[amsat-bb] Re: HEO history question

2011-12-05 Thread Armando Mercado
Hi John,

The UK and the mid-west were mutually visible
in the morning almost the entire month of
November, 1997, via AO-10.  There was
a gap for a couple of weeks in December,
1997, but mutual visibility returned for 
the 2nd half of January 1998 into
Feburary 1998.

RS12/13 made morning passes visible to
the mid-west roughly every other week
starting October, 1997 to March of
1998. (didn't calculate passes beyond that)

However, if you were tuning around in the FM
mode and found an SSB signal loud enough
to get your attention, I think you probably
heard RS12/13.

Do you remember how long you heard the
signal? (a couple of minutes or a half an 
hour or more).  Was the signal strength 
steady or was there a slow deep QSB?

73, Armando, N8IGJ



Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 13:58:52 -0600
From: John Geiger aa...@fidmail.com
To: AMSAT-BB amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] HEO history question
Message-ID:
CAFq43LZDtAvUcUDYzFtYxe4kG0XBQK_iaGNKkR6KE0tB=h1...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Back in late 1997 or early 1998 I was using a Kenwood TR9130 on 2m SSB.
One morning I was tuning from the FM to the SSB portion of the band, and
heard a station just below 146mhz.  I tuned them in, and it was a station
from Wales!  Obviously going thru a satellite as the 2 meter conditions
weren't that good that morning.  I am now wondering what satellite it
probably was.  Hearing it was enough to motivate me to eventually get into
satellite operations-that took a few years though.

Anyways, what satellite was I probably hearing?  I am guessing AO10 or AO13
but were they operational at that time?

73s John AA5JG


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Lets move forward

2011-12-05 Thread Gregg Wonderly



On 12/4/2011 11:35 PM, i8cvs wrote:

- Original Message -
From: Gordon JC Pearcegordon...@gjcp.net
To:amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 12:33 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Lets move forward


Leave SSB to the gallbladder brigade on 80m.

--
Gordon JC Pearce MM0YEQgordon...@gjcp.net


Hi Gordon, MM0YEQ

At the age of 80 (March 15th) I found that comment
very very offensive.


I think that the gallbladder comment was offensive from the perspective that it 
was derogatory.  I think it's important for all parts of amateur radio to 
understand how other parts view them.  That peer pressure helps to all have 
conversation (when it gets to be a bad view) which can help us arrive at 
educating each other about why our views, behavior, equipment, operating 
practices etc. are different.



In addition I see that you technically don't know the
advantages of the SSB over FM


This is a little on the assumptive side of the conversation.  He may in fact 
completely understand what SSB brings to the table, but also understand, that 
practically, FM, WiFi, PSK or any other mode doesn't necessarily enable 
communications through a satellite as much as it facilitates a particular type 
of operating practice, some of which are easier to use, than others.


For very short duration conversations, SSB tuning around diminishes the usable 
time, because it inhibits communications for the moments that the stations are 
chasing each other.  I.e. you don't know where the other station is at on 
the dial, and you tune around as they are calling, and then they start tuning 
away because no one comes back immediately.


With FM, you either hear them, or you don't, and the small single frequency sats 
make it unnecessary to guess.  You just need a Doppler tuning capable radio, and 
either software to do Doppler for you, or some experience to learn how to do it 
yourself, manually.



Listen here please how looks an SSB QSO via VO-52
made day 28 november 2011 between my self and
IW6OVD and compare with any FM satellite.

http://hamradio.selfip.com/iw6ovd/VO-52.mp3


Listening to this, points out the difference in operating practices required 
between FM and SSB.  It also illustrates a casual conversation on a satellite, 
which some would argue is something that you should not be using such limited 
resources for.  The fact that you are using your native language, might say to 
someone who doesn't know the language, that you are trying to ignore or leave 
out other Amateur operators who you don't want interfering with your QSO. 
That is the same kind of experience that many newer HF spectrum users find on 
80m.  There are some decade or longer friends roundtables on that band, and 
many of those conversations are so specific and/or so small in interest 
(health issues) that others operators don't feel like they can join the 
conversation.  On most of the other bands, conversations are very different in 
nature.


I'm not trying to be harsh Domenico.  Your contributions in the forum here, are 
always professional and educational.  I just want you to have an idea of how 
someone else might perceive your intent so that you can see how the original 
derogatory comment can become easy to toss out, in conversation.


Gregg Wonderly
W5GGW


73 de

i8CVS Domenico

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Wow

2011-12-05 Thread Jim Adams
I've noticed lately this board is sounding more and more like the boards on
a certain ham radio forum. Filled with personal attacks. Would the things
you say on the internet be something you would say to a persons face? I
think not. I thought we were on this board for one purpose, amateur radio
satellite communications. FM, SSB, CW, packet,  it doesn't matter. Making
contacts through a satellite zooming overhead is just a lot of fun. And
when you stop to think about it, pretty darn amazing. Let's get back to
helping one another and making contacts without all the grade school
nonsense.

Jim Adams - K0BAM
Delta County, Colorado DM68
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Wow

2011-12-05 Thread Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL

At 09:08 AM 12/5/2011 -0700, jim9...@gmail.com wrote:

I've noticed lately this board is sounding more and more like the boards on
a certain ham radio forum. Filled with personal attacks.




Well the CB'ers don't have AO-51 anymore so they have to vent someplace.


KB7ADL
Proud member of the gallbladder Brigade
  


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Wow

2011-12-05 Thread PE0SAT

Thanks for this clear statement.

I totally agree with you except the grade school nonsense comment.
That is exactly what not to do, but return to the base of the mailing list.

73 Jan PE0SAT

 I've noticed lately this board is sounding more and more like the boards
 on a certain ham radio forum. Filled with personal attacks. Would the
 things you say on the internet be something you would say to a persons
 face? I think not. I thought we were on this board for one purpose,
 amateur radio satellite communications. FM, SSB, CW, packet,  it doesn't
 matter. Making contacts through a satellite zooming overhead is just a
 lot of fun. And when you stop to think about it, pretty darn amazing.
 Let's get back to helping one another and making contacts without all
 the grade school nonsense.

 Jim Adams - K0BAM
 Delta County, Colorado DM68



-- 
With regards PE0SAT
Internet web-page http://www.pe0sat.vgnet.nl/


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Fwd: Wow

2011-12-05 Thread wa4hfn


- Forwarded Message -
From: wa4...@comcast.net
To: Jim Adams jim9...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 10:42:20 AM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Wow

I agree Jim. Sounds like a bunch of democrats wanting something for free and at 
someones else expence. Maybe the next bird should require a monthly fee to be a 
member and if you dont pay have them cut off
WA4HFN

- Original Message -
From: Jim Adams jim9...@gmail.com
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 10:08:01 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Wow

I've noticed lately this board is sounding more and more like the boards on
a certain ham radio forum. Filled with personal attacks. Would the things
you say on the internet be something you would say to a persons face? I
think not. I thought we were on this board for one purpose, amateur radio
satellite communications. FM, SSB, CW, packet,  it doesn't matter. Making
contacts through a satellite zooming overhead is just a lot of fun. And
when you stop to think about it, pretty darn amazing. Let's get back to
helping one another and making contacts without all the grade school
nonsense.

Jim Adams - K0BAM
Delta County, Colorado DM68
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Orbital Decay and Atmospheric Density

2011-12-05 Thread John Heath
Hi Gents,
 
I have been working on an excel spreadsheet regarding ARISSat-1, orbital decay 
and atmospheric density.
Its a small workbook with some calculations and a  chart.
 
The idea is to work out the volume that ARISSat-1 sweeps through per orbit, 
then calculate the mass of atomic material it will colloid with. 
Math is NOT my best subject
.
Is there a math guru on the list willing to take a quick look and tell me if I 
am on the right lines.
 
Let me know and I will send it off list.
 
Thanks
 
John 
G7HIA
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] A simple request made in a timeless video

2011-12-05 Thread Clayton Coleman W5PFG
This classic YouTube video expresses one young gentleman's concern for
the future of amateur radio satellite enthusiasts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sONfxPCTU0

In the last few seconds of the video, an appeal is made to all generations.
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] NASA Discovers New Planet

2011-12-05 Thread Clint Bradford
Wow ... NASA discovered a new planet our of our solar system! Averages 82 
degrees ... sunny ... water ...

I suggest they call it, Planet San Diego.

But some guy named Keplerian already had dibs ...


Clint Bradford





___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] info please

2011-12-05 Thread John Becker
At one time I was seeing updates on new SAT projects.
For some reason when I had my computer hard drive problem
I stop seeing such updates and cant seem to find the URL now.

Can someone please pass it to me again? And any word on 
what is happening on a replacement for AO-40 other then lack 
of funds.

Thanks, all

John, W0JAB
EM48lk



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: NASA Discovers New Planet

2011-12-05 Thread Ng, Peter
hey, didn't they discover Planet Hollywood a number of years back, but it 
turned out to be a restaurant!  go figure ;)

73's Peter 

ps a good laugh never hurts!

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf 
Of Clint Bradford
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 12:42 PM
To: AMSAT BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] NASA Discovers New Planet

Wow ... NASA discovered a new planet our of our solar system! Averages 82 
degrees ... sunny ... water ...

I suggest they call it, Planet San Diego.

But some guy named Keplerian already had dibs ...


Clint Bradford





___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] The Future Of Spaceflight As Seen Nearly 50 Years Ago

2011-12-05 Thread B J
http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1981/1

The predictions seem quaint now, but, back then, they seemed realistic.

73s

Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: NASA Discovers New Planet

2011-12-05 Thread Bob- W7LRD


however no intelligent life was found on this new planet 

Bob W7LRD 



- Original Message -


From: Clint Bradford clintbradf...@mac.com 
To: AMSAT BB amsat-bb@amsat.org 
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 12:41:40 PM 
Subject: [amsat-bb] NASA Discovers New Planet 

Wow ... NASA discovered a new planet our of our solar system! Averages 82 
degrees ... sunny ... water ... 

I suggest they call it, Planet San Diego. 

But some guy named Keplerian already had dibs ... 


Clint Bradford 





___ 
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. 
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! 
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: NASA Discovers New Planet

2011-12-05 Thread ka9qjg
Yes but they  could Not fig out if it was Humans or Aliens  because of all
the Strange or lack of clothes  Ha Ha 

73 De Don 

KA9QJG 

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Bob- W7LRD
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 8:04 PM
To: Clint Bradford
Cc: AMSAT BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: NASA Discovers New Planet



however no intelligent life was found on this new planet 

Bob W7LRD 



- Original Message -


From: Clint Bradford clintbradf...@mac.com 
To: AMSAT BB amsat-bb@amsat.org 
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 12:41:40 PM 
Subject: [amsat-bb] NASA Discovers New Planet 

Wow ... NASA discovered a new planet our of our solar system! Averages 82
degrees ... sunny ... water ... 

I suggest they call it, Planet San Diego. 

But some guy named Keplerian already had dibs ... 


Clint Bradford 







___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-27 status

2011-12-05 Thread George Henry
I have renamed the files with only the first letter capitalized to fix the 
case-sensitive OS issue.


I have also e-mailed Michael Wyrick to double-check the new Topr.txt file, 
as it shows the analog transponder only on for four minutes, and it 
definitely seemed to be on for the usual 7 minutes when I listened to a pass 
yesterday.  I think it's a typo...


George, KA3HSW

- Original Message - 
From: Greg D. ko6th_g...@hotmail.com

To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 12:29 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-27 status




Exactly, an O/S thing.  Windows (and its predecessor DOS) are case 
insensitive for file names.  Linux (which I run) is case sensitive - 
EOPC.txt and Epoc.txt are two entirely different names - and the program 
had an awful time with the apparently missing file.  I don't know what 
would happen on a Mac, but if you have trouble, that's one place to look.


Greg  KO6TH



Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 09:52:26 -0600
From: n...@lavabit.com
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-27 status

Interesting.  I installed the program last night, and then downloaded
and copied the epoch and topr files into that directory.  Epoch is
indeed all caps on the download, but the file in my directory from the
install had just the capital e.  Upon copying and choosing the replace
option in Vista, the capital e is retained with the rest lower case, and
the file works fine.  I guess that is an operating system thing, then?

73,
Jerry
N0JY



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb