Re: [ATrpms-users] Seeking mythtv 0.19 testers
The packaging for mythtv 0.19 works great for me! Upgraded mythtv to .19 yesterday from atrpms-testing using smart. I've been running .18.1 for a while. Upgrade was flawless. All seems to be working well. I'm chasing some problems with tinny sound and EIO errors from ivtv but these probles have been around since before the upgrade. (I'm running a PVR350 and a PVR150) Axel Rocks! Version Info Below: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep `uname -r` lirc-kmdl-2.6.12-1.1381_FC3-0.8.0-55.rhfc3.at kernel-2.6.12-1.1381_FC3 alsa-kmdl-2.6.12-1.1381_FC3-1.0.10-43.rhfc3.at ivtv-kmdl-2.6.12-1.1381_FC3-0.4.2-101.rhfc3.at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep myth mythtv-setup-0.19-120.rhfc3.at libmyth-0.19-120.rhfc3.at mythtv-backend-0.19-120.rhfc3.at mythtv-themes-0.19-120.rhfc3.at myththemes-0.18-104.at mythtv-0.19-120.rhfc3.at mythweb-0.18-69.at mythmusic-0.19-118.rhfc3.at mythbrowser-0.19-118.rhfc3.at mythtv-frontend-0.19-120.rhfc3.at mythdvd-0.19-118.rhfc3.at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep ivtv ivtv-firmware-dec-2.02.023-8.at ivtv-firmware-enc-2.04.024-8.at ivtv-0.4.2-101.rhfc3.at ivtv_xdriver-0.10.6-3.rhfc3.at perl-Video-ivtv-0.13-7.rhfc3.at ivtv-firmware-audio-0.0.1-5.at ivtv-kmdl-2.6.12-1.1381_FC3-0.4.2-101.rhfc3.at ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
[ATrpms-users] Re: apt-get strangeness
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 05:32:22PM -0400, Mark Schindel wrote:
After a long night (haven't slept since Sat and it's 5pm Mon) I've
managed to rebuild my main mythbackend/frontend combo after a
catastrophic disk failure during a HW upgrade gone horibbly wrong. All
is working in time for the new season of shows here in NA with more
storage and both PVR-350 and PVR-150 working great.
Everything is working except...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atrpms]# awk '$0 !~ ^# $0 !~ ^$ {print $0}'
/etc/apt/sour
ces.list.d/*
rpm http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/atrpms stable
rpm http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat release
rpm http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat updates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atrpms]# apt-get update
Get:1 http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/atrpms release [890B]
Get:2 http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat release [1006B]
Fetched 1896B in 0s (2465B/s)
Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/atrpms/stable pkglist
Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/atrpms/stable release
Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat/release pkglist
Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat/release release
Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat/updates pkglist
Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat/updates release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atrpms]# apt-get install gnome-terminal
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gnome-terminal: Depends: libbonoboui-2.so.0
Depends: libgnome-2.so.0
Depends: libgnomeui-2.so.0
Depends: libgnomevfs-2.so.0
E: Broken packages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atrpms]#
At some times over the last 24 hours I've had ATrpms testing and
FreshRPMs (and maybe DAG and Dries) enabled in apt/sources but not now.
My brain is fried... Any thoughts?
What does apt-cache policy libbonoboui say?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atrpms]# apt-cache policy libbonoboui
libbonoboui:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 2.8.0.99cvs20040929-2
Version Table:
2.8.0.99cvs20040929-2 0
500 http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat/release pkglist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atrpms]#
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
Re: [ATrpms-users] Re: apt-get strangeness
Mark Schindel wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 05:32:22PM -0400, Mark Schindel wrote:
After a long night (haven't slept since Sat and it's 5pm Mon) I've
managed to rebuild my main mythbackend/frontend combo after a
catastrophic disk failure during a HW upgrade gone horibbly wrong.
All is working in time for the new season of shows here in NA with
more storage and both PVR-350 and PVR-150 working great.
Everything is working except...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atrpms]# awk '$0 !~ ^# $0 !~ ^$ {print $0}'
/etc/apt/sour
ces.list.d/*
rpm http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/atrpms stable
rpm http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat release
rpm http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat updates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atrpms]# apt-get update
Get:1 http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/atrpms release [890B]
Get:2 http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat release [1006B]
Fetched 1896B in 0s (2465B/s)
Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/atrpms/stable pkglist
Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/atrpms/stable release
Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat/release pkglist
Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat/release release
Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat/updates pkglist
Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat/updates release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atrpms]# apt-get install gnome-terminal
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gnome-terminal: Depends: libbonoboui-2.so.0
Depends: libgnome-2.so.0
Depends: libgnomeui-2.so.0
Depends: libgnomevfs-2.so.0
E: Broken packages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atrpms]#
At some times over the last 24 hours I've had ATrpms testing and
FreshRPMs (and maybe DAG and Dries) enabled in apt/sources but not now.
My brain is fried... Any thoughts?
What does apt-cache policy libbonoboui say?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atrpms]# apt-cache policy libbonoboui
libbonoboui:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 2.8.0.99cvs20040929-2
Version Table:
2.8.0.99cvs20040929-2 0
500 http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat/release pkglist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atrpms]#
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
I started adding packages to the install until I got somewhere. The
following worked:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# apt-get install gnome-terminal libbonoboui libgnome
gnome-vf
s2
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
GConf2 ORBit2 bitmap-fonts gnome-keyring gnome-mime-data libIDL libbonobo
libglade2 libgnomecanvas libgnomeui libhowl-0.9.6_1 shared-mime-info
startup-notification vte
The following NEW packages will be installed:
GConf2 ORBit2 bitmap-fonts gnome-keyring gnome-mime-data gnome-terminal
gnome-vfs2 libIDL libbonobo libbonoboui libglade2 libgnome libgnomecanvas
libgnomeui libhowl-0.9.6_1 shared-mime-info startup-notification vte
0 upgraded, 18 newly installed, 0 removed and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 9233kB of archives.
After unpacking 36.2MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
It's working now...
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
