Re: [ATrpms-users] Re: Funny behaviour with smart and yum

2005-09-24 Thread Michael Mansour
Hi Axel,

 On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 02:56:34PM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
  On Sun, 2005-18-09 at 16:46 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
   On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
Hi all,

My nightly check4updates (with only yum enabled due to x86_64) tells me
that I have ...

libglib-2.0_0.x86_64 2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
atrpms  
libgmodule-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
atrpms  
libgobject-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
atrpms  
libgthread-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
atrpms 

Available.  

i386 versions were downloaded and installed.  Smart does not even show
them as available.

When I use yum to do an upgrade, it tells me that the gpg key for these
is not in the database.  I have all keys in the database and other
atrpms rpms download fine.  I suspect the gpg check is keeping smart
from even showing it to me.

What is the solution?
   
   The i386 and x86_64 packages have the same signatures:
   
   # rpm -qip libgthread-2.0_0-2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at.*|grep Sign
   Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 09:52:35 PM CEST, Key ID
508ce5e666534c2b
   Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 11:12:52 PM CEST, Key ID
508ce5e666534c2b
  
  This is weird because it seems as if one is recognized and the other
  not.
  
   I suspect that ATrpms' key has been removed from your rpm
   database. I've recently heard of another such case, where suddenly the
   ATrpms key was missing, so perhaps some repo is removing all gpg keys
   but some, or explicitely some keys including ATrpms'?/paranoia
   
   Try rpm -q gpg-pubkey-66534c2b
  
  Not Found.
 
 That seems to be the issue, then. Wuestin is how did it get removed?

Just so you know, I've noticed a couple of times now on quite a few machines,
when I've updated the yum version I ended up losing the ATRPMs key from my rpm
key database and I've had to re-add it in, each time, before i could install
packages from ATrpms.

I'm not sure why this happens, and the first time it did I just put it down to
 a glitch, but having seen it happen on other servers, and having read some
people here mentioning it also, I'm now thinking there's something wrong
somewhere.

I've recently updated spamassassin on various machines too, and haven't had
the ATrpms key vanish anymore, so now again, I'm putting it down to a glitch
somewhere :P

Michael.

  Which of your packages has it?  I have tried reinstalling
  atrpms-61-1.at and it is still not there.
 
 You need to import it, it cannot be installed. Use
 
 http://atrpms.net/RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms
 
 or
 
 /usr/share/atrpms/RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms
 -- 
 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
--- End of Original Message ---


___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users


[ATrpms-users] Re: Funny behaviour with smart and yum

2005-09-19 Thread Axel Thimm
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 02:56:34PM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
 On Sun, 2005-18-09 at 16:46 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
  On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
   Hi all,
   
   My nightly check4updates (with only yum enabled due to x86_64) tells me
   that I have ...
   
   libglib-2.0_0.x86_64 2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
   atrpms  
   libgmodule-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
   atrpms  
   libgobject-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
   atrpms  
   libgthread-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
   atrpms 
   
   Available.  
   
   i386 versions were downloaded and installed.  Smart does not even show
   them as available.
   
   When I use yum to do an upgrade, it tells me that the gpg key for these
   is not in the database.  I have all keys in the database and other
   atrpms rpms download fine.  I suspect the gpg check is keeping smart
   from even showing it to me.
   
   What is the solution?
  
  The i386 and x86_64 packages have the same signatures:
  
  # rpm -qip libgthread-2.0_0-2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at.*|grep Sign
  Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 09:52:35 PM CEST, Key ID 
  508ce5e666534c2b
  Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 11:12:52 PM CEST, Key ID 
  508ce5e666534c2b
 
 This is weird because it seems as if one is recognized and the other
 not.
 
  I suspect that ATrpms' key has been removed from your rpm
  database. I've recently heard of another such case, where suddenly the
  ATrpms key was missing, so perhaps some repo is removing all gpg keys
  but some, or explicitely some keys including ATrpms'?/paranoia
  
  Try rpm -q gpg-pubkey-66534c2b
 
 Not Found.

That seems to be the issue, then. Wuestin is how did it get removed?

 Which of your packages has it?  I have tried reinstalling
 atrpms-61-1.at and it is still not there.

You need to import it, it cannot be installed. Use

http://atrpms.net/RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms

or

/usr/share/atrpms/RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


pgpARxVJHf21X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

[ATrpms-users] Re: Funny behaviour with smart and yum

2005-09-19 Thread Axel Thimm
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:23:58AM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
 Now I am confused.  Is there a difference in the keys on your side?  Did
 the key change and I just missed it?

The key didn't change since years, I think last year I added a new
uid, but that was all.

There are more keys you need, at the very least the one from Red
Hat/Fedora Core:

rpm --import /usr/share/doc/fedora-release-4/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora

-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


pgpzFOaHRocT5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

[ATrpms-users] Re: Funny behaviour with smart and yum

2005-09-19 Thread Preet Khalsa
On Mon, 2005-19-09 at 16:54 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
 On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 02:56:34PM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
  On Sun, 2005-18-09 at 16:46 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
   On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
Hi all,

My nightly check4updates (with only yum enabled due to x86_64) tells me
that I have ...

libglib-2.0_0.x86_64 2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
atrpms  
libgmodule-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
atrpms  
libgobject-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
atrpms  
libgthread-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
atrpms 

Available.  

i386 versions were downloaded and installed.  Smart does not even show
them as available.

When I use yum to do an upgrade, it tells me that the gpg key for these
is not in the database.  I have all keys in the database and other
atrpms rpms download fine.  I suspect the gpg check is keeping smart
from even showing it to me.

What is the solution?
   
   The i386 and x86_64 packages have the same signatures:
   
   # rpm -qip libgthread-2.0_0-2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at.*|grep Sign
   Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 09:52:35 PM CEST, Key ID 
   508ce5e666534c2b
   Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 11:12:52 PM CEST, Key ID 
   508ce5e666534c2b
  
  This is weird because it seems as if one is recognized and the other
  not.
  
   I suspect that ATrpms' key has been removed from your rpm
   database. I've recently heard of another such case, where suddenly the
   ATrpms key was missing, so perhaps some repo is removing all gpg keys
   but some, or explicitely some keys including ATrpms'?/paranoia
   
   Try rpm -q gpg-pubkey-66534c2b
  
  Not Found.
 
 That seems to be the issue, then. Wuestin is how did it get removed?
 
  Which of your packages has it?  I have tried reinstalling
  atrpms-61-1.at and it is still not there.
 
 You need to import it, it cannot be installed. Use
 
 http://atrpms.net/RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms
 
 or
 
 /usr/share/atrpms/RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms

I tried rpm --import http://atrpms... but the problem remains.

Now when I do a rpm -qa | grep gpg this is what I get ...


gpg-pubkey-db42a60e-37ea5438
libgpg-error-1.0-1_6.rhfc3.at
libgpg-error-1.0-1_6.rhfc3.at
gpg-pubkey-66534c2b-41d57eae
gpg-pubkey-66534c2b-41d57eae
gpg-pubkey-4f2a6fd2-3f9d9d3b

As you can see, yours is there twice.  Interestingly enough, none of the keys 
show up in smart.

Is there a way to clean out all the gpg keys and simply reinstall them.  The 
question is really how to clean the rpmdb of keys.  I will get Fedora, atrpms, 
dag etc that are in medley-package-config and reinstall them.  or are they in 
that package and I simply remove/reinstall that?

Thanks again.  I hope this helps other people.

Preet



___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users


[ATrpms-users] Re: Funny behaviour with smart and yum

2005-09-19 Thread Axel Thimm
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:42:49PM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
 On Mon, 2005-19-09 at 16:54 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
  On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 02:56:34PM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
   On Sun, 2005-18-09 at 16:46 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 My nightly check4updates (with only yum enabled due to x86_64) tells 
 me
 that I have ...
 
 libglib-2.0_0.x86_64 2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
 atrpms  
 libgmodule-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
 atrpms  
 libgobject-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
 atrpms  
 libgthread-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
 atrpms 
 
 Available.  
 
 i386 versions were downloaded and installed.  Smart does not even show
 them as available.
 
 When I use yum to do an upgrade, it tells me that the gpg key for 
 these
 is not in the database.  I have all keys in the database and other
 atrpms rpms download fine.  I suspect the gpg check is keeping smart
 from even showing it to me.
 
 What is the solution?

The i386 and x86_64 packages have the same signatures:

# rpm -qip libgthread-2.0_0-2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at.*|grep Sign
Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 09:52:35 PM CEST, Key ID 
508ce5e666534c2b
Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 11:12:52 PM CEST, Key ID 
508ce5e666534c2b
   
   This is weird because it seems as if one is recognized and the other
   not.
   
I suspect that ATrpms' key has been removed from your rpm
database. I've recently heard of another such case, where suddenly the
ATrpms key was missing, so perhaps some repo is removing all gpg keys
but some, or explicitely some keys including ATrpms'?/paranoia

Try rpm -q gpg-pubkey-66534c2b
   
   Not Found.
  
  That seems to be the issue, then. Wuestin is how did it get removed?
  
   Which of your packages has it?  I have tried reinstalling
   atrpms-61-1.at and it is still not there.
  
  You need to import it, it cannot be installed. Use
  
  http://atrpms.net/RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms
  
  or
  
  /usr/share/atrpms/RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms
 
 I tried rpm --import http://atrpms... but the problem remains.
 
 Now when I do a rpm -qa | grep gpg this is what I get ...
 
 
 gpg-pubkey-db42a60e-37ea5438
 libgpg-error-1.0-1_6.rhfc3.at
 libgpg-error-1.0-1_6.rhfc3.at
 gpg-pubkey-66534c2b-41d57eae
 gpg-pubkey-66534c2b-41d57eae
 gpg-pubkey-4f2a6fd2-3f9d9d3b
 
 As you can see, yours is there twice.  Interestingly enough, none of the keys 
 show up in smart.
 
