[amsat-bb] Re: Telemetry for a newbie

2010-03-07 Thread PE0SAT
On Sat, March 6, 2010 23:39, Peter Wilson wrote:
 Hi all,

Hi Peter,

 My Gulf antenna arrived last week and togther with my recently aquired
 FT-736 I should be up and running within the month.

When you have some experience with your Gulf Alpha I hope to hear
how it is doing. I really love the design and the way they are build
but have no idea how the perform.

 My initial reason for building my satellite station was to receive and
 decode telemetry from the sats, hoping to monitor their condition over a
 period of time. I realise that some transmit TLM via morse, some via
 AX25, and some via 96K packet.

I decode also a lot of telemetry from the following sats:

DO-64: Via RASCAL that can be downloaded via there website www.delfic3.nl
FO-29: Morse
HO-68: Morse
RS-30: Morse
RS-38: Morse
etc etc

Only the sats that use 9k6 are out of my league but that will change in the
next couple of months

 What would be the best sat to start with, especially AX25? - Does AO51
 send TLM all the time or only over the USA? What resource is the best for
 reading? Does the F-736 need modifying for high speed packet reception?

For more detail on decoding with the FT-736 look at the website from
dk3wn (www.dk3wn.info)


 Many thanks for any help.

 Peter
 G8KEK

73 Jan PE0SAT

-- 
With regards PE0SAT
Internet web-page http://www.ham.vgnet.nl/


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Telemetry for a newbie

2010-03-07 Thread Mike Rupprecht
Hi Peter,

Here is a short overview what you can actually hear if you are interested in
to collect telemetry:

OSCAR IO-26  1k2 BPSK, sporadic 5 bursts
Fuji OSCAR FO-29 CW
AMRAD OSCAR AO-271k2 AFSK scheduled
GURWIN OSCAR GO-32   9k6 FSK  1 burst every 30 sec
(weak)
NavSat OSCAR 44  1k2 AFSK only in sunlight 1 burst
every 1 min
AMSAT OSCAR-E AO-51  9k6 FSK  scheduled
KKS-1CW
STARS (Mother)   CW
PRISMCW
HOPE OSCAR HO-68 CW
CubeSat OSCAR CO-57 (XI-IV)  CW
CubeSat OSCAR CO-58 (XI-V)   CW
CUBESAT OSCAR CO-55 (CUTE-I) CW
CUBESAT OSCAR CO-65 (CUTE1.7+APD II) CW
COMPASS-1CW beacon every 4 min
SEEDSCW
DELFI-C3 1k2 BPSK only in sunlight
SwissCubeCW
RS-22CW
RS-30CW
GeneSat-11k2 AFSK

You can see - it's the best way to start with CW satellites. The most of
them are sending telemetry continuously.

73, Mike
DK3WN



-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] Im
Auftrag von Peter Wilson
Gesendet: Samstag, 6. März 2010 23:39
An: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Betreff: [amsat-bb] Telemetry for a newbie

Hi all,

My Gulf antenna arrived last week and togther with my recently aquired
FT-736 I should be up and running within the month.

My initial reason for building my satellite station was to receive and
decode telemetry from the sats, hoping to monitor their condition over a
period of time. I realise that some transmit TLM via morse, some via AX25,
and some via 96K packet.

What would be the best sat to start with, especially AX25? - Does AO51 send
TLM all the time or only over the USA? What resource is the best for
reading? Does the F-736 need modifying for high speed packet reception?

Many thanks for any help.

Peter
G8KEK
AMSAT-UK 6897
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Membership Benefits

2010-03-07 Thread Joel Black
AMSAT-BB,

I realize what I'm going to get by asking this...  If you were giving a 
presentation to amateur radio operators who know little or nothing of 
AMSAT, what would you list as some of the benefits of being a member of 
AMSAT?  What would be the single most important reason?


73,
Joel, W4JBB
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Membership Benefits

2010-03-07 Thread Edward Cole
At 05:40 AM 3/7/2010, Joel Black wrote:
AMSAT-BB,

I realize what I'm going to get by asking this...  If you were giving a
presentation to amateur radio operators who know little or nothing of
AMSAT, what would you list as some of the benefits of being a member of
AMSAT?  What would be the single most important reason?


73,
Joel, W4JBB
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Supporting the launch of new ham satellites.


73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
==
  BP40IQ   500 KHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
500-KHz/CW, 144-MHz EME, 1296-MHz EME
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@hotmail.com
== 

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Membership Benefits

2010-03-07 Thread Dee
Joel,
As put before, we are the only organization that directly supports Amateur
Radio Satellites.  Everything we do supports this effort.  Those that use
the satellites for their fun and DO NOT belong to AMSAT are defeating this
effort.  Satellites don't magically appear for everyone's benefit.  
Whenever I give a talk, my bottom line is I work for donations!  We are
striving for the best bang for the buck and putting a satellite in orbit
that gives back the most in returns.
Pass the hat and pass the solar panels!
73,
Dee, NB2F
NJ AMSAT Co-coordinator 

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Joel Black
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 9:41 AM
To: AMSAT
Subject: [amsat-bb] Membership Benefits

AMSAT-BB,

I realize what I'm going to get by asking this...  If you were giving a
presentation to amateur radio operators who know little or nothing of AMSAT,
what would you list as some of the benefits of being a member of AMSAT?
What would be the single most important reason?


73,
Joel, W4JBB
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] FW: [ans] ANS-066 AMSAT News Service Weekly Bulletins

2010-03-07 Thread Dee

AMSAT NEWS SERVICE
ANS-066

ANS is a free, weekly, news and information service of AMSAT North America, 
The Radio Amateur Satellite Corporation. ANS reports on the activities of a 
worldwide group of Amateur Radio operators who share an active interest in 
designing, building, launching and communicating through analog and digital 
Amateur Radio satellites.

Please send any amateur satellite news or reports to:
ans-edi...@amsat.org

In this edition:

* East Coast APRS Satellite Launch 11 March!
* A new interference threat to the Ham Bands
* SK: Dave Toth, VE3GYQ
* Daylight Savings Time
* AO-51 Survives Close Encounter With FORMOSAT-3
* A Self adjusting Orbit Scheme
* ARISS Update


SB SAT @ AMSAT $ANS-066.01
East Coast APRS Satellite Launch 11 March!

AMSAT News Service Bulletin 066.01
From AMSAT HQ SILVER SPRING, MD.
March 7, 2010
To All RADIO AMATEURS
BID: $ANS-066.01
 

East Coast APRS Satellite Launch 11 March!
You will be able to see it too over most of the mid-atlantic.  I don't see a
launch time or any other info yet.  Here is what I have received:
-

A sounding rocket with amateur satellite operating on 144.39 MHZ APRS will
rise to 100 miles or so for an 8 minute mission.  The rocket (I think) is
the Hall 12.067.

The payload is called SOCEM/ADAMASat.  There is a computer program and GUI
to interface to your PC so you can grab the telemetry live.  It is on:
http://ssl.engr.uky.edu/adamasat_free_gui.exe

It's a one shot deal, so I'm gonna have a backup TNC and
HYPERTERM collecting everything.
ADAMASat is the Antenna Deployment and Mono-filament Actuator Satellite.
It's a 2U CubeSat designed by Kentucky Space as part of SOCEM, the
Sub-Orbital CubeSat Experimental Mission.
ADAMASat, which is scheduled to launch on Hall 12.067 out of Wallops Flight
Facility on 11 March, will fly in space for roughly 8 minutes performing an
engineering experiment and transmitting data down to Earth via APRS packets.


More information on ADAMASat is available at
http://ssl.engr.uky.edu/suborbital/adamasat Kentucky Space is hereby
releasing to the AMSAT-NA community the ADAMASat FREE GUI, a free 32-bit
Windows binary for amateur radio operators in the Eastern United States who
are interested in tracking ADAMASat on its launch day. The GUI is a
standalone application and upon opening it on his/her computer, the HAM will
be greeted with a popup window which explains the steps required to track
the payload. 

All that is needed is a Windows machine, a radio and TNC which can receive
on 144.390 MHz, a serial or USB cable, and a suitable location. The GUI
parses the APRS packets as they are received, graphing temperatures on-board
the payload and reporting status of the mission in real-time. It also
includes instructions on e-mailing the packet log to Kentucky Space to aid
in post-processing, and a built-in aggregator for the official ADAMASat
Twitter RSS feed. 

Disclaimer: Kentucky Space provides the GUI as is without warranties of
any kind, and shall not incur any liability for any damages connected to the
use of the GUI.


[ANS thanks Bob, WA4APR, for the above information]

/EX


SB SAT @ AMSAT $ANS-066.02
A new interference threat to the Ham Bands

AMSAT News Service Bulletin 066.02
From AMSAT HQ SILVER SPRING, MD.
March 7, 2010
To All RADIO AMATEURS
BID: $ANS-066.02

FCC to Permit Rescue Radio Robot in the 430 to 450 MHz Band

Reports initially carried in the February 26, 2010 edition of Amateur 
Radio NewslineT Report 1698, and on the QRZ.com website say the FCC 
has issued a waiver of the Part 90 rules to permit a company called 
Reconrobotics Incorporated to sell a remote controlled security robot 
that will operate in the 430 to 448 MHz band.  This is spectrum that 
is primary to the Federal Radiolocation Service but also encompasses 
the Amateur Service weak signal, satellite and repeater subbands.

The waiver permits Reconrobitics to manufacture and sell a device 
called the Recon Scout.  This is described as a device designed for 
state and local law enforcement and firefighting agencies, and secur-
ity personnel in critical infrastructure industries. The Recon Scout 
can be thrown, dropped, or launched into potentially hazardous areas 
and can provide real-time video to an operator located a safe dis-
tance away. Typical applications will include such things as checking 
a building prior to forced entry, searching vehicle undercarriages 
for explosives and searching for survivors in a burning structure.

The Recon Scout transmits the analog video signal to the operator on 
one of three six megahertz channels.  These are 430 to 436 MHz, 436 
to 442 MHz, and 442 to 448 MHz.  Reconrobotics says that multiple 
channels are necessary in order to avoid interference during incidents 
where multiple Recon Scouts are in use, but that such situations 
should be rare.

The company's now approved proposal is that the first unit sold to a 

[amsat-bb] Re: Membership Benefits

2010-03-07 Thread Bruce
Amsat-bb

   I just renewed my annual membership as I appreciate the continued great 
tech advice everyone is willing to provide when a question is posted on the 
bb and help fund currrent sats, launches in progress.

73, Bruce KG4YEV


- Original Message - 
From: Dee morse...@optonline.net
To: 'Joel Black' jbblac...@gmail.com; 'AMSAT' amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 10:04 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Membership Benefits


 Joel,
 As put before, we are the only organization that directly supports Amateur
 Radio Satellites.  Everything we do supports this effort.  Those that use
 the satellites for their fun and DO NOT belong to AMSAT are defeating this
 effort.  Satellites don't magically appear for everyone's benefit.
 Whenever I give a talk, my bottom line is I work for donations!  We are
 striving for the best bang for the buck and putting a satellite in orbit
 that gives back the most in returns.
 Pass the hat and pass the solar panels!
 73,
 Dee, NB2F
 NJ AMSAT Co-coordinator

 -Original Message-
 From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
 Behalf Of Joel Black
 Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 9:41 AM
 To: AMSAT
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Membership Benefits

 AMSAT-BB,

 I realize what I'm going to get by asking this...  If you were giving a
 presentation to amateur radio operators who know little or nothing of 
 AMSAT,
 what would you list as some of the benefits of being a member of AMSAT?
 What would be the single most important reason?


 73,
 Joel, W4JBB
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Membership Benefits

2010-03-07 Thread Bob- W7LRD



Hi Joel and all 

-This is a timely question for me.  Yesterday I organized and ran (with the 
help of Wayne-W9AE) a AMSAT table at a local hamfest.  I had the opportunity to 
meet many local hams both satellite ops and the curious.  I extolled the 
virtues of AMSAT and the satellite community in general.  A few points I 
noticed as an undercurrent in some of the conversations.  We hams are generally 
a frugal bunch and in some cases just plain cheap.  I had several antennas on 
display as well as several pictures, one was of an astronaut on a EVA 
installing one of our  antennas on the outside of the space station.  Some of 
the questions went like this, one guy asked, do you have to belong to AMSAT to 
operate satellites?, can I get this software (Satpc32) free on line? are 
these books available any where else?  My response to these and similar 
queries was, see this picture? what do you think the shipping cost is?  
What we do, is rocket science, and rocket science is not cheap.   How many 
active satellite operators do  not belong to AMSAT?  How many use pirated 
tracking programs.  How many do not contribute something to AMSAT.  Maybe 
some aspect of of AMSAT ticks you off, so you cut the cord.  I'm sure some part 
of the government ticks you off, you don't move to Canada.  In order for AMSAT 
and our efforts to succeed it takes money, and yes probably lots of it.  This 
event was a learning process for me and in the future I hope to hone my 
abilities and create more dues paying and contributing members.  Finally- this 
is rocket science and rocket science is not cheap. 





73 Bob W7LRD 
Washington State AMSAT area coordinator 

- Original Message - 
From: Joel Black jbblac...@gmail.com 
To: AMSAT amsat-bb@amsat.org 
Sent: Sunday, March 7, 2010 6:40:33 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: [amsat-bb]  Membership Benefits 

AMSAT-BB, 

I realize what I'm going to get by asking this...  If you were giving a 
presentation to amateur radio operators who know little or nothing of 
AMSAT, what would you list as some of the benefits of being a member of 
AMSAT?  What would be the single most important reason? 


73, 
Joel, W4JBB 
___ 
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. 
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! 
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Membership Benefits

2010-03-07 Thread Roger Kolakowski
Let's try it off the cuff...

AMSAT is the central collection point for current satellite status, 
future technological development, international lobbying efforts, 
informational resources, contact coordination, information 
dissemination, etc (forgot debate)

Without AMSAT and its BB reflector, a potential or existing Satellite 
operator would spend, days, weeks, months or maybe years Googleing 
resources to ease their introduction to the multiple aspects of the hobby.

Has anyone seen an up to date hard/softcover book that answers the 
majority of the questions that we see go by the BB every day? Would 2.4 
or 1.2 GHz have any activity if not for the AMSAT BB? How about 
automatic frequency control and tracking?

What's the information worth to the individual?...that's a personal 
decision. But without communication, interest declines resulting in a 
who cares attitude...after all most of us have cellphones that can 
probably accomplish many of the tasks we perform through satellites less 
expensively.

Roger
WA1KAT

Bob- W7LRD wrote:
 
 
 Hi Joel and all 
 
 -This is a timely question for me.  Yesterday I organized and ran (with the 
 help of Wayne-W9AE) a AMSAT table at a local hamfest.  I had the opportunity 
 to meet many local hams both satellite ops and the curious.  I extolled the 
 virtues of AMSAT and the satellite community in general.  A few points I 
 noticed as an undercurrent in some of the conversations.  We hams are 
 generally a frugal bunch and in some cases just plain cheap.  I had several 
 antennas on display as well as several pictures, one was of an astronaut on a 
 EVA installing one of our  antennas on the outside of the space station.  
 Some of the questions went like this, one guy asked, do you have to belong 
 to AMSAT to operate satellites?, can I get this software (Satpc32) free on 
 line? are these books available any where else?  My response to these and 
 similar queries was, see this picture? what do you think the shipping cost 
 is?  What we do, is rocket science, and rocket science is not cheap.   How 
 man
y active satellite operators do  not belong to AMSAT?  How many use pirated 
tracking programs.  How many do not contribute something to AMSAT.  Maybe 
some aspect of of AMSAT ticks you off, so you cut the cord.  I'm sure some part 
of the government ticks you off, you don't move to Canada.  In order for AMSAT 
and our efforts to succeed it takes money, and yes probably lots of it.  This 
event was a learning process for me and in the future I hope to hone my 
abilities and create more dues paying and contributing members.  Finally- this 
is rocket science and rocket science is not cheap. 
 
 
 
 
 
 73 Bob W7LRD 
 Washington State AMSAT area coordinator 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Joel Black jbblac...@gmail.com 
 To: AMSAT amsat-bb@amsat.org 
 Sent: Sunday, March 7, 2010 6:40:33 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  Membership Benefits 
 
 AMSAT-BB, 
 
 I realize what I'm going to get by asking this...  If you were giving a 
 presentation to amateur radio operators who know little or nothing of 
 AMSAT, what would you list as some of the benefits of being a member of 
 AMSAT?  What would be the single most important reason? 
 
 
 73, 
 Joel, W4JBB 
 ___ 
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. 
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! 
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Membership Benefits

2010-03-07 Thread Clint Bradford
AMSAT members receive an every-other-month printed Journal ... discounts on 
some satellite tracking software and publications ... members can proudly boast 
that they are supporting amateur satellite programs ... and talk to your CPA - 
AMSAT-NA is a 501(c)(3) organization that can be left a few bucks in one's will,

Clint Bradford, K6LCS
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Membership Benefits

2010-03-07 Thread Edward Cole
At 08:02 AM 3/7/2010, Bob- W7LRD wrote:
Hi Joel and all -This is a timely question for 
me.  Yesterday I organized and ran (with the 
help of Wayne-W9AE) a AMSAT table at a local 
hamfest.  I had the opportunity to meet many 
local hams both satellite ops and the 
curious.  I extolled the virtues of AMSAT and 
the satellite community in general.  A few 
points I noticed as an undercurrent in some of 
the conversations.  We hams are generally a 
frugal bunch and in some cases just plain 
cheap.  I had several antennas on display as 
well as several pictures, one was of an 
astronaut on a EVA installing one of our  
antennas on the outside of the space 
station.  Some of the questions went like this, 
one guy asked, do you have to belong to AMSAT 
to operate satellites?, can I get this software 
(Satpc32) free on line? are these books 
available any where else?  My response to 
these and similar queries was, see this 
picture? what do you think the shipping cost 
is?  What we do, is rocket science, and 
rocket science is not cheap.   How many 
active satellite operators do  not belong to 
AMSAT?  How many use pirated tracking 
programs.  How many do not contribute 
something to AMSAT.  Maybe some aspect of of 
AMSAT ticks you off, so you cut the cord.  I'm 
sure some part of the government ticks you off, 
you don't move to Canada.  In order for AMSAT 
and our efforts to succeed it takes money, and 
yes probably lots of it.  This event was a 
learning process for me and in the future I hope 
to hone my abilities and create more dues 
paying and contributing members.  Finally- 
this is rocket science and rocket science is 
not cheap. 73 Bob W7LRD Washington State AMSAT 
area coordinator - Original Message - 
From: Joel Black jbblac...@gmail.com To: 
AMSAT amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Sunday, March 
7, 2010 6:40:33 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: [amsat-bb] Â Membership Benefits 
AMSAT-BB, I realize what I'm going to get by 
asking this... Â If you were giving a 
presentation to amateur radio operators who know 
little or nothing of AMSAT, what would you list 
as some of the benefits of being a member of 
AMSAT? Â What would be the single most important 
reason? 73, Joel, W4JBB 
___ 
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed 
are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? 
Join now to support the amateur satellite 
program! Subscription settings: 
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 
___ 
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed 
are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? 
Join now to support the amateur satellite 
program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Re: being a member of Amsat:
That is the minimum we can support amateur 
satellites with.  I am proud of my low Amsat 
membership# as that shows I have been a 
long-standing member.  If I could afford more I 
would become a life-member, but in my retirement 
we will manage to come up with our annual 
dues.  Cheap?  I know, considering the cost of rocket science!

I have been a field-op since about 1998.  I have 
handed the torch off (sponsored) to four others 
in Alaska to become field-ops (they do a superb 
job).  I now try to support with technical advice, if I can.

I have fond memories of the early years in ham 
satellites (AO-6).  Looking forward to more with 
Amsat in the future.  My hat is off the 
volunteers that make it all possible (and to the members that support them).


73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
==
  BP40IQ   500 KHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
500-KHz/CW, 144-MHz EME, 1296-MHz EME
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@hotmail.com
== 


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Membership Benefits

2010-03-07 Thread Art McBride
Bob,
There are always a few that refuse to pay for anything and spend most of
their time trying to get something for free. 
If you spend a little on AMSAT then you can use the time that would be spent
on finding something for free, learning how to operate Satellites or build
some of the antennas published in the Journal and save real $

Most important is not to give any encouragement to the constant complainers
that never contribute anything to anything.

Art,
KC6QUH

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Bob- W7LRD
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 9:02 AM
To: Joel Black
Cc: AMSAT
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Membership Benefits




Hi Joel and all 

-This is a timely question for me.  Yesterday I organized and ran (with the
help of Wayne-W9AE) a AMSAT table at a local hamfest.  I had the opportunity
to meet many local hams both satellite ops and the curious.  I extolled the
virtues of AMSAT and the satellite community in general.  A few points I
noticed as an undercurrent in some of the conversations.  We hams are
generally a frugal bunch and in some cases just plain cheap.  I had several
antennas on display as well as several pictures, one was of an astronaut on
a EVA installing one of our  antennas on the outside of the space station. 
Some of the questions went like this, one guy asked, do you have to belong
to AMSAT to operate satellites?, can I get this software (Satpc32) free on
line? are these books available any where else?  My response to these and
similar queries was, see this picture? what do you think the shipping cost
is?  What we do, is rocket science, and rocket science is not cheap.  
How many active satellite operators do  not belong to AMSAT?  How many use
pirated tracking programs.  How many do not contribute something to
AMSAT.  Maybe some aspect of of AMSAT ticks you off, so you cut the cord. 
I'm sure some part of the government ticks you off, you don't move to
Canada.  In order for AMSAT and our efforts to succeed it takes money, and
yes probably lots of it.  This event was a learning process for me and in
the future I hope to hone my abilities and create more dues paying and
contributing members.  Finally- this is rocket science and rocket science
is not cheap. 





73 Bob W7LRD 
Washington State AMSAT area coordinator 

- Original Message - 
From: Joel Black jbblac...@gmail.com 
To: AMSAT amsat-bb@amsat.org 
Sent: Sunday, March 7, 2010 6:40:33 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: [amsat-bb]  Membership Benefits 

AMSAT-BB, 

I realize what I'm going to get by asking this...  If you were giving a 
presentation to amateur radio operators who know little or nothing of 
AMSAT, what would you list as some of the benefits of being a member of 
AMSAT?  What would be the single most important reason? 


73, 
Joel, W4JBB 
___ 
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. 
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! 
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4923 (20100307) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] current handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Bob- W7LRD


I have been asked- what is the best current handheld for FM sats?  What are 
we using?  I have an old IC-w32a, no longer in production. 

73 Bob W7LRD 
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: current handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner
At the moment there are no new HTs that are full duplex and work well enough 
for me to personally recommend. I've been pointing folks to going the two radio 
route, with anything that will receive 435, and anything that transmits on 2m 
(with PL for SO-50, 67, or 68). For a half duplex radio, I like the F6A as it 
will receive dc-daylight on FM and SSB/CW. I strongly suggest people use full 
duplex on the FM birds, but this rig works well as the receive portion.

73, Drew KO4MA


-Original Message-
From: Bob- W7LRD w7...@comcast.net
Sent: Mar 7, 2010 2:09 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb]  current handheld



I have been asked- what is the best current handheld for FM sats?  What are 
we using?  I have an old IC-w32a, no longer in production. 

73 Bob W7LRD 
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: current handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Tim - N3TL
Hi Bob,

The new Alinco is the only current-production HT that will operate full
duplex; but like others, I hear rumblings about a TH-D7 replacement from
Kenwood later this year. The D7 was full duplex.

Posters here an elsewhere haven't given the Alinco high marks for its
abilities to work the FM satellites. I haven't tried it, so I hope those who
have some experience with it will respond to you.

All of that being said, I would recommend the Kenwood TH-F6A from the group
of currently available non-full-duplex radios for one major reason - its
general coverage receiver is all mode. I borrowed one from a ham friend
several months ago and, over the course of a weekend, use it as my receive
radio with a FT-817ND as my transmit radio to make multiple contacts on all
of the then-active linear satellites (AO-7 Mode B, FO-29 and VO-52). It
performed very well as I worked all passes without a receive preamp for
either VHF or UHF.

It will work the FM satellites, while providing the bonus of giving
newcomers a chance to copy AO-7, FO-29, HO-68 in linear mode and VO-52. I
suspect that when they've heard a few passes of the linear satellites, they
will be interested in trying to get on them.

I hope this is helpful.

73 to all,

Tim - N3TL
Athens, Ga. - EM84ha

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Bob- W7LRD
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 2:10 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] current handheld



I have been asked- what is the best current handheld for FM sats?  What
are we using?  I have an old IC-w32a, no longer in production. 

73 Bob W7LRD 
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Clint Bradford
 ...  what is the best current handheld for FM sats??

We do not have a currently-manufactured TRUE DUPLEX HT available. Alinco tried 
- but the sub-band receive performance on their DJ-G7T is gruesome.

I use and like the Yaesu FT-60R - for MANY reasons ...

-Receives 108 to a gig
-bulletproof case
-strongest belt clip of any amateur HT chassis on the market
-easy to manually program
-1,000+ memories
-large, easy-to-read display
-and a battery situation that is great. Load up the optional FBA-25 AA alkaline 
tray with alkalines or NiMH cells, and you have FULL TX POWER available, is 
needed. Do that on, say, a Kenwood TH-F6a, and you have ONE-HALF WATT TX power.

Oh - and the Yaesu FT-60R can be programmed for split freq ops - where is 
receives on 440 and transmits on 2M.

Overall, it is a tremendous value for your money. Under $200 at HRO and AES and 
other authorized Yaesu dealers.

Clint Bradford, K6LCS
909-241-7666
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: current handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Gordon JC Pearce
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 15:14 -0500, Tim - N3TL wrote:

 All of that being said, I would recommend the Kenwood TH-F6A from the group
 of currently available non-full-duplex radios for one major reason - its
 general coverage receiver is all mode. 

All of my satellite contacts have been with the TH-F7E which is the
European version - no 220MHz, but no cellphone hole either.  What's
especially handy is you can open it up to work on PMR frequencies too,
so I can bung in the channels for a site where I'm working and use it to
test commercial gear.

Gordon MM0YEQ

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Kai Gunter Brandt
Clint Bradford wrote:
 ...  what is the best current handheld for FM sats??
   

 We do not have a currently-manufactured TRUE DUPLEX HT available. Alinco 
 tried - but the sub-band receive performance on their DJ-G7T is gruesome.

   

Have you tried the latest firmware? They have adjusted the filters and 
the RX on UHF on main/sub-band is much better. You can also download the 
service manual and change these parameters yourselves but this is 
probably not something that should be done.

Comparing it to my TH-D7 it's not that bad. They changed something on 
the 23cm too but i'm not sure what the issue was there.

Kai Gunter
LA3QMA
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Clint Bradford
 ... DJ-G7T ... adjusted the filters and the RX on UHF on main/sub-band is 
 much better ...

What version firmware are you at, Kai?

I will need to re-evaluate this unit!

Clint Bradford, K6LCS
909-241-7666





___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Kai Gunter Brandt
Clint Bradford wrote:
 ... DJ-G7T ... adjusted the filters and the RX on UHF on main/sub-band is 
 much better ...
   

 What version firmware are you at, Kai?

 I will need to re-evaluate this unit!
   
E5.000

[Updates of this firmware version]
1: RIT/TXIT functions / added.
2: Reverse function in repeater operation / bettered.
3: Beep sounds at turn-off the power / added.
4: CTCSS tone of Auto-repeater  memory / bettered (give priority to the 
tone in memory, not in VFO while auto-repeater is ON)
5: Welcome-screen setting / bettered.
6: New scan mode added = turns on the LCD light when scan stops. Very 
convenient operating G7 in the dark.
7: Firmware update operation: accepts the command only when the 
battery-icon shows full.
8: Minor bugs fixed.


Previous firmware: Bettered receiver performance around 320MHz range.

I have not tested this on the birds. But the local repeater using the 
same antenna. Not a very advanced test. Receiving the repeater before 
upgrade, flashing the firmware and test again from the same spot.

Anyhow the original antenna is not good on VHF but i think the UHF/SHF 
is better. Using the original antenna for the TH-D7 on the radio you 
gain better signal on the Alinco. So i have replaced the antenna for a 
SC951 SureCom for V/U and SHF and now it's better on VHF too.

On the birds i probably want to use another antenna but the SC951 should 
work ok and better than the original on V/UHF. For SHF i have nothing to 
compare them on.

I really like the dual-memorybank(splitband) so they are perfect for the 
birds. But i have not done any QSOs on the birds using this radio. But 
with the dual VFO control it's probably bnetter than the TH-D7 as you 
can adjust for dopler on RX on the Alinco. (The TH-D7 can only adjust 
the band you are TXing on)

So then i just have to try AO51 ;o) i just wanted to say that they have 
done something with the filters and i think they have adjusted more than 
just the 320MHz range even if they don't say so.

They are responding relatively fast on e-mail if you have any questions 
or suggestions for new functions or to change something into the better.

Kai Gunter
LA3QMA
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Clint Bradford
Kai - Are you working with Alinco in the U.S.? Is yours an Alinco DG-G7E or 
DJ-G7T?

Clint, K6LCS



___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread John Heath
No full duplex handheld - here is a simple solution. 

Use two rigs. Buy a 5w 2m radio for the uplink.
Several good ones available available at low cost. 
If using an Arrow run separate cables for each radio, this avoids the diplexer 
which some on this list report as a source of extras loss.

Works fine for me

73 John G7HIA

 




From: Clint Bradford clintbra...@earthlink.net
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Sunday, 7 March, 2010 20:23:12
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

 ...  what is the best current handheld for FM sats??

We do not have a currently-manufactured TRUE DUPLEX HT available. Alinco tried 
- but the sub-band receive performance on their DJ-G7T is gruesome.

I use and like the Yaesu FT-60R - for MANY reasons ...

-Receives 108 to a gig
-bulletproof case
-strongest belt clip of any amateur HT chassis on the market
-easy to manually program
-1,000+ memories
-large, easy-to-read display
-and a battery situation that is great. Load up the optional FBA-25 AA alkaline 
tray with alkalines or NiMH cells, and you have FULL TX POWER available, is 
needed. Do that on, say, a Kenwood TH-F6a, and you have ONE-HALF WATT TX power.

Oh - and the Yaesu FT-60R can be programmed for split freq ops - where is 
receives on 440 and transmits on 2M.

Overall, it is a tremendous value for your money. Under $200 at HRO and AES and 
other authorized Yaesu dealers.

Clint Bradford, K6LCS
909-241-7666
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Lee Ernstrom

Hi Guys,

I just ordered the microphone/headphone cable from HRO for my DJ-7G so I
will soon be able to try it out on full duplex.  I am very pleased, by
the way, on how well the sub band receiver hears the satelites.  

WA7HQD
Lee Ernstrom
Syracuse, Utah DN31xb

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] FS ICOM W2E

2010-03-07 Thread Dave Aitch
UK Only please.

Works OK but only with DC in the top connector.

DC lead, got a headset too. I used to use it /M with a
19 whip when out and about trucking. Worked great.

Don't do trucking anymore, so its surplus to me.

Lets haggle.

Cheers,  Dave. G1OCN.
AMSAT UK 5766.


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: FS ICOM W2E

2010-03-07 Thread David - KG4ZLB

I never realised you were a trucker Dave!

:-D

David
KG4ZLB

On 3/7/2010 17:45, Dave Aitch wrote:

UK Only please.

Works OK but only with DC in the top connector.

DC lead, got a headset too. I used to use it /M with a
19 whip when out and about trucking. Worked great.

Don't do trucking anymore, so its surplus to me.

Lets haggle.

Cheers,  Dave. G1OCN.
AMSAT UK 5766.


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

   


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: current handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Jeff KB2M
 Years ago I did a test of the various handheld radio's available for sat
use. I rated the TH-F6A a distant last. Reason is that its front-end is very
sensitive to inter-mod. The test was performed in front of HRO in DE. See my
HT test report on my webpage. It can be found by navigating to QRZ.com then
lookup kb2m. I also remember when I was on a business trip to Houston. While
there I meet with Jerry k5oe, Bruce kk5do, and Al n5afv for dinner(I have a
picture of the group if anyone is interested). After dinner we went to the
parking lot to work an FM bird. As my F6A was deaf from the urban inter-mod
I had to borrow someone's HT to finish making a contact. When I got home I
sold the Kenwood. It might be good out in the country, but it sucks in the
city!...

73 Jeff kb2m


-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Tim - N3TL
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 15:15 PM
To: 'Bob- W7LRD'; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: current handheld

Hi Bob,

The new Alinco is the only current-production HT that will operate full
duplex; but like others, I hear rumblings about a TH-D7 replacement from
Kenwood later this year. The D7 was full duplex.

Posters here an elsewhere haven't given the Alinco high marks for its
abilities to work the FM satellites. I haven't tried it, so I hope those who
have some experience with it will respond to you.

All of that being said, I would recommend the Kenwood TH-F6A from the group
of currently available non-full-duplex radios for one major reason - its
general coverage receiver is all mode. I borrowed one from a ham friend
several months ago and, over the course of a weekend, use it as my receive
radio with a FT-817ND as my transmit radio to make multiple contacts on all
of the then-active linear satellites (AO-7 Mode B, FO-29 and VO-52). It
performed very well as I worked all passes without a receive preamp for
either VHF or UHF.

It will work the FM satellites, while providing the bonus of giving
newcomers a chance to copy AO-7, FO-29, HO-68 in linear mode and VO-52. I
suspect that when they've heard a few passes of the linear satellites, they
will be interested in trying to get on them.

I hope this is helpful.

73 to all,

Tim - N3TL
Athens, Ga. - EM84ha

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Bob- W7LRD
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 2:10 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] current handheld



I have been asked- what is the best current handheld for FM sats?  What
are we using?  I have an old IC-w32a, no longer in production. 

73 Bob W7LRD 


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] videos from XE2/WD9EWK (DM21) and Yuma hamfest in February 2010

2010-03-07 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi!

I'm slowly getting the hang of video and putting it online in a usable
form.  I have placed 3 videos on YouTube this evening.  One video is 
of a demonstration from the Yuma (Arizona) hamfest on 20 February 2010
where Kevin KJ6DDS and I worked the microphone.  Larry KI6YAA operated
the video camera (my Nokia N900 phone).  At the end of the video, a 
Marine Corps Harrier jump jet was making its approach to land at 
Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, which is across the street from the 
hamfest site.  That video can be seen at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwyFsk9tFAc

The other two videos were from an AO-51 pass I worked as XE2/WD9EWK
from grid DM21jw in northern Baja California on 19 February 2010 at
0019 UTC.  On this afternoon, I was accompanied by Larry KI6YAA and
Kevin KJ6DDS, and Alex XE2BSS/N2IX worked the video camera.  We parked
along the highway on the Laguna Salada, a dry salty flat area near
the Colorado River on the way toward the Gulf of California.  The 
video had to be split into two parts, to comply with YouTube's 10-
minute limit on video length.  The first 7 minutes can be seen at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW5-hL3SDig

The remaining 7:14 can be seen at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2k2yAMGeALc

When we were down at DM21jw, it was windy.  XE2BSS tried his best to 
shield the phone/camera's mic from the wind, and allowing the speaker
that was connected to my radio to be heard in the video.  I worked 
several other passes from this location, all of which I have MP3 audio
recordings of, but this was the one we decided to make a video of. 

I hope to have the QSL cards from last month's trip to Baja California
and the Yuma hamfest ready this week.  I've received a lot of QSL 
requests already, especially for QSOs with DM21.  :-)  Please be patient,
the cards will be on their way.  And, eventually, the QSOs will make 
their way into ARRL's Logbook fo the World system (more on that in a 
separate message).  

73!




Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK 
http://www.wd9ewk.net/



___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: current handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Gordon JC Pearce
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 19:51 -0500, Jeff KB2M wrote:
 Years ago I did a test of the various handheld radio's available for sat
 use. I rated the TH-F6A a distant last. Reason is that its front-end is very
 sensitive to inter-mod. The test was performed in front of HRO in DE. See my
 HT test report on my webpage. It can be found by navigating to QRZ.com then
 lookup kb2m. I also remember when I was on a business trip to Houston. While
 there I meet with Jerry k5oe, Bruce kk5do, and Al n5afv for dinner(I have a
 picture of the group if anyone is interested). After dinner we went to the
 parking lot to work an FM bird. As my F6A was deaf from the urban inter-mod
 I had to borrow someone's HT to finish making a contact. When I got home I
 sold the Kenwood. It might be good out in the country, but it sucks in the
 city!...

I found that my TH-F7E is badly affected by pager rip in certain spots
around Glasgow, especially with an external antenna.  Oddly enough, some
of the high sites on tower blocks I maintain are really bad, and some
are practically silent.

Using it for satellite it seems that the diplexer in my homebrew crossed
yagi knocks enough of the out-of-band crap out to prevent this.  It's
not nearly so bad for intermod on UHF as it is on VHF, too.  This could
be because there are fewer UHF high-power paging transmitters here (just
a wee bit of mobitex, mostly).

Gordon MM0YEQ

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb