ;oP ) It doesn't let 
you specify the server to make the change on, only the server to send the FAZ 
(Find Auth Zone) request. I would have to play with that to see how that might 
cause an issue. Also Microsoft did something they don't normally do and they 
changed the da** format of the parameter between 2K/K3/XP and Vista/Longhorn. So 
I would have to add additional code to determine OS version. 


RE: the forreal. Well yes, someone could delete all 
records, but not with a single command from DNSSRVRec without specifying each 
SRV record individually. You can't do a zone *.*. Again, it doesn't look 
anything up, it simply sends the command you send so if you want all 
_ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.dom.com you can send that in a clear and bang they are 
gone, but you just asked for that to happen so I expect you would be 
disappointed if they didn't go away. Not sure why you would say /clear 
_ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.dom.com unless that is what you intended. Am I 
missing something here?

On the config file, that is exactly how nsupdate works now. 
It doesn't have the defaults that you mention in the 'also', but you can write 
to a file exactly what you want done for records and it does it. I am definitely 
working through my head possible variations that would be cool/fun to have for 
it though. 

I was pinged offline from a list member about the 
possibility of doing other types of records, not just SRV records. Can anyone 
see that being valuable to them and could you explain why? I am waiting for the 
response from that list member as well. The intent wasn't reallyto write a 
DNS management tool but I guess if nothing else is really fitting the bill, 
maybe its needed?




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kamlesh 
ParmarSent: Monday, January 16, 2006 5:17 PMTo: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] LDAPS SRV 
Records?
joe,Thanks for the link.As you mentioned, adding DNS 
server option turned out to be quite trickier, why not one server at a time. I 
know it makes sense to add/delete same records on multiple servers, but who says 
they can't be serialized. After all, it is not that time critical 
operation.For CLEAR switch, I was trying to say that, someone can 
accidentally delete ALL the records related to domain or site and make clients 
who are primarily pointing at that DNS server suffer, for the time those records 
are re registered/replicated back again.For config file, my idea was 
that, if you provide a way to specify server and read SRV operations from a 
file. (something like ldifde.exe). I could create a config file in which I 
could list down all the operations/records I want to manage. of course, this can 
be scripted and given to DNSSrvRec as command line options, but putting all 
together in a file where each operation is separated on single line, would give 
nice readability. (something like LDF file)Also, like adfind.exe if we can 
define some defaults for port,weight and ttl etc. in config file which are used 
for same RUN of the command.Currently what I am doing is, preparing a 
excel sheet containing all the sites in my forest and manually defining the 
priority order in which clients in each site will get authenticated by DCs (like 
first same site DCs, then nearest site DCs, basically making sure clients never 
have to look for generic SRV records). Afterwards based on this sheet, I will 
prepare a list of SRV records to create/delete on each DNS server and push those 
SRV records to respective servers.--Kamlesh
On 1/16/06, joe 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

  Hi 
  Kamlesh, you can get the initial version at 
  http://www.joeware.net/win/free/tools/DNSSrvRec.htm.I posted it to 
  the site last night and announced on my blog, there are over 50 
  downloadsalready which surprises me a bit. 
  
  The 
  initial version does not let you specify the DNS Server to make the change in. 
  I had started to add it and backed out as I wanted to think over the whole SOA 
  portion of it plus if I want to handle sending to multiple servers at the same 
  time and how to handle the errors coming back. This is all I have for 
  specifying specific servers at the moment, a commented out insertion to 
  validate the command.
  
  // 
  ValidOptions.push_back(L"dnssrv"); 
  // Which DNS Server(s)
  Not sure 
  what you are hoping for out of the clear option in terms of forreal. The tool 
  doesn't look records up first and then clear then one by one. It simply 
  sendsa singleclear command for the DNS Name, that is an option for 
  one of the functions. Having a forreal option would only basically echo what 
  you sent in via the parameters. I might consider having it try to pull the 
  record first and then display what would get wiped out. But that brings up 
  even more questions on the specifyingmultiple DNS servers 
  thoughts.
  
  Like 

RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version Questions

2006-01-17 Thread Noah Eiger








yes













From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
3:48 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep
Version Questions





Are you asking if 1830  196 ?











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
6:44 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] ADPrep
Version Questions

Hi-



I am
preparing to upgrade a W2k domain to W2k3. I want to use the latest version of
ADPrep. I have found the following info and am confused:



For
ADPrep on the following -

From Windows Server 2003 CD:

5.2.3790.0
July 22, 2004, 9:07:08 AM

from WindowsServer2003-KB889101-SP1-x86-ENU.exe:
5.2.3790.1830
November 07, 2005, 5:48:59 PM

listed
in MSKB / Hotfix 324392 


5.2.3790.196 July
23, 2004, 9:04



Am I
reading that correctly: the one from SP1 is a lower version and later date than
the one in the hotfix? Which one is the latest?



Thanks.



--
nme



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006










--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006
 

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006
 


RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version Questions

2006-01-17 Thread joe



one thousand eight hundred and thirty is greater than one 
hundred ninety six. The SP1 version is the most recent and highest version of 
adprep. 

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
...
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
...
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
...

 joe


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah 
EigerSent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 7:12 PMTo: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version 
Questions


yes






From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 
2006 3:48 PMTo: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version 
Questions

Are you asking if 1830  196 
?





From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Noah 
EigerSent: Tuesday, January 
17, 2006 6:44 PMTo: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version 
Questions
Hi-

I am 
preparing to upgrade a W2k domain to W2k3. I want to use the latest version of 
ADPrep. I have found the following info and am 
confused:

For 
ADPrep on the following -
From 
Windows Server 2003 CD: 
 
5.2.3790.0 
July 22, 2004, 9:07:08 AM
from 
WindowsServer2003-KB889101-SP1-x86-ENU.exe: 
5.2.3790.1830 
November 07, 2005, 5:48:59 PM
listed 
in MSKB / Hotfix 324392  
 
 
5.2.3790.196 
July 23, 2004, 9:04

Am I 
reading that correctly: the one from SP1 is a lower version and later date than 
the one in the hotfix? Which one is the latest?

Thanks.

-- 
nme

--No 
virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Free 
Edition.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 
1/16/2006
--No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG 
Free Edition.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release 
Date: 1/16/2006
--No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG 
Free Edition.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release 
Date: 1/16/2006


RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version Questions

2006-01-17 Thread Noah Eiger








Oh (blush)



Dont mind me. Im just over here re-learning that
whole tens, hundreds, thousands, etc thing. 



Ugh! (eyes roll skyward, head shakes)



;-)



Sorry for the wasted bandwidth.













From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
5:27 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep
Version Questions





one thousand eight hundred and thirty is greater than one hundred
ninety six. The SP1 version is the most recent and highest version of adprep. 



0

1

2

3

4

5

6

...

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

...

1826

1827

1828

1829

1830

1831

1832

1833

1834

1835

...



 joe









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
7:12 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep
Version Questions

yes













From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
3:48 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep
Version Questions





Are you asking if 1830  196 ?











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
6:44 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] ADPrep
Version Questions

Hi-



I am
preparing to upgrade a W2k domain to W2k3. I want to use the latest version of
ADPrep. I have found the following info and am confused:



For
ADPrep on the following -

From Windows Server 2003 CD:

5.2.3790.0
July 22, 2004, 9:07:08 AM

from WindowsServer2003-KB889101-SP1-x86-ENU.exe:
5.2.3790.1830
November 07, 2005, 5:48:59 PM

listed
in MSKB / Hotfix 324392 


5.2.3790.196 July
23, 2004, 9:04



Am I
reading that correctly: the one from SP1 is a lower version and later date than
the one in the hotfix? Which one is the latest?



Thanks.



--
nme



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006










--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006
 

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006