[avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR-GCC-list Digest, Vol 62, Issue 6

2010-03-27 Thread fpaolo63

Thanks a lot guys,
for me is not a matter to compile the tools chain, I'm looking for a 
tools chain based on gcc 4.4.x.


let me reformat the questions:

- what will happen if I build the tools chain without patch?
- which patch do I need to apply in order to build the GCC 4.4.x?
I saw that some patch, for gcc 4.2.x,  fix some bugs resolved in 4.4.x
- If I don't need support for Xmega, can I skip these patch?

Paolo


On 03/26/2010 05:01 PM, avr-gcc-list-requ...@nongnu.org wrote:
Message: 2 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:13:35 +0100 From: Bingo 
avr-li...@luna.dyndns.dk Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 4.4.3 and 
AVR To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Message-ID: 
4babc3ef.8070...@luna.dyndns.dk Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Weddington, Eric wrote:


  Please go to the AVR Freaks website (www.avrfreaks.net), on the AVR GCC 
Forum there is a sticky thread at the top that provides a working build script. 
IIRC it takes care of the patches you need
 

http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2file=viewtopict=42631start=0postdays=0postorder=aschighlight=
   

  Looking WINAVR project on sourceforge I saw a lot of patch for GCC
  4.2.x: some are GCC related (bugs) and others new uC support.

  Do I have to apply all or a subset ?
  
   


  Why would you only want to apply a subset?
  
 

  And what about binutils 2.20 ?
   

The one from the url above builds these versions
*build-avr-gcc-4.3.4-binutils-2.20-libc-1.6.8-insight6.8-dude-5.10

You can get .deb packages here

http://www.wrightflyer.co.uk/avr-gcc/

The avr-gcc-4.3.3-avrfreaks-25-feb-2010-special-static package , is
build with the winavr patches  from 2010 , and should run on both
32/64 bit system.


The *avr-gcc-4.3.4-avrfreaks-09-mar-2010 package , is build using the
script from the url above.
http://www.wrightflyer.co.uk/avr-gcc/avr-gcc-4.3.4-avrfreaks-09-mar-2010.txt
But isn't static linked , and would only work on 32 bit.

I build the system on an Ubuntu 8.04 LTS , but the versions seems to
work on newer releases.
Especially the static version.

HTH
Bingo





--

___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list


End of AVR-GCC-list Digest, Vol 62, Issue 6
***
   




___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list


Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR-GCC-list Digest, Vol 62, Issue 6

2010-03-27 Thread Joerg Wunsch
fpaolo63 fpaol...@gmail.com wrote:

 - what will happen if I build the tools chain without patch?

Have a look at the patches, and decide yourself.

 - which patch do I need to apply in order to build the GCC 4.4.x?

I think there has been a list of candidate patches posted here some
months ago.

 - If I don't need support for Xmega, can I skip these patch?

Many of the patches are labelled patch-bugXXX, you have to verify
they are really already included, otherwise you might run into
trouble.

-- 
cheers, Jorg   .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)


___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list