[Asterisk-Users] unsubscribe

2004-03-09 Thread Jess Magnaye



unsubscribe


[Asterisk-Users] Video Conference

2004-02-27 Thread Jess Magnaye



Is Asterisk capable of handling video 
conference? I am wondering if there is anybody in the list who tried it 
with NetMeeting(s). If it is possible, is the * required to register in 
the GK for this purpose? or making it as h323gw only is enough.







Re: [Asterisk-Users] Using * for large VoIP implementation

2004-02-21 Thread Jess Magnaye

I have it on my network but it is still on a day-to-day evaluation case for
me.  Sometimes the quality is not at its best, probably because I am only
using 800MHz CPU running SIP, Digium, T1-PRI, with g729 licenses. Maybe if
you could spare time to put it on a high-end machine and evaluate, you'll
find better results.  Just take note that echo-cancellation, etc. of * is
based on software (and is CPU intensive).  Unlike existing VoIP gateways on
the market, they have hardware chips (DSPs).  Plus, most users of * is g711.
Finding support for G729 is difficult though.  For calling card application,
it will be quite successful, as number of users for calling card is not as
many as for wholesale.



- Original Message - 
From: John Matte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 11:32 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Using * for large VoIP implementation


 Hi,

 I've searched the archives and can't find a satisfactory answer to this
 question: Does anybody out there have experience using * in large VoIP
 deployments? That is, switching large number of minutes from PSTN to VoIP
 and vice versa? How stable is it, what are the user experiences. I know
 Voicepulse and a few others do that, but I'd be interested to hear the
 experiences, what hardware is in use (e.g. who is using digium T1/E1
cards).

 Would greatly appreciate input on this

 Thanks

 _
 MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Echo

2004-02-09 Thread Jess Magnaye



I'm having bad echo between TDM and 
SIP.There's no echo between TDM-TDM though. I've seen this post from 
JTodd:

; Config notes:; - in /usr/src/zaptel/Makefile, set 
KFLAGS+=-DECHO_CAN_MARK2; - in /usr/src/zaptel/Makefile, set 
KFLAGS+=-DAGGRESSIVE_SUPPRESSOR ;; I compile with these two echo 
cancellation flags as it seems they; sound better with SIP 
phones interacting with Zap (analog) devices.

I am not into compiling, so I need to verify if I 
will just edit the Makefile in /usr/src/zaptel folder and execute "makefw"? or 
just load ztcfg after modifying the Makefile.



Thanks for the usual promptness. :) I 
welcome other ideas to resolve this echo issue.



[Asterisk-Users] G729 license

2004-01-30 Thread Jess Magnaye



Hello all,

I would like to just verify where to purchase the 
G729 license for Asterisk. Like I want to run G729 codec for all my calls 
passing thru Asterisk (voicemail, parking, via ZAP, via SIP, etc). The 
list says license is taken from Digium, does that apply also if I have Dialogic 
cards on my *?




Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mediatrix 1204 sip experience?

2004-01-23 Thread Jess Magnaye
Go for inter-fone products. it can both support sip and h323.


- Original Message - 
From: Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk-a-users-list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 2:40 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Mediatrix 1204 sip experience?



 Anyone had any good/bad/otherwise experience with the Mediatrix 1204 Sip
FXO
 4-port gateway?

 The archives tend to suggest the box is not very straight forward, and
possibly
 lacks some basic pstn interaction features.

 Thinking about trying one in place of a pair of x100p's (functioning fine
now).
 CallerId, etc, supported on this gateway?

 Rich


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] simple question...

2004-01-22 Thread Jess Magnaye



it just came to my mind, and i haven't done any 
researches yet if somebody tried this one with asterisk.. :) well just in case 
somebody or someone on the list aware, i appreciate any advise.

in telco world, there's like 64kbps per channel and 
voice can be carried on a 16kbps channel. is it possible to configure 
asterisk to make 4 extensions (ATAs example), to call out using single FXO port 
at the same time? if that is possible, then is it also possible to make 
t1-pri to be capable of transmitting 4x23ch simultaneous calls..?

just curious.. nothing very serious.

thanks :)


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Background Noise

2004-01-22 Thread Jess Magnaye
yes, power is also source of background noise, but not all the time. you
must also have proper grounding.

with pc-phone, it could also be related to your phone/speaker gain controls.
so u have to be definite on what kind of background noise u are getting.

best codec for sip? it's always best to have alaw or ulaw. :) but
bw-consuming. alaw is if u are using E1s. ulaw for T1s.  don't even bother
to use gsm. better get g729.  some says u can use g723.1 with * w/o add'l
purchase of license or something.. but i couldn't make this codec work. (so
i went for g729.. :) ) im testing its quality though as digium cards are
using CPUs as DSPs.




- Original Message - 
From: Jonathan Biggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Background Noise


 Just to add some info from recent experience. May
 help,
 May not   1 X100P  2 X 4 port TDM400P

 Had to hook a dial-in palm PDA base for a custom
 software implementation to my * system and have the
 modem dial out and work properly.  Phone connects to
 second port on PDA Base

 Experienced very bad electrical type noise on the
 line, hum, buzz, fad in and out. would come and go.

 Switched ports, wires,  rxgain and txgain changes,
 phone changes, nothing helped

 the PDA base is also connected via serial port (or USB
 did not matter) to desktop computer for sync purposes

 Through trial and error.  Found noise coming from
 connection to desk top computer. On, Off did not
 matter.

 Resolution.  The power strip surge protector I was
 using on the desktop computer has two modes for noise
 filtration built in.  75 Hertz (or something, don;t
 remember) and 50 Hertz.  I moved the plug for the
 desktop from the 75 side to the 50 side,  All noise on
 line now gone.

 Not sure if this helps, constant noise on all sides
 may be power and noise filtration related...





 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  Hi All
  i have some background noise problem with * and a
  diva srv 4bri + chan_capi 0.3.0 + X-Ten PRO on my
  pc.
  Both in incoming and outgoing call have a background
  noise.
 
  there is some tuning to do?
  where can i find documentation about capi.conf?
  which is the best codec for sip (ulaw, alaw,
  gsm...)?
 
  mark
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
 http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SER Asterisk

2004-01-16 Thread Jess Magnaye

I tried the following setups. Although there is a minor ringback issue
that I haven't found any solution yet.

1.) ATA-CiscoNAT-Asterisk-SER+RTPProxy-Cisco2600

2.) ATA-CiscoNAT-SER+RTPProxy1-Asterisk-SER+RTPProxy2-Cisco2600

I cannot remember if * can directly connect to Cisco2600. I know I had
problems initially with it, that's why I installed the SER, and since now
I'm focusing to solve the ringback issue, I didn't have time to take out SER
out of my equation.



- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SER  Asterisk


 Thanks guys, thought SER had to 'register' to be able to use
 any Asterisk contexts.
 But just defining a new entry in the sip.conf with just context  ip
worked!

 But now i'm stumbling on another problem.. Asterisk seems to want
 to send the SIP udp packets directly to the SIP clients.
 In the case of a SIP user/client behind a NAT, this obviously doesn't
 work.

 SER is configured to use the wonderful RTPProxy + SER nathelper module,
 and this works flawlessly (using the rewritehostport function).

 But when I try to call a phone number on the PSTN network from a SIP
 client behind NAT, SER sends the invites to Asterisk, and Asterisk
 makes an outbound call to the phone number, the phone rings, but when
 the pstn user picks up the phone, no sound, and after a while (couple of
 seconds), the call is dropped.
 Asterisk spews out the following warning,
   chan_sip.c:471 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for seqno 29898 (Response)
 Tried searching on the voip-info wiki and mailinglists, but didn't find
 a way to force Asterisk to use a SIP proxy/SER.

 Any ideas ?


 On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:12:14AM -0800, Chris Albertson wrote:
 
  Yes, you can keep non-authorized SIP callers from accessing the
  PSTN by setting up the .conf file correctly as below
  but you can also
  run a fire wall on the box that Asterisk runs on.  Firewall off
  SIP ports except for if they come from your SER server.
 
 
  --- Fran Boon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   [ser]
   context=sip-legal
   host=y.y.y.y ; IP address of SER
  
   Se this Wiki page for more flesh of my (not yet fully working!)
   configs:
   http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cisco+FXO
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Ringback Problem

2004-01-15 Thread Jess Magnaye



I would just like to follow-up on the ringback 
problem I'm getting from *. As I've said in my previous post, I am not 
hearing the "real ringback" from the Cisco gateway terminating my call. I 
don't want to provide false ringback from * (r option of dial), because it'll 
still give me ringback even if I am suppose to hear announcement or 
fastbusy. Below is captured ISDN debug from Cisco. It's sending 
ALERT (progress indicator 8), but I am not sure why * is not relaying that 
signal to the ATA. 
I hope someone is out there to help me on 
this. Thanks in advance.


Jan 15 22:53:24: ISDN Se1/0:23: TX - 
SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0078Jan 15 
22:53:24: Sending 
CompleteJan 15 22:53:24: 
Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2Jan 15 
22:53:24: Channel ID i = 
0xA98397Jan 15 22:53:24: 
Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '6882332', Plan:Unknown, Type:UnknownJan 15 
22:53:24: Called Party Number i 
= 0x80, '12123637055', Plan:Unknown, Type:UnknownJan 15 22:53:24: ISDN 
Se1/0:23: RX - STATUS pd = 8 callref = 0x8078Jan 15 
22:53:24: Cause i = 0x80E3A1 - 
Information element not implementedJan 15 
22:53:24: Call State i = 
0x01Jan 15 22:53:24: ISDN Se1/0:23: RX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 
callref = 0x8078Jan 15 
22:53:24: Channel ID i = 
0xA98397Jan 15 22:53:27: ISDN Se1/0:23: RX - ALERTING pd = 8 
callref = 0x8078Jan 15 
22:53:27: Progress Ind i = 
0x8088 - In-band info or appropriate now available Jan 15 22:53:32: ISDN 
Se1/0:23: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x0078Jan 15 
22:53:32: Cause i = 0x8090 - 
Normal call clearingJan 15 22:53:32: ISDN Se1/0:23: RX - RELEASE 
pd = 8 callref = 0x8078







[Asterisk-Users] announcement using Dial

2004-01-15 Thread Jess Magnaye




IF I want to play sound files, 
1.) what format should it be? (*.au or*.wav) 

2.) where should it reside? 
3.) what syntax should I follow? Is 
exten=_.,102,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1,tHA(sound.au)) 
correct? I tried this and it doesn't work. 

Thanks,



Re: [Asterisk-Users] Specifying a codec to be used in /etc/sip.conf

2004-01-13 Thread Jess Magnaye
Follow-up question, what does * use for fax? T38 or passthrough?


- Original Message - 
From: Peter Bittner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 10:12 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Specifying a codec to be used in /etc/sip.conf


 Hi all!

 Is it possible to tell * to allow connecting an incoming (SIP-) call with
the
 G711 codec (a simple fax). I have not found any setting in sip.conf that
 would refer to this problem.

 I am using * and the spandsp library to receive faxes from a SIP gateway.
 Everything works for now except the final transmission of the fax. It
seems
 that the sender and *, the receiver, do not negotiate the correct codec,
 which must definitely be G711.

 Any ideas?
 Peter

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] * and telco ringback

2004-01-13 Thread Jess Magnaye



Anybody knows why I am not receiving any telco 
alerting (ringback, fast busy, etc)? I can receive the rtp for voice 
though.

Pls advise thank you.


Re: [Asterisk-Users] How does the PSTN termination indurty realy work?

