Re: [Asterisk-Users] SNOM Softphone on windows 2000
Couldn't you also create a separate GPO that allows for Read-Only permissions?? Just in case. RandyW SANS wrote: Sorry had to jump in. I had a similar problem with Mozilla. Make sure the Users can write to the config file. I just made all the Users an Administrator at the local machine from Local Users menu, and that fixes write to issues. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christian Stredicke Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:37 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SNOM Softphone on windows 2000 Well we do write to the registry... Sorry about that, but how would we otherwise store the information that is needed for the phone?! CS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alexander Lopez Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 4:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SNOM Softphone on windows 2000 W2K had problems with Security (Surprising huh?) You may need to grant write access for the user to the Folder where SNOM is installed. I don't think SNOM is writing to the registry if so you will need to open permissions up on those keys in the hive. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] free sun boxes
Greetings All, The Ultra 5 will take Solaris 10 no problem, however RAM will be an issue. Be sure that there is at least 128MB of RAM on these units or Solaris 10 will tend to chug. The SparcStation, from everything I've read, is not supported under Solaris 10. You can, however, get older versions of Solaris on it (7,8). Other than that the Ultra 5 was really the last desktop workstation that Sun produced that was truly workstation class. While they are returning to that with their new Opteron boxes, but the SunBlade series was a true embarrassment. In 5 years, I've lost a lot more Sunblade 100/150 boxes to lame stuff like motherboard failures than I've ever lost Ultra's. You should be working on your Ultra 5 for years to come. RandyW Angelito Manansala wrote: how much are you selling that stuff? On 6/18/06, Mike Fedyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm in southern California, are you close or can you ship? Bob Knight wrote: I have 4 sparc based sun boxes I am about to pay money so I can get rid of them. They are running older versions of Solaris. You should be able to load Solaris 10 and play around with * on them. Time to clean the office: 3 Ultra 5 1 Sparcstation 5 I also have a box full of Sun keyboards and mice. Contact me offline if you want them. I've had many good years of development on them and it kills me to just toss them, but the office is just too damn cluttered. thanks, bk... ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] ECHO Tutorial
Expensive equipment with built-in echo-cancellers? Extensive planning and testing before deployment?Decades of experience dealing with such problems? Heh heh.. Ouch man, just pure ouch.. Yep, spot-on. Their stuff spends 5 years in beta development before it hits the production mold. These people try to break it in ways that we only wish would never happen to us. They really do know their stuff and while I shake my fist at them for their black-box mentality and their closed-source EVERYTHING, I do have a LOT more respect for them making this stuff work as well as it does. Telecom is probably the last 5 9's tech left in the world. Ever thing about how long it would take to make * 99.999% available?? It hurts to just think about it. RandyW ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Watchguard Firebox 1000 woes
Greetings Kerry, I've tinkered quite a bit with Firebox's (Specifically Firebox III's), and may be of some value. What version of the system manager are you using? What version of the Firebox are you using?? (I'm taking that the "1000" is the Firebox III 1000, am I right?) What type of logging do you have running? Syslog? Event Processor? Would you mind sharing your config file? Would you mind sharing what type of SIP connection you are trying to accomplish. I too have had significant challenges with WG lately, so I can see them saying that. I'm not sure what I can do, but I'd be glad to help. RandyW Kerry Garrison wrote: We are trying to setup a sip connection behind a Watchguard Firebox 1000 and it is simply put...not working. The ports are all forwarded but the packets are not going out. It is as if the firewall simply ignores SIP packets. Has anyone seen this or have any idea what the issue could be? Watchguard so far has been of zero help. Kerry Garrison Director of Technical Services Tech Data Pros - Orange County's Mobile IT Service Provider (949)502-7819 x200- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.techdatapros.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom firmwares suck
I'm gonna jump in here and join Dave here. It simply is of no value to just SPAM your opinion around without either providing real facts or asking for assistance. We are here to ask for or give out help. This just isn't productive. Now, if you want a detailed, painfully so, explanation why Sun's DLT 8000 tape drives are "underperformers" (notice I didn't "vomitous garbage") I would be happy to help you out. Off-line of course... grin RandyW Dave Cotton wrote: On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 10:21 -0400, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote: Old English saying "A bad workman always blames his tools" I don't think that's fair... these are very complicated phones, made in China for very low prices. Problems do occur with them. Some Snom LCDs do have problems. There are firmware glitches, though I've only run into minor ones. Overall though, they are very good phones. And that is the whole point of the saying. I object to the type of posting that says "XYZ sucks" it is the language and attitude of children. As Steve Davies said "I assume that you meant to add "Does any kind soul have a suggestion to help out?" :-)" ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Performance: Xeon or Opteron?
Yep, there is a lot of chatter about how hardware x performs with Asterisk and while I/O is the primary mover, most designs today will handle the modest Asterisk install easily. I've got a site where they use 6 lines and 15 users on a 500Mhz CPU w/512MB RAM and boot off a 2GB flash disk. VERY modest and absolutely dominates that particular install. Only in the larger installs will hardware be an issue, but even then it doesn't take much hardware (from a server perspective) to handle a LOT of Asterisk traffic. RandyW Waldo Rubinstein wrote: AFAIK, it doesn't make much of a difference if all you are going to be mainly using is the TE card. From what I've heard and seen, a single P4 3GHz machine will handle a fully loaded TE4XX board with no problem. - Waldo On Apr 11, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Tim Connolly wrote: I was offered an upgrade path for my two Dell 1750's (2.8 Dual Xeon) to get into a pair of new Dual Core Dual Opteron servers. Assuming I can get the IRQ BS worked out so my TE411XP doesn't flip out, this should be a pretty significant upgrade. Has anyone been able to quantify any benefits to using one processor over the other? Should I wait for the newer Intel processors this summer or go for the AMD DC DO? Thanks Tim ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Beginner: PBX for my house
What about the Asterisk Developer pack, a good Linux box and his standard phone line?? I've seen this work and it does a great job. The Telco doesn't know anything as Asterisk integrates with the analog phone line and things just work. Am I off base here?? RandyW Kerry Garrison wrote: Currently Asterisk will not integrate with Skype. You would need a provider such as Teliax, Broadvoice, IAX.cc or many others or you can use hardware devices to connect to traditional phone lines. You didn't say what broadband phone you have but if its Vonage, there are also issues with "true" integration there as well. There are lots of good articles at VOIPSpeak.net and NerdVittles.com Kerry Garrison Director of Technical Services Tech Data Pros - Orange County's Mobile IT Service Provider (949)502-7819 x200- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.techdatapros.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of erik Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 7:40 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Beginner: PBX for my house Hi, I am renovating my house completely and installing new cabling for communication. I'm not to into this PBX thing but I would like to have a simple one for my house, to have different phone numbers for my family members, some kind of integration with my Broadband telephone, and possibly Skype Browsing the digium website didn't make me much wiser. I have a linux box that I can dedicate to this. If I buy for example the Wildcard TE110P card, what can I as a simple homeuser do with this card? I have reasonable knowledge about networking and Linux administration, butnext to littleabout digital telephony and such. erik ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 or Fedora Core 4? yum update or not?
This is sound advice worth taking. If you get a system stable in production, LEAVE IT ALONE!! I say this to spare you lost nights and weekends wondering how things could have gone s wrong... Test and tweak on a duplicate system if it needs to be done. Technical Support wrote: We run FC4 on our production installs. It runs great. I should caution you that just because an update is available, it doesn't mean you SHOULD update. Treat your FC4 install as frozen - if it works don't update it! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zach A Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 9:31 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 or Fedora Core 4? yum update or not? Hi everyone, What is recommended for a production quality system, FC3 or FC4. Once installed, is it necessary to run yum update, does that make things any better or just take up more memory? Zach A. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
