Interesting issue - Bing does not give the same results, though yahoo does. Can we just be serious on this forum and not have fun?
Or should we not allow post of this nature because one search engine with too much market share lists the post as top result? Are we moving towards a editorial standard for this group? And we are not an "Official" fan club. I would rather prefer this being a self controlled group and eventually making www.arrahman.com the most definitive source of information and ours being a complementary forum to discuss and not disseminate information. My personal views. On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Pradeepan R <pradeepanisonl...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > I agree completely... > Why do ppl want to "entertain" & make "fun" in a Group created for talking > about ARR's music (opinions + facts). > At the very Least, please put in the subject as "Fake track list". > My first reaction on seeing that email was "vow...here is some info". > then as I read the mail , I realise its a piece of junk aimed at grabbing > attention first and fun later. > Is this a Tabloid ? NO. > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Aravind AM <aravind...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> >> @Rawat: >> Your point that the credibility of the group is at stake, is absolutely >> valid. >> >> @ Group: >> I think this logic should be extended to the "fake track lists" as well. >> >> We should all understand that the group's posts show up on google search >> results... >> Just Google for Raavan Tracklist, and you'll see that the first 4 results >> take you to the fake track list by Gopal Anandan, posted in this group! >> >> People like us, who are regular in the group know and understand. But >> imagine any other movie buff doing a search and landing up on this fake >> track list... It would lead to rumours being spread, with the source of the >> rumour being our group! Do we want this to happen? >> >> I appreciate one odd fun post, but not at the sake of the group's >> credibility. We've been getting exclusive updates and news about ARR in this >> group, but such posts reduce the credibility. I really enjoyed the post, but >> as already been pointed out, not everyone got the joke. So, I request Gopal >> Anandan to mention in his post if it's a fun post. >> >> >> Aravind >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Rahmania show interviews: http://rahmania.4shared.com >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> >> --- On *Sun, 18/10/09, V S Rawat <vsra...@gmail.com>* wrote: >> >> >> From: V S Rawat <vsra...@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: [arr] Such Bull! >> To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com >> Date: Sunday, 18 October, 2009, 11:16 AM >> >> >> >> On 10/18/2009 4:51 AM India Time, _Jahanzeb_ wrote: >> >> > exactly. this is what i have been saying all the time, that Chiggy Wiggy >> is a huge failure of ARR. >> > and yes though people didn't agree that it is a "failure" but i don't >> remember anyone calling it a worldclass masterpiece either. >> > >> > - >> > Jahanzeb >> >> Yup. >> >> I think it also puts on a question mark on the credibility of this group >> itself that several members acted like mouthpieces and kept on praising the >> song endlessly and even criticized those who were criticizing the song since >> day one. Some are like going that way. >> >> Now, such members would say that liking or not liking a song is a personal >> matter and they still like it. Well, it is, still there is a thing called >> objectivity. When we agree that this group is considered a place to get >> authentic information on ARR, and some members can't even tolerate a lovely >> prank played by Gopal Anandan for that exact point, then we can't hide from >> the fact that other people might be looking at this group to get authentic >> feedback on the "goodness" of his songs, and all those got misguided by this >> group's endless advertising Chiggy Wiggy and entire bullu. >> >> The reason might be: We fans might like anything given by our man because >> we love our man. It is normal human psychology. We might have convinced >> ourselves that we are liking Chiggy Wiggy or blue on some strengths it has >> while ignoring some down points it is having. >> >> I hope members will learn from this and will try to be more objective in >> giving their future reviews/ feedbacks on future releases of ARR. >> >> Remember, wrong feebacks in this group must be presenting a wrong picture >> about a song/ album to ARR himself if he is accessing the group. ARR needs >> truth. Underved praising will harm ARR. Let's not only utter Satyamev >> Jayate, but also practice it. >> >> > --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. >> > com<http://mc/compose?to=arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>, >> kishore parayath <kishore.parayath@ ...> wrote: >> >> >> >> This is the FIRST TIME that some OFFICIAL reviewer is calling an ARR >> track >> >> as "SECOND RATE" or cheap! >> >> Yup, it makes me sad. >> >> >> So, we must ADMIT facts! Chiggy Wiggy was >> >> certainly a MISTAKE from our BOSS's part, who is reverred in Bollywood >> and >> >> accross India for having created Superhuman Divine Musical wonders! >> >> Yes, we must admit that. And I really wonder why ARR remained so >> uncharacteristicall y unimaginative in this particular song. To put things >> in proper perspective, I think I find Chiggy Wiggy the only single track by >> ARR, out of his 800-1000 songs, that is umimaginative. May be, ARR might >> wish to share "the composing of Chiggy Wiggy" or something like that to tell >> us what went wrong in it. >> >> >> I still REMEMBER, how some fellow fans reacted when I said CHIGGY WIGGY >> was >> >> disappointing after the FIRST promo. They called it a worldclass >> masterpiece >> >> creation, and snubbed the fans who called it average, and expected in >> >> further albums. >> >> >> >> BOSS wont repeat mistakes. Vinnai Thaandi Varuvaaya promo makes all of >> us >> >> speechless!! Exceptional! ! >> >> Righto. Exactly. Boss' brand value remains high as ever. Chiggy Wiggy >> might be a first failure of him so we are facing a new situation really and >> we are not able to think how to accept this fact. But our trust in our man, >> that he had so laboriously and consistently built up through 18 years >> remains as high as always and we will devour each of his next releases. >> >> -- >> Rawat >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> Now, send attachments up to 25MB with Yahoo! India Mail. Learn >> how<http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_galaxy_2/*http://in.overview.mail.yahoo.com/photos>. >> >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Pradeepan. > > "All you need to do is, decide what to do with the time that is given to > you !" > > >
