Re: [Amsn-devel] No group problem in new contact list?
Hi, I know perfectly what you said... By the way you said it over MSN... But you see the same problem that me : we must take care of events perfectly because else, counts will be erroneous... But doing it through cmsn_draw_online is a really bad thing and I reject this idea... My final aim is to see this cmsn_draw_online proc disappear... I hate such things !! I vote for an event driven main window... :d So I think we must think when events are fired and when we must update counts... Another trouble is : group counting must take the precedence over the newCL because else, the counts won't be well updated... Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 00:58, Youness Alaoui a écrit : best thing would be whenever someone finds a bug, he fixes it.. otherwise, we'll never get this thing done. alvaro, this bug was explained in my earlier emails, maybe if you disable the do not show empty groups, you'll see that user appear... Phil, I also think I wrote a solution for that in a previous mail, but not sure if you didn't read it (or forgot) or if you read it but thought it was a bad idea.. I think we should have a proc from the groups namespace register for contact events, and update the user count directly from the groups procs. Another solution (would be better as it will be less buggy I suppose) would be to have a proc in groups::UpdateUserCounts which will go through the list of users and update all those user counts. And that proc could be called everytime we enter cmsn_draw_online ... The second solution would be better as it will be less buggy because it will refresh the count according to the list itself, not depending on some events.. the first solution would need to take account ALL possible list changes, like a user copied from one group to another, a user moved, a user blablabla... u know what I mean.. a little mistake and the user count will be corrupted until you logoff/login again. But it will be the 'best' way... KaKaRoTo On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 02:03:37PM +0100, Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: It's a know trouble as the count of contacts was done in oldCL code... We must implement that but I still don't know well how I will implement that... So either you code it either you wait for me to find time and code it... Phil Le Sunday 10 December 2006 13:57, Álvaro J. Iradier a écrit : Hi, a contact that is in no groups came online, but it was invisible in the contact list when in hybrid mode. The contact was there in standard or group mode, but not in hybrid mode. When moving the user to a group, it appears correctly in the new group. Is it possible that the No group group is not shown correctly? Also, the user count in every group is not updated correctly (maybe this is why the No group group is not shown, as it thinks there are 0 users). - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
Re: [Amsn-devel] No group problem in new contact list?
Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: Hi, I know perfectly what you said... By the way you said it over MSN... But you see the same problem that me : we must take care of events perfectly because else, counts will be erroneous... But doing it through cmsn_draw_online is a really bad thing and I reject this idea... My final aim is to see this cmsn_draw_online proc disappear... I hate such things !! I vote for an event driven main window... :d my vote for that (for what my vote is worth :P) and possibly OO: I tell this for you; it would be easier to develop and to maintain... and probably more funny :) bye - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
Re: [Amsn-devel] No group problem in new contact list?
Shouldn't group counts be done in the protocol layer ? I don't know much of this but can't it be done by keeping these counts as variables in the protocol layer which can be retrieved from other layers with a call ? Karel Op maandag 11-12-2006 om 19:34 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Philippe Valembois - Phil: Hi, I know perfectly what you said... By the way you said it over MSN... But you see the same problem that me : we must take care of events perfectly because else, counts will be erroneous... But doing it through cmsn_draw_online is a really bad thing and I reject this idea... My final aim is to see this cmsn_draw_online proc disappear... I hate such things !! I vote for an event driven main window... :d So I think we must think when events are fired and when we must update counts... Another trouble is : group counting must take the precedence over the newCL because else, the counts won't be well updated... Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 00:58, Youness Alaoui a écrit : best thing would be whenever someone finds a bug, he fixes it.. otherwise, we'll never get this thing done. alvaro, this bug was explained in my earlier emails, maybe if you disable the do not show empty groups, you'll see that user appear... Phil, I also think I wrote a solution for that in a previous mail, but not sure if you didn't read it (or forgot) or if you read it but thought it was a bad idea.. I think we should have a proc from the groups namespace register for contact events, and update the user count directly from the groups procs. Another solution (would be better as it will be less buggy I suppose) would be to have a proc in groups::UpdateUserCounts which will go through the list of users and update all those user counts. And that proc could be called everytime we enter cmsn_draw_online ... The second solution would be better as it will be less buggy because it will refresh the count according to the list itself, not depending on some events.. the first solution would need to take account ALL possible list changes, like a user copied from one group to another, a user moved, a user blablabla... u know what I mean.. a little mistake and the user count will be corrupted until you logoff/login again. But it will be the 'best' way... KaKaRoTo On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 02:03:37PM +0100, Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: It's a know trouble as the count of contacts was done in oldCL code... We must implement that but I still don't know well how I will implement that... So either you code it either you wait for me to find time and code it... Phil Le Sunday 10 December 2006 13:57, Álvaro J. Iradier a écrit : Hi, a contact that is in no groups came online, but it was invisible in the contact list when in hybrid mode. The contact was there in standard or group mode, but not in hybrid mode. When moving the user to a group, it appears correctly in the new group. Is it possible that the No group group is not shown correctly? Also, the user count in every group is not updated correctly (maybe this is why the No group group is not shown, as it thinks there are 0 users). - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
Re: [Amsn-devel] No group problem in new contact list?