2004-01-13 Thread Jess Magnaye
 normally, voip companies have their own switches, meaning PoP located
locally to resell minutes to other carriers, or they may have what they call
partners residing anywhere in the globe where they buy minutes from to push
their traffic to. in order for an individual to operate fully as voip
operator, you will need lots of back-up routes, bec most of voip operations
are not legal outside US -- and there are ppl not afraid of closing down
after 2-6 months because they already made money out of their routes during
the operation.  anyway, to put up your own company u need lots of contacts,
cold calls, (gateways if you want), and the most important thing is
softswitch+billing.  with softswitch u can buy/resell minutes between voip
vendors/clients. and of course billing is for your own sake, otherwise,
you'll loose everything. :)

good luck, and let me know if you got good routes/rates.  right now im
looking for cuba for additional capacity.


- Original Message - 
From: Chris Albertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:13 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] How does the PSTN termination indurty realy work?




 Does anyone here understand how these VOIP/PSTN gateway companies
 work?  There seem to be a number of small outfits that offer about
 the same service.  I'm thinking that a company that is really just
 one person and a web site can't possibly own and operate gateway
 equipent in 100 contries world wide.  I figure there must be some
 large outfit who _does_ have physical equipment installed in
 hundreds of locations that leases time to re-sellers like
 Nufone, Iconect, Voice Pulse, Addaline, xvoip and the others

 If this is realy how the industry works, then does it matter which
 retailer you pick?  Matter in terms of audio quality and reliabilty,
 this is.  I know each will have it's own customer support and
 pricing.


  This on the heels of switch-1.nufone.net being missing out of DNS.
 
  We have customers that expect their VOIP to work.  Is there anybody
  that's reliable?
 
  I am having probelms connecting to voicepulse this morning. Is
  anybody else

 =
 Chris Albertson
   Home:   310-376-1029  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Cell:   310-990-7550
   Office: 310-336-5189  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   KG6OMK

 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
 http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] * and signaling (clarification)

2004-01-13 Thread Jess Magnaye



Hello to the list again.

I have my ATA behind NAT connecting to * then calls 
are fwd to Cisco 2600. Calls are completing, I just cannot figure out why 
I don't hear any ALERTING signals from the 2600 (ringback, fast busy, SIT, 
etc). Audio works fine though. I'm using G711ulaw. And I don't 
want ATA or * to provide the false ringback so I took out ('r') in my Dial 
command. Existing command is as follows:

exten=_.,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN},20,tH)

I hope somebody out there could help me on 
this. Thanks.




[Asterisk-Users] SIP/2.0 487 Request Cancelled

2004-01-09 Thread Jess Magnaye



Here's my sip debug output. anybody knows 
whyCisco sent * isCANCEL msg? Can someone tell me what ATA version 
are they using? Maybe this is also another issue.. I am using 
v2.16.

This is using G711ulaw.



Sip read:  SIP/2.0 100 TryingVia: 
SIP/2.0/UDP asterisk:5060;branch=z9hG4bK13fbce3eFrom: "Jess" 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as6818ebfbTo: 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=243881BC-1D1Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 
17:56:09 GMTCall-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Server: 
Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.xCSeq: 102 INVITEAllow-Events: 
telephone-eventContent-Length: 0

10 headers, 0 linesSip read:  SIP/2.0 200 OKVia: 
SIP/2.0/UDP asterisk:5060;branch=z9hG4bK13fbce3eFrom: "Jess" 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as6818ebfbTo: 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:56:09 
GMTCall-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Content-Length: 
0CSeq: 102 CANCEL

8 headers, 0 linesSip read:  SIP/2.0 487 Request 
CancelledVia: SIP/2.0/UDP asterisk:5060;branch=z9hG4bK13fbce3eFrom: 
"Jess" sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as6818ebfbTo: 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=243881BC-1D1Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 
17:56:09 GMTCall-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Server: 
Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.xCSeq: 102 INVITEAllow-Events: 
telephone-eventContent-Length: 0


- FROM CISCO -

Jan 9 17:20:39: Sent: SIP/2.0 100 
Trying Via: 
SIP/2.0/UDP 
asterisk:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7db389e2 
From: "Jess" 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as7f1f229e 
To: 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=241801E4-2525 
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:20:39 
GMT Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Server: 
Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x 
CSeq: 102 INVITE 
Allow-Events: 
telephone-event 
Content-Length: 0 
 
 
 Jan 9 
17:20:39: Queued event from SIP SPI : 
SIPSPI_EV_CC_CALL_PROCEEDINGJan 9 17:20:39: 
ccsip_report_digit_control: enable=0: Jan 9 17:20:39: 
ccsip_report_digit_control: disabled.Jan 9 17:20:39: *CCB found in 
UAS Request table. ccb=0x642D4630Jan 9 17:20:39: 
CCSIP-SPI-CONTROL: act_recdinvite_new_messageJan 9 17:20:39: 
CCSIP-SPI-CONTROL: Clock Time Zone is UTC, same as GMT: Using 
GMTJan 9 17:20:39: sip_stats_methodJan 9 17:20:39: 
ccsip_set_release_source_for_peer:ownCallId[1132803], 
src[2] Jan 9 
17:20:39: 0x642D4630 : State change from (STATE_RECD_INVITE, 
SUBSTATE_NONE) to (STATE_DISCONNECTING, SUBSTATE_NONE)Jan 9 
17:20:39: Queued event from SIP SPI : SIPSPI_EV_SEND_MESSAGEJan 
9 17:20:39: sip_stats_status_codeJan 9 17:20:39: 
CCSIP-SPI-CONTROL: sipSPISendInviteResponseJan 9 17:20:39: 
Queued event from SIP SPI : SIPSPI_EV_SEND_MESSAGEJan 9 17:20:39: 
sip_stats_status_codeJan 9 17:20:39: CCSIP-SPI-CONTROL: 
sipSPIInitiateCallDisconnect : Initiate call disconnect(16) for incoming 
callJan 9 17:20:39: 0x642D4630 : State change from 
(STATE_DISCONNECTING, SUBSTATE_NONE) to (STATE_DISCONNECTING, 
SUBSTATE_NONE)Jan 9 17:20:39: Ignoring unexpected event 11 
(SIPSPI_EV_CC_CALL_PROCEEDING) in state 8 (STATE_DISCONNECTING) substate 0 
(SUBSTATE_NONE)Jan 9 17:20:39: Queued event from SIP SPI : 
SIPSPI_EV_CC_CALL_DISCONNECTJan 9 17:20:39: Sent: SIP/2.0 200 
OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
asterisk:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7db389e2 
From: "Jess" 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as7f1f229e 
To: 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:20:39 
GMT Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Content-Length: 0 
CSeq: 102 CANCEL 
 
