Re: (OT) Does anyone have problems with GirlFriend 3.1?
No problems here ... My system is set up so that GirlFriend 3.1 isn't desirable. The companion program -- BoyFriend 7.8 -- has been in development longer, but tests on my system and overall concurrence indicate that program has yet to reach "stable release" status even though it has been updated much more frequently than GF. One of the worst problems is the BF similarity to dozeware, with it wanting to run things the way it's coded and the system owner's wishes are always being negated. All attempts to totally remove BF from a system, rather than simply upgrading to new version, result in old BF suddenly showing up at the worst possible times and frequent system crashes. l.d. On Mon, 21 Aug 2000 21:42:40, Dale Mentzer wrote: Yes, this program is a resource hog and the hardware is very static sentive. I/O port conflicts are very common. There are reports that the use of certain Trojan "patches" may prevent the need to upgrade to Wife 1.0. ;) My advice is to stick to MT4D v6.00. -- Learn about B'FOR Join B'FOR - B'mothers For Open Records a href="http://www.b-for.org"B'FOR www.b-for.org/a [Associate members of triad also welcome; membership confidential if desired.] -- Arachne V1.64, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
Re: (OT) Does anyone have problems with GirlFriend 3.1?
Hi folks, for other funny things, try http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Way/7750/ (partly in German). -- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the Ultimate Internet Client -- Arachne V1.65, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/ _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: (OT) Does anyone have problems with GirlFriend 3.1?
On 21 Aug 00 at 23:45, Clarence Verge wrote: On Mon, 21 Aug 2000 21:42:40, Dale Mentzer wrote: My advice is to stick to MT4D v6.00. I'm sorry Dale. There have been reports of insufficient capacity with that version. I would sugggest an upgrade to v7.25. Ah, that must be the ambidextrous version. ;) Thanks. Regards, Dale Mentzer Practice random acts of intelligence and senseless acts of self-control. This mail written by a user of Arachne, the DOS Internet Client W World Wide Web Without Windows http://home.arachne.cz Arachne DOS Browser Home Page
Re: (OT) Does anyone have problems with GirlFriend 3.1?
Hi Dale, You wrote: ---snip--- Ah, that must be the ambidextrous version. ;) Thanks. Regards, Dale Mentzer Practice random acts of intelligence and senseless acts of self-control. ^ Just lurking, Eric :-)' -- __ | Ayrx |__\_ Eric S. Emerson | E-male:~_: ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] `~(*)(*)~' `
Re: (OT) Does anyone have problems with GirlFriend 3.1?
On 21 Aug 00 at 21:50, Samuel W. Heywood wrote: Hello my fellow Arachnids: Have any of you guys ever tried to install and run GirlFriend 3.1 yet? This one is supposed to be perfectly compatible with your old system, and she's supposed to run super-slick too, but many users have reported problems. For an authoritative bug report go here: http://www.thelimit.com/software.htm All the best, Yes, this program is a resource hog and the hardware is very static sentive. I/O port conflicts are very common. There are reports that the use of certain Trojan "patches" may prevent the need to upgrade to Wife 1.0. ;) My advice is to stick to MT4D v6.00. Regards, Dale Mentzer Shin: A device for finding furniture in the dark. This mail written by a user of Arachne, the DOS Internet Client W World Wide Web Without Windows http://home.arachne.cz Arachne DOS Browser Home Page
Re: (OT) Does anyone have problems with GirlFriend 3.1?
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000 21:42:40, Dale Mentzer wrote: My advice is to stick to MT4D v6.00. I'm sorry Dale. There have been reports of insufficient capacity with that version. I would sugggest an upgrade to v7.25. - Clarence Verge - Using Arachne V1.62 for a change
