[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2012-10-21 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 3 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 19 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) ==

* transmageddon-0.25-1 (any)
* espeakup-0.71-5 (i686)
* espeakup-0.71-5 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) ==

* transmageddon-0.25-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* almanah-0.10.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* espeakup-0.71-5 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* glabels-3.0.1-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* lxdm-0.4.1-17 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* shotwell-0.13.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* almanah-0.10.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* espeakup-0.71-5 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* glabels-3.0.1-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* lxdm-0.4.1-17 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* shotwell-0.13.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. dreisner - 1 signoffs



[aur-general] orphan request: fatsort

2012-10-21 Thread Antonis Kouliakiotis
Please orphan fatsort [1]. It is flagged for 4 months now, also the
maintainer is notified through the comments and by email  2 weeks ago
without taking any action.

[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4487


Re: [aur-general] orphan request: fatsort

2012-10-21 Thread Ike Devolder
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:36:21PM +0300, Antonis Kouliakiotis wrote:
 Please orphan fatsort [1]. It is flagged for 4 months now, also the
 maintainer is notified through the comments and by email  2 weeks ago
 without taking any action.
 
 [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4487

disowned, thx

-- 
Ike


pgpUCDmkSCLs5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] gnome-shell-extension-alternative-status-menu-git

2012-10-21 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 07:09:49AM -0700, Taylor Lookabaugh wrote:
 Package name is gnome-shell-extension-alternative-status-menu-git. Keeping
 record in mailing list.
 On Oct 19, 2012 2:48 AM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  Please remove said package of mine, Power Off is visible by default since
  GNOME 3.6.
  https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48607
 
  Thx in advance.

Deleted, thanks.

-- 
Jonathan Steel


pgpk9PTdah8ML.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[aur-general] TU Application - Felix Yan

2012-10-21 Thread Felix Yan
Dear archers,

I was looking for a sponsor in August 2012 [1], and thank Jonathan
Steel for contacting me right after he became a new TU. He helps me a
lot and I'm keeping clean up and improve my PKGBUILDs in AUR with his
suggestions. I think I can do more than as a user, so I am now
applying to become a Trusted User, after some knowledge  skills
preparing in the last few weeks. Bartłomiej Piotrowski has kindly
sponsored me (just today :P and thanks a lot).

I love Arch mainly because of the PKGBUILD. Never could I find another
great and simple-enough to write description file of an easy-to-use
package manager. I never created a successful package in .deb although
I was a Ubuntu and PPA user for more than two years(Hmm, my lack of
knowledge in bash  English should also be a problem at that time).
When I began to use Arch, I was impressed deeply by pacman(A lot of
points are in ILoveCandy, although :P) and that's why I switched all
my workspaces to Arch.

I have been an Archer only for one year and a half but 4 for the Linux
world. I submitted my first package by the end of last year, and
maintain more and more during the last a few months (61 for now [2],
with a total of 460 votes). I am eager to maintain packages that loved
and needed by Chinese users as I am one too, such as input
methods(fcitx-*, ibus-*, sunpinyin, libpinyin, rime, etc), internet
supplicant in Chinese universities(mentohust/ruijieclient), chat tools
qq related(linuxqq, webqq, libqq*, etc) and popular proxy tools
(sshuttle, goagent, etc). As I am a python programmer and maintaining
more than 20 python libraries I use for now, I'm also ready for some
popular python libraries. I'll take those orphans in [community] (or
possibly [extra] if approved and moved) in these cases, too.

I am also a good user in keeping active in reporting and following
issues upstream, such as pidgin-lwqq [3].

As I looked after more and more packages on AUR I found many users not
so convenient to install so many packages in AUR, so I joined
archlinuxcn's community repository project [4] to provide popular
packages in binary. But this is not good for user to involve in (such
as flag out-of-date, report bugs, etc). It could be a lot better if I
could move the most popular ones into [community] so users does not
need to manually add a (not fully-trusted) third-party community
repository.

I am also an IT manager in work, and maintaining several Arch servers.

I only use x86_64 architecture but keep an eye on i686 as some of the
old hardwares are not ready for 64-bit. I have several popular WM/DEs
installed but using XFCE mostly.

I am a wine user and keep an eye on its fresh news. Although I am not
using any wine programs too much, I sometimes play osu! or TESV:
Skyrim under wine.

Some more info about me: 21, male, Wuhan in China, working in a
startup, not very good at C and English, but trying to keep them in a
package-ready level :P A classical music lover, and also accept some
of the NewAge.

Thank you for your time in reading my application.

[1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2012-August/020104.html
[2] 
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0K=felixonmarsdo_Search=Godetail=1C=0SeB=mSB=nSO=aPP=100outdated=
[3] https://github.com/xiehuc/pidgin-lwqq/issues?page=1state=closed  (Chinese)

Kind regards,

Felix Yan
Twitter: @felixonmars
Wiki: http://felixc.at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
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=XnG6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Felix Yan

2012-10-21 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 10/21/2012 05:04 PM, Felix Yan wrote:
 Bartłomiej Piotrowski has kindly sponsored me (just today :P and thanks a 
 lot).

I confirm my sponsorship. So, let the discussion begin!

