Re: [Asterisk-Users] new CVS Checkout
Hi, From: rnc Info Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] Today I deleted the files in the asterisk, libpri, zaptel directories that are in /usr/src and did a new CVS checkout (not update). After doing the make installs and starting asterisk the show version is the same as before: Asterisk CVS-10/09/03-20:33:57 built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a i586 running Linux You must be sure you deleted the file .version (hidden) in the .../src/asterisk directory. Better delete all, including directories. See my problem from a couple of days ago in the mail archive. If you have just deleted the content of the asterisk, zapata, zaptel and libpri directories then is normal to have the same version displayed when starting Asterisk. Best regards, Dan ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] new CVS Checkout
I just updated yesterday, but I did a complete rm -Rf for all of the following directories: /usr/src/zaptel /usr/src/zapata /usr/src/libpri /usr/src/asterisk Then I did a new cvs checkout for all four of those items before recompiling them (make clean; make install) in the same order. My Asterisk now states that its running Version CVS-12/12/03-09:47:51. Hope this helps. Joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 8:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] new CVS Checkout Hi, From: rnc Info Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] Today I deleted the files in the asterisk, libpri, zaptel directories that are in /usr/src and did a new CVS checkout (not update). After doing the make installs and starting asterisk the show version is the same as before: Asterisk CVS-10/09/03-20:33:57 built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a i586 running Linux You must be sure you deleted the file .version (hidden) in the .../src/asterisk directory. Better delete all, including directories. See my problem from a couple of days ago in the mail archive. If you have just deleted the content of the asterisk, zapata, zaptel and libpri directories then is normal to have the same version displayed when starting Asterisk. Best regards, Dan ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.550 / Virus Database: 342 - Release Date: 12/9/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.550 / Virus Database: 342 - Release Date: 12/9/2003 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] new CVS Checkout
Did you do a make clean first before the make make install ? Just my $.02 :) -bh Quoting rnc Info Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Today I deleted the files in the asterisk, libpri, zaptel directories that are in /usr/src and did a new CVS checkout (not update). After doing the make installs and starting asterisk the show version is the same as before: Asterisk CVS-10/09/03-20:33:57 built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a i586 running Linux It looks like there are executable asterisk files in /usr/sbin and /usr/lib with a change date of today. I would have expected a newer data on the Version. Is there something I missed doing? Robert ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by The CCIS.net MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by the Bugs.Hamel.Net MailScanner, and appears to be clean. -- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by the Bugs.Hamel.Net MailScanner, and appears to be clean. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] new CVS Checkout
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 16:41, Joe Dennick wrote: I just updated yesterday, but I did a complete rm -Rf for all of the following directories: /usr/src/zaptel /usr/src/zapata /usr/src/libpri /usr/src/asterisk Then I did a new cvs checkout for all four of those items before recompiling them (make clean; make install) in the same order. My Asterisk now states that its running Version CVS-12/12/03-09:47:51. I use make update. In the Makefile under update: is the instruction rm -f .version -- Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] new CVS Checkout
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 16:41, Joe Dennick wrote: I just updated yesterday, but I did a complete rm -Rf for all of the following directories: /usr/src/zaptel /usr/src/zapata /usr/src/libpri /usr/src/asterisk Then I did a new cvs checkout for all four of those items before recompiling them (make clean; make install) in the same order. My Asterisk now states that its running Version CVS-12/12/03-09:47:51. I use make update. In the Makefile under update: is the instruction rm -f .version -- Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks to everyone who replied to this question. I got rid of the hidden files and reloaded from CVS. It is ok now.Guess over the next days I'll go through the archives and learn a bit more about using CVS to maintain updates. Robert ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] new CVS Checkout
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 10:32, rnc Info Lists wrote: On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 16:41, Joe Dennick wrote: I just updated yesterday, but I did a complete rm -Rf for all of the following directories: /usr/src/zaptel /usr/src/zapata /usr/src/libpri /usr/src/asterisk Then I did a new cvs checkout for all four of those items before recompiling them (make clean; make install) in the same order. My Asterisk now states that its running Version CVS-12/12/03-09:47:51. I use make update. In the Makefile under update: is the instruction rm -f .version -- Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks to everyone who replied to this question. I got rid of the hidden files and reloaded from CVS. It is ok now.Guess over the next days I'll go through the archives and learn a bit more about using CVS to maintain updates. While reading up on CVS is a good thing and I do not wish to dissuade you, I doubt you will find anything in there about the .version file. The .version file is just something created by the make file so you can track your version somewhat usefully. -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
