[BangPypers] Life lessons shared by Jesse Noller
Hi, Jesse Noller talks about the turn of events in his life since last couple of years : http://jessenoller.com/blog/2015/9/27/a-lot-happens. Valuable lessons for everyone. Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Twitter: @abdulmuneer <http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer> ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Re: [BangPypers] List of n but same objects
Hi Rajiv, Premise 1: Every time you *create* an object, it has a new id. Examples: a = list () b = list() id(a), id(b) (140688241027768, 140688241027840) p = dict() q = dict() id(p), id(q) (140688241071280, 140688241071560) x = iter(range(10)) y = iter(range(10)) id(x), id(y) (140688241024208, 140688241024272) Premise 2: Every time you associate the same object to multiple names, they all will point to same object. Examples: a = list() b = a id(a), id(b) (140688241028200, 140688241028200) p = dict() q = p id(p), id(q) (140688241071840, 140688241071840) x = iter(range(10)) y = x id(x), id(y) (140688241024464, 140688241024464) In your problem, Case 1 and Case 3 follow the pattern [an_object]*3 which results in [an_object, an_object, an_object] where as Case 2 follows the pattern [create_object(), create_object(), create_object()] Note that in Case 3, iter(x) is evaluated before multiplying. Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Rajiv Subramanian M rajiv.m1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Shreyas, Thanks for your answer. For the questions numered 2 and 3 do you have any thoughts? 2. Is there any other possibility or way (like * operator does here) by which we can obtain the same result as in CASE 1? 3. Does only list and listiterators objects can behave this way? what other python datatypes can behave this way? On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Kulkarni, Shreyas shy...@gmail.com wrote: When you call iter(x) it returns you a listiterator object. Every time you call iter(x) it *creates* a new listiterator and returns it back. The differences you are seeing in your cases are not because of how lists of list operators work, but because of how they are called. In case-1, iter(x) gets called once, and the same returned object is used when you do '* 3' on the list. In case-2, you are calling iter(x) three times, so naturally you get 3 different iterators - three different objects with different base addresses in memory. Case-3 is how python typically works - when you do an assignment, python doesn't create a copy, but a reference. So when you say y = [x] * 3; y is essentially a list with 3 references to the same memory location pointed to by x. So when you update one value, all three refs point to the same location, and hence you are seeing what you are seeing. If you want deep copy instead of shallow one with references, take a look at 'copy' module and copy.deepcopy method in particular. shreyas On Dec 11, 2014, at 3:58 PM, Rajiv Subramanian M rajiv.m1...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Group, I am Rajiv, Python/Django developer in a startup, Bangalore. Today when I experimenting with python I came across the following CASE 1: x = range(10) [iter(x)] * 3 [listiterator object at 0x7f6aa5594850, listiterator object at 0x7f6aa5594850, listiterator object at 0x7f6aa5594850] Thing to Note: Here all the 3 listiterator object in the list is actually a same single instance residing at the memory location 0x7f6aa5594850 CASE 2: [iter(x), iter(x), iter(x)] [listiterator object at 0x7f6aa5594890, listiterator object at 0x7f6aa55948d0, listiterator object at 0x7f6aa5594910] Thing to Note: In this case literally I created called the iter(x) for 3 times so it created 3 different listiterator object. CASE 3: x = [1, 2, 3] y = [x] * 3 y [[1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3]] y[0][0] = 5 y [[5, 2, 3], [5, 2, 3], [5, 2, 3]] x [5, 2, 3] Things to Note: As like in first case, here the list objects inside the list y are not the duplicates of x but the x itself Question: 1. How in the first case i.e [iter(x)] * 3 creates a list of 3 but the same objects? 2. Is there any other possibility or way (like * operator does here) by which we can obtain the same result as in CASE 1? 3. Does only list and listiterators objects can behave this way? what other python datatypes can behave this way? ~ Regards Rajiv M ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers -- [image: --] Rajiv Subramanian M [image: http://]about.me/rajiv.m1991 http://about.me/rajiv.m1991?promo=email_sig ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Re: [BangPypers] Moving from python 2.6 to 2.7
