Re: [aur-general] TU application - ConnorBehan
On 17/04/12 09:18 AM, Sergej Pupykin wrote: At Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:54:12 -0700, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Archers. This is my application to be a trusted user and my sponsor is Sergej Pupykin. My name on all Arch projects is ConnorBehan. Discussion looks finished, I have started voting in AUR. Thank-you. By the way, I just realized that one of the things I said may have come out wrong. I referred to info2man as a neglected package since there are a few necessary changes that I could make if I adopted it soon. This is still true, but at the time I didn't realize that the maintainer was Dragonlord - an active TU who maintains hundreds of packages. This is a bigger contribution than I have made so far so I must clarify that I meant no disrespect! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 72 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (61 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (11 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * contacts-0.12-6 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686), since 2012-04-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 4 signoffs 2. dan - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 1 signoffs 4. andyrtr - 1 signoffs
[aur-general] Delete request
Please remove nodeunit[1]. It is a duplicate of nodejs-nodeunit[2] but has no maintainer, no votes and a worse PKGBUILD. The latter is also better named. 1: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53796 2: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54948 Thanks signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Deletion request: kate-ctags-plugin
The kate-ctags-plugin package[1] is old, orphaned and there is already a ctags plugin bundled with Kate. Perhaps it should be removed from the AUR? Thank you. --Chris Sakalis [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13942
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: kate-ctags-plugin
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Chris Sakalis chrissaka...@gmail.com wrote: The kate-ctags-plugin package[1] is old, orphaned and there is already a ctags plugin bundled with Kate. Perhaps it should be removed from the AUR? Thank you. --Chris Sakalis [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13942 Done, thanks
Re: [aur-general] Delete request
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Sid Karunaratne s...@karunaratne.net wrote: Please remove nodeunit[1]. It is a duplicate of nodejs-nodeunit[2] but has no maintainer, no votes and a worse PKGBUILD. The latter is also better named. 1: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53796 2: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54948 Thanks Removed
[aur-general] Disown rosa-media-player
Hello, The rosa-media-player[1] package is out-of-date and not currently maintained by its current maintainer. Thus, I would like to request that it be disowned, so that myself or any other user interested in this package is able to maintain it properly. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54417 -- Regards, Vítor Ferreira.
Re: [aur-general] Disown rosa-media-player
On 18/04/12 18:48, Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira wrote: Hello, The rosa-media-player[1] package is out-of-date and not currently maintained by its current maintainer. Thus, I would like to request that it be disowned, so that myself or any other user interested in this package is able to maintain it properly. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54417 -- Regards, Vítor Ferreira. Have you contacted the current maintainer? If not, you'll need to do that first and after two weeks, if nothing has changed, you can request this package to b be disowned. That is the standard procedure. -- /Best Regards/, *Matej Ľach* Support our efforts! http://www.fsf.org/ Use Linux http://distrowatch.com/search.php?ostype=Linuxcategory=Allorigin=Allbasedon=Allnotbasedon=Nonedesktop=Allarchitecture=Allstatus=Active / BSD http://distrowatch.com/search.php?ostype=BSDcategory=Allorigin=Allbasedon=Allnotbasedon=Nonedesktop=Allarchitecture=Allstatus=Active on your computer +SlimICS http://slimroms.webs.com//AOKP http://forum.aokp.co/page/news/CM(9) http://www.cyanogenmod.com/about on your [Android http://www.android.com/about/] device and experience true freedom! Proudly supporting *LeanKernel http://rootzwiki.com/topic/13299-leankernel-minimalistic-kernel-300-4112/*. http://www.archlinux.org/ archlinux x86_64 + KDE4 USER, FAN CONTRIBUTOR
Re: [aur-general] Disown rosa-media-player
Ok, I will do so. Thanks, Vítor Ferreira. 2012/4/18 Matej Ľach matej.l...@linux.com On 18/04/12 18:48, Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira wrote: Hello, The rosa-media-player[1] package is out-of-date and not currently maintained by its current maintainer. Thus, I would like to request that it be disowned, so that myself or any other user interested in this package is able to maintain it properly. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=54417https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54417 -- Regards, Vítor Ferreira. Have you contacted the current maintainer? If not, you'll need to do that first and after two weeks, if nothing has changed, you can request this package to b be disowned. That is the standard procedure. -- /Best Regards/, *Matej Ľach* Support our efforts! http://www.fsf.org/ Use Linux http://distrowatch.com/**search.php?ostype=Linux** category=Allorigin=All**basedon=Allnotbasedon=None** desktop=Allarchitecture=All**status=Activehttp://distrowatch.com/search.php?ostype=Linuxcategory=Allorigin=Allbasedon=Allnotbasedon=Nonedesktop=Allarchitecture=Allstatus=Active / BSD http://distrowatch.com/**search.php?ostype=BSD** category=Allorigin=All**basedon=Allnotbasedon=None** desktop=Allarchitecture=All**status=Activehttp://distrowatch.com/search.php?ostype=BSDcategory=Allorigin=Allbasedon=Allnotbasedon=Nonedesktop=Allarchitecture=Allstatus=Active on your computer +SlimICS http://slimroms.webs.com//**AOKP http://forum.aokp.co/page/**news http://forum.aokp.co/page/news/CM(9) http://www.cyanogenmod.com/**about http://www.cyanogenmod.com/about on your [Android http://www.android.com/about/**] device and experience true freedom! Proudly supporting *LeanKernel http://rootzwiki.com/topic/** 13299-leankernel-minimalistic-**kernel-300-4112/http://rootzwiki.com/topic/13299-leankernel-minimalistic-kernel-300-4112/ *. http://www.archlinux.org/ archlinux x86_64 + KDE4 USER, FAN CONTRIBUTOR -- Vítor Ferreira, Undergraduate Student, Madeira Interactive Technologies Institute, University of Madeira
[aur-general] Delete request
Hi, I'm the maintainer of the Lilyterm-testing package (it was my very first aur pkgbuild!) the goal of this package was to provide lilyterm release candidate 0.9.9, which took a lng time to be released. anyway, got released and community has that package, so this is no longer needed. The url is https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42280 thanks
Re: [aur-general] Delete request
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Christopher luna chrislcenter-mam...@yahoo.com.mx wrote: Hi, I'm the maintainer of the Lilyterm-testing package (it was my very first aur pkgbuild!) the goal of this package was to provide lilyterm release candidate 0.9.9, which took a lng time to be released. anyway, got released and community has that package, so this is no longer needed. The url is https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42280 thanks Gone, thanks
[aur-general] Deletion Request: mosh, mosh-git
Hi there, I (metasyntax) am the maintainer of the mosh and mosh-git packages in the AUR. I hereby request that they be deleted so that those names may be taken over by the packages currently named mobile-shell and mobile-shell-git, respectively. FWIW, I will be uploading my packages under the new names mosh-scheme and mosh-scheme-git, so if you renaming is as easy as just removing them, that's just fine by me. Thanks much! -- Taylor C. Venable http://metasyntax.net/
