Re: [AOLSERVER] ACT voting procedural question
In a message dated 11/8/2002 2:50:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Should nominees be prohibited from voting as well, then? -- Dossy I think everyone should get one vote, which you can chose to use for yourself, or for someone else. Hadn't really given much thought to whether or not AOL employees could/should vote. Honestly I don't see why not since everyone's goal here is to pick the best team to help lead the project going forward. I'd love to hear more feedback from the community about this though. - n
Re: [AOLSERVER] ACT voting procedural question
On 2002.11.08, Peter M. Jansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since AOL already has representatives on the core team, should AOL > employees be prohibited from voting for community core team members? Should nominees be prohibited from voting as well, then? -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Panoptic Computer Network web: http://www.panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
[AOLSERVER] ACT voting procedural question
Since AOL already has representatives on the core team, should AOL employees be prohibited from voting for community core team members?