 
 Jan 9 
17:20:39: Sent: SIP/2.0 487 Request 
Cancelled Via: 
SIP/2.0/UDP 
asterisk:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7db389e2 
From: "Jess" 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as7f1f229e 
To: 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=241801E4-2525 
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:20:39 
GMT Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Server: 
Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x 
CSeq: 102 INVITE 
Allow-Events: 
telephone-event 
Content-Length: 0 



Re: [Asterisk-Users] * and Cisco Gateways

2004-01-09 Thread Jess Magnaye
Testing between ATA and Asterisk is working fine. I am getting voicemail
etc.  But when I'm trying to call to the carrier side i find it not
working.  I see on my Cisco gateway that it negotiated the g711ulaw codec,
but when the state goes into active, I just automatically get busy tone
from my ATA.  It looks like that the ATA-* leg is disconnected while
*-CiscoGateway is still trying to connect.  My ATA is setup as g711ulaw
(using Txcodec:2, Rxcodec:2).

Probably * is trying to negotiate with ATA using GSM codec? Is there a
command in * (or * utility) that I can use to debug the codec negotiation,
and/or the RTP status?

My sip and exten are as follows:


sip.conf

[general]
port = 5060
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0
context = siptest
tos=lowdelay
tos=184
maxexpirey=3600
disallow=all
allow=gsm
allow=ulaw

register = [EMAIL PROTECTED]

nat=yes
query=yes
autocreatepeer=yes

[carrier]
type=friend
fromdomain=mydomain
host=X.X.X.X - carrier IP


extensions.conf

;extension
exten = 1234,1,Dial(SIP/1234,10,tr)
exten = 1234,2,Voicemail,u1234
exten = 1234,102,Voicemail,b1234

;oubound to carrier
exten = _011.,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],tr)

;getting voicmails
exten = 73*,1,VoicemailMain





- Original Message - 
From: Arslan Saeed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] * and Cisco Gateways


Hi, Send me your * configuration u r using for troubleshooting this
problem.

Arslan.

-Original Message-
From: Jess Magnaye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] * and Cisco Gateways
Importance: High

That didn't work. I ran tcpdump and looks like looks like my Linux has
problems with its on-board Ethernet.  I'm getting the following error,
which
most likely is the reason for no audio.

14:40:57.628080 asterisk  cisco: icmp: asterisk udp port 13696
unreachable
[tos 0xd4]
14:40:58.275665 asterisk  cisco: icmp: asterisk udp port 13697
unreachable
[tos 0xc0]
14:40:58.622308 asterisk  cisco: icmp: asterisk udp port 13696
unreachable
[tos 0xd4]

I am now installing a new linux with (pci-ethernet) to load the *.  I
hope
when I'm done, things will go smoothly.



- Original Message - 
From: John Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] * and Cisco Gateways


 Anybody on the list who implemented Cisco ATA + * + Cisco 2600?  I
 cannot get my calls from ATA to terminate to the Cisco gateway via
 *.  I am not sure if it is my hardware problem.  I'm getting the
 following codec negotiation problem from Cisco.
 
 23:39:08:  Unexpected VoIPCodec Type :g729br8
 23:39:08:  Unexpected VoIPCodec Type :gsmefr
 
 
 I appreciate any help I can get.  Thanks.

 Go into sip.conf, and add these lines to the SIP peer for your Cisco
2600:

 disallow=all
 allow=ulaw
 allow=alaw


 This will force G.711 codec usage, which may solve your problems
 though it will increase your bandwidth.

 JT
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] At last!!! :)

2004-01-09 Thread Jess Magnaye



I can smile now. I made my * work with my 
Cisco. Finally. First problem was Ethernet on my Linux. After 
installing * on a different machine, I got rid of that "icmp udp unreachable" 
error. My next problem was the call stays on on Cisco gateway, but the ATA 
drops it. I figured out it was my mistake on dialplan in extensions.conf 
--- (it took me a day to notice it.. damn!). my config was: 
exten=_.,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],tr). 
The reason why my ATA is getting fast busy (or dropping the call immediately) 
while Cisco gateway (myprovider) is trying to connect my call, was that I am 
missing the "seconds" parameter. When I changed this to Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],20,tr), 
I was able to connect. 

There is one little problem left though. How 
come after I diale the number from ATA, I am getting false ringback. I 
meant, local ringback from ATA, instead of the ringback coming from my Cisco 
(myprovider).

I appreciate any bright ideas and advise from 
anybody.

Thank you and have a happy 
weekend!


Re: [Asterisk-Users] PSTN SIP Gateways?

2004-01-09 Thread Jess Magnaye
i worked with Mediatrix boxes before (in '01-'02).  configuring them using
the ume (unit manager express) is highly suggested, as there are
parameters in there that you won't see in its telnet access... :)

generally it works fine, depending on how you use them, or how strict are
you in evaluating a product.  i used it for both origination (fxs) and
termination (fxo). for termination, they only supported battery-reversal
that time. i am not aware now if they support answer supervision via
voice-detect. a particular problem i remember with the termination is that
it cannot handle properly the far-end disconnect, where it locks up or the
channel appears to be in a call even if the far-end already got
disconnected. for fxs, i had problems with the volume (rx/tx gain) -- 
they're inconsistent -- something like, you'll find them working at its best
today, and the next day you don't know what happens why the quality is not
the same as it was.

(so maybe they made some improvements at the present? u have to find
out. :) good luck. )


- Original Message - 
From: Michael Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 5:56 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] PSTN  SIP Gateways?


 Since my earlier inquiry about gateways went unanswered perhaps
 rephrasing will help. Does anyone here have experience with standalone
 SIP FXO gateways like those from Mediatrix? Care to share their
 experiences with them? Off list if necessary.

 Michael

 --
 Michael Graves   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sr. Product Specialist  www.pixelpower.com
 Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I knew a man who couldn't lose 'cause he never gave in. He stuck
 to his pistols and it made him a better man. - D. Van Zant

 ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] E100P : Pb with outgoing calls

2004-01-08 Thread Jess Magnaye

check why is this happening:

 Ext: 1 Cause: Invalid information element contents (100), class = Protocol
Error (6) ]

it looks to me that your operator doesn't recognize a message coming from
the *.  sometimes this is fixed by changing the switch-type.  you may need
to get your operator involve on this. i experienced this error too when i
interconnected my *'s t1-pri to cisco-pri, and it was resolved when i
changed my cisco's config to use bearer-cap speech. i am not sure if that
will help in your case, or if you will need to verify with * or with your
operator about the bearer capability issues.

try also checking the isdn plan/type. i see it here that it is using
national/isdn. try setting it up as unknown/unknown.




- Original Message - 
From: Olivier Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:12 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] E100P : Pb with outgoing calls


 I use a E100P in France with a french operator E1. I can receive calls via
 the E1 and tranfer them to a VoIP phone, play IVR etc 
 But outgoing calls doesn't work at all. I receive a RELEASE COMPLETE just
 after the SETUP.
 There is no pb with the operator (the E1 work well with an other Pbx).
 Here a call trace.
 Anyone have an idea ?
 (g1 is my group name for the 30 channels)

 -- Accepting call from '147241527' to '5797' on channel 21, span 1
 -- Executing Dial(Zap/21-1, Zap/g1/3361100) in new stack
 -- Making new call for cr 32784
  Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=42
  Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 16/0x10) (Originator)
  Message type: SETUP (5)
  Bearer Capability (len= 3) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer
 capability: Speech (0)
  Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode
 (16)
  Ext: 1 User information layer 1: A-Law (35)
  Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, Exclusive
 Dchan: 0
  ChanSel: Reserved
  Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3
  Ext: 1 Channel: 1 ]
  Calling Number (len=13) [ Ext: 0 TON: National Number (2) NPI:
 ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1)
  Presentation: Presentation allowed of network
 provided number (3) '147241527' ]
  Called Number (len=13) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number (2) NPI:
 ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '3361100' ]
  Sending Complete (len= 0)
 -- Called g1/3361100
  Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=9
  Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 32784/0x8010) (Terminator)
  Message type: RELEASE COMPLETE (90)
  Cause (len= 2) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location:
 International network (7)
  Ext: 1 Cause: Invalid information element contents (100),
 class = Protocol Error (6) ]
 -- Processing IE 8 (Cause)
 -- Channel 1, span 1 got hangup
 NEW_HANGUP DEBUG: Calling q931_hangup, ourstate Null, peerstate Null
 NEW_HANGUP DEBUG: Destroying the call, ourstate Null, peerstate Null
 -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1'
 == No one is available to answer at this time
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] * and Cisco Gateways

2004-01-08 Thread Jess Magnaye



Anybody on the list who implemented Cisco ATA + * + 
Cisco 2600? I cannot get my calls from ATA to terminate to the Cisco 
gateway via *. I am not sure if it is my hardware problem. I'm 
getting the following "codec negotiation problem" from Cisco.

23:39:08: Unexpected VoIPCodec Type 
:g729br8
23:39:08: Unexpected VoIPCodec Type 
:gsmefr


I appreciate any help I can get. 
Thanks.


Re: [Asterisk-Users] * and Cisco Gateways

2004-01-08 Thread Jess Magnaye
That didn't work. I ran tcpdump and looks like looks like my Linux has
problems with its on-board Ethernet.  I'm getting the following error, which
most likely is the reason for no audio.

14:40:57.628080 asterisk  cisco: icmp: asterisk udp port 13696 unreachable
[tos 0xd4]
14:40:58.275665 asterisk  cisco: icmp: asterisk udp port 13697 unreachable
[tos 0xc0]
14:40:58.622308 asterisk  cisco: icmp: asterisk udp port 13696 unreachable
[tos 0xd4]

I am now installing a new linux with (pci-ethernet) to load the *.  I hope
when I'm done, things will go smoothly.



- Original Message - 
From: John Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] * and Cisco Gateways


 Anybody on the list who implemented Cisco ATA + * + Cisco 2600?  I
 cannot get my calls from ATA to terminate to the Cisco gateway via
 *.  I am not sure if it is my hardware problem.  I'm getting the
 following codec negotiation problem from Cisco.
 
 23:39:08:  Unexpected VoIPCodec Type :g729br8
 23:39:08:  Unexpected VoIPCodec Type :gsmefr
 
 
 I appreciate any help I can get.  Thanks.

 Go into sip.conf, and add these lines to the SIP peer for your Cisco 2600:

 disallow=all
 allow=ulaw
 allow=alaw


 This will force G.711 codec usage, which may solve your problems
 though it will increase your bandwidth.

 JT
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 2nd call leg status?

2004-01-08 Thread Jess Magnaye
 of course you must use a digital outbound interface (bri,pri),
 since on analog there's no way to know if the call has
 been answered (and for cdr logs asterisk assumes
 that the call in always ANSWERED when dialling
 through analog lines).


does that mean battery reversal is not supported by * for analog
interfaces??




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] * crashed

2004-01-07 Thread Jess Magnaye



I am just wondering if this is normal. I have 
my * running for a week now and I'm still testing its interoperability with 
other voip provider (in sip using codecs other than g711). yesterday, i changed 
my linux's (RH9). and since the new ip i assigned is located on a different 
site, i have to shut it down and move it physically. after that, i cannot 
run my * anymore. i am getting this error when im trying to connect, and then it 
suddenly dies out.

ERROR[1074412224]: File asterisk.c, Line 1349 
(main): Unable to connect to remote asterisk

I tried to run it again using "asterisk -gc" 
and I got the ff error:

WARNING[1074412224]: File loader.c, Line 312 
(ast_load_resource): chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning 
-1Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Not sure why. It looks to me it got corrupted after 
my reboot during change of IP. (Can someone shed light on 
this?)

Thanks.


Re: [Asterisk-Users] * crashed

2004-01-07 Thread Jess Magnaye



hmm.. i did the modprobe wct1xxp. but i didn't do 
ztcfg bec i thought i will only need it if there's change in the zaptel 
config. let me try it and i'll let u know.

thanks.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Brent 
  Franks 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:52 
  AM
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] * 
  crashed
  
  
  Are you doing these 
  items before trying to start asterisk:
  
   
  loadmod driver (In my case its wcfxo)
  
  After that is 
  completed:
  
   
  Ztcfg
  
  This configures all 
  of the zaptel harware in 
  the system.
  
  You might want to 
  place this in init.d to get it to do it 
  automatically.
  
  - 
  Brent
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jess MagnayeSent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:36 
  AMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Asterisk-Users] * 
  crashedImportance: 
  High
  
  
  I am just wondering if this is 
  normal. I have my * running for a week now and I'm still testing its 
  interoperability with other voip provider (in sip using codecs other than 
  g711). yesterday, i changed my linux's (RH9). and since the new ip i assigned 
  is located on a different site, i have to shut it down and move it 
  physically. after that, i cannot run my * anymore. i am getting this 
  error when im trying to connect, and then it suddenly dies 
  out.
  
  
  
  ERROR[1074412224]: File 
  asterisk.c, Line 1349 (main): Unable to connect to remote 
  asterisk
  
  
  
  I tried to run it again using 
  "asterisk -gc" and I got the ff error:
  
  
  
  WARNING[1074412224]: File 
  loader.c, Line 312 (ast_load_resource): chan_zap.so: load_module failed, 
  returning -1Segmentation fault (core 
  dumped)
  
  
  
  Not sure why. It looks to me it 
  got corrupted after my reboot during change of IP. (Can someone shed 
  light on this?)
  
  
  
  Thanks.


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pls confirm

2004-01-07 Thread Jess Magnaye
Does this mean I can run with G711 between ATA and *, and GSM between * and
voip-provider?

Example:

ATA  -  g711 via SIP  -  *  - gsmfr via SIP - Cisco-VoIP - Pots

I am wondering because I am just getting silence.  It looks like rtp coming
back from the voip-provider is not matching with my * or ATA's codec.




- Original Message - 
From: Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pls confirm


 On Tuesday 06 January 2004 12:00, Jess Magnaye wrote:
  Can someone on the list confirm if Asterisk can do g723 or g729?
  when connecting to provider? or it is only supporting g711?

 G.723 and G.729 are both patent-encumbered codecs.  G.729 is
 available for purchase by contacting Digium.  G.723 is not.

 I would really recommend that you go with a different codec, such
 as GSM or ILBC.

 -Tilghman

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] * crashed

2004-01-07 Thread Jess Magnaye
Using modprobe+ztcfg didn't work.

Kernel patch is ok.

I just re-installed aterisk and now it's working. :(

Anyway, now that my * is remotely placed.  My ATAs are behind NAT. (setup
is: private ATA - router+nat - public internet - public*).  I configured
my sip.conf to have host=172.30.200.27, nat=yes and qualify=yes.
Unfortunately, I'm still getting this message (no NAT) on my debug.

9 headers, 0 lines
Using latest request as basis request
Sending to 172.30.200.27 : 5060 (non-NAT)
Transmitting (no NAT):
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.30.200.27:5060
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone;tag=523636298
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone;tag=as301ad6f2
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 4 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 0






- Original Message - 
From: Michael Devenijn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:05 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] * crashed


May be it's due to a kernel patch ... ??

Try to recompile zaptel, asterisk, ...


Van: Jess Magnaye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: wo 7/01/2004 17:36
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [Asterisk-Users] * crashed

I am just wondering if this is normal.  I have my * running for a week now
and I'm still testing its interoperability with other voip provider (in sip
using codecs other than g711). yesterday, i changed my linux's (RH9). and
since the new ip i assigned is located on a different site, i have to shut
it down and move it physically.  after that, i cannot run my * anymore. i am
getting this error when im trying to connect, and then it suddenly dies out.

ERROR[1074412224]: File asterisk.c, Line 1349 (main): Unable to connect to
remote asterisk

I tried to run it again using asterisk -gc and I got the ff error:

WARNING[1074412224]: File loader.c, Line 312 (ast_load_resource):
chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning -1
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Not sure why. It looks to me it got corrupted after my reboot during change
of IP.  (Can someone shed light on this?)

Thanks.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Pls confirm

2004-01-06 Thread Jess Magnaye



Can someone on the list confirm if Asterisk can do 
g723 or g729? when connecting to provider? or it is only supporting 
g711?




Fw: [Asterisk-Users] Pls confirm

2004-01-06 Thread Jess Magnaye

- Original Message - 
From: Jess Magnaye [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pls confirm


 Is the format allow=g723.1 in sip.conf valid?

 somehow i cannot get it working to do g723 passthru.  also, i've read that
 doing g723 will disable voicemail, and other * features. is that true? if
it
 is, will the licensed-g729 work for * features?

 thanks again in advance.


 - Original Message - 
 From: WipeOut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:38 PM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pls confirm


  Jess Magnaye wrote:
 
   Can someone on the list confirm if Asterisk can do g723 or g729? when
   connecting to provider? or it is only supporting g711?
  
  
 
  It can do G.723 between endpoints (passthrough).. It can do G.729a with
  the purchase of an additional licence of $10 per channel..
 
  Yes you can use G.711 with a provider, some providers offer GSM, iLBC
  and Speex as alternative codecs..
 
  Later..
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] question re voicemail

2004-01-05 Thread Jess Magnaye



Hi,
I just setup my * with digium. I started testing 
voicemail first between atas, and i am not sure why it is not prompting me any 
when the call is not answered or if busy.i only get continuous 
ringback andthe following message: 

asterisk*CLI  -- 
Executing Dial("SIP/6882332-1697", "SIP/5104112978|20|tr") in new 
stack -- Called 5104112978 -- 
SIP/5104112978-3f88 is ringing -- Nobody picked up in 
2 ms

I wonder if my uextension and 
bextension config is correct, mispelled, or something else is 
missing. Note that ata to ata via * works, 
as well as getting to VoicemailMain via extension 1234. Please 
help. My config are found below. I appreciate your 
help.


sip.conf
---

[6882332]type=friendusername=6882332secret=testhost=dynamicdefaultip=172.30.200.27dtmfmode=rfc2833mailbox=6882332callerid 
= "test1" 6882332context=sip
[5104112978]type=friendusername=5104112978secret=testhost=dynamic;canreinvite=nodefaultip=172.30.200.26dtmfmode=rfc2833mailbox=5104112978callerid 
= "test2" 5104112978context=sip
extensions.conf

[sip];ringexten = 
5104112978,1,Dial(SIP/5104112978,20,tr)exten = 
6882332,1,Dial(SIP/6882332,15,tr)exten = 
,1,Dial(SIP/,5,tr)

;unansweredexten = 
6882332,102,Voicemail,u6882332exten = 
5104112978,102,Voicemail,u5104112978exten = 
,102,Voicemail,u

;busyexten = 
6882332,103,Voicemail,b6882332exten = 
5104112978,103,Voicemail,b5104112978exten = 
,103,Voicemail,b

;get messageexten = 
1234,1,VoicemailMain(6882332);exten = 
,1,VoicemailMain();

voicemail.conf
-

[default]6882332 = 
6882332,test1,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
5104112978 = 5104112978,test2, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
9011 = 9011,Asterisk,[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
= ,Nada,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[Asterisk-Users] Need Help...

2004-01-05 Thread Jess Magnaye




Is this setup possible?
ATA - Asterisk - SER with RTPproxy - AnySIPGateway
how can I instruct * to send all unknown extensions to go to SER/RTPProxy? Do 
I have to use "exten"? What syntax shld I use?
I cannot find any matching document from wikki. :(




Re: [Asterisk-Users] Are messages censored on this board?

2004-01-05 Thread Jess Magnaye
No it is not censored.  I think there is delay.

- Original Message - 
From: John Coll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 5:23 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Are messages censored on this board?


 I've submitted a message twice this evening and it has not appeared. Are
 messages censored on this board?
 
 regards
 
 john
 -
 John A Coll, Director, Connection Software
 391 City Road, LONDON, EC1V 1NE, UK
 Tel: 020 7713 8000 From outside UK Tel: +44 20 7713 8000
 Fax: 020 7713 8001 Fax: +44 20 7713 8001
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Web: www.csoft.co.uk
 PGP Public Key from keyserver
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Fw: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: Questions and finding

2003-12-23 Thread Jess Magnaye

 Thanks for the reply.

 1. My VAD is turned off (00140014), and it didn't help for that cut-off.
I
 am not sure if OutboundProxy has to be configured to have it working fine.
 Or this just happened to me?  What is your ATA's software?

 2. I tried dtmfmode=inband on sip.conf, and dtmfmode=rfc2833.  None
worked.
 As per ATA, it is by default using rfc2833.  I tried setting it up as
inband
 by setting Audiomode, but nothing helped.  I was thinking the * is ONLY
 recognizing the DTMF if there is telco board installed.  Is it?


 - Original Message - 
 From: Philipp von Klitzing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Jess Magnaye [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:36 PM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: Questions and finding


  Hi!
 
   1.) First test
   - ATA1 calls to ATA2. When voicemail starts playing, it just cuts-off
   after 5-10seconds (consistently).
   - Solution: I have to reconfigure ATA to use OutboundProxy to be
 Asterisk
   IP.
   - Am I doing the right thing?
 
  Turn of silence detection / VAD.
 
   Any solution to this one?
   My thinking was that DTMF can only be detected by *
 
  Take a look at your SIP configuration and make sure you have the correct
  dtmfmode= set. Try different values if you continue to have trouble and
  configure your ATA accordingly.
 
  Cheers, Philipp
 
 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: Questions and finding

2003-12-23 Thread Jess Magnaye


 Hi!

  1. My VAD is turned off (00140014), and it didn't help for that cut-off.

 Then check if you have a firewall in between * and your ATA that closes
 the port due to inactivity of your ATA. Also use SIP DEBUG in the CLI
 to try to see a bit more of what is going on. You could also use Ethereal
 to monitor the SIP traffic (or the rtp/UDP traffic).

  am not sure if OutboundProxy has to be configured to have it working
fine.
  Or this just happened to me?  What is your ATA's software?