NoWhereMan wrote: more funny :) ARRRGH I meant funnier. Damn. I must be tired -__-' - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
Re: [Amsn-devel] No group problem in new contact list?
LOl,
I thought about that too
Simpler but it's many code to add to protocol but I think it's silly to make
the count in the oldCL code...
Phil
Le Monday 11 December 2006 19:47, Karel Demeyer a écrit :
Shouldn't group counts be done in the protocol layer ? I don't know
much of this but can't it be done by keeping these counts as variables
in the protocol layer which can be retrieved from other layers with a
call ?
Karel
Op maandag 11-12-2006 om 19:34 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Philippe
Valembois - Phil:
Hi,
I know perfectly what you said...
By the way you said it over MSN...
But you see the same problem that me : we must take care of events
perfectly because else, counts will be erroneous...
But doing it through cmsn_draw_online is a really bad thing and I reject
this idea... My final aim is to see this cmsn_draw_online proc
disappear... I hate such things !! I vote for an event driven main
window... :d So I think we must think when events are fired and when we
must update counts...
Another trouble is : group counting must take the precedence over the
newCL because else, the counts won't be well updated...
Phil
Le Monday 11 December 2006 00:58, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
best thing would be whenever someone finds a bug, he fixes it..
otherwise, we'll never get this thing done. alvaro, this bug was
explained in my earlier emails, maybe if you disable the do not show
empty groups, you'll see that user appear...
Phil, I also think I wrote a solution for that in a previous mail, but
not sure if you didn't read it (or forgot) or if you read it but
thought it was a bad idea.. I think we should have a proc from the
groups namespace register for contact events, and update the user count
directly from the groups procs.
Another solution (would be better as it will be less buggy I suppose)
would be to have a proc in groups::UpdateUserCounts which will go
through the list of users and update all those user counts. And that
proc could be called everytime we enter cmsn_draw_online ...
The second solution would be better as it will be less buggy because it
will refresh the count according to the list itself, not depending on
some events.. the first solution would need to take account ALL
possible list changes, like a user copied from one group to another, a
user moved, a user blablabla... u know what I mean.. a little mistake
and the user count will be corrupted until you logoff/login again. But
it will be the 'best' way...
KaKaRoTo
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 02:03:37PM +0100, Philippe Valembois - Phil
wrote:
It's a know trouble as the count of contacts was done in oldCL
code... We must implement that but I still don't know well how I will
implement that... So either you code it either you wait for me to
find time and code it... Phil
Le Sunday 10 December 2006 13:57, Álvaro J. Iradier a écrit :
Hi, a contact that is in no groups came online, but it was
invisible in the contact list when in hybrid mode. The contact
was there in standard or group mode, but not in hybrid mode. When
moving the user to a group, it appears correctly in the new group.
Is it possible that the No group group is not shown correctly?
Also, the user count in every group is not updated correctly (maybe
this is why the No group group is not shown, as it thinks there
are 0 users).
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -
and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DE
VDEV ___
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
---
-- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn
cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVD
EV ___
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn
cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Amsn-devel
Re: [Amsn-devel] No group problem in new contact list?