 Is there a way to clean out all the gpg keys

Yes, rpm -e gpg-pubkey --allmatches


 and simply reinstall them.  The question is really how to clean the
 rpmdb of keys.  I will get Fedora, atrpms, dag etc that are in
 medley-package-config and reinstall them.  or are they in that
 package and I simply remove/reinstall that?

They are under /usr/share/atrpms if you installed the atrpms package.

-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


pgpmhK5MPYbzC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

[ATrpms-users] Re: Funny behaviour with smart and yum

2005-09-19 Thread Preet Khalsa
On Mon, 2005-19-09 at 22:49 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:42:49PM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
  On Mon, 2005-19-09 at 16:54 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
   On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 02:56:34PM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
On Sun, 2005-18-09 at 16:46 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
 On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
  Hi all,
  
  My nightly check4updates (with only yum enabled due to x86_64) 
  tells me
  that I have ...
  
  libglib-2.0_0.x86_64 2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
  atrpms  
  libgmodule-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
  atrpms  
  libgobject-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
  atrpms  
  libgthread-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
  atrpms 
  
  Available.  
  
  i386 versions were downloaded and installed.  Smart does not even 
  show
  them as available.
  
  When I use yum to do an upgrade, it tells me that the gpg key for 
  these
  is not in the database.  I have all keys in the database and other
  atrpms rpms download fine.  I suspect the gpg check is keeping smart
  from even showing it to me.
  
  What is the solution?
 
 The i386 and x86_64 packages have the same signatures:
 
 # rpm -qip libgthread-2.0_0-2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at.*|grep Sign
 Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 09:52:35 PM CEST, Key ID 
 508ce5e666534c2b
 Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 11:12:52 PM CEST, Key ID 
 508ce5e666534c2b

This is weird because it seems as if one is recognized and the other
not.

 I suspect that ATrpms' key has been removed from your rpm
 database. I've recently heard of another such case, where suddenly the
 ATrpms key was missing, so perhaps some repo is removing all gpg keys
 but some, or explicitely some keys including ATrpms'?/paranoia
 
 Try rpm -q gpg-pubkey-66534c2b

Not Found.
   
   That seems to be the issue, then. Wuestin is how did it get removed?
   
Which of your packages has it?  I have tried reinstalling
atrpms-61-1.at and it is still not there.
   
   You need to import it, it cannot be installed. Use
   
   http://atrpms.net/RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms
   
   or
   
   /usr/share/atrpms/RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms
  
  I tried rpm --import http://atrpms... but the problem remains.
  
  Now when I do a rpm -qa | grep gpg this is what I get ...
  
  
  gpg-pubkey-db42a60e-37ea5438
  libgpg-error-1.0-1_6.rhfc3.at
  libgpg-error-1.0-1_6.rhfc3.at
  gpg-pubkey-66534c2b-41d57eae
  gpg-pubkey-66534c2b-41d57eae
  gpg-pubkey-4f2a6fd2-3f9d9d3b
  
  As you can see, yours is there twice.  Interestingly enough, none of the 
  keys show up in smart.
  
  Is there a way to clean out all the gpg keys
 
 Yes, rpm -e gpg-pubkey --allmatches
 
 
  and simply reinstall them.  The question is really how to clean the
  rpmdb of keys.  I will get Fedora, atrpms, dag etc that are in
  medley-package-config and reinstall them.  or are they in that
  package and I simply remove/reinstall that?
 
 They are under /usr/share/atrpms if you installed the atrpms package.
 

Thank you Axel.  That did the trick.  Since your key was missing, smart
also had disabled the atroms channel and when I found that, all went
fine.

Now the mystery of why your keys went missing remains.

Preet


___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users


[ATrpms-users] Re: Funny behaviour with smart and yum

2005-09-18 Thread Axel Thimm
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Preet Khalsa wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 My nightly check4updates (with only yum enabled due to x86_64) tells me
 that I have ...
 
 libglib-2.0_0.x86_64 2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
 atrpms  
 libgmodule-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
 atrpms  
 libgobject-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
 atrpms  
 libgthread-2.0_0.x86_64  2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at
 atrpms 
 
 Available.  
 
 i386 versions were downloaded and installed.  Smart does not even show
 them as available.
 
 When I use yum to do an upgrade, it tells me that the gpg key for these
 is not in the database.  I have all keys in the database and other
 atrpms rpms download fine.  I suspect the gpg check is keeping smart
 from even showing it to me.
 
 What is the solution?

The i386 and x86_64 packages have the same signatures:

# rpm -qip libgthread-2.0_0-2.6.6-1_12.rhfc3.at.*|grep Sign
Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 09:52:35 PM CEST, Key ID 
508ce5e666534c2b
Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Sat 10 Sep 2005 11:12:52 PM CEST, Key ID 
508ce5e666534c2b

I suspect that ATrpms' key has been removed from your rpm
database. I've recently heard of another such case, where suddenly the
ATrpms key was missing, so perhaps some repo is removing all gpg keys
but some, or explicitely some keys including ATrpms'?/paranoia

Try rpm -q gpg-pubkey-66534c2b
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


pgpl8KiuVQ0Ts.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users