Re: When are we going to get another list? (was: RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City)

2007-08-19 Thread Kirk Northrop

Andrew Bowden wrote:

It's also got to be said that the majority of people on a mailing list
don't post.  I don't know the stats for this list, but I'm on a mailing
list of 300 people, about 20 of which post regularly.  There's a lot of
readers, and occassionally some of them post, but mostly it's reading.
Why do people join a list and not post?  Well to get the signal.  So if
there's very little signal, you lose your incentive to remain a reader.


Indeed, I've got about 400 unread messages lasting back ages because 
no-one talks about, you know, XML and APIs anymore. So I don't bother to 
read, so I'm missing the signal, and it just makes me feel this list 
isn't cared for.


--
From the North, this is Kirk
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: When are we going to get another list? (was: RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City)

2007-08-16 Thread Brian Butterworth
Chris,

Finally, remember that the noise *is *the signal. You can't post too much.
Deploy filters.

http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html


On 15/08/07, Christopher Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think that description of a shill is fairly accurate myself (but then, I
 don't think I always fall under the WP NPOV guidelines! ;)


 Now then, all this discussion regarding MS, DRM, fair use, more DRM,
 Apple,
 Windows, more DRM etc... I find hugely interesting, and I even take part
 in
 discussions myself - unless other people beat me to making the point I was
 going to make myself. That said, I am beginning to agree more and more
 with
 those who are pointing out that this list is *not* the best venue for all
 this DRM- and quite specifically-related debate, and I think many of us
 will
 agree it's not the kind of off-topic discussion that the Backstage list
 was
 primarily brought into being to be a host to.

 Is there a way the Beeb could make another list just for discussion of
 these
 kind of topics, which can run in parallel alongside the main Backstage
 mailing list (which I've always thought is more for discussion of mashups,
 new and novel ways of using the BBC's offerings via APIs and feeds and the
 like)? I'd like to see a 'decluttering' of all this lengthy, and sometimes
 roundabout, discussion of DRM, iPlayer, interoperability, platform
 neutrality, but at the same time I'd appreciate the input from people
 actually working on these kind of projects at the BBC and beyond, but
 without all of this vigorous (and sometimes heated) debate sullying and
 diluting the main Backstage list.

 I know this has been raised in the past, but given this current round of
 discussions which is taking the list off-topic again, I feel it's more
 suitable for discussion. I'd definitely subscribe to (and participate in)
 both!

 Cheers
 Christopher

  -Original Message-
  From: Gordon Joly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 15 August 2007 21:17
  To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
  Subject: Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow,
  Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City
 
  At 19:44 +0100 15/8/07, Dave Crossland wrote:
  On 15/08/07, Paul Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Dave,
Who is Dan Lyons?
  
  A journalist for Forbes who has constantly attacked the software
  freedom movement.
  
What is a shill?
  
  A shill is an associate of a person selling goods or services or a
  political group, who pretends no association to the seller/group and
  assumes the air of an enthusiastic customer. The intention
  of the shill
  is, using crowd psychology, to encourage others unaware of
  the set-up
  to purchase said goods or services or support the political group's
  ideological claims. Shills are often employed by confidence
  artists and
  governments.
  - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill
  
 
 
  And from that Wikipedia link...
 
  This article has been nominated to be checked for its neutrality.
 
  I like that
 
  Gordo
 
  --
  Think Feynman/
  http://pobox.com/~gordo/
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]///
  -
  Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To
  unsubscribe, please visit
  http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




-- 
Please email me back if you need any more help.

Brian Butterworth
www.ukfree.tv


Re: When are we going to get another list? (was: RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City)

2007-08-16 Thread Peter Bowyer
On 16/08/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Chris,

 Finally, remember that the noise is the signal. You can't post too much.
 Deploy filters.

 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html

... which has been taken retrospectively to mean 'post what you like
about any subject remotely or even not remotely connected to the BBC'.
There are some here who joined to talk about what the list (and the
Programme)'s main aims are, not to participate in general-purpose
BBC-bashing.

Hence I agree that we should separate it out.

Peter

-
Peter Bowyer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-16 Thread Jason Cartwright
Does iPlayer contain Silverlight? I've not seen anything to suggest it does.

What the hell does all this matter anyhow, there is no lock in. The tech is
just being used to deliver the content as per spec, which it seems to be
doing. Nothing is stopping the BBC ditching MS products for iPlayer at any
time with a simple (automatically installed?) patch, right?

Seems the anti-DRM protests are misdirected. Why is the yellow jump-suit
brigade talking to the people who actually have the power to change it? The
rights holders. We've seen rights-cleared videos being released without DRM
on bbc.co.uk for years. I don't see anyone hassling Apple - but plenty of
people are hassling record labels, and they have gone on to do something
about it.

iPlayer installation numbers will be tiny compared to Flash installations -
you know YouTube gets many, many more visitors that bbc.co.uk?

J


On 15/8/07 20:15, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 14/08/07, Jason Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The irony is that it probably doesn't matter now. They could now download it
 using their Windows XP machine in DRMed Windows Media Format.
 
 All thanks to our new overlord Bill, and his maniacal scheme to take over
 the BBC from the inside.
 
 Adobe currently has web video locked down; Apple, Real, Java, Xiph,
 and of course Microsoft are all in very niche use compared to Adobe
 Flash. Adobe Apollo is a direct competitor to Microsoft Silverlight,
 and with the inertia of Flash video and a large group of web designers
 already familiar with Flash, plus cheaper a licensing model than
 Microsoft, it looks like its in with a chance. The typical Microsoft
 response to fair competition is to compete unfairly.
 
 iPlayer, and a number of other high profile 2007 BBC projects, are
 based on Silverlight technology. Highfield's reponse on the Backstage
 blog points at the other proprietary technologies the BBC foists on
 the public, but these are based on previous technology decisions; the
 new stuff is all Silverlight based.
 
 100,000 iPlayer sign-ups in a week, Martin? That's 100,000 more
 Silverlight installations. Given Microsoft's other major play to
 deploy Silverlight is Vista, and we all know how well that's working
 out for them this year, its outrageous to me that the BBC has paid
 Microsoft _anything_ for forcing license fee payers to install this
 key piece of strategic technology for them. Then UK is, afterall, one
 of the most broadband-saturated and media-consuming audiences, leading
 the way for other nations - Is the BBC likely to open up a
 non-zero-price iPlayer to international viewers at somepoint? So this
 is a big win for Microsoft's bid to control the next stage of web
 development with Silverlight.
 
 The BBC is committed to shipping a cross-platform iPlayer, and its a
 shame that this becomes the sole focus of the reporting on this issue.
 An iPlayer for 3 or 4 platforms is 3 or 4 times as worse as an XP-only
 iPlayer, because it is imposing DRM on even more people, and implying
 that DRM is acceptable.
 
 When it does ship a cross-platform iPlayer, I expect it will be based
 on Novell's Mono Moonlight for GNU/Linux, probably doing the media
 codec stuff with the GStreamer framework given that Fluendo, its
 sponsor, sells Windows Media Codecs already -
 https://shop.fluendo.com/product_info.php?products_id=45 - and the Mac
 OS X one might be Mono or Microsoft based.
 
 That's going to really help the widespread adoption of Silverlight as
 the Rich Internet Application platform of choice.
 
 In 2007, Google has maintained the dominant position for monetising
 search and advertising - of the text web. Their purchase of YouTube
 suggested they were serious about monetising the emerging video web,
 but the DRM aspects of Silverlight video delivery mean that their
 ability to provide search and advertising for web video is going to be
 undermined.
 
 So the BBC hasn't just helped Microsoft pull a Adobe-killer, it's also
 helping Microsoft pull a Google-killer.

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: When are we going to get another list? (was: RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City)

2007-08-16 Thread Andrew Bowden
 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth
Sent: 16 August 2007 08:47
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: When are we going to get another list? (was: RE:
[backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White
City)

Chris,
Finally, remember that the noise is the signal. You can't post
too much. Deploy filters.
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html 

For my sins, I've been involved with online communities since 1996.
During my university years it sometimes felt like I did little else.
 
There's one problem I've personally seen with the signal to noise
argument, it's that in a situation where there's huge amounts of noise,
ultimately people get fed up of filtering out the noise all the time,
and can't be bothered adding the signal - because it feels like, what's
the point?
 
Then there's the second problem - people who newly join a list, just see
the noise all the time, wonder where the signal is, then disappear off.
I've even seen communities wither away and die because of it.
 
Now sometimes signal to noise works - it helps a cohesive group of
people together.  I'm on a couple of mailing lists where the noise helps
the community bond closer, so new people become new friends.  (However
of course, it can make lists look a bit insular - which can make it
harder to join lists as a newbie)
 
It's also got to be said that the majority of people on a mailing list
don't post.  I don't know the stats for this list, but I'm on a mailing
list of 300 people, about 20 of which post regularly.  There's a lot of
readers, and occassionally some of them post, but mostly it's reading.
Why do people join a list and not post?  Well to get the signal.  So if
there's very little signal, you lose your incentive to remain a reader.
 
Sorry, but my own experience says signal to noise is NOT a simplistic
situation as some people like to think.  When the noise works, it doth
good.  When the noise doesn't work, it doth big harm.


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-16 Thread Dave Crossland
On 16/08/07, Jason Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Seems the anti-DRM protests are misdirected. Why is the yellow jump-suit
 brigade talking to the people who actually have the power to change it? The
 rights holders.

The BBC is being very sneaky about responsibility for the DRM:
It doesn't name the companies which it asks us to blame, so it is
hiding behind them while protecting them too.

-- 
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-16 Thread Andrew Bowden
 On 16/08/07, Jason Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Seems the anti-DRM protests are misdirected. Why is the yellow 
  jump-suit brigade talking to the people who actually have 
 the power to 
  change it? The rights holders.
 The BBC is being very sneaky about responsibility for the DRM:
 It doesn't name the companies which it asks us to blame, so 
 it is hiding behind them while protecting them too.


Well seeing as you ask, there's already a wealth of information on the
internet for those who seek it (and know the correct acronyms)

A good start would be the terms of trade agreed with an organisation
called PACT who represent independent production companies - and whose
members are very keen to exploit the commercial rights to the programmes
they make for any broadcaster.  One such company, RDF announced plans to
put their programmes online commercially, about a year ago.

Broadcast would be the best source on such stories, however it's
subscription only, so here's a few links that are related to the BBC's
discussions with the,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2006/06_june/02/n
ewmedia.shtml
http://informitv.com/articles/2006/06/02/pactagreesnew/

PACT appear to have the full terms of trade on their website, but sadly
you have to work for a member company to see them.
www.pact.co.uk

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-16 Thread Jason Cartwright
I can't imagine it would be difficult to get hold of a list of suppliers of
BBC programming (in the annual report? FOI act request? Phone the
commissioning dept?), then you could just ask the companies themselves (or
their PR?) what their opinion on iPlayer and DRM is.

FOI act won't help you here though, there is stuff in it to stop details of
business relationships getting out.

J


On 16/8/07 09:36, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 16/08/07, Jason Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Seems the anti-DRM protests are misdirected. Why is the yellow jump-suit
 brigade talking to the people who actually have the power to change it? The
 rights holders.
 
 The BBC is being very sneaky about responsibility for the DRM:
 It doesn't name the companies which it asks us to blame, so it is
 hiding behind them while protecting them too.

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-16 Thread Gordon Joly

At 09:09 +0100 16/8/07, Jason Cartwright wrote:


[...]
iPlayer installation numbers will be tiny compared to Flash installations -
you know YouTube gets many, many more visitors that bbc.co.uk?

J




And so it should. YouTube is commercial, part of Google, and hip.

The BBC is a corporation, funded by a licence fee (BTW, not required 
for  iPlayer use). The Internet arm of the BBC dates back to the 
early 1990s and is still a matter of some concern to those of us who 
believe in the BBC as a *broadcaster*. I believe that the web and 
other IP based BBC services are also a matter of constant concern to 
H M Government.



--
73
de
Gordo
G6DFY
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: When are we going to get another list? (was: RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City)

2007-08-16 Thread Matthew Cashmore
Hey all ­ was going to announce this when it was actually working ­ but I¹ve
set up a new list called backstage-developer; it¹s a list totally devoted to
developers and technical issues around BBC feeds and APIs ­ it will be
policed to ensure this is the main aim of that list. You¹ll still be able to
post these questions to the general list and I¹m sure people will still
respond ­ but I think there¹s real value in some of the conversations on the
backstage list and I don¹t want them to stop.

As soon as I can get MajorDomo to play with the list correctly I¹ll post
details on how to join here.

m


On 16/8/07 09:25, Andrew Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 
  
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian  Butterworth
 Sent: 16 August 2007 08:47
 To:  backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
 Subject: Re: When are we going to get  another list? (was: RE: [backstage]
 BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday  14th, 10:30AM, White City)
  
  
 Chris,
  
 Finally, remember that the noise is the signal. You can't post  too much.
 Deploy filters.
  
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html
 For my sins, I've been involved with online communities since 1996.  During my
 university years it sometimes felt like I did little else.
  
 There's one problem I've personally seen with the signal to noise argument,
 it's that in a situation where there's huge amounts of noise, ultimately
 people get fed up of filtering out the noise all the time, and can't be
 bothered adding the signal - because it feels like, what's the point?
  
 Then there's the second problem - people who newly join a list, just see the
 noise all the time, wonder where the signal is, then disappear off.  I've even
 seen communities wither away and die because of it.
  
 Now sometimes signal to noise works - it helps a cohesive group of people
 together.  I'm on a couple of mailing lists where the noise helps the
 community bond closer, so new people become new friends.  (However of course,
 it can make lists look a bit insular - which can make it harder to join lists
 as a newbie)
  
 It's also got to be said that the majority of people on a mailing list don't
 post.  I don't know the stats for this list, but I'm on a mailing list of 300
 people, about 20 of which post regularly.  There's a lot of readers, and
 occassionally some of them post, but mostly it's reading.  Why do people join
 a list and not post?  Well to get the signal.  So if there's very little
 signal, you lose your incentive to remain a reader.
  
 Sorry, but my own experience says signal to noise is NOT a simplistic
 situation as some people like to think.  When the noise works, it doth good.
 When the noise doesn't work, it doth big harm.
 


___
Matthew Cashmore
Development Producer

BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP

T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
M:07711 913241(072 83959)



Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-16 Thread Dave Crossland
On 16/08/07, Jason Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Does iPlayer contain Silverlight? I've not seen anything to suggest it does.

It might not today, but its very clear what Microsoft's web-video strategy is.

There was an article in The Register today about this:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/16/silverlight_iplayer_playready/

 What the hell does all this matter anyhow, there is no lock in. The tech is
 just being used to deliver the content as per spec, which it seems to be
 doing. Nothing is stopping the BBC ditching MS products for iPlayer at any
 time with a simple (automatically installed?) patch, right?

No lock in? Nothing stopping the BBC ditching MS products?  Let's see
an iPlayer that is free software then please.

-- 
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-16 Thread Brian Butterworth
On 16/08/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 16/08/07, Jason Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Does iPlayer contain Silverlight? I've not seen anything to suggest it
 does.

 It might not today, but its very clear what Microsoft's web-video strategy
 is.

 There was an article in The Register today about this:

 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/16/silverlight_iplayer_playready/

  What the hell does all this matter anyhow, there is no lock in. The tech
 is
  just being used to deliver the content as per spec, which it seems to be
  doing. Nothing is stopping the BBC ditching MS products for iPlayer at
 any
  time with a simple (automatically installed?) patch, right?