OUch just thought :s No it can't be in protocol as it depends on display mode (eg Hybrid, Grouped or Online/Offline) so it must be splitted Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 19:49, Philippe Valembois - Phil a écrit : LOl, I thought about that too Simpler but it's many code to add to protocol but I think it's silly to make the count in the oldCL code... Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 19:47, Karel Demeyer a écrit : Shouldn't group counts be done in the protocol layer ? I don't know much of this but can't it be done by keeping these counts as variables in the protocol layer which can be retrieved from other layers with a call ? Karel Op maandag 11-12-2006 om 19:34 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Philippe Valembois - Phil: Hi, I know perfectly what you said... By the way you said it over MSN... But you see the same problem that me : we must take care of events perfectly because else, counts will be erroneous... But doing it through cmsn_draw_online is a really bad thing and I reject this idea... My final aim is to see this cmsn_draw_online proc disappear... I hate such things !! I vote for an event driven main window... :d So I think we must think when events are fired and when we must update counts... Another trouble is : group counting must take the precedence over the newCL because else, the counts won't be well updated... Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 00:58, Youness Alaoui a écrit : best thing would be whenever someone finds a bug, he fixes it.. otherwise, we'll never get this thing done. alvaro, this bug was explained in my earlier emails, maybe if you disable the do not show empty groups, you'll see that user appear... Phil, I also think I wrote a solution for that in a previous mail, but not sure if you didn't read it (or forgot) or if you read it but thought it was a bad idea.. I think we should have a proc from the groups namespace register for contact events, and update the user count directly from the groups procs. Another solution (would be better as it will be less buggy I suppose) would be to have a proc in groups::UpdateUserCounts which will go through the list of users and update all those user counts. And that proc could be called everytime we enter cmsn_draw_online ... The second solution would be better as it will be less buggy because it will refresh the count according to the list itself, not depending on some events.. the first solution would need to take account ALL possible list changes, like a user copied from one group to another, a user moved, a user blablabla... u know what I mean.. a little mistake and the user count will be corrupted until you logoff/login again. But it will be the 'best' way... KaKaRoTo On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 02:03:37PM +0100, Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: It's a know trouble as the count of contacts was done in oldCL code... We must implement that but I still don't know well how I will implement that... So either you code it either you wait for me to find time and code it... Phil Le Sunday 10 December 2006 13:57, Álvaro J. Iradier a écrit : Hi, a contact that is in no groups came online, but it was invisible in the contact list when in hybrid mode. The contact was there in standard or group mode, but not in hybrid mode. When moving the user to a group, it appears correctly in the new group. Is it possible that the No group group is not shown correctly? Also, the user count in every group is not updated correctly (maybe this is why the No group group is not shown, as it thinks there are 0 users). --- -- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID= DE VDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel - -- -- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DE VD EV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel --- -- Take Surveys. Earn
Re: [Amsn-devel] No group problem in new contact list?
Humm.. how about NEVER counting ... What I mean is, instead of an event to keep the count, and isntead of caling a updatecounts before the cmsn_draw_online, we could instead directly do a : ::groups::GetCount $group which will calculate it on the fly... I hate the idea of keeping the count in a variable and update that count on events.. I know it's not the most efficient thing, but I'd prefer to loose some speed compared to adding tons of bugs.. Also, it might not be that bad in performance, since the group count will be read only once per group, instead of having the event be fired, callback called, count updated for every contact action... no? + the issue of the group update callback being called before the CL update event... that would be a mess to acheive.. I would also vote for event driven window, but hey, we need to compromise! what do you think ? KKRT On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 07:53:04PM +0100, Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: OUch just thought :s No it can't be in protocol as it depends on display mode (eg Hybrid, Grouped or Online/Offline) so it must be splitted Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 19:49, Philippe Valembois - Phil a écrit : LOl, I thought about that too Simpler but it's many code to add to protocol but I think it's silly to make the count in the oldCL code... Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 19:47, Karel Demeyer a écrit : Shouldn't group counts be done in the protocol layer ? I don't know much of this but can't it be done by keeping these counts as variables in the protocol layer which can be retrieved from other layers with a call ? Karel Op maandag 11-12-2006 om 19:34 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Philippe Valembois - Phil: Hi, I know perfectly what you said... By the way you said it over MSN... But you see the same problem that me : we must take care of events perfectly because else, counts will be erroneous... But doing it through cmsn_draw_online is a really bad thing and I reject this idea... My final aim is to see this cmsn_draw_online proc disappear... I hate such things !! I vote for an event driven main window... :d So I think we must think when events are fired and when we must update counts... Another trouble is : group counting must take the precedence over the newCL because else, the counts won't be well updated... Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 00:58, Youness Alaoui a écrit : best thing would be whenever someone finds a bug, he fixes it.. otherwise, we'll never get this thing done. alvaro, this bug was explained in my earlier emails, maybe if you disable the do not show empty groups, you'll see that user appear... Phil, I also think I wrote a solution for that in a previous mail, but not sure if you didn't read it (or forgot) or if you read it but thought it was a bad idea.. I think we should have a proc from the groups namespace register for contact events, and update the user count directly from the groups procs. Another solution (would be better as it will be less buggy I suppose) would be to have a proc in groups::UpdateUserCounts which will go through the list of users and update all those user counts. And that proc could be called everytime we enter cmsn_draw_online ... The second solution would be better as it will be less buggy because it will refresh the count according to the list itself, not depending on some events.. the first solution would need to take account ALL possible list changes, like a user copied from one group to another, a user moved, a user blablabla... u know what I mean.. a little mistake and the user count will be corrupted until you logoff/login again. But it will be the 'best' way... KaKaRoTo On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 02:03:37PM +0100, Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: It's a know trouble as the count of contacts was done in oldCL code... We must implement that but I still don't know well how I will implement that... So either you code it either you wait for me to find time and code it... Phil Le Sunday 10 December 2006 13:57, Álvaro J. Iradier a écrit : Hi, a contact that is in no groups came online, but it was invisible in the contact list when in hybrid mode. The contact was there in standard or group mode, but not in hybrid mode. When moving the user to a group, it appears correctly in the new group. Is it possible that the No group group is not shown correctly? Also, the user count in every group is not updated correctly (maybe this is why the No group group is not shown, as it thinks there are 0 users). --- -- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's
Re: [Amsn-devel] No group problem in new contact list?
On 12/11/06, Youness Alaoui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Humm.. how about NEVER counting ... What I mean is, instead of an event to keep the count, and isntead of caling a updatecounts before the cmsn_draw_online, we could instead directly do a : ::groups::GetCount $group which will calculate it on the fly... I hate the idea of keeping the count in a variable and update that count on events.. I know it's not the most efficient thing, but I'd prefer to loose some speed compared to adding tons of bugs.. Also, it might not be that bad in performance, since the group count will be read only once per group, instead of having the event be fired, callback called, count updated for every contact action... no? + the issue of the group update callback being called before the CL update event... that would be a mess to acheive.. I would also vote for event driven window, but hey, we need to compromise! what do you think ? I would want to stay completely with events. What if something else comes up that you could use an event for, but it would be easier to 'compromise' and not use events... then we end up with bad code and direct calls, don't we? Just my opinion, I don't know much about this sort of things, but in my head events = good :P Tom KKRT On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 07:53:04PM +0100, Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: OUch just thought :s No it can't be in protocol as it depends on display mode (eg Hybrid, Grouped or Online/Offline) so it must be splitted Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 19:49, Philippe Valembois - Phil a écrit: LOl, I thought about that too Simpler but it's many code to add to protocol but I think it's silly to make the count in the oldCL code... Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 19:47, Karel Demeyer a écrit: Shouldn't group counts be done in the protocol layer ? I don't know much of this but can't it be done by keeping these counts as variables in the protocol layer which can be retrieved from other layers with a call ? Karel Op maandag 11-12-2006 om 19:34 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Philippe Valembois - Phil: Hi, I know perfectly what you said... By the way you said it over MSN... But you see the same problem that me : we must take care of events perfectly because else, counts will be erroneous... But doing it through cmsn_draw_online is a really bad thing and I reject this idea... My final aim is to see this cmsn_draw_online proc disappear... I hate such things !! I vote for an event driven main window... :d So I think we must think when events are fired and when we must update counts... Another trouble is : group counting must take the precedence over the newCL because else, the counts won't be well updated... Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 00:58, Youness Alaoui a écrit : best thing would be whenever someone finds a bug, he fixes it.. otherwise, we'll never get this thing done. alvaro, this bug was explained in my earlier emails, maybe if you disable the do not show empty groups, you'll see that user appear... Phil, I also think I wrote a solution for that in a previous mail, but not sure if you didn't read it (or forgot) or if you read it but thought it was a bad idea.. I think we should have a proc from the groups namespace register for contact events, and update the user count directly from the groups procs. Another solution (would be better as it will be less buggy I suppose) would be to have a proc in groups::UpdateUserCounts which will go through the list of users and update all those user counts. And that proc could be called everytime we enter cmsn_draw_online ... The second solution would be better as it will be less buggy because it will refresh the count according to the list itself, not depending on some events.. the first solution would need to take account ALL possible list changes, like a user copied from one group to another, a user moved, a user blablabla... u know what I mean.. a little mistake and the user count will be corrupted until you logoff/login again. But it will be the 'best' way... KaKaRoTo On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 02:03:37PM +0100, Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: It's a know trouble as the count of contacts was done in oldCL code... We must implement that but I still don't know well how I will implement that... So either you code it either you wait for me to find time and code it... Phil Le Sunday 10 December 2006 13:57, Álvaro J. Iradier a écrit : Hi, a contact that is in no groups came online, but it was invisible in the contact list when in hybrid mode. The contact was there in standard or group mode, but not in hybrid mode. When moving the user to a group, it appears correctly in the new group. Is it possible that the No group group is
Re: [Amsn-devel] No group problem in new contact list?
Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: OUch just thought :s No it can't be in protocol as it depends on display mode (eg Hybrid, Grouped or Online/Offline) so it must be splitted Phil I don't know if it's stupid, but how about putting the display mode in protocol, or something? Maybe an intermediate layer? - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
Re: [Amsn-devel] No group problem in new contact list?
No, that would be bad.. but I don't think the display mode really matters here, the online contacts count doesn't change no matter how we display it (it's actually whether we use it or not), same goes for offline, and for other groups.. the only difference would be for hybrid where you show the user count instead of $count/$total ... In that case, the GetUserCount could return a list of [list $count $list] and depending on the mode we could either show one or show both... I start understanding why the group count is done in CL code, it's beccause it's specific to the CL, since it's the CL that shows the info, but it's not something important for the protocol to keep that count.. because of the ::groups namespace, the count should be there for modularity reasons, but if noone else apart from the CL uses it, I don't see why it shouldn't be linked with the CL. I would really go with a compromise by doing the code that counts in the groups namespace, but count everytime instead of keeping a variable of the count and use that with events... KKRT On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 08:22:03PM +0100, NoWhereMan wrote: Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: OUch just thought :s No it can't be in protocol as it depends on display mode (eg Hybrid, Grouped or Online/Offline) so it must be splitted Phil I don't know if it's stupid, but how about putting the display mode in protocol, or something? Maybe an intermediate layer? - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
Re: [Amsn-devel] No group problem in new contact list?
I am currently coding it like you say (notice I just begun before reading you.. :d) I just hope to have enough time to finish it for this evening... Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 21:01, Youness Alaoui a écrit : No, that would be bad.. but I don't think the display mode really matters here, the online contacts count doesn't change no matter how we display it (it's actually whether we use it or not), same goes for offline, and for other groups.. the only difference would be for hybrid where you show the user count instead of $count/$total ... In that case, the GetUserCount could return a list of [list $count $list] and depending on the mode we could either show one or show both... I start understanding why the group count is done in CL code, it's beccause it's specific to the CL, since it's the CL that shows the info, but it's not something important for the protocol to keep that count.. because of the ::groups namespace, the count should be there for modularity reasons, but if noone else apart from the CL uses it, I don't see why it shouldn't be linked with the CL. I would really go with a compromise by doing the code that counts in the groups namespace, but count everytime instead of keeping a variable of the count and use that with events... KKRT On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 08:22:03PM +0100, NoWhereMan wrote: Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: OUch just thought :s No it can't be in protocol as it depends on display mode (eg Hybrid, Grouped or Online/Offline) so it must be splitted Phil I don't know if it's stupid, but how about putting the display mode in protocol, or something? Maybe an intermediate layer? - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
Re: [Amsn-devel] No group problem in new contact list?
Enjoy !! Should be bugfree... :d (At least in newCL code as I cleant the oldCL code too) Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 21:14, Philippe Valembois - Phil a écrit : I am currently coding it like you say (notice I just begun before reading you.. :d) I just hope to have enough time to finish it for this evening... Phil Le Monday 11 December 2006 21:01, Youness Alaoui a écrit : No, that would be bad.. but I don't think the display mode really matters here, the online contacts count doesn't change no matter how we display it (it's actually whether we use it or not), same goes for offline, and for other groups.. the only difference would be for hybrid where you show the user count instead of $count/$total ... In that case, the GetUserCount could return a list of [list $count $list] and depending on the mode we could either show one or show both... I start understanding why the group count is done in CL code, it's beccause it's specific to the CL, since it's the CL that shows the info, but it's not something important for the protocol to keep that count.. because of the ::groups namespace, the count should be there for modularity reasons, but if noone else apart from the CL uses it, I don't see why it shouldn't be linked with the CL. I would really go with a compromise by doing the code that counts in the groups namespace, but count everytime instead of keeping a variable of the count and use that with events... KKRT On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 08:22:03PM +0100, NoWhereMan wrote: Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: OUch just thought :s No it can't be in protocol as it depends on display mode (eg Hybrid, Grouped or Online/Offline) so it must be splitted Phil I don't know if it's stupid, but how about putting the display mode in protocol, or something? Maybe an intermediate layer? --- -- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVD EV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
