Re: differentiate 1 and 1.0 in bbdb-pop-up-window-size

2011-04-21 Thread Roland Winkler
On Thu Apr 21 2011 Leo wrote:
 I propose the following small improvement.

 -   (if (= bbdb-pop-up-window-size 1)
 +   (if (eql bbdb-pop-up-window-size 1.0)

...so that an integer value of 1 gives one line (useful for one-line
layout) whereas 1.0 corresponds to a switch-to-buffer.

Makes sense to me.  Thanks,

Roland

--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
___
bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BBDB] ChangLog 2011-04-16

2011-04-21 Thread Sam Steingold
 * Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-04-18 16:15:04 -0500]:

 On Mon Apr 18 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
  Now bbdb-mode is also derived from special-mode.
 
 I think this make bbdb-mode-map inherit from special-mode-map
 automatically.

 I do not know if this could work (suggestions welcome).

look at the macro define-derived-mode in derived.el.
(define-derived-mode child parent ...)
does
(set-keymap-parent child-map parent-map)
so if you do
(define-derived-mode bbdb-mode special-mode ...)
then you do not need to do
(set-keymap-parent bbdb-mode-map special-mode-map)

 So these people are asked to just email fsf-reco...@gnu.org, and tell
 them that their work on BBDB should be considered part of their Emacs
 assignment.
done

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.5 (Final) X 
11.0.60900031
http://ffii.org http://honestreporting.com http://openvotingconsortium.org
http://pmw.org.il http://camera.org http://mideasttruth.com http://dhimmi.com
Experience comes with debts.


--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
___
bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/


Re: mail administrivia

2011-04-21 Thread Sam Steingold
 * Ted Zlatanov g...@yvsrybtf.pbz [2011-04-18 11:03:57 -0500]:

 - set up a bbdb-vcs list for commit messages

- subscribe bbdb-info to bbdb-vcs in the digest mode

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.5 (Final) X 
11.0.60900031
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://dhimmi.com http://mideasttruth.com http://ffii.org
Independence: nobody pays for you.  Liberty: nobody thinks for you.


--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
___
bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/


Re: Replace bbdb-defstruct with defstruct?

2011-04-21 Thread Sam Steingold
 * Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-04-18 16:21:29 -0500]:
 On Mon Apr 18 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
  * Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-04-16 18:19:20 -0500]:
  On Fri Apr 15 2011 Leo wrote:
  I wonder if it makes sense to replace bbdb-defstruct with defstruct?
  What benefit(s) would you expect from that?
 - less code duplication (more maintainable)
 - smaller memory footprint
 - benefit from potential speedups in the mainline code

 I still don't know how this would work. But I'll be happy to look at a
 patch (provided it doesn't break too much).

To test a patch I need to switch to bbdb 3.
To switch to bbdb 3 I need to migrate my customizations.
To migrate my customizations I need the list of obsolete variables in a
machine-readable format (preferably an elisp file containing
make-obsolete forms).

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.5 (Final) X 
11.0.60900031
http://camera.org http://openvotingconsortium.org http://truepeace.org
http://thereligionofpeace.com http://jihadwatch.org http://pmw.org.il
usually: can't pay == don't buy. software: can't buy == don't pay


--
Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise
Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been 
demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE 
containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain 
from the move. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails
___
bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/


Re: mail administrivia

2011-04-21 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:01:59 -0500 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote: 

RW On Tue Apr 19 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
 If you send 3 warnings (1 per week) before disabling the sourceforge.net
 mailing list (making it just a forward address), I think that's
 sufficient.  We'll set up the new list on Gmane to feed into the same
 gmane.emacs.bbdb.user newsgroup so people tracking it through Gmane see
 no breaks.  We should be able to copy the member list anyhow.  

RW Thanks for your help with this. I do not know how the old list is
RW set up / administered. Who has access to the current list of
RW subscribers?

sourceforge.net, I believe (assuming the list owner is not helpful).

 If you agree, go ahead and send the first of the warnings.
 
 I'll try to set up the bbdb-vcs mailing list and plug it into Gmane,
 meanwhile.

RW How about we wait with the first warning till the new list is
RW actually running so that the first warning already includes definite
RW instructions on what will replace the old list?

OK.

Ted


--
Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise
Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been 
demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE 
containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain 
from the move. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails
___
bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/


Re: mail administrivia

2011-04-21 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:10:24 -0400 Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org wrote: 

 * Ted Zlatanov g...@yvsrybtf.pbz [2011-04-18 11:03:57 -0500]:
 
 - set up a bbdb-vcs list for commit messages

Sam - subscribe bbdb-info to bbdb-vcs in the digest mode

E I'm not sure that's necessary.  I wouldn't find it useful.
Roland should decide.

Ted


--
Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise
Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been 
demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE 
containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain 
from the move. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails
___
bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-21 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:01:09 -0400 Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org wrote: 

 * Ted Zlatanov g...@yvsrybtf.pbz [2011-04-21 13:21:42 -0500]:

TZ I didn't think timestamp was updated every time you see a message from
TZ someone, just when the record is modified.  This one would explicitly
TZ say I saw a message from you on -MM-DD and leave timestamp
TZ unchanged because it's not a true data change.

Sam a third timestamp field is fine by me, but it will not solve the problem
Sam (which as I say below does not seem to have an automatic solution).

OK, then it's not needed.  I'd rather not add features no one needs :)

Sam I think the right approach is to add a field called export-class with
Sam values being a set of symbols and each export operation (e.g., print,
Sam diary c) should operate on the records of the specific class (`print',
Sam `diary' c) which should be the value of an option, e.g.,
Sam `bbdb-print-class', `bbdb-diary-class', so that I can bind them around a
Sam call to an export function.

Oh, I see, you want to have a general record category and then filter on
that category.  Don't call it export-class though.  It's just class
or category I think.  That should be trivial and we can even offer
completion based on the categories already specified in the BBDB
entries.  Then you just need to filter the BBDB entries using a category
filter.

Ted


--
Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise
Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been 
demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE 
containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain 
from the move. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails
___
bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/