RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: build srecord under mingw [SOLVED]
-Original Message- From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu. org] On Behalf Of Gene Smith Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:17 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Re: build srecord under mingw [SOLVED] Sorry, I was wrong (again). Defining -I option in just CXXFLAGS does work. You just get a warning with ./configure but the Makefile looks OK and srecord builds. However, if you define -I in CPPFLAGS you get an error-free ./configure and it builds OK too. That's weird. Sounds like it needs to be reported to Peter Miller. ___ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: build srecord under mingw [SOLVED]
Weddington, Eric eric.wedding...@atmel.com wrote: That's weird. Sounds like it needs to be reported to Peter Miller. Nope, that's pretty normal for autoconf-generated Makefiles. The standard way for -I is to go into CPPFLAGS. However, if you put it (only) into CXXFLAGS or CFLAGS (depending on the language used), it will eventually compile anyway but lead to a configure warning that compiler and preprocessor disagree about the usability of a certain header file. -- cheers, Jorg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) ___ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: build srecord under mingw [SOLVED]
-Original Message- From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu. org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 12:10 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: build srecord under mingw [SOLVED] Weddington, Eric eric.wedding...@atmel.com wrote: That's weird. Sounds like it needs to be reported to Peter Miller. Nope, that's pretty normal for autoconf-generated Makefiles. The standard way for -I is to go into CPPFLAGS. However, if you put it (only) into CXXFLAGS or CFLAGS (depending on the language used), it will eventually compile anyway but lead to a configure warning that compiler and preprocessor disagree about the usability of a certain header file. Ah, ok, thanks for the explanation. CPPFLAGS it is, then. ___ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: build srecord under mingw [SOLVED]
Weddington, Eric eric.wedding...@atmel.com wrote: For version 1.47 of SRecord, look at the Makefile.in file in the top level. Lines 54-57 state: Both, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS in autoconf-generated Makefiles should include CPPFLAGS. This is done outside Makefile.am. The point is that any non-standard -I options in general ought to go into CPPFLAGS, and any non-standard -L options inot LDFLAGS. I'm using that e.g. in situations where autoconf stuff has to look out for libusb in non-standard places. -- cheers, Jorg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) ___ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