Hi, As far as I know, nothing written in python should break. If you are upgrading OS too, then you should be watchful as some of the c libraries can introduce version conflicts. We had faced such a problem with pyactivemq at our office. Pyactivemq depends on activemq-cpp library which in turn depends on a few system libraries. The problem was that the development of pyactivemq stagnated while activemq-cpp moved on the version checks caused conflicts. If I used a version of activemq-cpp that satisfies pyactivemq, activemq-cpp had problems with system libraries as they too had moved on to newer versions. IIRC, I solved it by changing the regex that looks for the versions. Regards, Abdul Muneer Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Kulkarni, Shreyas shy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, We are planning to move our production environment from 2.6 to 2.7 on one of the projects. While I understand it's not a significant upgrade, this being a production environment, I was wondering what aspects of 2.6 might break under 2.7 and what I should be watching out for. I tried searching about it, but didn't hit anything useful. Anyone here has any suggestions, or has experienced any difficulties after bumping the version to 2.7? Thanks in advance. shreyas ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Re: [BangPypers] Need help Extracting data properly in python
There is an old python package which does it neatly
http://www.astro.rug.nl/~breddels/python/tableio.html
Regards,
Abdul Muneer
--
Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Kulkarni, Shreyas shy...@gmail.com wrote:
if this is a valid tab-seperated file, you could try parsing it using csv
module with dialect set to '\t' or 'excel-tab' maybe?
shreyas
On Feb 19, 2014, at 5:43 PM, kamalakar06 . foxrun2...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a file like this(Tabular data) :
0 1 CEN/4 1.e33.000e3 4.000e-3
1.000e-3 3.000e3 5.000e3
112.000e3 3.000e4 6.000e3
1.000e4 1.000e4 1.000e5
12 1.00e4 1.000e5 1.000e6
2.00e42.000e5 1.000e4
0 2 CEN/41.e33.000e3 4.000e-3
1.000e-3 3.000e3 5.000e3
41 2.000e3 3.000e4 6.000e3
1.000e4 1.000e41.000e5
50 1.00e4 1.000e5 1.000e6
2.00e4 2.000e5 1.000e4
I want to extract the data column wise. How do i do that
My code is like this :
import os
f1=open('newdata1.txt','w')
L = []
for index, line in enumerate(open('Trial_1.txt','r')):
#print index
if index 0: #skip first 5 lines
continue
else:
line =line.split()
L.append('%s\t%s\t %s\t %s\t%s\n' %(line[0],
line[1],line[2],line[3],line[4]))
f1.writelines(L)
f1.close()
Output looks like this:
0 1 CEN/4 1.e33.000e3
1.000e-3 3.000e3 5.000e3
Now the code is not extracting the column data properly,since there is
tab
space after first line . How to give tab space in python wherever space
is
there to extract the data properly.Where to modify my code.
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Re: [BangPypers] Issue with list comprehension
Hi, _sum=sum([n for n in itertools.takewhile(lambda x: x 400, fib)]) TypeError: 'int' object is not callable Probably 'sum' might have been used earlier in the code to store the value of some integer. sum is a builtin function but the moment you assign sum=(x+y) or something, you have lost that function. If you are doubtful, do `from __builtin__ import * ` to reclaim your builtin variables and functions. Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Asokan Pichai paso...@gmail.com wrote: import itertools def fib(): a, b = 0, 1 while True: yield b a, b = b, a+b print sum(itertools.takewhile(lambda x: x 400, fib)) --- I tried the above; and it worked too (986) Asokan Pichai ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Re: [BangPypers] Do you pin your requirements.txt ?
I also pin requirements. But when I do 'pip freeze', I remove the packages that are installed as a dependency to main libraries which were explicitly installed. Packages from pypi may specify dependency as = and it will fetch the latest. But if you had pinned those too, it can cause conflicts especially if you upgrade the main component. Had run into issues because of this while working on a pylons project. Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Aditya Laghate adi...@thinrhino.net.inwrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:50:27PM +0530, Vineet Naik wrote: I always pin requirements. Here is a related article on the topic - http://nvie.com/posts/pin-your-packages/ Interesting blog link. I did like the idea of using '==' instead of '=' ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Re: [BangPypers] https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py
+1 Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:52 AM, T S KAMATH tsk.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Hi.. Its was in bad taste and treated as such, proper apology demanded and given.. hence we hope all the concerned party rest this.. or take it up in private. ..a full apology from Anand is on the maillist, posted at 9:50AM 8 Sep 2013. rgds Srikanth On 08-Sep-2013, at 11:15 AM, Pratham Gadre pratham.ga...@gmail.com wrote: Audrey, We would like to hear your thoughts on the antics pulled by Anand Pillai (member of PSF). ref: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2013-September/thread.html Mails with the subject : https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py Most of us, don't like the way he is hiding behind his style of sarcastic humor, but for fear of being called an outcast from the community, we don't have the guts to come out in the open. Being a member / moderator / owner of various e-groups (tech non-tech) in India, I know very well, how quickly one can become an outcast for speaking out. Especially, against somebody popular like Anand. I would personally, recommend, that a proper warning be served to Anand for his misconduct. I sincerely hope that Anand is given his due for his uncalled and unwarranted 'sarcastic humor'. I am taking the trouble to escalate this issue, since Anand is a member of PSF and President of Indian Python Software Society. People with attitude like his should not be allowed to hold such posts. Regards Pratham PS: If somebody has cloned the code repository by Anand, please share the code with pyladies. If you don't want to get entangled in this mess, email the code to me, I will guarantee your anonymity. Anand, in the meanwhile please read : http://www.pyladies.com/CodeOfConduct/ On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Daniel Greenfeld pyda...@gmail.com wrote: As a PSF member I'm going to delurk right now. That's because as an admirer/supporter of the India Python community, I'm rather shocked and saddened by this thread. Angry. Furious. Demanding of real apologies. Svashka is standing up for what's right. I'm behind what she says 100%. ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Re: [BangPypers] https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py
Ouch, there was mail that came just before i hit send. I +1-ed what Mr. Kamath said. Its was in bad taste and treated as such, proper apology demanded and given.. hence we hope all the concerned party rest this.. or take it up in private. It might be a politically incorrect thing for person holding a position to resort to humor (because it may not be humor for ALL audience). But I do not consider that as damaging as blowing it out of proportion. Let's not linger on the negativity for too long as it is toxic. Please cheer up, dear folks. Hug each other.. Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Abdul Muneer abdulmun...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:52 AM, T S KAMATH tsk.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Hi.. Its was in bad taste and treated as such, proper apology demanded and given.. hence we hope all the concerned party rest this.. or take it up in private. ..a full apology from Anand is on the maillist, posted at 9:50AM 8 Sep 2013. rgds Srikanth On 08-Sep-2013, at 11:15 AM, Pratham Gadre pratham.ga...@gmail.com wrote: Audrey, We would like to hear your thoughts on the antics pulled by Anand Pillai (member of PSF). ref: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2013-September/thread.html Mails with the subject : https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py Most of us, don't like the way he is hiding behind his style of sarcastic humor, but for fear of being called an outcast from the community, we don't have the guts to come out in the open. Being a member / moderator / owner of various e-groups (tech non-tech) in India, I know very well, how quickly one can become an outcast for speaking out. Especially, against somebody popular like Anand. I would personally, recommend, that a proper warning be served to Anand for his misconduct. I sincerely hope that Anand is given his due for his uncalled and unwarranted 'sarcastic humor'. I am taking the trouble to escalate this issue, since Anand is a member of PSF and President of Indian Python Software Society. People with attitude like his should not be allowed to hold such posts. Regards Pratham PS: If somebody has cloned the code repository by Anand, please share the code with pyladies. If you don't want to get entangled in this mess, email the code to me, I will guarantee your anonymity. Anand, in the meanwhile please read : http://www.pyladies.com/CodeOfConduct/ On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Daniel Greenfeld pyda...@gmail.com wrote: As a PSF member I'm going to delurk right now. That's because as an admirer/supporter of the India Python community, I'm rather shocked and saddened by this thread. Angry. Furious. Demanding of real apologies. Svashka is standing up for what's right. I'm behind what she says 100%. ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Re: [BangPypers] problem with python classes
Hi, If it is necessary that the calculation has to be performed by ClassOne, use a classmethod. class ClassOne(object): def __init__(self, value): self.value = value @classmethod def calculate_value(cls, value): do something return new_value and in ClassTwo, change the relevant line to this one. self.values.append(ClassOne.calculate_value(inputvalues)) Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:11 PM, hiharry danny hrd...@gmail.com wrote: i have python 2.7.4..now suppose i have two new-style base classes , i.e. class ClassName(object): and the two base classes are related by __init__ constructor where the __init__ constructor of one base class is accessed by the __init property of the other base class , for example : class ClassOne(object): def __init__(self,value): self.value = value class ClassTwo(object): def __init__(self,inputvalues): self.values = [] for i in inputvalues: self.values.append(ClassOne(inputvalues)) if this be the case , then without using inheritance property of OOP ,i,e, without creating further new subclasses , how can I access other user defined methods of ClassOne class via Class Two class. The ouput value will be returned by a user defined method of ClassTwo but the computation will be done by a method of ClassOne which is called by the user defined method of class two ...? so what will be the solution ? ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Re: [BangPypers] Need help for python coding
Hi Kamalakar, You can use os.path.join() to join the user input to a base path. Python will take care of unix/windows differentiation and append slashes accordingly. import os base_path = os.getcwd() base_path '/home/amuneer/workspace/playground' file_name = raw_input(Enter Filename\n) Enter Filename play complete_path = os.path.join(base_path, file_name) complete_path '/home/amuneer/workspace/playground/play' Note:if you are not using python3, use raw_input instead of input. raw_input accepts the values as string and therefore people cannot do nasty things by typing executable code. Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Kamalakar gs foxrun2...@gmail.com wrote: HI all, I have a query that i have doc which is read through python.But instead of giving path and filename in the coding.I want to manipulate it like python has to ask USER for a specific filename so that python recognizes the directory internally and read the file .How do i do this.I have tried with filename = input (filename) but it just file name and will not recognises the path. For example: file name = input (file name: ) file name = python it has to recognizes the path likeC:\users\desktop\python Thanks Regards Kamalakar ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Re: [BangPypers] Reorder Dictionary Size in python
Expecting this behaviour from built-in dict is not a good idea. However try if garbage collection helps. import gc gc.collect() I have not tried it out myself, though. Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Rahul R rahul8...@gmail.com wrote: As far as i know, python performs a lazy deletion of values , when we delete content from a dictionary (correct me if i am wrong) . So, when we insert a lot of values the dictionary automatically expands. I don't see dict shrinking when we delete values from dictionary. In such case, is there a way to forcibly reduce the dictionary size ? Don't try to optimize something that is not required. Python core developers are smarted than you, trust them. Premature optimization is root cause of all evil. Anand ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
[BangPypers] The FSF awards Fernando Perez, the creator of IPython
Hi, From fsf.org: The Award for the Advancement of Free Software is given annually to an individual who has made a great contribution to the progress and development of free software, through activities that accord with the spirit of free software. This year, it was given to Dr. Fernando Perez, the creator of IPython. IPython provides a rich architecture for interactive computing with a debugger, editor, and python command-line interpreter all in one. https://www.fsf.org/news/2012-free-software-award-winners-announced-2 Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Re: [BangPypers] wierd class behavior
Thank you Anand for bringing up this thought provoking question!
Regardless of the possible explanations, it has to be said that this
behaviour is indeed confusing. This will conflict with the general idea of
LEGB scoping order (i.e. Local, Enclosing Function local, Global,
Built-in). The functions f and g apparently show conflicting behavior in
the way variables x and y are treated respectively.
To summarize the confusions:
1. in *f*, print(x) statement under class definition causes an
exception. Shouldn't it have accepted the *x* that was declared in its
Enclosing function?
2. If we accept that as the default behaviour, why on earth is the *gety
* function inside *g* returning value 1 instead of 2? (It would have
returned 1 regardless of its class had a statement like 'y=1'!)
The following might explain this:
The original variable '*y*' in function *g* and the '*y*' inside
*gety*function are the same object! But the '
*y*' in the class Foo local is different. You can check it this way:
def g():
y = 1
*print 'id(y) originally in g:', id(y)*
class Foo():
y = 2
*print 'id(y) in class Foo:', id(y)*
def gety(self):
*print 'id(y) in function gety inside Foo:', id(y)*
return y
foo = Foo()
print (y, foo, foo.gety())
But why??
*
*
*The x in function f and y in function g, though may look identical to us,
are stored differently by python! *This can be seen from the disassembly of
both functions:
dis(f)
2 0 LOAD_CONST 1 (1)
3 STORE_FAST 0 (x)
3 6 LOAD_CONST 2 ('Foo')
9 LOAD_CONST 4 (())
12 LOAD_CONST 3 (code object Foo at
0x101102bb0, file class_check.py, line 3)
15 MAKE_FUNCTION0
18 CALL_FUNCTION0
21 BUILD_CLASS
22 STORE_FAST 1 (Foo)
7 25 LOAD_FAST0 (x)
28 LOAD_FAST1 (Foo)
31 LOAD_ATTR0 (x)
34 BUILD_TUPLE 2
37 PRINT_ITEM
38 PRINT_NEWLINE
39 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
42 RETURN_VALUE
dis(g)
10 0 LOAD_CONST 1 (1)
3 STORE_DEREF 0 (y)
11 6 LOAD_CONST 2 ('Foo')
9 LOAD_CONST 4 (())
12 LOAD_CLOSURE 0 (y)
15 BUILD_TUPLE 1
18 LOAD_CONST 3 (code object Foo at
0x101102d30, file class_check.py, line 11)
21 MAKE_CLOSURE 0
24 CALL_FUNCTION0
27 BUILD_CLASS
28 STORE_FAST 0 (Foo)
15 31 LOAD_FAST0 (Foo)
34 CALL_FUNCTION0
37 STORE_FAST 1 (foo)
16 40 LOAD_DEREF 0 (y)
43 LOAD_FAST1 (foo)
46 LOAD_ATTR0 (y)
49 LOAD_FAST1 (foo)
52 LOAD_ATTR1 (gety)
55 CALL_FUNCTION0
58 BUILD_TUPLE 3
61 PRINT_ITEM
62 PRINT_NEWLINE
63 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
66 RETURN_VALUE
It can be noticed that x is stored as STORE_FAST while y is stored as
STORE_DEREF.
The excellent 'Python Innards series' (which I can understand only very
little) explains this in one of the articles
http://tech.blog.aknin.name/2010/06/05/pythons-innards-naming/ :
The secret sauce here is that at compilation time, if a variable is seen
to be resolved from a lexically nested function, it will not be stored and
will not be accessed using the regular naming opcodes. Instead, a special
object called a
cellhttp://docs.python.org/py3k/c-api/cell.html#cell-objectsis
created to store the value of the object. When various code objects
(the
outer function, the inner function, etc) will access this variable, the use
of the *_DEREF opcodes will cause the cell to be accessed rather than the
namespace of the accessing code object.
additional reference: Python Closure:
Link1http://ynniv.com/blog/2007/08/closures-in-python.html
Link2 http://www.shutupandship.com/2012/01/python-closures-explained.html,
Regards,
Abdul Muneer
--
Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:26 PM, steve st...@lonetwin.net wrote:
On Tuesday 04 December 2012 09:24 AM, Anand Chitipothu wrote:
Python scoping rules when it comes to classes are so confusing.
Can you guess what would be output of the following program?
x = 1
class Foo:
print(x)
Prints the global x
x = x + 1
print(x)
Prints
Re: [BangPypers] Looking for Guest Speaker on Python and NLTK
Hi, Some course from stanford on ml and ai. ml-class.org ai-class.org Join last date is already gone, but my friends are able to join even now.. Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Whom I'm Lookin' for is The One who sees!! On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:42 PM, s|s supr.e.etse...@gmail.com wrote: I would have loved to conduct the session. Unfortunately, I am in Delhi and also I am conducting a session on databases on 22nd. I am sending some important links in this context. http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Fuzzy http://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-Levenshtein/ http://www.nltk.org/ http://streamhacker.com/2010/05/10/text-classification-sentiment-analysis-naive-bayes-classifier/ http://nlp.lsi.upc.edu/freeling/ https://github.com/djinn/freeling-python As criticism of NLP http://teddziuba.com/2008/11/avoiding-nlp-at-all-costs.html Hope you guys have a great session. -- Supreet Sethi Ph IN: +919811143517 Ph Skype: d_j_i_n_n Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/supreet.sethi Twt: http://twitter.com/djinn ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
