Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released
Matt Florell wrote: Yep, my bad I found them once I searched with the dash '-' after the 1.4.23. They were lost in the flood of users list mail in my inbox. I wonder if these could also be posted on the asterisk-announce list more consistently? I see a few releases on the announce list, but last 1.4 one was December 2nd and nothing after that on that list except for a few vulnerability postings. The policy that we have been following is that only final releases will be announced to the asterisk-announce list. Betas and release candidates are not. The rationale is that asterisk-announce is supposed to be a low-volume list and that most subscribers to it would not appreciate all the noise of announcing release candidates or betas there. I should think that the policy could be amended; however, I'm not really in a position to make that call, nor do I know if you're a vocal minority or if most subscribers to the -announce list would appreciate seeing such messages. Mark Michelson ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released
The policy that we have been following is that only final releases will be announced to the asterisk-announce list. Betas and release candidates are not. The rationale is that asterisk-announce is supposed to be a low-volume list and that most subscribers to it would not appreciate all the noise of announcing release candidates or betas there. I should think that the policy could be amended; however, I'm not really in a position to make that call, nor do I know if you're a vocal minority or if most subscribers to the -announce list would appreciate seeing such messages. Survey? I would appreciate such postings to the -announce list. Even with the rc release notices, it will still be a very low volume list. - Noah ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released
Noah Miller wrote: The policy that we have been following is that only final releases will be announced to the asterisk-announce list. Betas and release candidates are not. The rationale is that asterisk-announce is supposed to be a low-volume list and that most subscribers to it would not appreciate all the noise of announcing release candidates or betas there. I should think that the policy could be amended; however, I'm not really in a position to make that call, nor do I know if you're a vocal minority or if most subscribers to the -announce list would appreciate seeing such messages. Survey? I would appreciate such postings to the -announce list. Even with the rc release notices, it will still be a very low volume list. - Noah ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users I second that. -- Jonn Taylor Taylor Telephone Systems, Inc http://www.taylortelephone.com/ ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released
On 1/30/09, Mark Michelson mmichel...@digium.com wrote: Matt Florell wrote: Yep, my bad I found them once I searched with the dash '-' after the 1.4.23. They were lost in the flood of users list mail in my inbox. I wonder if these could also be posted on the asterisk-announce list more consistently? I see a few releases on the announce list, but last 1.4 one was December 2nd and nothing after that on that list except for a few vulnerability postings. The policy that we have been following is that only final releases will be announced to the asterisk-announce list. Betas and release candidates are not. The rationale is that asterisk-announce is supposed to be a low-volume list and that most subscribers to it would not appreciate all the noise of announcing release candidates or betas there. Got this December 1st on the asterisk-announce list: from: Asterisk Team asteriskt...@digium.com to asterisk-annou...@lists.digium.com dateDec 1, 2008 11:58 PM subject [asterisk-announce] Asterisk 1.2.30.3, 1.4.23-rc2, 1.6.0.2, 1.6.1-beta3, and Asterisk-Addons 1.6.0.1, 1.6.1-rc2 released mailed-by lists.digium.com The Asterisk.org development team has released Asterisk versions 1.2.30.3, 1.4.23-rc2, 1.6.0.2, 1.6.1-beta3, as well as Asterisk-Addons versions 1.6.0.1 and 1.6.1-rc2. These releases are available for immediate download from http://downloads.digium.com/. I know that there were official releases mentioned in this email, but an RC and a beta were also both announced. MATT--- ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released
1.4.23.1 doesn't seem to work for me. I did an in-place upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.21 and upgraded to the latest zaptel as well. Incoming calls stopped working. Whenever an extension was trying to pickup the phone by doing a group pickup with *8 the extension just got dead audio and the next phone in the group stared ringing. I was running 1.4.23.1 with the latest FreePBX. 1.4.22.2 is working fine. (Yes i know zaptel was replaced by DAHDI but upgrading is a PITA) On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Asterisk Development Team wrote: The Asterisk.org development team has announced the release of Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5. These releases are available for immediate download from http://downloads.digium.com/. This update for Asterisk includes a security fix for chan_iax2. Please see the associated security adivisory for more details: http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2009-001.html These updates are a fix to a previous security release (released as versions 1.2.31, 1.4.22.1, and 1.6.0.3). The new versions are being released after additional testing revealed some issues with the way that scanning for users was blocked. Those issues have been corrected in this release. This security issue affects the 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6 series of Asterisk. Also note, that Asterisk 1.6.0.4-rc1 was released yesterday prior to the security update. That release has been removed as there will be no 1.6.0.4 release, but rather will be reincarnated as 1.6.0.6-rc1. The reason for the dead release is to avoid 5 digit release numbers. ChangeLogs for the various releases are available at: http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/ChangeLog-1.2.31.1 http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/ChangeLog-1.4.22.2 http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/ChangeLog-1.4.23.1 http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/ChangeLog-1.6.0.5 Thank you for your continued support of Asterisk! ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released
On Thursday 29 January 2009 09:23:41 Remco Barendse wrote: 1.4.23.1 doesn't seem to work for me. I did an in-place upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.21 and upgraded to the latest zaptel as well. Incoming calls stopped working. Whenever an extension was trying to pickup the phone by doing a group pickup with *8 the extension just got dead audio and the next phone in the group stared ringing. Yeah. Thats http://bugs.digium.com:80/view.php?id=14206 I'm also concerned about that one: http://bugs.digium.com:80/view.php?id=13488 cheers t. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Thomas Stein wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 09:23:41 Remco Barendse wrote: 1.4.23.1 doesn't seem to work for me. I did an in-place upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.21 and upgraded to the latest zaptel as well. Incoming calls stopped working. Whenever an extension was trying to pickup the phone by doing a group pickup with *8 the extension just got dead audio and the next phone in the group stared ringing. Yeah. Thats http://bugs.digium.com:80/view.php?id=14206 I'm also concerned about that one: http://bugs.digium.com:80/view.php?id=13488 cheers t. Thanks for your reply, indeed that is the problem. Strange that this stable release is still prominently on the asterisk.org website as the latest and greatest. The latest bug you mentioned is only valid for mISDN installations i think? Thanks again! ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released
On Thursday 29 January 2009 13:50:19 Remco Barendse wrote: On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Thomas Stein wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 09:23:41 Remco Barendse wrote: 1.4.23.1 doesn't seem to work for me. I did an in-place upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.21 and upgraded to the latest zaptel as well. Incoming calls stopped working. Whenever an extension was trying to pickup the phone by doing a group pickup with *8 the extension just got dead audio and the next phone in the group stared ringing. Yeah. Thats http://bugs.digium.com:80/view.php?id=14206 I'm also concerned about that one: http://bugs.digium.com:80/view.php?id=13488 cheers t. Thanks for your reply, indeed that is the problem. Strange that this stable release is still prominently on the asterisk.org website as the latest and greatest. Where do you see us denoting any release as stable (or defining what that term actually means)? We release when we think that we've eliminated the bugs we can find, and then people find more bugs. If you can fix bugs before they're reported, we'd love to have you contribute to the development effort. -- Tilghman ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released
For a while we were seeing RC(release cantidates) release announcements and I can see that there were RC release for this 1.4.23 release. Any reason they aren't being publicized, or am I just looking in the wrong place? We always do compatibility testing before putting a new release in production and at this point 1.4.21.2 is the most recent stable release as far as we are concerned. Of course 1.4 wasn't really stable until 1.4.18, which is when the RC releases started too. MATT--- On 1/29/09, Tilghman Lesher tilgh...@mail.jeffandtilghman.com wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 13:50:19 Remco Barendse wrote: On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Thomas Stein wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 09:23:41 Remco Barendse wrote: 1.4.23.1 doesn't seem to work for me. I did an in-place upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.21 and upgraded to the latest zaptel as well. Incoming calls stopped working. Whenever an extension was trying to pickup the phone by doing a group pickup with *8 the extension just got dead audio and the next phone in the group stared ringing. Yeah. Thats http://bugs.digium.com:80/view.php?id=14206 I'm also concerned about that one: http://bugs.digium.com:80/view.php?id=13488 cheers t. Thanks for your reply, indeed that is the problem. Strange that this stable release is still prominently on the asterisk.org website as the latest and greatest. Where do you see us denoting any release as stable (or defining what that term actually means)? We release when we think that we've eliminated the bugs we can find, and then people find more bugs. If you can fix bugs before they're reported, we'd love to have you contribute to the development effort. -- Tilghman ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released
Yep, my bad I found them once I searched with the dash '-' after the 1.4.23. They were lost in the flood of users list mail in my inbox. I wonder if these could also be posted on the asterisk-announce list more consistently? I see a few releases on the announce list, but last 1.4 one was December 2nd and nothing after that on that list except for a few vulnerability postings. I know it would help me to get those release notices on that list, then I could flag them better so my mail viewer will smack me on the head to read them when they come in. Thanks, MATT--- On 1/29/09, Tilghman Lesher tilgh...@mail.jeffandtilghman.com wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 16:00:14 Matt Florell wrote: For a while we were seeing RC(release cantidates) release announcements and I can see that there were RC release for this 1.4.23 release. Any reason they aren't being publicized, or am I just looking in the wrong place? http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2008-December/222727.html http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2008-December/223668.html http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2009-January/224940.html I'd say you just missed them, as they were published to this list, as evidenced by the archives. -- Tilghman ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released
Has anybody ever asked Digium to provide something like the kernel.org RSS feed? My impression was this was created because kernel.org was tired of how many people built cron-ified wget scripts against kernel.org | diff against last get | sendmail you get the idea Perhaps downloads.digium.com has the same problem? the kernel.org rss feed is: http://www.kernel.org/kdist/rss.xml On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Matt Florell astma...@gmail.com wrote: Yep, my bad I found them once I searched with the dash '-' after the 1.4.23. They were lost in the flood of users list mail in my inbox. I wonder if these could also be posted on the asterisk-announce list more consistently? I see a few releases on the announce list, but last 1.4 one was December 2nd and nothing after that on that list except for a few vulnerability postings. I know it would help me to get those release notices on that list, then I could flag them better so my mail viewer will smack me on the head to read them when they come in. Thanks, MATT--- On 1/29/09, Tilghman Lesher tilgh...@mail.jeffandtilghman.com wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 16:00:14 Matt Florell wrote: For a while we were seeing RC(release cantidates) release announcements and I can see that there were RC release for this 1.4.23 release. Any reason they aren't being publicized, or am I just looking in the wrong place? http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2008-December/222727.html http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2008-December/223668.html http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2009-January/224940.html I'd say you just missed them, as they were published to this list, as evidenced by the archives. -- Tilghman ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released
David Backeberg schrieb: Has anybody ever asked Digium to provide something like the kernel.org RSS feed? My impression was this was created because kernel.org was tired of how many people built cron-ified wget scripts against kernel.org | diff against last get | sendmail you get the idea Perhaps downloads.digium.com has the same problem? the kernel.org rss feed is: http://www.kernel.org/kdist/rss.xml http://www.kempgen.net/asterisk/current/ has an RSS feed (and a release timeline). e.g. http://www.kempgen.net/asterisk/current/version/asterisk-1.4 always points to the current 1.4.x release, http://www.kempgen.net/asterisk/current/version/asterisk-1.6 always points to the current 1.6.x release etc. Release candidates (-rc) are not considered. Only now I realize that new hotfix releases (1.4.22.2) are not considered if a release with a higher version (1.4.23.1) is already in the database. Philipp Kempgen -- AMOOCON 2009, May 4-5, Rostock / Germany - http://www.amoocon.de Asterisk: http://the-asterisk-book.com - http://das-asterisk-buch.de AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister: Neuwied B14998 -- ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released
The Asterisk.org development team has announced the release of Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5. These releases are available for immediate download from http://downloads.digium.com/. This update for Asterisk includes a security fix for chan_iax2. Please see the associated security adivisory for more details: http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2009-001.html These updates are a fix to a previous security release (released as versions 1.2.31, 1.4.22.1, and 1.6.0.3). The new versions are being released after additional testing revealed some issues with the way that scanning for users was blocked. Those issues have been corrected in this release. This security issue affects the 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6 series of Asterisk. Also note, that Asterisk 1.6.0.4-rc1 was released yesterday prior to the security update. That release has been removed as there will be no 1.6.0.4 release, but rather will be reincarnated as 1.6.0.6-rc1. The reason for the dead release is to avoid 5 digit release numbers. ChangeLogs for the various releases are available at: http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/ChangeLog-1.2.31.1 http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/ChangeLog-1.4.22.2 http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/ChangeLog-1.4.23.1 http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/ChangeLog-1.6.0.5 Thank you for your continued support of Asterisk! ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
