[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld-Which is best

2010-03-09 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi!

 Heres another vote for the Yaesu HT rigs; I use a Yaesu VX-7R and
 I appreciate being able to program a single odd band split, memory
 channel (that require no pl), then I use the memory tune (MT) function
 on the radio and turn one dial back and forth to adjust for Doppler
 and the 2 meter transmit is ready to go anytime I squeeze the PTT.
  This set up works much better for me then 5 separate memory
 channels for every bird.  The Kenwood HT's wont let you program
 that odd band split into a single memory channel, (dont know
 about others) however sadly, Yaseu made it so you cannot pass pl
 tones in the odd band split memory channels   but of course you
 can pass pl tones in the other memory or VFO modes.

Actually, you can program PL tones in the odd-split memories on a
Yaesu radio.  You just have to program the tones with both of the
frequencies - even if you only need a PL on the transmit frequency.
Make sure the T is lit up for a transmitted PL when you are putting
the first (receive) frequency into the odd-split memory.

I have never tried the Memory Tune function on Yaesu HTs.  I have
a VX-8R at home, but previously had a VX-2R and VX-3R that worked
OK for satellites.  I may give that a try.  Still not a full-duplex setup, but
an interesting way to deal with tuning the receiver for the FM birds.
Another item on the to-do list...

 snip

 Sure wish we had a good full duplex, dual or tri-band, HT that had
 an excellent receiver, (worked USB on both TX and RX) and had
 the modest other functions we need to work the satellites but the
 compromised HT's are still a bunch of fun, with a portable Yagi in
 the trunk, a spare 19 minutes (including set up) and a pass
 prediction schedule, can bring a big smile to my face when I am
 out and about, in the car.

That would be nice.  Until that ever materializes, I've settled on a pair
of FT-817NDs for my all-mode full-duplex portable satellite setup.  Not
as small as an HT, but that pair of radios is certainly adequate for
what I do.  Having higher-capacity internal rechargeable packs lets
me run 5W without worrying about an external power source, or I can
plug either (or both) 817s into a 12V jumpstart battery for extended
operating time.

After setting up the 817s many times at hamfests or in the field, I don't
need much more time with the two 817s compared to using an HT or
a 2m/70cm FM mobile radio.  Hamfest demos using the two 817s on
VO-52 or AO-7 have drawn much more interest in recent times, and
they will be with me at the next hamfest I attend on Saturday (13th).  :-)

73!





Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld-Which is best

2010-03-09 Thread Gordon JC Pearce
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 18:38 -0800, D. Craig Fox wrote:
  necessary, but it takes away all guess work.  These radios also do an
 excellent job digipeating over ISS (when the D'ptr is turned on),

Not that it's likely any time soon.  What's that, a month or so now
since any real activity?  It was on for an hour two weeks ago, but
that's been about it.

Gordon MM0YEQ

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: current handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner
At the moment there are no new HTs that are full duplex and work well enough 
for me to personally recommend. I've been pointing folks to going the two radio 
route, with anything that will receive 435, and anything that transmits on 2m 
(with PL for SO-50, 67, or 68). For a half duplex radio, I like the F6A as it 
will receive dc-daylight on FM and SSB/CW. I strongly suggest people use full 
duplex on the FM birds, but this rig works well as the receive portion.

73, Drew KO4MA


-Original Message-
From: Bob- W7LRD w7...@comcast.net
Sent: Mar 7, 2010 2:09 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb]  current handheld



I have been asked- what is the best current handheld for FM sats?  What are 
we using?  I have an old IC-w32a, no longer in production. 

73 Bob W7LRD 
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: current handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Tim - N3TL
Hi Bob,

The new Alinco is the only current-production HT that will operate full
duplex; but like others, I hear rumblings about a TH-D7 replacement from
Kenwood later this year. The D7 was full duplex.

Posters here an elsewhere haven't given the Alinco high marks for its
abilities to work the FM satellites. I haven't tried it, so I hope those who
have some experience with it will respond to you.

All of that being said, I would recommend the Kenwood TH-F6A from the group
of currently available non-full-duplex radios for one major reason - its
general coverage receiver is all mode. I borrowed one from a ham friend
several months ago and, over the course of a weekend, use it as my receive
radio with a FT-817ND as my transmit radio to make multiple contacts on all
of the then-active linear satellites (AO-7 Mode B, FO-29 and VO-52). It
performed very well as I worked all passes without a receive preamp for
either VHF or UHF.

It will work the FM satellites, while providing the bonus of giving
newcomers a chance to copy AO-7, FO-29, HO-68 in linear mode and VO-52. I
suspect that when they've heard a few passes of the linear satellites, they
will be interested in trying to get on them.

I hope this is helpful.

73 to all,

Tim - N3TL
Athens, Ga. - EM84ha

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Bob- W7LRD
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 2:10 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] current handheld



I have been asked- what is the best current handheld for FM sats?  What
are we using?  I have an old IC-w32a, no longer in production. 

73 Bob W7LRD 
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Clint Bradford
 ...  what is the best current handheld for FM sats??