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Felix Yan

2012-10-21 Thread Felix Yan
On 10/21/2012 11:04 PM, Felix Yan wrote:
 Dear archers,
 
 I was looking for a sponsor in August 2012 [1], and thank Jonathan
 Steel for contacting me right after he became a new TU. He helps me a
 lot and I'm keeping clean up and improve my PKGBUILDs in AUR with his
 suggestions. I think I can do more than as a user, so I am now
 applying to become a Trusted User, after some knowledge  skills
 preparing in the last few weeks. Bartłomiej Piotrowski has kindly
 sponsored me (just today :P and thanks a lot).
 
 I love Arch mainly because of the PKGBUILD. Never could I find another
 great and simple-enough to write description file of an easy-to-use
 package manager. I never created a successful package in .deb although
 I was a Ubuntu and PPA user for more than two years(Hmm, my lack of
 knowledge in bash  English should also be a problem at that time).
 When I began to use Arch, I was impressed deeply by pacman(A lot of
 points are in ILoveCandy, although :P) and that's why I switched all
 my workspaces to Arch.
 
 I have been an Archer only for one year and a half but 4 for the Linux
 world. I submitted my first package by the end of last year, and
 maintain more and more during the last a few months (61 for now [2],
 with a total of 460 votes). I am eager to maintain packages that loved
 and needed by Chinese users as I am one too, such as input
 methods(fcitx-*, ibus-*, sunpinyin, libpinyin, rime, etc), internet
 supplicant in Chinese universities(mentohust/ruijieclient), chat tools
 qq related(linuxqq, webqq, libqq*, etc) and popular proxy tools
 (sshuttle, goagent, etc). As I am a python programmer and maintaining
 more than 20 python libraries I use for now, I'm also ready for some
 popular python libraries. I'll take those orphans in [community] (or
 possibly [extra] if approved and moved) in these cases, too.
 
 I am also a good user in keeping active in reporting and following
 issues upstream, such as pidgin-lwqq [3].
 
 As I looked after more and more packages on AUR I found many users not
 so convenient to install so many packages in AUR, so I joined
 archlinuxcn's community repository project [4] to provide popular
 packages in binary. But this is not good for user to involve in (such
 as flag out-of-date, report bugs, etc). It could be a lot better if I
 could move the most popular ones into [community] so users does not
 need to manually add a (not fully-trusted) third-party community
 repository.
 
 I am also an IT manager in work, and maintaining several Arch servers.
 
 I only use x86_64 architecture but keep an eye on i686 as some of the
 old hardwares are not ready for 64-bit. I have several popular WM/DEs
 installed but using XFCE mostly.
 
 I am a wine user and keep an eye on its fresh news. Although I am not
 using any wine programs too much, I sometimes play osu! or TESV:
 Skyrim under wine.
 
 Some more info about me: 21, male, Wuhan in China, working in a
 startup, not very good at C and English, but trying to keep them in a
 package-ready level :P A classical music lover, and also accept some
 of the NewAge.
 
 Thank you for your time in reading my application.
 
 [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2012-August/020104.html
 [2] 
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0K=felixonmarsdo_Search=Godetail=1C=0SeB=mSB=nSO=aPP=100outdated=
 [3] https://github.com/xiehuc/pidgin-lwqq/issues?page=1state=closed  
 (Chinese)
 
 Kind regards,
 
 Felix Yan
 Twitter: @felixonmars
 Wiki: http://felixc.at
 

Sorry for the wrong signature, I am a new user of Thunderbird :P

Now I am confirming my application with correct signature.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] dropping vim-gist

2012-10-21 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 14/10/12 14:49, Alfredo Palhares wrote:
 I don't use vim-gist anymore, so is anyone interested in adopting it
 else I'll drop it.
 Me i use it.
 
Dropped it, you can adopt it in AUR.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63806




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Felix Yan

2012-10-21 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Thanks for applying to become a TU. Hopefully this will sort out the
ibus packages. :)

Your AUR packages look ok, IMO. The quoting of strings and variables
is slightly inconsistent, but this happens to the best of us.

Vim or emacs?

Best of luck!

---
Cordially,
 Alexander Rødseth
 Arch Linux Trusted User
 (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)


Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Felix Yan

2012-10-21 Thread Xyne
Alexander Rødseth wrote:

Your AUR packages look ok, IMO. The quoting of strings and variables
is slightly inconsistent, but this happens to the best of us.

I agree with each point above.



Vim or emacs?

Answer very carefully. This is a veiled attempt to assess your diplomatic
skills. :P

*waits to see if Alexander acquires the new record for derailing an application
discussion*



Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Felix Yan

2012-10-21 Thread Felix Yan
On 10/22/2012 03:28 AM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
 Thanks for applying to become a TU. Hopefully this will sort out the
 ibus packages. :)
 
 Your AUR packages look ok, IMO. The quoting of strings and variables
 is slightly inconsistent, but this happens to the best of us.
Thanks, I'll take care of this since now.

 Vim or emacs?
I am only a beginner in vim and not yet used emacs, so It's not
appropriate for me to judge which is better :P

In my daily coding (Python mainly), I am using Sublime Text 2, and
Geany/Eclipse before I bought a ST2 license myself.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature