Re: [aur-general] python-foo and python2-foo - should they conflict?

2012-10-16 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman 
On 16 October 2012 16:48, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
 python-foo and python2-foo - should they conflict?

Absolutely not. At least, ideally. I may work with both Python
versions and in that case will need libraries for each. Shared files
have been a problem, and so far the (painful) route is to split them
into a -common package (since upstream does not care to handle such
inconveniences). See pyqt for an example.


--
GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1

Re: [aur-general] python-foo and python2-foo - should they conflict?

2012-10-16 Thread Oon-Ee Ng 
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote:
 As mentioned in the Arch Packaging Standards [1]:
 /usr/share/doc/{pkg}Application documentation

 You should rename the documentation folder of your packages to
 /usr/share/doc/$pkgname, so there would be not anymore conflict.

 [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards

The thing is both use /usr/share/doc/python-foo. Yeah I guess it makes
sense that one should use /usr/share/doc/python2-foo, thanks =)