 I don't have such a device, in fact never had. :-)

MY ATA and * are sitting on the same LAN.  So FW or NAT problem is not
possible.  This is also the reason why I commented out nat=1 in the
sip.conf.

  2. I tried dtmfmode=inband on sip.conf, and dtmfmode=rfc2833.  None
worked.

 Note: inband only works with g.711 codec. Doesn't the ATA also offer
 info as third dtmfmode option? Anyway, you might want to search the
 mailing list for setup info, there are a lot of people around that use
 it.

  by setting Audiomode, but nothing helped.  I was thinking the * is
  ONLY recognizing the DTMF if there is telco board installed.  Is it?

 No no, * doesn't require any hardware to be installed.

LET ME TRY dtmfmode=info  AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS NEXT.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: Questions and finding

2003-12-23 Thread Jess Magnaye
Hi Philip, I found the problem.  My sip.conf config was changed by somebody
else. :(  The external IP was uncommented and that's what is causing my
problem.


- Original Message - 
From: Jess Magnaye [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: Questions and finding




  Hi!
 
   1. My VAD is turned off (00140014), and it didn't help for that
cut-off.
 
  Then check if you have a firewall in between * and your ATA that closes
  the port due to inactivity of your ATA. Also use SIP DEBUG in the CLI
  to try to see a bit more of what is going on. You could also use
Ethereal
  to monitor the SIP traffic (or the rtp/UDP traffic).
 
   am not sure if OutboundProxy has to be configured to have it working
 fine.
   Or this just happened to me?  What is your ATA's software?
 
  I don't have such a device, in fact never had. :-)

 MY ATA and * are sitting on the same LAN.  So FW or NAT problem is not
 possible.  This is also the reason why I commented out nat=1 in the
 sip.conf.

   2. I tried dtmfmode=inband on sip.conf, and dtmfmode=rfc2833.  None
 worked.
 
  Note: inband only works with g.711 codec. Doesn't the ATA also offer
  info as third dtmfmode option? Anyway, you might want to search the
  mailing list for setup info, there are a lot of people around that use
  it.
 
   by setting Audiomode, but nothing helped.  I was thinking the * is
   ONLY recognizing the DTMF if there is telco board installed.  Is it?
 
  No no, * doesn't require any hardware to be installed.
 
 LET ME TRY dtmfmode=info  AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS NEXT.

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk as a PSTN gateway for SER

2003-12-22 Thread Jess Magnaye
how did u setup your asterisk for this:

I can also start a call through Asterisk to a VoIP
provider, but there is a problem after the first ring: 


- Original Message - 
From: jerk face [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk as a PSTN gateway for SER


 First off, here is what I want to do:
 SIP Clients - SER - Asterisk - VoIP provider
 
 Where SER will handle communications between SIP
 clients (since I would prefer that my SIP clients not
 use all of my bandwidth)
 Asterisk will handle calls to a VoIP provider
 
 I have read that people have similar setups working,
 but I have not seen any documentation of these setups.
 
 So far, SIP Clients can talk to each other.
 I can also start a call through Asterisk to a VoIP
 provider, but there is a problem after the first ring:
 
 Here is the output:
 -- Executing Dial(SIP/-08114560,
 SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) in new stack
 -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- SIP/SIPprovider-5e0c is making progress passing it
 to SIP/-08114560
 -- SIP/SIPprovider-5e0c answered SIP/-08114560
 -- Attempting native bridge of SIP/-08114560 and
 SIP/SIPprovider-5e0c
 
 I have tried this with my SIP client behind a NAT and
 outside of a NAT, so I don't that is the problem.
 I have also tried this with both IAX and SIP providers
 and the problem is the same.  One ring, and then
 silence.
 
 Any thoughts?
 
 Thank you for your time.
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
 http://photos.yahoo.com/
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Fw: Questions and finding

2003-12-22 Thread Jess Magnaye




I installed * to primarily test its voicemail 
feature. I installed it on a server WITHOUT any telco board (i.e., 
digium). Installation looks ok, however I am having problems.

MY SETUP:

2xATAs are configured to use * as 
GkorProxy
Asterisk is registered to my SER SIP/RTP 
Proxy

1.) First test
- ATA1 calls to ATA2. When voicemail starts 
playing, it just cuts-off after 5-10seconds (consistently). 
- Solution: I have to reconfigure ATA to use 
OutboundProxy to be Asterisk IP.
- Am I doing the right thing?

2.) Second test:
- ATA1 calls ATA2 and left a message. * sends 
an email to the owner of ATA2.
- ATA2 retrieves the message by dialing the 
extension (i.e., exten=,1,VoiceMailMain(123))
- VoiceMail prompts for password. ATA2 keys 
in its pasword. * doesn't reply and keeps on prompting for 5 times, until 
it disconnects:
-- Executing 
VoiceMailMain("SIP/6882332-6b3a", "123") in new stack -- 
Playing 'vm-password' (language 'en') -- Incorrect 
password '' for user '123' (context = any) -- 
Playing 'vm-incorrect' (language 'en') -- Playing 
'vm-password' (language 'en') -- Incorrect password '' for 
user '123' (context = any) -- Playing 
'vm-incorrect' (language 'en') -- Playing 'vm-password' 
(language 'en')
- Tried to change AudioMode of ATA, to use 
0x00140014, 0x11241124, and default 0x00150015. But there were no 
difference.
- Tried to skip the password on *, using 
exten=,1,VoiceMailMain(s123). * prompted there arenew 
messages, and instructions on how to retreive them. Unfortunately, 
none of the dtmf keys worked (1, #, etc).

Any solution to this one?

My thinking was that DTMF can only be detected by * 


3.) How can I configure * to support the following 
setup. I know * doesn't work 100% like softswitch, but maybe this type of 
connection is supported?

ATA - * - CiscoAS5300

ATA to *, is IP connection
* to CiscoAS5300 is also IP connection


I appreciate your help. Thank 
you.