We do not have a currently-manufactured TRUE DUPLEX HT available. Alinco tried 
- but the sub-band receive performance on their DJ-G7T is gruesome.

I use and like the Yaesu FT-60R - for MANY reasons ...

-Receives 108 to a gig
-bulletproof case
-strongest belt clip of any amateur HT chassis on the market
-easy to manually program
-1,000+ memories
-large, easy-to-read display
-and a battery situation that is great. Load up the optional FBA-25 AA alkaline 
tray with alkalines or NiMH cells, and you have FULL TX POWER available, is 
needed. Do that on, say, a Kenwood TH-F6a, and you have ONE-HALF WATT TX power.

Oh - and the Yaesu FT-60R can be programmed for split freq ops - where is 
receives on 440 and transmits on 2M.

Overall, it is a tremendous value for your money. Under $200 at HRO and AES and 
other authorized Yaesu dealers.

Clint Bradford, K6LCS
909-241-7666
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: current handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Gordon JC Pearce
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 15:14 -0500, Tim - N3TL wrote:

 All of that being said, I would recommend the Kenwood TH-F6A from the group
 of currently available non-full-duplex radios for one major reason - its
 general coverage receiver is all mode. 

All of my satellite contacts have been with the TH-F7E which is the
European version - no 220MHz, but no cellphone hole either.  What's
especially handy is you can open it up to work on PMR frequencies too,
so I can bung in the channels for a site where I'm working and use it to
test commercial gear.

Gordon MM0YEQ

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Kai Gunter Brandt
Clint Bradford wrote:
 ...  what is the best current handheld for FM sats??
   

 We do not have a currently-manufactured TRUE DUPLEX HT available. Alinco 
 tried - but the sub-band receive performance on their DJ-G7T is gruesome.

   

Have you tried the latest firmware? They have adjusted the filters and 
the RX on UHF on main/sub-band is much better. You can also download the 
service manual and change these parameters yourselves but this is 
probably not something that should be done.

Comparing it to my TH-D7 it's not that bad. They changed something on 
the 23cm too but i'm not sure what the issue was there.

Kai Gunter
LA3QMA
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Clint Bradford
 ... DJ-G7T ... adjusted the filters and the RX on UHF on main/sub-band is 
 much better ...

What version firmware are you at, Kai?

I will need to re-evaluate this unit!

Clint Bradford, K6LCS
909-241-7666





___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Kai Gunter Brandt
Clint Bradford wrote:
 ... DJ-G7T ... adjusted the filters and the RX on UHF on main/sub-band is 
 much better ...
   

 What version firmware are you at, Kai?

 I will need to re-evaluate this unit!
   
E5.000

[Updates of this firmware version]
1: RIT/TXIT functions / added.
2: Reverse function in repeater operation / bettered.
3: Beep sounds at turn-off the power / added.
4: CTCSS tone of Auto-repeater  memory / bettered (give priority to the 
tone in memory, not in VFO while auto-repeater is ON)
5: Welcome-screen setting / bettered.
6: New scan mode added = turns on the LCD light when scan stops. Very 
convenient operating G7 in the dark.
7: Firmware update operation: accepts the command only when the 
battery-icon shows full.
8: Minor bugs fixed.


Previous firmware: Bettered receiver performance around 320MHz range.

I have not tested this on the birds. But the local repeater using the 
same antenna. Not a very advanced test. Receiving the repeater before 
upgrade, flashing the firmware and test again from the same spot.

Anyhow the original antenna is not good on VHF but i think the UHF/SHF 
is better. Using the original antenna for the TH-D7 on the radio you 
gain better signal on the Alinco. So i have replaced the antenna for a 
SC951 SureCom for V/U and SHF and now it's better on VHF too.

On the birds i probably want to use another antenna but the SC951 should 
work ok and better than the original on V/UHF. For SHF i have nothing to 
compare them on.

I really like the dual-memorybank(splitband) so they are perfect for the 
birds. But i have not done any QSOs on the birds using this radio. But 
with the dual VFO control it's probably bnetter than the TH-D7 as you 
can adjust for dopler on RX on the Alinco. (The TH-D7 can only adjust 
the band you are TXing on)

So then i just have to try AO51 ;o) i just wanted to say that they have 
done something with the filters and i think they have adjusted more than 
just the 320MHz range even if they don't say so.

They are responding relatively fast on e-mail if you have any questions 
or suggestions for new functions or to change something into the better.

Kai Gunter
LA3QMA
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Clint Bradford
Kai - Are you working with Alinco in the U.S.? Is yours an Alinco DG-G7E or 
DJ-G7T?

Clint, K6LCS



___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread John Heath
No full duplex handheld - here is a simple solution. 

Use two rigs. Buy a 5w 2m radio for the uplink.
Several good ones available available at low cost. 
If using an Arrow run separate cables for each radio, this avoids the diplexer 
which some on this list report as a source of extras loss.

Works fine for me

73 John G7HIA

 




From: Clint Bradford clintbra...@earthlink.net
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Sunday, 7 March, 2010 20:23:12
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

 ...  what is the best current handheld for FM sats??

We do not have a currently-manufactured TRUE DUPLEX HT available. Alinco tried 
- but the sub-band receive performance on their DJ-G7T is gruesome.

I use and like the Yaesu FT-60R - for MANY reasons ...

-Receives 108 to a gig
-bulletproof case
-strongest belt clip of any amateur HT chassis on the market
-easy to manually program
-1,000+ memories
-large, easy-to-read display
-and a battery situation that is great. Load up the optional FBA-25 AA alkaline 
tray with alkalines or NiMH cells, and you have FULL TX POWER available, is 
needed. Do that on, say, a Kenwood TH-F6a, and you have ONE-HALF WATT TX power.

Oh - and the Yaesu FT-60R can be programmed for split freq ops - where is 
receives on 440 and transmits on 2M.

Overall, it is a tremendous value for your money. Under $200 at HRO and AES and 
other authorized Yaesu dealers.

Clint Bradford, K6LCS
909-241-7666
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Current Handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Lee Ernstrom

Hi Guys,

I just ordered the microphone/headphone cable from HRO for my DJ-7G so I
will soon be able to try it out on full duplex.  I am very pleased, by
the way, on how well the sub band receiver hears the satelites.  

WA7HQD
Lee Ernstrom
Syracuse, Utah DN31xb

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: current handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Jeff KB2M
 Years ago I did a test of the various handheld radio's available for sat
use. I rated the TH-F6A a distant last. Reason is that its front-end is very
sensitive to inter-mod. The test was performed in front of HRO in DE. See my
HT test report on my webpage. It can be found by navigating to QRZ.com then
lookup kb2m. I also remember when I was on a business trip to Houston. While
there I meet with Jerry k5oe, Bruce kk5do, and Al n5afv for dinner(I have a
picture of the group if anyone is interested). After dinner we went to the
parking lot to work an FM bird. As my F6A was deaf from the urban inter-mod
I had to borrow someone's HT to finish making a contact. When I got home I
sold the Kenwood. It might be good out in the country, but it sucks in the
city!...

73 Jeff kb2m


-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Tim - N3TL
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 15:15 PM
To: 'Bob- W7LRD'; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: current handheld

Hi Bob,

The new Alinco is the only current-production HT that will operate full
duplex; but like others, I hear rumblings about a TH-D7 replacement from
Kenwood later this year. The D7 was full duplex.

Posters here an elsewhere haven't given the Alinco high marks for its
abilities to work the FM satellites. I haven't tried it, so I hope those who
have some experience with it will respond to you.

All of that being said, I would recommend the Kenwood TH-F6A from the group
of currently available non-full-duplex radios for one major reason - its
general coverage receiver is all mode. I borrowed one from a ham friend
several months ago and, over the course of a weekend, use it as my receive
radio with a FT-817ND as my transmit radio to make multiple contacts on all
of the then-active linear satellites (AO-7 Mode B, FO-29 and VO-52). It
performed very well as I worked all passes without a receive preamp for
either VHF or UHF.

It will work the FM satellites, while providing the bonus of giving
newcomers a chance to copy AO-7, FO-29, HO-68 in linear mode and VO-52. I
suspect that when they've heard a few passes of the linear satellites, they
will be interested in trying to get on them.

I hope this is helpful.

73 to all,

Tim - N3TL
Athens, Ga. - EM84ha

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Bob- W7LRD
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 2:10 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] current handheld



I have been asked- what is the best current handheld for FM sats?  What
are we using?  I have an old IC-w32a, no longer in production. 

73 Bob W7LRD 


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: current handheld

2010-03-07 Thread Gordon JC Pearce
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 19:51 -0500, Jeff KB2M wrote:
 Years ago I did a test of the various handheld radio's available for sat
 use. I rated the TH-F6A a distant last. Reason is that its front-end is very
 sensitive to inter-mod. The test was performed in front of HRO in DE. See my
 HT test report on my webpage. It can be found by navigating to QRZ.com then
 lookup kb2m. I also remember when I was on a business trip to Houston. While
 there I meet with Jerry k5oe, Bruce kk5do, and Al n5afv for dinner(I have a
 picture of the group if anyone is interested). After dinner we went to the
 parking lot to work an FM bird. As my F6A was deaf from the urban inter-mod
 I had to borrow someone's HT to finish making a contact. When I got home I
 sold the Kenwood. It might be good out in the country, but it sucks in the
 city!...

I found that my TH-F7E is badly affected by pager rip in certain spots
around Glasgow, especially with an external antenna.  Oddly enough, some
of the high sites on tower blocks I maintain are really bad, and some
are practically silent.

Using it for satellite it seems that the diplexer in my homebrew crossed
yagi knocks enough of the out-of-band crap out to prevent this.  It's
not nearly so bad for intermod on UHF as it is on VHF, too.  This could
be because there are fewer UHF high-power paging transmitters here (just
a wee bit of mobitex, mostly).

Gordon MM0YEQ

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb