LTO drive VS 3590E1A
Hello to you... Everybody saying that LTO Ultrium drive is a latest drive technology that why we quoting to this to replace our existing tape library, can you please provide me info regarding the LTO vs 3590 comparisons in terms of accessibility, availability, performance, etc. regards, Zosi Noriega
Re: Select statement
I tried that. filespace_name still wrapped. I selected enough fields so that the output looks like this... NODE: HOC08F5001 SPACE_MB: 704.00 PCT_USED: 91.20 FILESPACE: /export/AIX433_ML BACKUP_START: 2000-10-03 00:25:39.00 BACKUP_END: 2000-10-03 00:25:46.00 I xfer this data to OS/390 and using REXX, I create the report I want. -Original Message- From: John Monahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 6:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Select statement You can also: select cast(filespace_name as char(40)) as Filespace Name.. John Monahan Senior Consultant Enterprise Solutions Computech Resources, Inc. Office: 952-833-0930 ext 109 Cell: 952-484-5435 http://www.compures.com Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/16/2002 07:11 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Select statement Are you asking how to increase the width so that the file space name doesn't wrap to multiple lines? While this example doesn't wrap, it does illustrate a method you can use to adjust the output column widths. STANDARD WIDTH: select filespace_name, node_name, capacity from filespaces FILESPACE_NAME NODE_NAME CAPACITY -- -- \\raibeck\c$ RAIBECK 44481.4 CUSTOM WIDTH (40 columns for FILESPACE_NAME): select filespace_name as FILESPACE NAME , node_name, capacity from filespaces FILESPACE NAME NODE_NAME CAPACITY -- \\raibeck\c$ RAIBECK 44481.4 Note: The as specification for FILESPACE_NAME is padded with blanks to bring the entire column width to 40. When running in batch mode, if you want the display to appear in tabular format rather than list format, put the select command in a macro, say, select.mac. Then invoke dsmadmc like this: dsmadmc -id=adminid -pa=x -displaymode=table macro select.mac or like this this to redirect output to a file: dsmadmc -id=adminid -pa=x -displaymode=table macro select.mac select.out 21 Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. From: Hunley, Ike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Select statement Hi all, I hope someone out there has the answer for this. How do I increase the output field size for filespace_name so I can output the filespace_name along with quantity and node_name? Thanks Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect the views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
Re: WARNING about Tivoli 4.2.1.0: .0 means none of the bugs found yet
The actual production release we put in production was not 4.2.1.0. I believe it was 4.2.1.1. We have the same fear of anything .0 . We had to install TSM 4.2.1.9 because both the WEB client and the Admin interface caused S0C4 abends in the OS/390 TSM Server. We are now experiencing NT clients refusing connection due to down level client code. I downloaded TSM 4.2.1.10 based on advice from IBM. This is supposed to correct this problem. In the mean time the NT Admins have been upgrading to TSM client 4.2.1 . Question: Are TSM admins usually responsible for installing TSM client code, or is that task given to each platform Admin? -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WARNING about Tivoli 4.2.1.0: .0 means none of the bugs foun d yet I would never install a x.x.x.0 release in production unless Tivoli had categorical proof that it was absolutely solid. Typically, I wait 3 months after it is generally available and do some APAR searches to see where the problems are. I typically wait until x.x.x.2 or .3 before I put in production. Remember everyone is installing the stuff in a test area that has many TB at stake and verifying the product works correctly before the deploy to production. They are the ones generating the initial problems that are fixed and they do a lot of testing. -Original Message- From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WARNING about Tivoli 4.2.1.0 Dough, Did u put 4.2.1.9 Fix and try ,because I feel 3.7.0 also had problems .But after updating fixes it went well. So could u pl tell us did they say even after updating to 4.2.1.9 u may face problems? Because it will help me know what else I need to look at later . Thanks Balanand -Original Message- From: James, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 7:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WARNING about Tivoli 4.2.1.0 We tested 4.2.1.0 for a month, and then applied it in production. After two weeks in production, TSM died. After sending IBM lots of data dumps, the IBM help desk admitted that there were KNOWN BUGS in 4.2.1.0. Our choices were to backlevel to an older version of TSM, or move ahead to a BETA version, 4.2.1.9, that was supposed to fix our problem. We have been running this Beta for about two months, but it is scary to be on the bleeding edge. I do not understand why Tivoli would put out code with major known problems. Doug James -Original Message- From: Robert Ouzen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 3:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Novell performance issue Hi George From where did you get 4.2.1.24 Client I found only from Tivoli 4.2.1.0 ( IP22371.exe) T.I.A Regards Robert Ouzen \\\/// / _ _ \ (| (.) (.) |) +--oOOo--()--oOOo-+ || | Ouzen Robert | | Helpdesk Manager| | Haifa University | || | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Work : 972-4-8240345 | || +--oooO-+ ( ) Oooo. \ ( ( ) \_) ) / (_/ -Original Message- From: Jason Mount [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 7:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Novell performance issue George, I was using the 4.2.1.0 NW client and the SMDR/TSA that came with SP3 for NW 5.1. After going to 4.2.1.24 client and TSA5up7, a lot of my TSM error messages and performance problems went away. I am too scared of Beta files, but I have about 40 NW 5.1 servers running it and no burps from these SMDR/TSA files yet. Sugguest you try them out on a few non-critical systems and then go roll them out. - Original Message - From: Brandon Eckmann/NS/WSC [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:41 PM Subject: Re: Novell performance issue George, I've been at TSA500 5.4 and SMDR 5.5 for 4 months now with no problems running with DSMC ver4 rel2 level 1.7. Brandon Eckmann Network and Technology Services Wayne State College Wayne NE. |-+ | | George Lesho | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | Sent by: ADSM: | | | Dist Stor| | | Manager | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | .EDU| | |
Re: dsmserv restore db problem with 3494 libr
a further APAR to the problem: APAR Identifier .. IC31865 Last Changed 01/11/09 UNABLE TO USE 3494 LIBRARY FOR RESTORE DB. HAVE TO DEFINE DRIVE WITHIN 3494 AS TYPE MANUAL TO COMPLETE DB RESTORE. Symptom .. IN INCORROUT Status ... CLOSED PER Severity ... 3 Date Closed . 01/11/09 Component .. 5698TSMAX Duplicate of Reported Release . 410 Fixed Release 999 Component Name TSM AIX SERVER Special Notice Current Target Date .. Flags SCP ... AIXRSC Platform AIX Status Detail: Not Available PE PTF List: PTF List: Release 410 : PTF not available yet Release 420 : PTF not available yet Parent APAR: Child APAR list: IC32146 IC32147 IC32148 IC32149 ERROR DESCRIPTION: A 3494 library cannot be used when performing a TSM server restore db. To complete a db restore using a drive in a 3494 you have to define the library as type manual and a drive within the 3494 as belonging to this manual library. The db restore tape(s) then has to be loaded into the drive manually (or via mtlib). This restriction needs to be removed. TSM servers should be able to use the full library function of a 3494 for db restores. Initial Impact: Medium LOCAL FIX: Define the library as type manual. PROBLEM SUMMARY: * USERS AFFECTED: Users whose database backup volumes are * * in a 3494 library* * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: The 3494 cannot be used with the* * RESTORE DB command, but the volumes * * can be loaded by changing the devconfig * * file to use a manual library, with* * the backup vols in that library.* * RECOMMENDATION: * The problem is a bug in the code that references the very database that is being restored by RESTORE DB. PROBLEM CONCLUSION: The bug is removed. -Original Message- From: Richard Cowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dsmserv restore db problem with 3494 libr Matching APARs. Note the dates and closed status. These are for 3.7 and 4.1. Pretty confusing. Does someone have a newer APAR? APAR= IC29523 SER=IN INCORROUT DATABASE RESTORE WILL FAIL FOR 3494 LIBRARY IF THE LIBTYPE IS NOT MANUAL IN THE DEVCONFIG FILE. Status: CLOSED Closed: 02/20/01 Apar Information: RCOMP= 5698TSMSUTSM SUN/SOL SER RREL= R410 FCOMP= PFREL= F TREL= T SRLS: Return Codes: Applicable Component Level/SU: Error Description: When performing a database restore using a device class associated with a 3494 library, the restore will fail with the following errors: ANR8416E DEFINE LIBRARY: The DEVICE parameter is invalid for library type MANUAL. ANRD admdbbk.c(4144): Error 272 creating device class 3590CLASS. The error above indicates that the libtype specified in the DEFINE LIBRARY command is manual, however, from the device configuration file we can see that this is not accurate: /* Device Configuration */ DEFINE DEVCLASS 3590CLASS DEVTYPE=3590 FORMAT=DRIVE MOUNTLIMIT=DRIVES MOUNTWAIT=60 MOUNTRETENTION=60 PREFIX=ADSM LIBRARY=3494 DEFINE LIBRARY 3494 LIBTYPE=349X DEVICE=3494 PRIVATECATEGORY=300 SCRATCHCATEGORY=301 SHARED=NO DEFINE DRIVE 3494 DRIVE1 DEVICE=//dev/rmt/0st ONLINE=YES . Based on the information in the device configuration file, the ANR8416E message is clearly erroneous. In order to successfully restore the database using the 3494 library, the customer must change the libtype in the DEFINE LIBRARY command to manual. The volume(s) required for the restore must then be mounted in the appopriate drive via mtlib. . To recreate this problem: 1. Create a devconfig file using the DEFINE DEVCLASS, DEFINE LIBRARY and DEFINE DRIVE commands listed above. 2. Attempt a database restore using the 3590CLASS device class (i.e. dsmserv restore db devclass=3590CLASS) . This problem has been seen on AIX and Solaris with the TSM 3.7.x and 4.1.x levels of Server code. APAR= IC31194 SER=DD DOC THE TSM SERVER MANUALS DO NOT INDICATE THAT A DATABASE RESTORE CAN ONLY BE PERFORMED WITH A LIBTYPE OF MANUAL OR SCSI Status: CLOSED Closed: 10/01/01 Apar Information: RCOMP= 5698TSMAXTSM AIX SERVER RREL= R410 FCOMP=
Re: WARNING about Tivoli 4.2.1.0: .0 means none of the bugs found yet
I give client installation, maintenance, AND MONITORING, to the platform administrators. I work with them to get them going and help as needed. We give them the means to backup their data. But it is still their data. I work with them and setup all the schedules, client and Admin. Matt -Original Message- From: Hunley, Ike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 7:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WARNING about Tivoli 4.2.1.0: .0 means none of the bugs found yet The actual production release we put in production was not 4.2.1.0. I believe it was 4.2.1.1. We have the same fear of anything .0 . We had to install TSM 4.2.1.9 because both the WEB client and the Admin interface caused S0C4 abends in the OS/390 TSM Server. We are now experiencing NT clients refusing connection due to down level client code. I downloaded TSM 4.2.1.10 based on advice from IBM. This is supposed to correct this problem. In the mean time the NT Admins have been upgrading to TSM client 4.2.1 . Question: Are TSM admins usually responsible for installing TSM client code, or is that task given to each platform Admin? -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WARNING about Tivoli 4.2.1.0: .0 means none of the bugs foun d yet I would never install a x.x.x.0 release in production unless Tivoli had categorical proof that it was absolutely solid. Typically, I wait 3 months after it is generally available and do some APAR searches to see where the problems are. I typically wait until x.x.x.2 or .3 before I put in production. Remember everyone is installing the stuff in a test area that has many TB at stake and verifying the product works correctly before the deploy to production. They are the ones generating the initial problems that are fixed and they do a lot of testing. -Original Message- From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WARNING about Tivoli 4.2.1.0 Dough, Did u put 4.2.1.9 Fix and try ,because I feel 3.7.0 also had problems .But after updating fixes it went well. So could u pl tell us did they say even after updating to 4.2.1.9 u may face problems? Because it will help me know what else I need to look at later . Thanks Balanand -Original Message- From: James, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 7:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WARNING about Tivoli 4.2.1.0 We tested 4.2.1.0 for a month, and then applied it in production. After two weeks in production, TSM died. After sending IBM lots of data dumps, the IBM help desk admitted that there were KNOWN BUGS in 4.2.1.0. Our choices were to backlevel to an older version of TSM, or move ahead to a BETA version, 4.2.1.9, that was supposed to fix our problem. We have been running this Beta for about two months, but it is scary to be on the bleeding edge. I do not understand why Tivoli would put out code with major known problems. Doug James -Original Message- From: Robert Ouzen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 3:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Novell performance issue Hi George From where did you get 4.2.1.24 Client I found only from Tivoli 4.2.1.0 ( IP22371.exe) T.I.A Regards Robert Ouzen \\\/// / _ _ \ (| (.) (.) |) +--oOOo--()--oOOo-+ || | Ouzen Robert | | Helpdesk Manager| | Haifa University | || | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Work : 972-4-8240345 | || +--oooO-+ ( ) Oooo. \ ( ( ) \_) ) / (_/ -Original Message- From: Jason Mount [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 7:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Novell performance issue George, I was using the 4.2.1.0 NW client and the SMDR/TSA that came with SP3 for NW 5.1. After going to 4.2.1.24 client and TSA5up7, a lot of my TSM error messages and performance problems went away. I am too scared of Beta files, but I have about 40 NW 5.1 servers running it and no burps from these SMDR/TSA files yet. Sugguest you try them out on a few non-critical systems and then go roll them out. - Original Message - From: Brandon Eckmann/NS/WSC [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:41 PM Subject: Re: Novell performance issue George, I've been at TSA500 5.4 and SMDR 5.5 for
Re: LTO drive VS 3590E1A
IBM marketing has always done a great job at preventing side-by-side comparisons on their specifications sheets. They often list different performance specifications. As far as I can tell, the IBM 3580 Ultrium drive holds an impressive 100GB native (2:1 compression) whereas the IBM 3590-E1A can only hold 40GB native with the extended cartridges (3:1 compression). IBM also publishes a sustained data transfer rate of 15MB/second on the Ultrium, making it faster than the 3590-E1A's maximum drive data rate of 14MB/second. Having said that... my IBM storage representative says that the 3494 library is a more industrial tape library intended for larger enterprise environments than the Ultrium 3584 tape library. IBM offers and supports extended utilities for the 3494, such as StorWatch Expert software. Also, the 3494 library and 3590-E1A tape drives can be FC-AL attached. Currently, the Ultrium 3580s can not. But, I must admit that for the GB/sq. foot the LTO 3584 is very nice. I've worked with both libraries and they are both among the top in the industry. Here are the specifications links... http://www.storage.ibm.com/hardsoft/tape/3494/prod_data/g225-6601.html http://www.storage.ibm.com/hardsoft/tape/3584/prod_data/g225-6853.html Hope that helps! Regards, Chris Neumeyer -Original Message- From: Zosimo Noriega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 4:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LTO drive VS 3590E1A Hello to you... Everybody saying that LTO Ultrium drive is a latest drive technology that why we quoting to this to replace our existing tape library, can you please provide me info regarding the LTO vs 3590 comparisons in terms of accessibility, availability, performance, etc. regards, Zosi Noriega
Re: LTO drive VS 3590E1A
-Original Message- From: Zosimo Noriega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 4:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LTO drive VS 3590E1A Hello to you... Everybody saying that LTO Ultrium drive is a latest drive technology that why we quoting to this to replace our existing tape library, can you please provide me info regarding the LTO vs 3590 comparisons in terms of accessibility, availability, performance, etc. regards, Zosi Noriega
TDP for Exchange
Hi *SM-ers! We are looking at TDP for Exchange for backing up our Exchange servers. The backups should be kept for 3 weeks. I'm looking for a correct TSM policy definition. The easiest way to do this is defining a backup copygroup with retonly=21 and retextra=21. However, I think this is not save. A full backup on day 1 will be deleted on day 22, so all incrementals after this full (day 2,3,4,5,6 and 7) are then also useless! So one cannot go back 3 weeks in this case. What is the best way to guarantee a 3 week retention? Another small issue I detected: The TDP for Exchange manual states: After the storage group and logs are successfully backed up, the log files are deleted. In our case there are always 4 log files left behind after a full backup. Is that normal behavior? Thanks in advance for any reply!! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
Re: Select statement
I think you'll also need to specify SET SQLDISPLAYMODE WIDE. Bill Boyer DSS, Inc. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Monahan Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 6:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Select statement You can also: select cast(filespace_name as char(40)) as Filespace Name.. John Monahan Senior Consultant Enterprise Solutions Computech Resources, Inc. Office: 952-833-0930 ext 109 Cell: 952-484-5435 http://www.compures.com Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/16/2002 07:11 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Select statement Are you asking how to increase the width so that the file space name doesn't wrap to multiple lines? While this example doesn't wrap, it does illustrate a method you can use to adjust the output column widths. STANDARD WIDTH: select filespace_name, node_name, capacity from filespaces FILESPACE_NAME NODE_NAME CAPACITY -- -- \\raibeck\c$ RAIBECK 44481.4 CUSTOM WIDTH (40 columns for FILESPACE_NAME): select filespace_name as FILESPACE NAME , node_name, capacity from filespaces FILESPACE NAME NODE_NAME CAPACITY -- \\raibeck\c$ RAIBECK 44481.4 Note: The as specification for FILESPACE_NAME is padded with blanks to bring the entire column width to 40. When running in batch mode, if you want the display to appear in tabular format rather than list format, put the select command in a macro, say, select.mac. Then invoke dsmadmc like this: dsmadmc -id=adminid -pa=x -displaymode=table macro select.mac or like this this to redirect output to a file: dsmadmc -id=adminid -pa=x -displaymode=table macro select.mac select.out 21 Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. From: Hunley, Ike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Select statement Hi all, I hope someone out there has the answer for this. How do I increase the output field size for filespace_name so I can output the filespace_name along with quantity and node_name? Thanks
TDP for Domino
I would like to hear from anyone backing up Domino databases with the TDP and relay their experience as it relates to backup/restores. Ours are on WIN2K only. I'm wondering what seems to be the easiest, or best practice, procedures. What kinds of backups are you doing? What book did you find the best examples for scripts? Thanks, Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (888) 997-9614
Re: Many files updated every night
Hmmm, I've seen this behaviour before on dos/windows filesystems mounted under Linux. Guess what, q file SI_GIULIA gives just one entry: Node Name Filespace FSID Platform FilespaceIs Capacity Pct Name Type Filespace (MB) Util Unicode? --- --- - - - SI_GIULIA /mnt/win 1 Linux86 VFAT No 3,090.4 72.1 ^^ Guess this is can only be solved by changing the behaviour of linux on mounted dos filesystems Hello, Server 4.2.1.8 on AIX 4.3.3 Client 4.2.1.0 on Linux86 Every night almost every file on the machine is updated according to TSM: 02/18/02 13:05:26 ANE4952I (Session: 8234, Node: SI_GIULIA) Total number of objects inspected: 24,410 02/18/02 13:05:26 ANE4954I (Session: 8234, Node: SI_GIULIA) Total number of objects backed up: 302 02/18/02 13:05:26 ANE4958I (Session: 8234, Node: SI_GIULIA) Total number of objects updated: 22,861 02/19/02 13:02:32 ANE4952I (Session: 10891, Node: SI_GIULIA) Total number of objects inspected: 24,392 02/19/02 13:02:32 ANE4954I (Session: 10891, Node: SI_GIULIA) Total number of objects backed up: 0 02/19/02 13:02:32 ANE4958I (Session: 10891, Node: SI_GIULIA) Total number of objects updated: 23,161 This is just a laptop and not much ever changes on it. Certainly no one is changing the permissions and/or ownership of 23,000 files every night. First I thought it was a bug in the Linux client, but we have more clients on this level and this is the only one that behaves like this. Has anyone seen this before? Regards, Alexander -- --- Alexander Verkooijen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Systems Programmer SARA High Performance Computing -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdam High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams
Many files updated every night
Hello, Server 4.2.1.8 on AIX 4.3.3 Client 4.2.1.0 on Linux86 Every night almost every file on the machine is updated according to TSM: 02/18/02 13:05:26 ANE4952I (Session: 8234, Node: SI_GIULIA) Total number of objects inspected: 24,410 02/18/02 13:05:26 ANE4954I (Session: 8234, Node: SI_GIULIA) Total number of objects backed up: 302 02/18/02 13:05:26 ANE4958I (Session: 8234, Node: SI_GIULIA) Total number of objects updated: 22,861 02/19/02 13:02:32 ANE4952I (Session: 10891, Node: SI_GIULIA) Total number of objects inspected: 24,392 02/19/02 13:02:32 ANE4954I (Session: 10891, Node: SI_GIULIA) Total number of objects backed up: 0 02/19/02 13:02:32 ANE4958I (Session: 10891, Node: SI_GIULIA) Total number of objects updated: 23,161 This is just a laptop and not much ever changes on it. Certainly no one is changing the permissions and/or ownership of 23,000 files every night. First I thought it was a bug in the Linux client, but we have more clients on this level and this is the only one that behaves like this. Has anyone seen this before? Regards, Alexander -- --- Alexander Verkooijen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Systems Programmer SARA High Performance Computing
More than one storage pool backing up to a single copypool.
All, Is it possible to have two storage pool's backup to the same copy storage pool? I don't see anything in the manuals saying yes or no. We currently have a 'TAPEPOOL' which is backed up to a 'COPYPOOL' . Then the 'COPYPOOL' tapes are sent offsite. The original intention of our TSM installation was for backup of 'server' data only. The 'TAPEPOOL' uses collocation. Recently a growing number of executives have asked to have their desktops installed as TSM clients. My problem is that right now each of these desktops will hog an entire volume because of the collocation. What I would like to do is create a 'TAPEPOOL_PC' which has collocation turned off and does a backup to the existing 'COPYPOOL'. Thank You, Jon Martin
Re: More than one storage pool backing up to a single copypool.
Yes you can do what you requested. Many primary pools, both collocated and uncollocated can backup to one uncollated COPYPOOL. David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/19/02 09:55AM All, Is it possible to have two storage pool's backup to the same copy storage pool? I don't see anything in the manuals saying yes or no. We currently have a 'TAPEPOOL' which is backed up to a 'COPYPOOL' . Then the 'COPYPOOL' tapes are sent offsite. The original intention of our TSM installation was for backup of 'server' data only. The 'TAPEPOOL' uses collocation. Recently a growing number of executives have asked to have their desktops installed as TSM clients. My problem is that right now each of these desktops will hog an entire volume because of the collocation. What I would like to do is create a 'TAPEPOOL_PC' which has collocation turned off and does a backup to the existing 'COPYPOOL'. Thank You, Jon Martin MMS health-first.org made the following annotations on 02/19/02 10:16:45 -- This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ==
Re: More than one storage pool backing up to a single copypool.
Absolutely, but you get what you ask for, it may not be what you want. Typically, where it is used is a primary disk pool with a next pool (tape), with a next pool (tape), etc. This group of storage would be propogated to a storage copy pool in order as documented in the manual. There is no issue also with having multiple primary pool with next pool groups to a single copy pool. -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: More than one storage pool backing up to a single copypool. All, Is it possible to have two storage pool's backup to the same copy storage pool? I don't see anything in the manuals saying yes or no. We currently have a 'TAPEPOOL' which is backed up to a 'COPYPOOL' . Then the 'COPYPOOL' tapes are sent offsite. The original intention of our TSM installation was for backup of 'server' data only. The 'TAPEPOOL' uses collocation. Recently a growing number of executives have asked to have their desktops installed as TSM clients. My problem is that right now each of these desktops will hog an entire volume because of the collocation. What I would like to do is create a 'TAPEPOOL_PC' which has collocation turned off and does a backup to the existing 'COPYPOOL'. Thank You, Jon Martin
Re: How do you secure the passwd in a TSM admin command run a vi a batch script
expect works really well if you are used to TCL/c-shell type logic. If you are more of a ksh person, or already know perl you will probably prefer the perl version. It works well if you are running it from AIX or Solaris. HP/UX handles tty's in a strange fashion, and perl expect does not work there. If you are an HP/UX shop there is perl Net::Telnet. It runs on the three platforms I have tested, but as the name implies, you are opening a new telnet session under your current process, so you need to provide logon credentials as well as the TSM credentials. Once you are connected though, it is very powerful. My personal preference is to run everything from an AIX base, and if I need to do something on an HP box I use perl expect to control /usr/bin/telnet to the HP box. grin If you decide to use the perl expect you might want to borrow a copy of the O'Rielly Expect book (sorry, I can't remember the name) to read once for concepts. The perl version works well, but is not as thoroughly documented. - Kai On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 12:29:33 -0800, Alex Paschal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you like, you can use something like expect to script your dsmadmc commands. For applications that block regular STDIN piping and redirecting, like telnet or dsmadmc, expect does the magic tty swapping that's necessary to feed the password into the password prompt so it won't show in the ps. I don't know much more about it because it's a little higher powered programming than I've done in years, but if the security is that important to you, it might be worth your time. Here's the web site. http://expect.nist.gov/ There's also a Perl version, but I don't know how good it's cross-platform functionality is. http://search.cpan.org/search?dist=Expect
Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000
The drives have the newest microcode. -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 This really sounds like down level microcode in the drives. -Original Message- From: Gloeer, Kirsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 We haven't tried it with SCSI drives and NTutil. We've tried it with SAN drives and NTutil and with and without the TSM drivers. Kirsten -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 6:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 Remember, TSM takes control of the drives with its driver. The Magstar driver is overridden. The TSM driver is not compatible with NTUTIL to my knowledge. There are also specific ways the drivers have to be installed. Have you tried doing this with SCSI drives and NTUTIL and the TSM drivers? I am guessing not. I am presuming that you have already installed the TSM SAN agent and configured the drives. If not, then the Magstar driver is in control. -Original Message- From: Gloeer, Kirsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 4:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 - TSM Server connected to the SAN via Fibre and TCP/IP connection to LAN Yes. - 3494 library connected directly to the SAN via Fibre Yes. - NT4 Server(s) connected to SAN via Fibre and TCP/IP connection to LAN Yes. On the Win4 server can you see the SAN attached drives and access them? With the EMULEX driver 4.4.52 it was possible to see the drives. However, it wasn't possible to access the drives. With the EMULEX driver 4.4.53a it is neither possible to see the drives nor to access them. Can the current (LAN path) client access the TSM server (manual backup from desktop) and can the TSM GUI see all the SAN drives (mappings - should be the same when viewing mappings through explorer) The TSM client was deinstalled. He could access the TSM server on the LAN path. regards, Kirsten -Original Message- From: Joe Cascanette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 Could you describe your layout abit: ie: - TSM Server connected to the SAN via Fibre and TCP/IP connection to LAN - 3494 library connected directly to the SAN via Fibre (or connected via SCSI to TSM Server) - NT4 Server(s) connected to SAN via Fibre and TCP/IP connection to LAN On the Win4 server can you see the SAN attached drives and access them? Can the current (LAN path) client access the TSM server (manual backup from desktop) and can the TSM GUI see all the SAN drives (mappings - should be the same when viewing mappings through explorer) Joe -Original Message- From: Gloeer, Kirsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 We use this fibre card with WinNT 4 SL6. I tried to use NTutil but without success. Any hints? Kirsten -Original Message- From: Joe Cascanette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 I am using this fibre card for both windows NT 4 and Windows 2000 ADV svr (connected to a SAN). There are different drivers for Win2000 (but win2000 picks up the LP8000 - you need to change this - use update driver and tell it to use Windows update). You also require a different client to backup directly to tape (LAN FREE) (see SAN storage agent guide), however if this path is not found it will use the LAN path to get to the diskpools. Not sure about the RS/6000, but if it is attached to the SAN with your library then why not?! Server - Windows2000 TSM v4.2.1.6 Joe -Original Message- From: Gloeer, Kirsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 6:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 Hi, We have problems to backup a NT Server via SAN with an Emulex LP8000 adapter to a 3494 library with 3590E1A tape drives. Has anyone tried this? It is possible to access disks from the NT server via SAN and it is possible to access the 3590E1A drives via an RS/6000. Best regards, Kirsten Glver Commerzbank AG ZIT P 5.22 Mainzer Landstr. 15160327 Frankfurt Tel.: 069/136-22505 Fax: 069/136-25059
Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000
Time to call 1-800-its-brok. -Original Message- From: Gloeer, Kirsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 The drives have the newest microcode. -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 This really sounds like down level microcode in the drives. -Original Message- From: Gloeer, Kirsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 We haven't tried it with SCSI drives and NTutil. We've tried it with SAN drives and NTutil and with and without the TSM drivers. Kirsten -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 6:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 Remember, TSM takes control of the drives with its driver. The Magstar driver is overridden. The TSM driver is not compatible with NTUTIL to my knowledge. There are also specific ways the drivers have to be installed. Have you tried doing this with SCSI drives and NTUTIL and the TSM drivers? I am guessing not. I am presuming that you have already installed the TSM SAN agent and configured the drives. If not, then the Magstar driver is in control. -Original Message- From: Gloeer, Kirsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 4:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 - TSM Server connected to the SAN via Fibre and TCP/IP connection to LAN Yes. - 3494 library connected directly to the SAN via Fibre Yes. - NT4 Server(s) connected to SAN via Fibre and TCP/IP connection to LAN Yes. On the Win4 server can you see the SAN attached drives and access them? With the EMULEX driver 4.4.52 it was possible to see the drives. However, it wasn't possible to access the drives. With the EMULEX driver 4.4.53a it is neither possible to see the drives nor to access them. Can the current (LAN path) client access the TSM server (manual backup from desktop) and can the TSM GUI see all the SAN drives (mappings - should be the same when viewing mappings through explorer) The TSM client was deinstalled. He could access the TSM server on the LAN path. regards, Kirsten -Original Message- From: Joe Cascanette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 Could you describe your layout abit: ie: - TSM Server connected to the SAN via Fibre and TCP/IP connection to LAN - 3494 library connected directly to the SAN via Fibre (or connected via SCSI to TSM Server) - NT4 Server(s) connected to SAN via Fibre and TCP/IP connection to LAN On the Win4 server can you see the SAN attached drives and access them? Can the current (LAN path) client access the TSM server (manual backup from desktop) and can the TSM GUI see all the SAN drives (mappings - should be the same when viewing mappings through explorer) Joe -Original Message- From: Gloeer, Kirsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 We use this fibre card with WinNT 4 SL6. I tried to use NTutil but without success. Any hints? Kirsten -Original Message- From: Joe Cascanette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 I am using this fibre card for both windows NT 4 and Windows 2000 ADV svr (connected to a SAN). There are different drivers for Win2000 (but win2000 picks up the LP8000 - you need to change this - use update driver and tell it to use Windows update). You also require a different client to backup directly to tape (LAN FREE) (see SAN storage agent guide), however if this path is not found it will use the LAN path to get to the diskpools. Not sure about the RS/6000, but if it is attached to the SAN with your library then why not?! Server - Windows2000 TSM v4.2.1.6 Joe -Original Message- From: Gloeer, Kirsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 6:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000 Hi, We have problems to backup a NT Server via SAN with an Emulex LP8000 adapter to a 3494 library with 3590E1A tape drives. Has anyone tried this? It is possible to access disks from the NT server via SAN and it is possible to access the 3590E1A drives via an RS/6000. Best regards, Kirsten Glver Commerzbank AG ZIT P 5.22 Mainzer Landstr. 15160327 Frankfurt Tel.: 069/136-22505 Fax: 069/136-25059
Re: Installing multiple BA clients on Solaris
Hi NiklasYou can either choose to install multiple ba-clients in diffent directories.You can also create different dsm.opt files (server1.opt, server2.opt and so on), and the specify which opt-file to use with /optfile:.You can also use the same optfile for different nodes, using the servername parameter in dsm.opt(see exampel below):ServerName ADSM1Nodename Client1TCPServerAddress 192.168.10.1SCHEDMODE promtpedServerName ADSM2Nodename Client2TCPServerAddress 192.168.10.1SCHEDMODE pollingPasswordaccess generate.All of the examples below can also be used with the scheduler service. All you have to do is either specify optfile using /optfile: or specify node settings to use with -servername option.Best RegardsDaniel Sparrman---Daniel SparrmanExist i Stockholm ABBergkllavgen 31D192 79 SOLLENTUNAVxel: 08 - 754 98 00Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51Niklas Lundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]2002-02-19 10:36Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: bcc: Subject: Installing multiple BA clients on Solaris HelloIs it possible to install multiple BA-clients on Solaris and how do I do it?MVHNiklas LundstrmFreningssparbanken IT08-5859 5164
Re: LTO drive VS 3590E1A
Awesome. I'm glad to hear they finally included those! Thanks! -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LTO drive VS 3590E1A I have a new 3584-L32 library (6 weeks) and it has the Storwatch Expert S/W and it has (8) 3580 drives, directly FC-AL attached. David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/19/02 08:57AM Having said that... my IBM storage representative says that the 3494 library is a more industrial tape library intended for larger enterprise environments than the Ultrium 3584 tape library. IBM offers and supports extended utilities for the 3494, such as StorWatch Expert software. Also, the 3494 library and 3590-E1A tape drives can be FC-AL attached. Currently, the Ultrium 3580s can not. Regards, Chris Neumeyer -Original Message- From: Zosimo Noriega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 4:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LTO drive VS 3590E1A Hello to you... Everybody saying that LTO Ultrium drive is a latest drive technology that why we quoting to this to replace our existing tape library, can you please provide me info regarding the LTO vs 3590 comparisons in terms of accessibility, availability, performance, etc. regards, Zosi Noriega MMS health-first.org made the following annotations on 02/19/02 09:52:39 -- This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ==
Re: Antwort: Netware 5.1/ TSM client 4.1 restore problem - diskspace
Per our Netware Admin we do not have space restrictions in use. The restore was apparently trying to turn them on! The other permissions you listed below are all correct. But we still have the restore problem. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/18/02 03:23AM David, when you backup a file from a novell file server all file information, including file_owner, will be saved. At restore time all these information will be written to disk. If the file_owner exsist and the volume space is limited by user space restrictions the restore may fail. If ihe file_owner doesn t exsist the file_owner will be replaced with the name you assigned for TSM to access the volumes. Set the user space restrictions to unlimited for the specific user and retry to restore. Hope that helps Greetings Jan Möwe David Longo David.Longo@HEALTH-An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FIRST.ORG Kopie: Gesendet von: ADSM:Thema: Netware 5.1/ TSM client 4.1 restore problem - disk space Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] U 15.02.2002 23:01 Bitte antworten an ADSM: Dist Stor Manager We have TSM server 3.7.4.0 on AIX 4.3.3. Have some Netware clients on Netware 5.1 SP3 and TSM client 4.1.0.0. Netware VOL1 is NSS volume and set for Long File Names. Have been running fine for about a year in this config. Have restored users files many times this last year. Now have problem trying to do some restores. When tried to restore a users many files in ...NT 4.0 workstation Profile.../ folders and subdirs, several things happened. 134 files restored and 500 failed. We tried this sevreal times and restored to another node to see what happened. You get Tivoli message ANS 4024E ... write failed.. on certain files. also a TSA message about can't write to file (didn't get message copied). We found that on the Netware System Console a message pops up the first time we try on a node. Directory quotas enabled on volume VOL1. Our Netware Admin says the only way he knows that can happen is to type a command on the console to enable it. We tried restoring to the SYS: volume on 2 nodes and then when we get to certain files(the ones that failed on VOL1:) it says Out of disk space... and gives you a prompt to Abort/Retry/Skip. However we are not out of disk space. The files in general that fail are *.lnk, *.bmp and *.ini, but not sure if that is a pattern or not. It will fail on same file each time. In case it was some problem with that users files, tried another users NT Profile directories and got similar results. As I said we have restored many times in last year, but I don';t think much restore done from NT profile directory. Have done some search on Tivoli Web site for this problem and didn't find. Does anyone have an idea what our problem(s) are? Thanks, David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5525 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MMS health-first.org made the following annotations on 02/15/02 17:14:15 -- This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. == __ Diese Nachricht kann vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfänger sein, so bitten wir um eine kurze Nachricht. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulässig. Da wir nicht die Echtheit oder Vollständigkeit der in dieser Nachricht enthaltenen Informationen garantieren können, schließen wir die rechtliche Verbindlichkeit der vorstehenden Erklärungen und Äußerungen aus. This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please inform us. Any unauthorised dissemination, distribution or copying hereof is prohibited. As
Chained Tapepools to avoid reclamation ?
I think about, wheter it makes sense to have several typepools (all primary) chained together. Disk- Tapepool1 - Tapepool2 ( - Tapepool 3) Maybe it is possible to reduce reclamtion processing by putting the frequent changing files to the beginning of the chain and allowing the static files (controlled by migration delay) to fill the tapes in the second tapepool. Does it work? What are your experiences? Kind regards, Stefan Holzwarth -- Stefan Holzwarth ADAC e.V. (Informationsverarbeitung - Systemtechnik - Basisdienste) Am Westpark 8, 81373 München, Tel.: (089) 7676-5212, Fax: (089) 76768924 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Object field in Archive schedule
We want performing an 'archive' using schedules. A few clients have a lot of filesystems, about 50 or more. We already encountered the limitation of 20 objects in the object-field, so we made 3 archive-schedules per system. It is a lot of work to define those schedules and it will be much easier to select a volumegroup or the whole system, so we are going to do a request for an enhancement. In clientversion 4.2.x. you can use the -filelist option, but upgrading is not possible for the moment. One possible alternative is to define a schedule with 'action=command' to run a shell script or Perl script on the client system, and have the script issue a series of 'dsmc archive' commands to archive whatever you want.
Re: SELFTUNEBUFpoolsize
Well, I just noticed something weirder- I have two identical 6M1s both with 4.2.1.9 and AIX 4.3.3.ML09, with SELFTUNEBUFFPOOLSIZE set to YES on both, and one is working (runs daily after expiration) and the other isn't (hasn't ever run that I can determine). No hits in the APAR database, either. Any ideas??? |+-- || Rushforth, Tim| || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || PEG.MB.CA | || | || 02/18/2002 01:56 PM | || Please respond to | || ADSM: Dist Stor| || Manager| || | |+-- | || | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: (bcc: Lisa Cabanas/SC/MODOT) | | Subject: Re: SELFTUNEBUFpoolsize | | We've noticed this also - running on 4.2.0 on W2K. We've switched to manually increasing bufpoolsize and turning off SELFTUNEBUFFPOOLSIZE. From a TSM 3.7 Redbook - The current values for memory usage limits by the BUFPOOLSIZE value are 10% of the real memory for AIX, HP Unix, Sun Solaris, and Windows NT, and 50% of the region size in OS/390. This does also mean that Tivoli Storage Manager may not be able, in all cases, to optimally tune the BUFPOOLSIZE value, because the server could not have enough real memory installed. Can anyone confirm if the above is still true for 4.x? Thanks, Tim Rushforth City of Winnipeg -Original Message- From: Rupp Thomas (Illwerke) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 4:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SELFTUNEBUFpoolsize Hi TSM-ers, I have set SELFTUNEBUFFPOOLSIZE to YES and the BUFPoolsize in DSMSERV.OPT to 131072. When EXPIRE INVENTURY has finished I get message ANR0386I The BUFPoolsize has been changed to 131072 Is this pure coincidence or does this message tell me that SELFTUNEBUFFPOOLSIZE doesn't work? I'm running TSM 4.1.5.0 on AIX 4.3.3.0 Kind regards Thomas Rupp Vorarlberger Illwerke AG MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TEL:++43/5574/4991-251 FAX:++43/5574/4991-820-8251 -- Dieses eMail wurde auf Viren geprueft. Vorarlberger Illwerke AG --
SQL to get EVENT STATUS
What SQL/Tables/Columns is needed to get the same information you get from: Q EVENT * * BEGINDATE=-1 When we use SQL to query the EVENT table, we only get the Scheduled ADMIN events, not the CLIENT EVENT info. Speaking of SQL, I have an old PDF with the following cover info: Using the ADSM SQL Interface ADSTAR Distributed Storage Manager Using the ADSM SQL Interface Andrew M. Raibeck IBM Storage Systems Division 5600 Cottle Road San Jose, CA 95193 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: This is a prototype of a work in progress. Please forward comments and suggestions to the e-mail address above. © Copyright IBM Corporation, 1998 What this ever finished/updated ? Zoltan Forray Virginia Commonwealth University - University Computing Center e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - voice: 804-828-4807
Moving from 3570 to STK LTO 700
We are moving to a Storagetek L700 (LTO) from 3570...(TSM 4.1.5 running on AIX 4 .3.3). I have some questions on migrating the data. The current plan is to connect the L700 to our box leaving our magstar connected as well. We will change the 3570 tapepool to read only. Then we will create a new pool for LTO and migrate data from our 3570 tapepool to the new LTO tapepool. My question concerns our offsite copypool. How do I handle it the data within it? Depending on how long the migration takes for our approx. 4 TB of data, I was thinking we could just do a backup of the LTO pool to copypool and once we know we have everything offsite, destroy the 3570 tapes??? I may be way off base so any suggestions would be helpful. I don't want to lose one little bit (or byte) of data.. You are basically on the right track. You don't have to do one monster 'backup stgpool' command. You can do a series of backup operations as data flows into the onsite L700 pool and populate the offsite L700 pool incrementally. If you have large amounts of data in relatively short lived database backups, you may want to start sending new backups to L700 and wait a while to migrate old backups from 3570 tape. This would allow a large portion of the data to age off, eliminating the need to migrate it. The phrase 'destroy the 3570 tapes' makes me cringe a bit. The clean way to deal with the old tapes once you have a full set of offsite copies on L700 tapes is to run 'delete volume' commands with 'discarddata=yes'.
Problem of labelisation
Hello in all
I collide has a problem of labelisation: I would like to change the label of
a cartridge being already in my robotics.
During the command{*order*} of LABEL, TSM reads the cartridge and realize
that this cartridge already possesses a label.
How to rewrite a label without the cartridge rose in the reader and read?
Thank you your good advices
Frédéric Rigoulay
Re: Problem of labelisation
With the LABEL LIBVOL command there is an option:
overwrite=yes. This will write new label you specify even if a label exists.
My standard caveat on this is be careful as you can overwrite good
data tapes.
David Longo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/19/02 11:46AM
Hello in all
I collide has a problem of labelisation: I would like to change the label of
a cartridge being already in my robotics.
During the command{*order*} of LABEL, TSM reads the cartridge and realize
that this cartridge already possesses a label.
How to rewrite a label without the cartridge rose in the reader and read?
Thank you your good advices
Frédéric Rigoulay
MMS health-first.org made the following
annotations on 02/19/02 12:09:38
--
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential,
proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is
waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please
immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies
of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications
through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely
those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or
opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by
the entity to give such views or opinions.
==
TCPIP Errors when RESTORING DB ON MVS
Our test TSM DATABASE crashed so we began the restore process and when it came time to run the restore db job we encountered the following. ANR5099E UNABLE TO INITIALIZE TCP/IP DRIVER - ERROR BINDING ACCEPTOR SOCKET 0 (RC $EQ; 0) From the old archives the only thing I could pick up was to recycle TCPIP and then try the restoredb again...Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks
Re: Select statement
Hi, Could someone please give me an easy way to remember how to convert DATE_TIME into manipulative items? I've seen so many ways to convert to time and date - I'm confused about the math that is being used - or if someone knows of a good whitepaper? I have sql books and the TSM guides - and can't seem to find any references to this field. Thanks in advance, Jane Jane Bamberger IS Department Bassett Healthcare 607-547-4784 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Monahan Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 6:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Select statement You can also: select cast(filespace_name as char(40)) as Filespace Name.. John Monahan Senior Consultant Enterprise Solutions Computech Resources, Inc. Office: 952-833-0930 ext 109 Cell: 952-484-5435 http://www.compures.com Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/16/2002 07:11 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Select statement Are you asking how to increase the width so that the file space name doesn't wrap to multiple lines? While this example doesn't wrap, it does illustrate a method you can use to adjust the output column widths. STANDARD WIDTH: select filespace_name, node_name, capacity from filespaces FILESPACE_NAME NODE_NAME CAPACITY -- -- \\raibeck\c$ RAIBECK 44481.4 CUSTOM WIDTH (40 columns for FILESPACE_NAME): select filespace_name as FILESPACE NAME , node_name, capacity from filespaces FILESPACE NAME NODE_NAME CAPACITY -- \\raibeck\c$ RAIBECK 44481.4 Note: The as specification for FILESPACE_NAME is padded with blanks to bring the entire column width to 40. When running in batch mode, if you want the display to appear in tabular format rather than list format, put the select command in a macro, say, select.mac. Then invoke dsmadmc like this: dsmadmc -id=adminid -pa=x -displaymode=table macro select.mac or like this this to redirect output to a file: dsmadmc -id=adminid -pa=x -displaymode=table macro select.mac select.out 21 Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. From: Hunley, Ike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Select statement Hi all, I hope someone out there has the answer for this. How do I increase the output field size for filespace_name so I can output the filespace_name along with quantity and node_name? Thanks
Re: Select statement: Data Time Stamp Manipulation
The character representation of the CURRENT_TIMESTAMP is called a TIMESTAMP, same for any date/time field in TIMESTAMP format. There are many functions you can use against it to get portions of the field. The functions are: DATE() HOUR() MINUTE() SECOND() to name a few. Look in the DB2 SQL Command Reference if you have it. You can do something like this: CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - 14 DAYS CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - 2 HOURS As arguments in a WHERE clause. -Original Message- From: Jane Bamberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Select statement Hi, Could someone please give me an easy way to remember how to convert DATE_TIME into manipulative items? I've seen so many ways to convert to time and date - I'm confused about the math that is being used - or if someone knows of a good whitepaper? I have sql books and the TSM guides - and can't seem to find any references to this field. Thanks in advance, Jane Jane Bamberger IS Department Bassett Healthcare 607-547-4784 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Monahan Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 6:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Select statement You can also: select cast(filespace_name as char(40)) as Filespace Name.. John Monahan Senior Consultant Enterprise Solutions Computech Resources, Inc. Office: 952-833-0930 ext 109 Cell: 952-484-5435 http://www.compures.com Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/16/2002 07:11 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Select statement Are you asking how to increase the width so that the file space name doesn't wrap to multiple lines? While this example doesn't wrap, it does illustrate a method you can use to adjust the output column widths. STANDARD WIDTH: select filespace_name, node_name, capacity from filespaces FILESPACE_NAME NODE_NAME CAPACITY -- -- \\raibeck\c$ RAIBECK 44481.4 CUSTOM WIDTH (40 columns for FILESPACE_NAME): select filespace_name as FILESPACE NAME , node_name, capacity from filespaces FILESPACE NAME NODE_NAME CAPACITY -- \\raibeck\c$ RAIBECK 44481.4 Note: The as specification for FILESPACE_NAME is padded with blanks to bring the entire column width to 40. When running in batch mode, if you want the display to appear in tabular format rather than list format, put the select command in a macro, say, select.mac. Then invoke dsmadmc like this: dsmadmc -id=adminid -pa=x -displaymode=table macro select.mac or like this this to redirect output to a file: dsmadmc -id=adminid -pa=x -displaymode=table macro select.mac select.out 21 Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. From: Hunley, Ike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Select statement Hi all, I hope someone out there has the answer for this. How do I increase the output field size for filespace_name so I can output the filespace_name along with quantity and node_name? Thanks
Re: Select statement: Data Time Stamp Manipulation
Go to oracle.com and then find link to IT. -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Select statement: Data Time Stamp Manipulation The character representation of the CURRENT_TIMESTAMP is called a TIMESTAMP, same for any date/time field in TIMESTAMP format. There are many functions you can use against it to get portions of the field. The functions are: DATE() HOUR() MINUTE() SECOND() to name a few. Look in the DB2 SQL Command Reference if you have it. You can do something like this: CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - 14 DAYS CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - 2 HOURS As arguments in a WHERE clause. -Original Message- From: Jane Bamberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Select statement Hi, Could someone please give me an easy way to remember how to convert DATE_TIME into manipulative items? I've seen so many ways to convert to time and date - I'm confused about the math that is being used - or if someone knows of a good whitepaper? I have sql books and the TSM guides - and can't seem to find any references to this field. Thanks in advance, Jane Jane Bamberger IS Department Bassett Healthcare 607-547-4784 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Monahan Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 6:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Select statement You can also: select cast(filespace_name as char(40)) as Filespace Name.. John Monahan Senior Consultant Enterprise Solutions Computech Resources, Inc. Office: 952-833-0930 ext 109 Cell: 952-484-5435 http://www.compures.com Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/16/2002 07:11 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Select statement Are you asking how to increase the width so that the file space name doesn't wrap to multiple lines? While this example doesn't wrap, it does illustrate a method you can use to adjust the output column widths. STANDARD WIDTH: select filespace_name, node_name, capacity from filespaces FILESPACE_NAME NODE_NAME CAPACITY -- -- \\raibeck\c$ RAIBECK 44481.4 CUSTOM WIDTH (40 columns for FILESPACE_NAME): select filespace_name as FILESPACE NAME , node_name, capacity from filespaces FILESPACE NAME NODE_NAME CAPACITY -- \\raibeck\c$ RAIBECK 44481.4 Note: The as specification for FILESPACE_NAME is padded with blanks to bring the entire column width to 40. When running in batch mode, if you want the display to appear in tabular format rather than list format, put the select command in a macro, say, select.mac. Then invoke dsmadmc like this: dsmadmc -id=adminid -pa=x -displaymode=table macro select.mac or like this this to redirect output to a file: dsmadmc -id=adminid -pa=x -displaymode=table macro select.mac select.out 21 Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. From: Hunley, Ike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Select statement Hi all, I hope someone out there has the answer for this. How do I increase the output field size for filespace_name so I can output the filespace_name along with quantity and node_name? Thanks
Re: TDP for Exchange
set up your policy domain for 27 or 28 days. This will always ensure you have a 3 week recovery window. 27 will do what is needed as long as you run your full backups on a weekly schedule and do not miss any. -Original Message- From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TDP for Exchange Hi *SM-ers! We are looking at TDP for Exchange for backing up our Exchange servers. The backups should be kept for 3 weeks. I'm looking for a correct TSM policy definition. The easiest way to do this is defining a backup copygroup with retonly=21 and retextra=21. However, I think this is not save. A full backup on day 1 will be deleted on day 22, so all incrementals after this full (day 2,3,4,5,6 and 7) are then also useless! So one cannot go back 3 weeks in this case. What is the best way to guarantee a 3 week retention? Another small issue I detected: The TDP for Exchange manual states: After the storage group and logs are successfully backed up, the log files are deleted. In our case there are always 4 log files left behind after a full backup. Is that normal behavior? Thanks in advance for any reply!! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
Re: TSM licensing
Not to beat a dead horse, but this is what I just received from my sales rep as to the pricing structure for TSM clients. I hadn't heard this until today, so thought I'd share it: Clarification I just rec'd, Old Way all clients were four Tivoli points= about $120 New Way Desktop Clients = four Tivoli points NT Server = seven Tivoli points Unix = 15 Tivoli points List price is $31/ point Steve Argersinger Ruan Transportation -Original Message- From: Bill Mansfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: What qualifies as an in use license? I also contacted Tivoli, and got the answer (in writing) that you register each machine, regardless of how many nodes there are registered to TSM for the machine. Guess it depends on who at Tivoli you ask (or, perhaps, what country you live in). It's surprising that no one at Tivoli has weighed in on this discussion with an official pronouncement... _ William Mansfield Senior Consultant Solution Technology, Inc Daniel Sparrman daniel.sparrman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @EXIST.SE cc: Sent by: ADSM:Subject: Re: What qualifies as an in use license? Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] T.EDU 01/17/2002 09:52 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Hi Bill When I received your mail, I contacted Tivoli. According to them, each registred nodename on the TSM server is a managed system. There is NO special situations where you can register more licenses than you have purchased. If it is so, how do you controll how many licenses you have to buy? Hopefully, you don't have to many servers registred like this. And also, according to Tivoli, the number of licenses you have to buy, is the number that is stated using q lic, not how many hardware systems you have. Best Regards Daniel Sparrman PS My contact is Adam Czulinski at Tivoli Sweden. He's a large account presale. --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Bergkällavägen 31D 192 79 SOLLENTUNA Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51
Labeling dlt tape on 7337 library
I'm working with TSM 4.2 running on AIX 4.3.3. I defined the Library, drives and devclass with the element number 116 and 117 succesfully. But when i try to label a volume, i receive the following error. ANR8779E Unable to open drive /dev/mt2, error number=46. ANR8302E I/O error on drive DRIVE02 (/dev/mt2) (OP=OFFL, Error Number=46, CC=203, KEY=02, ASC=04, ASCQ=02, SENSE=70.00.02.00.00.00.00.16.00.00.00.00.04.02.00.00.00.00.86.00.5B.00.00.13. 16.00.00.00.00., Do you know where is the problem? Thank you very much, Diego. Saludos/Regards, Diego. Diego Nicolás Fabani Distributed Services E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. #: 54-11-4319-7063. Tie Line #: 840-7063 CTSI Martinez. IBM Argentina S.A.
TDP on Exchange Server
Hi Gurus I have an ACN5350E problem on an Exchange server. This is the configuration:- Client:- Tivoli Data Protection for Microsoft Exchange Server Version 2 Release 2 Level 0.0 Exchange Server 2000, Service Pack 2. Server:- AIX 4.3.3 ML 08 TSM 4.1.2 From excfull.log: Full: 3 Read: 38413238706 Written: 38410092978 Rate: 1,820.20 Kb/Sec Full: 3 Read: 38416384434 Written: 38413238706 Rate: 1,820.26 Kb/Sec Full: 3 Read: 38418481586 Written: 38415335858 Rate: 1,820.27 Kb/Sec Full: 3 Read: 38420578738 Written: 38417433010 Rate: 1,820.28 Kb/Sec Full: 3 Read: 38422675890 Written: 38419530162 Rate: 1,820.29 Kb/Sec Full: 0 Read: 38422676056 Written: 38422675890 Rate: 1,820.35 Kb/Sec Full: 0 Read: 38422676056 Written: 38422675890 Rate: 1,820.26 Kb/Sec Full: 0 Read: 38422676056 Written: 38422675890 Rate: 1,820.17 Kb/Sec Full: 0 Read: 38422676056 Written: 38422675890 Rate: 1,820.08 Kb/Sec Full: 0 Read: 38422676056 Written: 38422675890 Rate: 1,819.99 Kb/Sec Full: 0 Read: 38422676056 Written: 38422675890 Rate: 1,819.90 Kb/Sec Full: 0 Read: 38422676056 Written: 38422675890 Rate: 1,819.81 Kb/Sec Waiting for Exchange server... Full: 0 Read: 38422676056 Written: 38422676056 Rate: 1,819.33 Kb/Sec Backup of storage group First Storage Group failed. ACN5350E An unknown Exchange API error has occurred. Retrying failed backups... Total storage groups requested for backup: 2 Total storage groups backed up: 1 Total storage groups expired: 0 Total storage groups excluded: 0 Throughput rate:1,980.43 Kb/Sec Total bytes transferred:192,083,123,812 Elapsed processing time:94,717.26 Secs ACN0151E Errors occurred while processing the request. On the server log I have the following error:- ANE4993E (Session: 7067, Node: EXCHANGE4) TDP MSExchgV2 NT TDP for Microsoft Exchange: full backup of First Storage Group from server EXCHANGE4 failed, rc = 425. Can anybody help?? Kelvin Tan
AW: backupset questions
Hi Justin, a backup set is a collection of backed up files from one client. It is a snapshot of active backed up files (files on the server) from one client. You don´t need include or exclude lists for a backup set. Kind regards Stefan Oing -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Justin Bleistein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2002 05:03 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: backupset questions Do backupsets ignore include exclude lists on the client? --Justin Richard Bleistein
Server License Compliance FAILED
I had to reboot the server because of an bad CMOS Battery. After the reboot I did an ACCEPT DATE for the server because the TSM server had an problem with the date/time configuration, that is why I forgot to change the BIOS date/time settings to change. Now the server is running but when I make an q st the system tells me that the Server License Compliance: FAILED. I tried to register the license new but then I got the error message ANR9638W. I read the what the error message means but I dont know what the license authorization file is. Can someone tell me more ? Oliver Martin Hypo Informatik- Gesellschaft m.b.H. Telefon: +43(0)5574/414-145 Fax: +43(0)5574/414-457
Re: Server License Compliance FAILED
HiOn a Windows box, the license authorization file is adsmlicn.dll.On a UNIX box it's called dsmlicense.The file must somehow have been damaged. Just re-install your licenses.The file(s) are located under /usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin, or c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\server.Best RegardsDaniel Sparrman---Daniel SparrmanExist i Stockholm ABBergkllavgen 31D192 79 SOLLENTUNAVxel: 08 - 754 98 00Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51Oliver Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]2002-02-20 08:04Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: bcc: Subject: Server License Compliance FAILED I had to reboot the server because of an bad CMOS Battery. After the rebootI did an ACCEPT DATE for the server because the TSM server had an problemwith the date/time configuration, that is why I forgot to change the BIOSdate/time settings to change.Now the server is running but when I make an q st the system tells me thatthe Server License Compliance: FAILED. I tried to register the license newbut then I got the error message ANR9638W. I read the what the errormessage means but I dont know what the license authorization file is. Cansomeone tell me more ?Oliver MartinHypo Informatik-Gesellschaft m.b.H.Telefon: +43(0)5574/414-145Fax: +43(0)5574/414-457
Re: Server License Compliance FAILED
The NODELOCK file is the license authorization file. This has been discussed before on the list. I believe the discussion was to just delete the file and reregister your configuration. But, you will need the base CD that has all of the registration files on it unless you copied them to your server. -Original Message- From: Oliver Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Server License Compliance FAILED I had to reboot the server because of an bad CMOS Battery. After the reboot I did an ACCEPT DATE for the server because the TSM server had an problem with the date/time configuration, that is why I forgot to change the BIOS date/time settings to change. Now the server is running but when I make an q st the system tells me that the Server License Compliance: FAILED. I tried to register the license new but then I got the error message ANR9638W. I read the what the error message means but I dont know what the license authorization file is. Can someone tell me more ? Oliver Martin Hypo Informatik- Gesellschaft m.b.H. Telefon: +43(0)5574/414-145 Fax: +43(0)5574/414-457