 No lock in? Nothing stopping the BBC ditching MS products?  Let's see
 an iPlayer that is free software then please.


I guess the idea is Microsoft use the BBC content (that created from licence
fees) and use it to leverage their PlayReady system on multiple platforms,
so the BBC can claim that the system is cross-platform, whereas people are
actually asking for something that isn't owned by Bill Gates' company...


--
 Regards,
 Dave
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




-- 
Please email me back if you need any more help.

Brian Butterworth
www.ukfree.tv


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-16 Thread Brian Butterworth
 in next generation technologies.

A3.27 The analysis above considers the potential costs that ISPs using
IPStream may
incur as a result of the iPlayer. Another short term impact is at the retail
level where
many consumers are purchasing broadband products which include a cap on
monthly download. For example, BT's Option 1 broadband product retails at
£17.99/month and is limited to 2GBytes of download each month. End users who
currently use this product and subsequently become regularly users of the
BBC
catch up service will need to upgrade to BT Option 2 which has a 6 GByte
download limit and costs an additional £5/month. Whilst other ISPs have
different
retail offerings, all ISPs using BT wholesale products will be subject to
the same
underlying costs and hence may need to adjust their retail offerings as
service such
as BBC catch up become more popular.

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research/tv/bbcmias/ondemand/bbc_ondemand/bbc_ondemand.pdf


On 16/08/07, Christopher Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Because of the nature of how the iPlayer CDN works though, it's going to
 have that disproportionately-big effect on bandwidth and network usage for
 the ISPs which has already been highlighted in stories on El Reg and
 ArsTechnica.

 ...Which leads me to ask: have any of the ISPs actually contacted the BBC
 and asked for cold, hard cash yet? I just had to laugh so much when I first
 read that the service providers were getting into a hissy fit about the
 potential uptake of iPlayer and all the extra bandwidth they'd need to find,
 but then I started to worry a little because you know what'll happen is that
 they'll just QoS prioritise anything BUT p2p iPlayer traffic, bunging it
 alongside bittorrent, and they'll cap our bandwidth usage to buggery (like
 they already do on VM). I know that when my connection gets capped on VM
 after using iPlayer on it, I'll be ringing Virgin and raising HELL about it!

 Maybe the BBC can finally effect some much-needed change in the ISPs'
 attitude towards bandwidth and service provisioning? Because most UK service
 providers have been stalling on that front for years, desperately trying to
 reallocate and apportion out an insufficient amount of available bandwidth
 whilst obtaining more and more customers... And they wonder why their churn
 rate is so high...

  --
 *From:* Jason Cartwright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *Sent:* 16 August 2007 11:05
 *To:* backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
 *Subject:* Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th,
 10:30AM, White City


   That will be the fact that less than 1% of the planet's population
 lives in the UK?

 YouTube has almost as much UK traffic as bbc.co.uk [1]. bbc.co.uk content
 is used/marketed/referred to overseas by BBC Worldwide and the World Service
 [2].

 My point was that iPlayer's impact on media delivery system market shares
 is probably quite small when compared to the plethora on video sites out
 there (of which YouTube is the biggest).

 J


 [1]
 http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-hopkins/2007/06/youtube_to_overtake_bbc_in_uk_1.html
 [2] Example: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/arabic/news/, or go to the homepage
 and click ' International version'.

 On 16/8/07 10:34, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 On 16/08/07, *Jason Cartwright* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Does iPlayer contain Silverlight? I've not seen anything to suggest it
 does.

 What the hell does all this matter anyhow, there is no lock in. The tech
 is
 just being used to deliver the content as per spec, which it seems to be
 doing. Nothing is stopping the BBC ditching MS products for iPlayer at any
 time with a simple (automatically installed?) patch, right?

 Seems the anti-DRM protests are misdirected. Why is the yellow jump-suit
 brigade talking to the people who actually have the power to change it?
 The
 rights holders. We've seen rights-cleared videos being released without
 DRM
 on bbc.co.uk http://bbc.co.uk http://bbc.co.uk/  for years. I don't
 see anyone hassling Apple - but plenty of
 people are hassling record labels, and they have gone on to do something
 about it.


 Good point. They should talk to http://www.pact.co.uk/ but I guess it's
 the old everyone has to pay the licence fee issue and all the
 touchy-freely stuff from the BBC management and BBC Trust (in the vein of
 it's your BBC) which confuses people.  There is clearly a problem now as
 the Trust supports the management, not the licence-fee payers!

 I guess people read things like this
 http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2006/09_september/28/microsoft.shtml
 http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2006/09_september/28/microsoft.shtmlhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2006/09_september/28/microsoft.shtml
  and put 10 and 10 together and get 101 (binary joke!).




 iPlayer installation numbers will be tiny compared to Flash installations
 -
 you know YouTube gets many, many more

Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-16 Thread Martin Belam
 I guess the idea is Microsoft use the BBC content (that created
from licence fees) and use it to leverage their PlayReady system on
multiple platforms, so the BBC can claim that the system is
cross-platform, whereas people are actually asking for something that
isn't owned by Bill Gates' company...


s/created/commissioned/;
s/people/some people/;


m


On 16/08/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 16/08/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 16/08/07, Jason Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
  
   Does iPlayer contain Silverlight? I've not seen anything to suggest it
 does.
 
  It might not today, but its very clear what Microsoft's web-video strategy
 is.
 
  There was an article in The Register today about this:
 
 
 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/16/silverlight_iplayer_playready/
 
   What the hell does all this matter anyhow, there is no lock in. The tech
 is
   just being used to deliver the content as per spec, which it seems to be
   doing. Nothing is stopping the BBC ditching MS products for iPlayer at
 any
   time with a simple (automatically installed?) patch, right?
 
  No lock in? Nothing stopping the BBC ditching MS products?  Let's see
  an iPlayer that is free software then please.


 I guess the idea is Microsoft use the BBC content (that created from licence
 fees) and use it to leverage their PlayReady system on multiple platforms,
 so the BBC can claim that the system is cross-platform, whereas people are
 actually asking for something that isn't owned by Bill Gates' company...


  --
  Regards,
  Dave
  -
  Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 



 --
 Please email me back if you need any more help.

 Brian Butterworth
 www.ukfree.tv


-- 
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-16 Thread Brian Butterworth
On 16/08/07, Martin Belam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I guess the idea is Microsoft use the BBC content (that created
 from licence fees) and use it to leverage their PlayReady system on
 multiple platforms, so the BBC can claim that the system is
 cross-platform, whereas people are actually asking for something that
 isn't owned by Bill Gates' company...


 s/created/commissioned/;


And that makes it OK then?   Imagine if a bank worked like this, and
exchanged your deposits for your gifts...  *I* understand what is
happening, but I'm sure there are many people in the UK who think that their
Licence Fee is used to pay for programmes, largely because that's what the
BBC told us it did with the cash for a long time...

Actually, the current situation is a bit like a big BBC endowment mortgage
where the BBC thinks it has been buying a metaphorical house only to find
that the money it has paid isn't going to cover the costs of actual
ownership...

Can I say that I'm really, really sad about this? I suppose it was the only
way the corporation could have survived, but it's a poor state of affairs
when a cultural organisation doesn't own the cultural assets it has
created for the nation, and can only embrace the future with a leaseback
deal.


s/people/some people/;


I actually meant these people referring to the subject of the email, but
some will do.  Anyone fancy commissioning a survey of what the GBP Licence
fee payers actually think happens to their cash?

(I'm sorry, I had some photos printed in the Daily Mail the other day and it
must be going to my head...)


m


 On 16/08/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 16/08/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On 16/08/07, Jason Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
   
Does iPlayer contain Silverlight? I've not seen anything to suggest
 it
  does.
  
   It might not today, but its very clear what Microsoft's web-video
 strategy
  is.
  
   There was an article in The Register today about this:
  
  
  http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/16/silverlight_iplayer_playready/
  
What the hell does all this matter anyhow, there is no lock in. The
 tech
  is
just being used to deliver the content as per spec, which it seems
 to be
doing. Nothing is stopping the BBC ditching MS products for iPlayer
 at
  any
time with a simple (automatically installed?) patch, right?
  
   No lock in? Nothing stopping the BBC ditching MS products?  Let's see
   an iPlayer that is free software then please.
 
 
  I guess the idea is Microsoft use the BBC content (that created from
 licence
  fees) and use it to leverage their PlayReady system on multiple
 platforms,
  so the BBC can claim that the system is cross-platform, whereas people
 are
  actually asking for something that isn't owned by Bill Gates' company...
 
 
   --
   Regards,
   Dave
   -
   Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
 please
  visit
  http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
   Unofficial list archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
  
 
 
 
  --
  Please email me back if you need any more help.
 
  Brian Butterworth
  www.ukfree.tv


 --
 Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




-- 

Brian Butterworth
www.ukfree.tv


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-15 Thread Richard Lockwood
Whereas, looking at the photos indicates that 20 is an exaggeration of
about 100%.

Cheers,

R.

On 8/15/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 More likely, Organisers put the turnout at 800...

 R.

 On 8/15/07, Martin Belam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Presumably on the news we'll get the traditional 10+% rule of
  Organisers put the turnout at 20 people, whilst The Metropolitan
  Police said 2-and-a-half-people turned up?
 
 
  cheers,
  martin
 
 
 
  On 14/08/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On 14/08/07, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Forrester wrote:
 Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.
   
So were they making a point or trying to make a difference?
  
   I believe the additional media coverage of the unconscionable
   restrictions in the iPlayer will make a difference.
  
   --
   Regards,
   Dave
   -
   Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, 
   please visit 
   http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
   Unofficial list archive: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
  
 
 
  --
  Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
  -
  Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
  visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
  Unofficial list archive: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 


 --
 SilverDisc Ltd is registered in England no. 2798073

 Registered address:
 4 Swallow Court, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6XX



-- 
SilverDisc Ltd is registered in England no. 2798073

Registered address:
4 Swallow Court, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6XX
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-15 Thread Paul Daniel
A view from America.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheSecretDiaryOfSteveJobs/~3/144065882/freeta
rds-attack-bbc-but-get-beaten-off.html

Paul Daniel

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Lockwood
Sent: 15 August 2007 16:37
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th,
10:30AM, White City


More likely, Organisers put the turnout at 800...

R.

On 8/15/07, Martin Belam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Presumably on the news we'll get the traditional 10+% rule of
 Organisers put the turnout at 20 people, whilst The Metropolitan
 Police said 2-and-a-half-people turned up?


 cheers,
 martin



 On 14/08/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 14/08/07, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Ian Forrester wrote:
Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.
  
   So were they making a point or trying to make a difference?
 
  I believe the additional media coverage of the unconscionable
  restrictions in the iPlayer will make a difference.
 
  --
  Regards,
  Dave
  -
  Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 


 --
 Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/



--
SilverDisc Ltd is registered in England no. 2798073

Registered address:
4 Swallow Court, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6XX
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/953 - Release Date: 14/08/2007
17:19

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/953 - Release Date: 14/08/2007
17:19



-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-15 Thread Matthew Cashmore
Well. When I was interviewing at about 10:45 there were 12 people there
(that's when I took the photos) Ian then came down when I left and he came
back and said there were about 20 people there after others joined.

m


On 15/8/07 16:54, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Whereas, looking at the photos indicates that 20 is an exaggeration of
 about 100%.
 
 Cheers,
 
 R.
 
 On 8/15/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 More likely, Organisers put the turnout at 800...
 
 R.
 
 On 8/15/07, Martin Belam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Presumably on the news we'll get the traditional 10+% rule of
 Organisers put the turnout at 20 people, whilst The Metropolitan
 Police said 2-and-a-half-people turned up?
 
 
 cheers,
 martin
 
 
 
 On 14/08/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 14/08/07, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ian Forrester wrote:
 Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.
 
 So were they making a point or trying to make a difference?
 
 I believe the additional media coverage of the unconscionable
 restrictions in the iPlayer will make a difference.
 
 --
 Regards,
 Dave
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
 Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 
 
 
 --
 Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
 Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 
 
 
 --
 SilverDisc Ltd is registered in England no. 2798073
 
 Registered address:
 4 Swallow Court, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6XX
 
 

___
Matthew Cashmore
Development Producer

BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP

T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
M:07711 913241(072 83959)

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-15 Thread vijay chopra
It seems you made it to the slashdot frontpage!
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/15/1721229

Vijay

On 15/08/07, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Well. When I was interviewing at about 10:45 there were 12 people
 there
 (that's when I took the photos) Ian then came down when I left and he came
 back and said there were about 20 people there after others joined.

 m


 On 15/8/07 16:54, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Whereas, looking at the photos indicates that 20 is an exaggeration of
  about 100%.
 
  Cheers,
 
  R.
 
  On 8/15/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  More likely, Organisers put the turnout at 800...
 
  R.
 
  On 8/15/07, Martin Belam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Presumably on the news we'll get the traditional 10+% rule of
  Organisers put the turnout at 20 people, whilst The Metropolitan
  Police said 2-and-a-half-people turned up?
 
 
  cheers,
  martin
 
 
 
  On 14/08/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 14/08/07, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Ian Forrester wrote:
  Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.
 
  So were they making a point or trying to make a difference?
 
  I believe the additional media coverage of the unconscionable
  restrictions in the iPlayer will make a difference.
 
  --
  Regards,
  Dave
  -
  Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
 please
  visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 
 
 
  --
  Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
  -
  Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
 please
  visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 
 
 
  --
  SilverDisc Ltd is registered in England no. 2798073
 
  Registered address:
  4 Swallow Court, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6XX
 
 

 ___
 Matthew Cashmore
 Development Producer

 BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
 BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP

 T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
 M:07711 913241(072 83959)

 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/



RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-15 Thread Paul Daniel
Dear Dave,
Who is Dan Lyons?
What is a shill?
Who is M...?

Namaste
Paul Daniel

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Crossland
Sent: 15 August 2007 18:33
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th,
10:30AM, White City


On 15/08/07, Paul Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 A view from America.
 http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheSecretDiaryOfSteveJobs/~3/144065882/freeta
 rds-attack-bbc-but-get-beaten-off.html

Dan Lyons is a well known Microsoft shill.

-- 
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/953 - Release Date: 14/08/2007 
17:19
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/953 - Release Date: 14/08/2007 
17:19
 



-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-15 Thread Martin Belam
 Dan Lyons is a well known Microsoft shill.

Who said outing him would spoil the Fake Steve Jobs fun?

Although I do still like the fact that people put serious comments in
reply to the posts, kind of like writing to one of the characters in
Monkey Dust to set them straight about something :-)










On 15/08/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 15/08/07, Paul Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  A view from America.
  http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheSecretDiaryOfSteveJobs/~3/144065882/freeta
  rds-attack-bbc-but-get-beaten-off.html

 Dan Lyons is a well known Microsoft shill.

 --
 Regards,
 Dave
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial list archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/



-- 
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-15 Thread Martin Belam
From /.

An anonymous reader writes The future of iPlayer, the BBC's new
online on-demand system for delivering content, is continuing to look
bleaker. With ISPs threatening to throttle the content delivered
through the iPlayer, consumers petitioning the UK government and the
BBC to drop the DRM and Microsoft-only technology, and threatened
legal action from the OSC, the last thing the BBC wanted to see today
was street protests at their office and at the BBC Media Complex
accompanied by a report issued by DefectiveByDesign about their
association with Microsoft.


Elsewhere in the news, more than 100,000 iPlayer sign-ups in a week ;-)

/. is surely the Fox News of the tech world, no?

m







On 15/08/07, vijay chopra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It seems you made it to the slashdot frontpage!
 http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/15/1721229

 Vijay


  On 15/08/07, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Well. When I was interviewing at about 10:45 there were 12 people
 there
  (that's when I took the photos) Ian then came down when I left and he came
  back and said there were about 20 people there after others joined.
 
  m
 
 
  On 15/8/07 16:54, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Whereas, looking at the photos indicates that 20 is an exaggeration of
   about 100%.
  
   Cheers,
  
   R.
  
   On 8/15/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   More likely, Organisers put the turnout at 800...
  
   R.
  
   On 8/15/07, Martin Belam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Presumably on the news we'll get the traditional 10+% rule of
   Organisers put the turnout at 20 people, whilst The Metropolitan
   Police said 2-and-a-half-people turned up?
  
  
   cheers,
   martin
  
  
  
   On 14/08/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On 14/08/07, David Greaves  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Ian Forrester wrote:
   Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.
  
   So were they making a point or trying to make a difference?
  
   I believe the additional media coverage of the unconscionable
   restrictions in the iPlayer will make a difference.
  
   --
   Regards,
   Dave
   -
   Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
 please
   visit
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
   Unofficial list archive:
  
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
  
  
  
   --
   Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
   -
   Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
 please
   visit
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
   Unofficial list archive:
  
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
  
  
  
   --
   SilverDisc Ltd is registered in England no. 2798073
  
   Registered address:
   4 Swallow Court, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6XX
  
  
 
  ___
  Matthew Cashmore
  Development Producer
 
  BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
  BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP
 
  T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
  M:07711 913241(072 83959)
 
  -
  Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 




-- 
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-15 Thread Dave Crossland
On 15/08/07, Paul Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear Dave,
 Who is Dan Lyons?

A journalist for Forbes who has constantly attacked the software
freedom movement.

 What is a shill?

A shill is an associate of a person selling goods or services or a
political group, who pretends no association to the seller/group and
assumes the air of an enthusiastic customer. The intention of the
shill is, using crowd psychology, to encourage others unaware of the
set-up to purchase said goods or services or support the political
group's ideological claims. Shills are often employed by confidence
artists and governments.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill

 Who is M...?
 Namaste

But you already knew that.

-- 
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-15 Thread Dave Crossland
On 14/08/07, Jason Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The irony is that it probably doesn't matter now. They could now download it
 using their Windows XP machine in DRMed Windows Media Format.

 All thanks to our new overlord Bill, and his maniacal scheme to take over
 the BBC from the inside.

Adobe currently has web video locked down; Apple, Real, Java, Xiph,
and of course Microsoft are all in very niche use compared to Adobe
Flash. Adobe Apollo is a direct competitor to Microsoft Silverlight,
and with the inertia of Flash video and a large group of web designers
already familiar with Flash, plus cheaper a licensing model than
Microsoft, it looks like its in with a chance. The typical Microsoft
response to fair competition is to compete unfairly.

iPlayer, and a number of other high profile 2007 BBC projects, are
based on Silverlight technology. Highfield's reponse on the Backstage
blog points at the other proprietary technologies the BBC foists on
the public, but these are based on previous technology decisions; the
new stuff is all Silverlight based.

100,000 iPlayer sign-ups in a week, Martin? That's 100,000 more
Silverlight installations. Given Microsoft's other major play to
deploy Silverlight is Vista, and we all know how well that's working
out for them this year, its outrageous to me that the BBC has paid
Microsoft _anything_ for forcing license fee payers to install this
key piece of strategic technology for them. Then UK is, afterall, one
of the most broadband-saturated and media-consuming audiences, leading
the way for other nations - Is the BBC likely to open up a
non-zero-price iPlayer to international viewers at somepoint? So this
is a big win for Microsoft's bid to control the next stage of web
development with Silverlight.

The BBC is committed to shipping a cross-platform iPlayer, and its a
shame that this becomes the sole focus of the reporting on this issue.
An iPlayer for 3 or 4 platforms is 3 or 4 times as worse as an XP-only
iPlayer, because it is imposing DRM on even more people, and implying
that DRM is acceptable.

When it does ship a cross-platform iPlayer, I expect it will be based
on Novell's Mono Moonlight for GNU/Linux, probably doing the media
codec stuff with the GStreamer framework given that Fluendo, its
sponsor, sells Windows Media Codecs already -
https://shop.fluendo.com/product_info.php?products_id=45 - and the Mac
OS X one might be Mono or Microsoft based.

That's going to really help the widespread adoption of Silverlight as
the Rich Internet Application platform of choice.

In 2007, Google has maintained the dominant position for monetising
search and advertising - of the text web. Their purchase of YouTube
suggested they were serious about monetising the emerging video web,
but the DRM aspects of Silverlight video delivery mean that their
ability to provide search and advertising for web video is going to be
undermined.

So the BBC hasn't just helped Microsoft pull a Adobe-killer, it's also
helping Microsoft pull a Google-killer.

-- 
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-15 Thread Gordon Joly

At 19:44 +0100 15/8/07, Dave Crossland wrote:

On 15/08/07, Paul Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dear Dave,
 Who is Dan Lyons?


A journalist for Forbes who has constantly attacked the software
freedom movement.


 What is a shill?


A shill is an associate of a person selling goods or services or a
political group, who pretends no association to the seller/group and
assumes the air of an enthusiastic customer. The intention of the
shill is, using crowd psychology, to encourage others unaware of the
set-up to purchase said goods or services or support the political
group's ideological claims. Shills are often employed by confidence
artists and governments.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill




And from that Wikipedia link...


This article has been nominated to be checked for its neutrality.


I like that

Gordo

--
Think Feynman/
http://pobox.com/~gordo/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]///
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


When are we going to get another list? (was: RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City)

2007-08-15 Thread Christopher Woods
I think that description of a shill is fairly accurate myself (but then, I
don't think I always fall under the WP NPOV guidelines! ;)


Now then, all this discussion regarding MS, DRM, fair use, more DRM, Apple,
Windows, more DRM etc... I find hugely interesting, and I even take part in
discussions myself - unless other people beat me to making the point I was
going to make myself. That said, I am beginning to agree more and more with
those who are pointing out that this list is *not* the best venue for all
this DRM- and quite specifically-related debate, and I think many of us will
agree it's not the kind of off-topic discussion that the Backstage list was
primarily brought into being to be a host to.

Is there a way the Beeb could make another list just for discussion of these
kind of topics, which can run in parallel alongside the main Backstage
mailing list (which I've always thought is more for discussion of mashups,
new and novel ways of using the BBC's offerings via APIs and feeds and the
like)? I'd like to see a 'decluttering' of all this lengthy, and sometimes
roundabout, discussion of DRM, iPlayer, interoperability, platform
neutrality, but at the same time I'd appreciate the input from people
actually working on these kind of projects at the BBC and beyond, but
without all of this vigorous (and sometimes heated) debate sullying and
diluting the main Backstage list.

I know this has been raised in the past, but given this current round of
discussions which is taking the list off-topic again, I feel it's more
suitable for discussion. I'd definitely subscribe to (and participate in)
both!

Cheers
Christopher

 -Original Message-
 From: Gordon Joly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 15 August 2007 21:17
 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
 Subject: Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, 
 Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City
 
 At 19:44 +0100 15/8/07, Dave Crossland wrote:
 On 15/08/07, Paul Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Dear Dave,
   Who is Dan Lyons?
 
 A journalist for Forbes who has constantly attacked the software 
 freedom movement.
 
   What is a shill?
 
 A shill is an associate of a person selling goods or services or a 
 political group, who pretends no association to the seller/group and 
 assumes the air of an enthusiastic customer. The intention 
 of the shill 
 is, using crowd psychology, to encourage others unaware of 
 the set-up 
 to purchase said goods or services or support the political group's 
 ideological claims. Shills are often employed by confidence 
 artists and 
 governments.
 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill
 
 
 
 And from that Wikipedia link...
 
 This article has been nominated to be checked for its neutrality.
 
 I like that
 
 Gordo
 
 --
 Think Feynman/
 http://pobox.com/~gordo/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]///
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To 
 unsubscribe, please visit 
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
   Unofficial list archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Matthew Cashmore
Hi Andy - that's really informative - thanks very much :-)

m


On 13/8/07 21:27, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 13/08/07, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Cool Perhaps someone would like to post to the list why this protest is
 happening, what it's aims are (if any) and what are the points that the
 group would like to get across are?
 
 You could try the groups website(s).
 Defective By Designs website is: http://defectivebydesign.org/
 A quick bit of background to provide you with some context (provide
 corrections anyone if this is incorrect):
 DBD is a project run by the Free Software Foundation (FSF). DBD's main
 purpose is the abolition of DRM (Digital Rights Management, or Digital
 Restriction Management, depending on your view). The FSF is the main
 sponsor of the Gnu Project, I project that aims to provide a
 completely free Operating System. Not just free in that you don't have
 to pay for it but free in that you can do much more with it than other
 software. For instance you could read the source code (technical
 term meaning the stuff the software developers/programmers actually
 type, instead of the code that the machine executes which is normally
 transformed by a special program, not always though). Currently they
 provide many tools that are then bundled with the Linux kernel (the
 kernel is the core of an OS, it does much of the low level stuff that
 you don't really see but you are glad is there).
 
 Needless to say they are likely unhappy at the BBC's actions which
 could cripple UK Linux adoption. It could also pose significant harm
 to other OS vendors, such as Apple (of MacOS fame), and the people
 behind the different versions of BSD.
 
 You might find: http://defectivebydesign.org/iPlayerProtest and
 http://defectivebydesign.org/blog/BBCcorrupted useful to understand
 why there are protests.
 
 FreeTheBBC ( http://www.freethebbc.info/ ) is a project from Binary
 Freedom Boston, please don't ask why someone from Boston is behind
 FreeTheBBC, I don't know (and I did ask once). Of course a quick
 reading of the BBC's charter states clearly that one should not take
 the term UK license fee payer literally.
 
 As I don't know much about Binary Freedoms background I will quote
 part of their site:
 1. Rid BBC content and programming of harmful DRM
 2. Make BBC content and programming available in free formats
 from: http://www.freethebbc.info/node/7
 
 I think the main aims are:
 
 - Opening up access to _all_ Operating Systems, not the select few
 (currently one). As far as I can tell their appears to be no plans for
 an all OS solution, only a select few, but more than one
 solution*.
 
 - Use of openly specified protocols and formats (of which there are
 way too may to list, but the BBC knows this already, it's a member of
 the consortium that writes some of them!!! (BBC is listed as a member
 of W3C, source: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List )).
 
 - Removal of DRM.
 
 Of course you would need to ask the individuals involved what their
 personal reasoning is.
 
 
 I shall not be there tomorrow, it clashes with a more important event
 work. I may check news sites during my lunch though, now where does
 one find an impartial reporter on this matter?
 
 _Andy
 
 * this is only as far as I can tell, official sources regarding all
 OS would be welcomed.
 
 And in the spirit of the BBC: I am not responsible for the content of
 external sites, Other websites are available.
 

___
Matthew Cashmore
Development Producer

BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP

T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
M:07711 913241(072 83959)

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Richard Lockwood
So - is there anyone there?  (And if so, are they getting wet?)

Cheers,

Rich.

On 8/14/07, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Andy - that's really informative - thanks very much :-)

 m


 On 13/8/07 21:27, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  On 13/08/07, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Cool Perhaps someone would like to post to the list why this protest is
  happening, what it's aims are (if any) and what are the points that the
  group would like to get across are?
 
  You could try the groups website(s).
  Defective By Designs website is: http://defectivebydesign.org/
  A quick bit of background to provide you with some context (provide
  corrections anyone if this is incorrect):
  DBD is a project run by the Free Software Foundation (FSF). DBD's main
  purpose is the abolition of DRM (Digital Rights Management, or Digital
  Restriction Management, depending on your view). The FSF is the main
  sponsor of the Gnu Project, I project that aims to provide a
  completely free Operating System. Not just free in that you don't have
  to pay for it but free in that you can do much more with it than other
  software. For instance you could read the source code (technical
  term meaning the stuff the software developers/programmers actually
  type, instead of the code that the machine executes which is normally
  transformed by a special program, not always though). Currently they
  provide many tools that are then bundled with the Linux kernel (the
  kernel is the core of an OS, it does much of the low level stuff that
  you don't really see but you are glad is there).
 
  Needless to say they are likely unhappy at the BBC's actions which
  could cripple UK Linux adoption. It could also pose significant harm
  to other OS vendors, such as Apple (of MacOS fame), and the people
  behind the different versions of BSD.
 
  You might find: http://defectivebydesign.org/iPlayerProtest and
  http://defectivebydesign.org/blog/BBCcorrupted useful to understand
  why there are protests.
 
  FreeTheBBC ( http://www.freethebbc.info/ ) is a project from Binary
  Freedom Boston, please don't ask why someone from Boston is behind
  FreeTheBBC, I don't know (and I did ask once). Of course a quick
  reading of the BBC's charter states clearly that one should not take
  the term UK license fee payer literally.
 
  As I don't know much about Binary Freedoms background I will quote
  part of their site:
  1. Rid BBC content and programming of harmful DRM
  2. Make BBC content and programming available in free formats
  from: http://www.freethebbc.info/node/7
 
  I think the main aims are:
 
  - Opening up access to _all_ Operating Systems, not the select few
  (currently one). As far as I can tell their appears to be no plans for
  an all OS solution, only a select few, but more than one
  solution*.
 
  - Use of openly specified protocols and formats (of which there are
  way too may to list, but the BBC knows this already, it's a member of
  the consortium that writes some of them!!! (BBC is listed as a member
  of W3C, source: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List )).
 
  - Removal of DRM.
 
  Of course you would need to ask the individuals involved what their
  personal reasoning is.
 
 
  I shall not be there tomorrow, it clashes with a more important event
  work. I may check news sites during my lunch though, now where does
  one find an impartial reporter on this matter?
 
  _Andy
 
  * this is only as far as I can tell, official sources regarding all
  OS would be welcomed.
 
  And in the spirit of the BBC: I am not responsible for the content of
  external sites, Other websites are available.
 

 ___
 Matthew Cashmore
 Development Producer

 BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
 BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP

 T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
 M:07711 913241(072 83959)

 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial list archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/



-- 
SilverDisc Ltd is registered in England no. 2798073

Registered address:
4 Swallow Court, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6XX
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Andrew Bowden
 So - is there anyone there?  (And if so, are they getting wet?)

What do we want?  
Umberellas!
When do we want them?
Now!


(Actually right now in glorious W12, the rain seems to have ceased.)

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Ian Forrester
Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.

Ian Forrester

This e-mail is: [ x ] private; [  ] ask first; [  ] bloggable

Senior Producer, BBC Backstage
BC5 C3, Media Village, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TP
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p: +44 (0)2080083965

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Bowden
Sent: 14 August 2007 11:25
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, 
White City

 So - is there anyone there?  (And if so, are they getting wet?)

What do we want?  
Umberellas!
When do we want them?
Now!


(Actually right now in glorious W12, the rain seems to have ceased.)

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread George Wright
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:32 +0100, Ian Forrester wrote:
 Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.
 
 Ian Forrester

And you were talking about 500, scaring the life out of Erik :)



-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread David Greaves

Ian Forrester wrote:

Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.


So were they making a point or trying to make a difference?

David

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Matthew Cashmore
Photos already up on flickr over here

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattcashmore/sets/72157601436583881/

And here

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cubicgarden/sets/72157601430492360/

m


On 14/8/07 13:07, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ian Forrester wrote:
 Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.
 
 So were they making a point or trying to make a difference?
 
 David
 
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
 Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

___
Matthew Cashmore
Development Producer

BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP

T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
M:07711 913241(072 83959)

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Melissa Packer
A handful here at Manchester NBH, and yes, they're getting pretty
soaked.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Lockwood
Sent: 14 August 2007 11:14
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th,
10:30AM, White City

So - is there anyone there?  (And if so, are they getting wet?)

Cheers,

Rich.

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Kim Plowright
An aside

My favourite BBC protest ever: Archers fans complaining about changing
the time of the show. Marched up Regent Street with placards, stopped
traffic, whilst chanting
What do we want? the Archers! When do we want it? Now! What do we say? Please!'


 What do we want?
 Umberellas!
 When do we want them?
 Now!
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Deirdre Harvey



 An aside
 
 My favourite BBC protest ever: Archers fans complaining about 
 changing the time of the show. Marched up Regent Street with 
 placards, stopped traffic, whilst chanting What do we want? 
 the Archers! When do we want it? Now! What do we say? Please!'

:)

Were they marching at the exact time the show normally went out and that
they wanted it restored to?

I really hope so.


 
  What do we want?
  Umberellas!
  When do we want them?
  Now!
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To 
 unsubscribe, please visit 
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
   Unofficial list archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Jason Cartwright
The irony is that it probably doesn't matter now. They could now download it
using their Windows XP machine in DRMed Windows Media Format.

All thanks to our new overlord Bill, and his maniacal scheme to take over
the BBC from the inside.

J


On 14/8/07 14:21, Deirdre Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 
 An aside
 
 My favourite BBC protest ever: Archers fans complaining about
 changing the time of the show. Marched up Regent Street with
 placards, stopped traffic, whilst chanting What do we want?
 the Archers! When do we want it? Now! What do we say? Please!'
 
 :)
 
 Were they marching at the exact time the show normally went out and that
 they wanted it restored to?
 
 I really hope so.
 
 
 
 What do we want?
 Umberellas!
 When do we want them?
 Now!
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To
 unsubscribe, please visit
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
   Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 
 
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
 Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Brian Butterworth
Can I use one of these photos on my site?  Are the CC licenced?

On 14/08/07, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Photos already up on flickr over here

 http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattcashmore/sets/72157601436583881/

 And here

 http://www.flickr.com/photos/cubicgarden/sets/72157601430492360/

 m


 On 14/8/07 13:07, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Ian Forrester wrote:
  Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.
 
  So were they making a point or trying to make a difference?
 
  David
 
  -
  Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
 please
  visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

 ___
 Matthew Cashmore
 Development Producer

 BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
 BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP

 T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
 M:07711 913241(072 83959)

 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




-- 
Please email me back if you need any more help.

Brian Butterworth
www.ukfree.tv


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Matthew Cashmore
Mr Butterworth :-)

As you¹ll see from the flickr streams themselves.. All our photos are
released under Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0

Knock yourself out within that licence.

m

On 14/8/07 14:50, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Can I use one of these photos on my site?  Are the CC licenced?
 
 On 14/08/07, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Photos already up on flickr over here
 
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattcashmore/sets/72157601436583881/
 
 And here
 
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/cubicgarden/sets/72157601430492360/
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/cubicgarden/sets/72157601430492360/
 
 m
 
 
 On 14/8/07 13:07, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Ian Forrester wrote:
  Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.
 
  So were they making a point or trying to make a difference?
 
  David
 
  -
  Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk http://backstage.bbc.co.uk  discussion
 group.  To unsubscribe, please
  visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 
 ___
 Matthew Cashmore
 Development Producer
 
 BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
 BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP
 
 T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
 M:07711 913241(072 83959)
 
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk http://backstage.bbc.co.uk  discussion
 group.  To unsubscribe, please visit
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 
 


___
Matthew Cashmore
Development Producer

BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP

T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
M:07711 913241(072 83959)



Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Matthew Somerville

Brian Butterworth wrote:

Can I use one of these photos on my site?  Are the CC licenced?


If you look at any of the photos, you'll see the CC licence they are under 
(by-nc-sa) on the right hand side of the page.


ATB,
Matthew

On 14/08/07, *Matthew Cashmore* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Photos already up on flickr over here

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattcashmore/sets/72157601436583881/

And here

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cubicgarden/sets/72157601430492360/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cubicgarden/sets/72157601430492360/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread James Bridle
They're not mine, but both are listed as CC  Att-NonComm-ShareAlike on 
the site.



shorttermmemoryloss.com



Brian Butterworth wrote:

Can I use one of these photos on my site?  Are the CC licenced?

On 14/08/07, *Matthew Cashmore* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Photos already up on flickr over here

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattcashmore/sets/72157601436583881/

And here

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cubicgarden/sets/72157601430492360/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cubicgarden/sets/72157601430492360/

m


On 14/8/07 13:07, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ian Forrester wrote:
 Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.

 So were they making a point or trying to make a difference?

 David

 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk http://backstage.bbc.co.uk
discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
 Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

___
Matthew Cashmore
Development Producer

BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP

T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
M:07711 913241(072 83959)

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk http://backstage.bbc.co.uk
discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  Unofficial
list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




--
Please email me back if you need any more help.

Brian Butterworth
www.ukfree.tv http://www.ukfree.tv 


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Brian Butterworth
Thanks.

I thought I was being humorous - it would be deeply ironic if pictures of a
protest outside Auntie's TV HQ about DRM were copyrighted...


On 14/08/07, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mr Butterworth :-)

 As you'll see from the flickr streams themselves.. All our photos are
 released under Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0

 Knock yourself out within that licence.

 m

 On 14/8/07 14:50, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Can I use one of these photos on my site?  Are the CC licenced?

 On 14/08/07, *Matthew Cashmore* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Photos already up on flickr over here

 http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattcashmore/sets/72157601436583881/

 And here

 http://www.flickr.com/photos/cubicgarden/sets/72157601430492360/
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/cubicgarden/sets/72157601430492360/http://www.flickr.com/photos/cubicgarden/sets/72157601430492360/

 m


 On 14/8/07 13:07, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Ian Forrester wrote:
  Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.
 
  So were they making a point or trying to make a difference?
 
  David
 
  -
  Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk 
  http://backstage.bbc.co.ukhttp://backstage.bbc.co.uk/ discussion group. 
   To unsubscribe, please
  visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

 ___
 Matthew Cashmore
 Development Producer

 BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
 BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP

 T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
 M:07711 913241(072 83959)

 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk 
 http://backstage.bbc.co.ukhttp://backstage.bbc.co.uk/ discussion group.  
 To unsubscribe, please visit
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/





 ___
 *Matthew Cashmore
 *Development Producer
 *
 **BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
 *BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP

 *T:*020 8008 3959(02  83959)
 *M:*07711 913241(072 83959)




-- 
Please email me back if you need any more help.

Brian Butterworth
www.ukfree.tv


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread David Greaves

Brian Butterworth wrote:

Thanks.
 
I thought I was being humorous - it would be deeply ironic if pictures 
of a protest outside Auntie's TV HQ about DRM were copyrighted...


They are copyrighted. They are also licensed.

Anti-DRM isn't anti-copyright. Most anti-DRM sentiment opposes the:

You may only watch this film/production:
* once (if you fell asleep - tough! Powercut - tough!)
* if you don't skip the commercials
* using the original non-1-7yr-old proof disc
* on a hi-res screen *if* it's made by Acme
* with people who are immediate members of your family (but no more than 3 at 
once)
* at a time we the licensees decide
* on the original PC you had 4 years ago when you bought the disc
* for as long as we're in business (Google Video anyone? 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6944292.stm)


Sigh.

David
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Brian Butterworth
David,

Yeah, I know.  Which is also ironic...


On 14/08/07, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Brian Butterworth wrote:
  Thanks.
 
  I thought I was being humorous - it would be deeply ironic if pictures
  of a protest outside Auntie's TV HQ about DRM were copyrighted...

 They are copyrighted. They are also licensed.

 Anti-DRM isn't anti-copyright. Most anti-DRM sentiment opposes the:

 You may only watch this film/production:
 * once (if you fell asleep - tough! Powercut - tough!)
 * if you don't skip the commercials
 * using the original non-1-7yr-old proof disc
 * on a hi-res screen *if* it's made by Acme
 * with people who are immediate members of your family (but no more than 3
 at once)
 * at a time we the licensees decide
 * on the original PC you had 4 years ago when you bought the disc
 * for as long as we're in business (Google Video anyone?
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6944292.stm)

 Sigh.

 David
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




-- 
Please email me back if you need any more help.

Brian Butterworth
www.ukfree.tv


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-14 Thread Dave Crossland
On 14/08/07, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ian Forrester wrote:
  Yep we were there along with about another 20 people.

 So were they making a point or trying to make a difference?

I believe the additional media coverage of the unconscionable
restrictions in the iPlayer will make a difference.

-- 
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-13 Thread Dave Crossland
On 13/08/07, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 And we'll be out there - backstage tshirts on hand, and doing some
 interviews.

Cool! :-)

 But why is it happening outside TVC? I'm sure it's already been said
 elsewhere but... FMT are in the Broadcast Centre, 1/2 mile up the road?

I guess its not as chic a venue ;-)

Watch out for 411 scammers by the way, I hear they are calling people
up and stuff

-- 
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-13 Thread Peter Bowyer
Because it is only intended to make a point, not make a difference.

On 13/08/07, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 And we'll be out there - backstage tshirts on hand, and doing some
 interviews.

 But why is it happening outside TVC? I'm sure it's already been said
 elsewhere but... FMT are in the Broadcast Centre, 1/2 mile up the road?

 m


 On 13/8/07 14:33, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hi Folks,
 
  Not seen mention of it in her yet, so those those interested in the
  on-going iPlayer controversy, the Free Software Foundation's Defective
  By Design campaign is holding a protest outside the BBC Television
  Center in White City tomorrow at 10:30AM.
 
  Read all about it at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/iPlayerProtest
 
  And there's also Ian Forrester's http://geekdinner.co.uk/ in the
  evening with Eric Meyer, with a dinner event instead of just hanging
  out at the bar.

 ___
 Matthew Cashmore
 Development Producer

 BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
 BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP

 T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
 M:07711 913241(072 83959)

 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial list archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/



-- 
Peter Bowyer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-13 Thread Matthew Cashmore
On 13/8/07 14:55, Peter Bowyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Because it is only intended to make a point, not make a difference.
 
Cool Perhaps someone would like to post to the list why this protest is
happening, what it's aims are (if any) and what are the points that the
group would like to get across are?

We'll be out there with the protesters interviewing and making sure that
your point of view is heard.

m

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-13 Thread Brian Butterworth
I'm wondering if the police will be able to continue protecting us from
terrorwrists if they have to police an iPlayer DRM demo?

On 13/08/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 To my cynical mind, this translates as there isn't going to be a
 noticeable number of people there.

 Cheers,

 Rich.

 On 8/13/07, Peter Bowyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Because it is only intended to make a point, not make a difference.
 
  On 13/08/07, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   And we'll be out there - backstage tshirts on hand, and doing some
   interviews.
  
   But why is it happening outside TVC? I'm sure it's already been said
   elsewhere but... FMT are in the Broadcast Centre, 1/2 mile up the
 road?
  
   m
  
  
   On 13/8/07 14:33, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Hi Folks,
   
Not seen mention of it in her yet, so those those interested in the
on-going iPlayer controversy, the Free Software Foundation's
 Defective
By Design campaign is holding a protest outside the BBC Television
Center in White City tomorrow at 10:30AM.
   
Read all about it at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/iPlayerProtest
   
And there's also Ian Forrester's http://geekdinner.co.uk/ in the
evening with Eric Meyer, with a dinner event instead of just hanging
out at the bar.
  
   ___
   Matthew Cashmore
   Development Producer
  
   BBC Future Media  Technology, Research and Innovation
   BC5C3, Broadcast Centre, Media Village, W12 7TP
  
   T:020 8008 3959(02  83959)
   M:07711 913241(072 83959)
  
   -
   Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
 please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
  
 
 
  --
  Peter Bowyer
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  -
  Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
 please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 


 --
 SilverDisc Ltd is registered in England no. 2798073

 Registered address:
 4 Swallow Court, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6XX
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




-- 
Please email me back if you need any more help.

Brian Butterworth
www.ukfree.tv


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-13 Thread Dave Crossland
On 13/08/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm wondering if the police will be able to continue protecting us from
 terrorwrists if they have to police an iPlayer DRM demo?

Yeah dude, its going to turn violent, for sure.

lol

-- 
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] BBC iPlayer Protest tommorow, Tuesday 14th, 10:30AM, White City

2007-08-13 Thread Andy
On 13/08/07, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Cool Perhaps someone would like to post to the list why this protest is
 happening, what it's aims are (if any) and what are the points that the
 group would like to get across are?

You could try the groups website(s).
Defective By Designs website is: http://defectivebydesign.org/
A quick bit of background to provide you with some context (provide
corrections anyone if this is incorrect):
DBD is a project run by the Free Software Foundation (FSF). DBD's main
purpose is the abolition of DRM (Digital Rights Management, or Digital
Restriction Management, depending on your view). The FSF is the main
sponsor of the Gnu Project, I project that aims to provide a
completely free Operating System. Not just free in that you don't have
to pay for it but free in that you can do much more with it than other
software. For instance you could read the source code (technical
term meaning the stuff the software developers/programmers actually
type, instead of the code that the machine executes which is normally
transformed by a special program, not always though). Currently they
provide many tools that are then bundled with the Linux kernel (the
kernel is the core of an OS, it does much of the low level stuff that
you don't really see but you are glad is there).

Needless to say they are likely unhappy at the BBC's actions which
could cripple UK Linux adoption. It could also pose significant harm
to other OS vendors, such as Apple (of MacOS fame), and the people
behind the different versions of BSD.

You might find: http://defectivebydesign.org/iPlayerProtest and
http://defectivebydesign.org/blog/BBCcorrupted useful to understand
why there are protests.

FreeTheBBC ( http://www.freethebbc.info/ ) is a project from Binary
Freedom Boston, please don't ask why someone from Boston is behind
FreeTheBBC, I don't know (and I did ask once). Of course a quick
reading of the BBC's charter states clearly that one should not take
the term UK license fee payer literally.

As I don't know much about Binary Freedoms background I will quote
part of their site:
 1. Rid BBC content and programming of harmful DRM
 2. Make BBC content and programming available in free formats
 from: http://www.freethebbc.info/node/7

I think the main aims are:

- Opening up access to _all_ Operating Systems, not the select few
(currently one). As far as I can tell their appears to be no plans for
an all OS solution, only a select few, but more than one
solution*.

- Use of openly specified protocols and formats (of which there are
way too may to list, but the BBC knows this already, it's a member of
the consortium that writes some of them!!! (BBC is listed as a member
of W3C, source: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List )).

- Removal of DRM.

Of course you would need to ask the individuals involved what their
personal reasoning is.


I shall not be there tomorrow, it clashes with a more important event
work. I may check news sites during my lunch though, now where does
one find an impartial reporter on this matter?

_Andy

* this is only as far as I can tell, official sources regarding all
OS would be welcomed.

And in the spirit of the BBC: I am not responsible for the content of
external sites, Other websites are available.


-- 
Computers are like air conditioners.  Both stop working, if you open windows.
-- Adam Heath
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/