Re: Monsanto submitted its petition for comm. of GE Wheat

2003-01-07 Thread Hugh Lovel
I don't mean to discourage anyone. Let's keep building awareness, and
rejection of the vogue agendas such as Monsanto's. But quite frankly I see
little salvation in this alone. What will help us most is if things get a
LOT worse. SNIP Like I said, things may have to get a LOT worse
before they will get significantly better.

I totally agree with you, Hugh, with the exception that in this
particular case they are playing with the very basis of our
civalization: our basic cultivars and in such a way that there may be
no returning to the plants we have now. Seeing the SUPER WEED Canola
in Schmeiser's slides makes it pretty clear to me that even if things
get bad enough to stop Monsanto, there may never be an opportunity to
grow food plants en masse that contain the same DNA that our
ancestors co-evolved with. Sally Fallon has commented extensively on
how difficult it is for our bodies to actually thrive when estranged
from our traditional food.

I realize how futile the effort is at this point, Hugh.

Thank for your good post. -Allan

Allan,

I know. So it goes. A similar thing happened in Atlantis. I suppose we will
have to become more adaptable.

Hugh
Visit our website at: www.unionag.org




Re: Monsanto submitted its petition for comm. of GE Wheat

2003-01-07 Thread Hugh Lovel
Hugh, what do you think about beginning some trials with eradicain these
super weeds with peppers???  sstorch

Dear Steve,

We've tried peppers and they didn't work as well as we expected. So we need
to try some more things, such as running some of the weed through the
blender and using that. What we want, of course, is something that works
like a charm the first year, not by the fourth year.

Best,
Hugh
Visit our website at: www.unionag.org




FW: [globalnews] Bush's War on the Dolphins

2003-01-07 Thread Jane Sherry
Title: FW: [globalnews] Bush's War on the Dolphins






Environmental News Service
U.S. Changes Meaning of Dolphin Safe Tuna Label

By Cat Lazaroff

WASHINGTON, DC, January 6, 2003 (ENS) - The Bush administration has decided that a controversial fishing method involving encircling pods of dolphins with mile long nets to catch tuna has no significant adverse impact on the dolphins. Conservation groups say the determination, which will allow tuna from Mexico to be sold in the U.S. under a dolphin safe label, could spell disaster for imperiled dolphin populations.

On December 31, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) announced that after new research, it had concluded that the tuna purse seine industry practice of encircling dolphins to catch tuna has no significant adverse impact on dolphin populations in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean. The announcement came less than a month after a conservation group released an unpublished NMFS report indicating that thousands of dolphins, particularly baby dolphins, are still dying in tuna nets in the eastern tropical Pacific.

label
The Commerce Department's Dolphin Safe tuna label. (Logo courtesy NMFS)
The New Year's Eve finding cleared the way for tuna caught under the terms of a binding multilateral environmental agreement, particularly in waters off the coast of Mexico, to be imported into the United States with the dolphin safe label, so long as no dolphins are injured or killed during the set in which the tuna are caught.

One of our main goals is to reduce dolphin deaths and to conserve living marine resources, while at the same time maintaining the sustainability of the Eastern Tropical Pacific tuna fishery under the international agreement, said NMFS director Bill Hogarth. This agreement has reduced dolphin mortality from hundreds of thousands of dolphins to approximately 2,000 dolphins per year.

In 1991, NMFS implemented the dolphin safe labeling system as a way of reducing dolphin deaths due to tuna fishing. Under the initial label criteria, tuna harvested in the Eastern Tropical Pacific could be labeled dolphin safe only if no nets were intentionally set on dolphins during the fishing trip.

Under the December 31 decision, the criteria have been changed so that tuna harvested in the Eastern Tropical Pacific by large purse seine vessels can be labeled dolphin safe even if dolphins are encircled, so long as an on board observer certifies that no dolphins are killed or seriously injured during the set in which the tuna were caught.

Hogarth
NMFS Director Bill Hogarth during a wetlands restoration day in Baltimore Harbor, Maryland. (Photo by Bill Folsom, courtesy NMFS)
The dolphin safe label was developed as a way to help protect and conserve dolphins, said Hogarth. With this decision, Americans can continue to have confidence that when they purchase tuna with the dolphin safe label that dolphins are being protected.

But conservation groups warn that the relaxed requirements for dolphin safe labeling could lead to the deaths of thousands more dolphins each year.

The whole point of the 'dolphin safe' label is to give consumers a choice of tuna that wasn't caught by netting dolphins, said William Snape, vice president for law and litigation at Defenders of Wildlife, one of several groups planning to challenge the NMFS decision in court. We have great confidence that the courts will strike down this blatantly illegal decision, Snape added.

In the 1950s, fishers discovered that yellowfin tuna in the Eastern Tropical Pacific could be found beneath schools of dolphin. For years after the discovery, the predominant tuna fishing methods in the region involved encircling schools of dolphins with fishing nets to trap the tuna concentrated below.

Hundreds of thousands of dolphins died because of this fishing method. Under the International Dolphin Conservation Program (IDCP), fishers were required to change their purse seine fishing methods, and since the 1980s, confirmed dolphin mortalities have dropped to about 2,000 per year.

dolphins caughts
Dolphins caught in tuna nets. (Photo courtesy Greenpeace)
Critics of tuna fishing in the Eastern Tropical Pacific say the actual number of dolphins harmed is probably much higher. A 96 page report by NMFS scientists, made public last month, found that the fishing methods favored by commercial tuna fisheries in Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia and other nations may stress dolphins, even when they are not caught in nets, or when they are released from nets alive.

Many of the region's tuna fishers chase down schools of dolphins in order to target the tuna on which the dolphins feed, than encircle the tuna with nets that can also ensnare dolphins. At least six to 10 percent of eastern spinner dolphin mortality, and 10 to 15 percent of northeastern offshore spotted dolphin mortality, is caused by the separation of baby dolphins from their mothers during the chasing and netting process, the report found.

Despite 

FW: [globalnews] Environmental Community to Support the Cape WindProject

2003-01-07 Thread Jane Sherry
Title: FW: [globalnews] Environmental Community to Support the Cape Wind Project




>From globalnews own Jon Naar:

Beautifully written, important statement on which we can all take positive action as indicated.  jn

 -

 

Environmental Community to Support the Cape Wind Project
by Charles Komanoff
January, 2003

Dear colleague -

Perhaps you read the Dec. 29 NY Times article detailing 
the ecological and social devastation being caused by 
coal-bed methane development in Wyomings Powder River 
Basin. The article took me back to a time 25 years ago, 
in the mid-1970s, when the future path of energy 
development was up for grabs and activists mobilized 
to stop the fossil-nuke industry from laying waste to 
natural and human communities all over the U.S.

Defending the American West from ruinous energy development 
was a particularly intense, gut-level part of that struggle 
for many of us, including me. I was living in New York then 
but spending as much time as I could in the Northern Rockies, 
hiking the high country and getting out onto the land, 
meeting ranchers, Indians, environmentalists and fellow 
eco-freaks. I fished for my breakfast in Shoshone streams, 
played barrelhouse piano in a Montana renewable-energy road 
show, and got high inhaling Amory Lovins Soft Energy Paths 
at 12,000 feet in the Wind River range.

Natural gas, or methane, occupied a middle position in the 
energy debate back then. Gas was a fossil fuel, hence non-
renewable, but it was less polluting than coal or oil and 
seemed well suited for democratically scaled small engines 
and generators that could later switch to quasi-renewable 
fuels like hydrogen. Gas could be the bridge carrying us 
from our bondage in the Egypt of oil, nukes and coal to the 
promised land where thermodynamically correct renewable 
and conservation technologies could warm our houses and 
cool our beer without draining our pocketbooks and 
plundering the planet.

Conventional natural gas deposits in the Lower 48 were 
running out, we thought, but there was hope that 
unconventional sources would take up the slack. One such 
source, coal-bed methane, promised to be especially simple 
and benign; just sink a pipe and collect the gas. A few 
decades later, the reality revealed in the Times is anything 
but benign: the austerely beautiful Powder River Basin is 
now laced with saline creeks and flammable rivers; the vast 
Wyoming silences are shattered 24-7 by screaming 
compressors; fifth-generation ranchers, their wells ruined, 
are being forced off the land and driven to violence.

The Times article is yet another reminder of the ongoing 
devastation wrought by Americas overuse of fossil and 
nuclear fuels. Last month, I circulated an open letter 
(http://www.cars-suck.org/littera-scripta/windfarm.html) 
in support of the Cape Wind project in Nantucket Sound. The 
immediate backdrop to that letter was the destruction of 
hundreds of miles of Spanish coast by the spilled cargo of 
the oil tanker Prestige. The Wyoming coal-bed methane 
horror has spurred todays letter, but there is no shortage of 
relevant news: record melting of the Greenland ice sheet; 
dwindling glaciers in the Alps, Andes and Rockies; 
Appalachian forests and towns obliterated by mountaintop 
strip-mining of coal; and of course the daily flow of oil 
money from U.S. motorists to al Qaeda via the House of 
Saud.

Against this onslaught the projected output of the 170 
turbines comprising the Cape Wind project is, to be sure, a 
drop in the bucket: one part in 2,500 of U.S. electricity 
production, and one part in 7,500 of all energy consumed in 
the fifty states. On the other hand, 17 other proposals for 
off-shore wind farms totaling over 3,000 turbines have been 
advanced for the East Coast outer continental shelf, from 
Massachusetts to Virginia, according to a draft brief by the 
Humane Society of the United States, which opposes the 
Cape Wind project. In round numbers, these proposals would 
sum to one percent of U.S. electricity production. Add the 
onshore wind projects underway and proposed in California 
and the Great Plains, and the share multiplies. Not the 18% 
share that wind supplies in Denmark, far from it, in fact, but 
clearly getting somewhere.

Wind clutter, the towers and turbines are already being 
called. For me, this is a sourly evocative phrase. When 
cyclists locked their bikes to poles outside the World Trade 
Center, the Port Authority guys called it bike clutter to 
justify clipping the locks and taking the bikes. That was in 
1990, before global warming from burning fossil fuels had 
manifested itself beyond any doubt, before Gulf War I (or II) 
had set the Middle East afire, and of course before the twin 
towers themselves were reduced to ashes. And before some 
residents of Cape Cod - among them, we may be certain, 
shareowners in the corporations taking the methane out from 
under the 

Re: Epiphany

2003-01-07 Thread Mary Ann Skillman
We have several trees in the DC area rigged to broadcast the bd remedies, so 
ask the trees to send the bd energy to the area within the circle you have 
sprayed, they will understand...sstorch 


Will do. Thank you. Mary AnnThe new MSN 8 is here: Try it  free* for 2 months 



Joly to speak in Oregon Feb 15

2003-01-07 Thread barrylia
For those on the west coast and who do not receive mailings from the
BDFGA (this workshop doesn't appear to be posted on www.biodynamics.com
calendar as yet):

Nicolas Joly, proprietor of Coulee de Servant, Savennieres, France and
author of Wine From Sky to Earth will be giving a workshop titled The
Truth of a Place: Rebirth of the Appellation and Biodynamics, on
Saturday, February 15, 2003, from 10:00 to 4:00 at Cooper Mountain
Vinyards, 9480 SW Grabhorn Road, Beaverton Oregon.

Fee $100 includes lunch
Contact BDFGA 888.516.7797
___
Barry Lia \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ Seattle WA
 




Fwd: [compost_tea] Alternative Viticulture Meeting

2003-01-07 Thread Allan Balliett

Don't forget, we'll be doing a similar thing here in Loudoun CO, VA
the weekend of Nov 14 this year. Steve Storch, Alan York, Bob
Shaffer, a couple of French BD viticulturists, and Soils Wizard Jerry
Brunetti will be bringing information to Mid-Atlantic Viticulturists
and horticulturists on how to bring maximum health to plants and
maximum quality to produce by working with the soil and the
atmosphere. More information soon. -Allan




Folks,



I just wanted to pass this invitation along to the group in case
anyone wants to attend.  Don Lotter and I will be presenting
information about compost tea in organic agriculture on the first
day.  We will also be discussing our proposed SARE project which
will investigate the efficacy of compost tea for disease prevention
in Mid-Atlantic vineyards and in other horticultural crops such as
pumpkins and potatoes at The Rodale Institute.  Below I have
included the brochure and registration information.



Matthew Ryan
Research Technician
The Rodale Institute
611 Siegfriedale Road
Kutztown, PA 19530
(610) 683-1405



Alternative Viticulture - A Closer Look at Sustainable, Organic and
Biodynamic Grape Growing



Penn State Day

January 28 and 29, 2003

Spring Garden Conference Center

Middletown, Pennsylvania

Registration Fee - $80   Pre-registration deadline is January 17.



The goal of the meeting is to bring perspective and information to
the often fuzzy realm of non-conventional commercial viticulture.
This would include sustainable, organic and biodynamic methods.
Recently, there has been a tremendous growth in interest in these
new techniques of farming wine grapes.  Because much of the
practices and technologies exist outside of our customary
agricultural experience, it is the objective of this meeting to give
sound and practical information on subjects that are too often
tainted with hyperbole and unrealistic expectations. A group of
serious consultants, researchers, growers, vendors and extension
agents will present their views and experience of this new frontier
in grape growing.  These are truly some of the best minds in the
business and many of their names will be familiar to you.  It is
hoped that, armed with this information, new and experienced growers
alike will be able to decide for themselves if they want to employ
these practices on their own farms.  We are seeking to encourage
creative, innovative, disciplined and intelligent wine grape growing
that will produce high quality wines with a minimum impact on the
environment and continued profitability to the farmer.  There are
great challenges to successful alternative practices under Eastern
growing conditions, hopefully this meeting will put these challenges
and the risks into proper perspective.  Please plan to attend and
pass the word about this meeting to all your wine growing friends.
The Wine Appreciation Guild will have a variety of publications on
these special topics available for sale and equipment/supply vendors
will be present.



Program



Tuesday, January 28



7:00 Registration and Coffee



7:50 Mark Chien, Penn State
Cooperative Extension - Welcome and Introduction



8:00 Alice Wise, Cornell
Cooperative Extension, Riverhead, LINY.

Alternative
Viticultural Practices on Long Island



8:45 Al MacDonald, Chemeketa
Community College, Salem, OR.

Oregon Low Input
Viticulture and Enology (LIVE)



9:45 Break



10:00   Vicki Bess, BBC Labs,
Tempe, AZ.  Soil Microbiology and

Microbial Diversity - Tools for Vineyard Management



11:00   William Brinton, Woods
End Research Lab, Mt. Vernon, Maine

Overview of Organic
Agricultural Practices



Noon  Lunch



1:00 Nancy Wenner/Elwin
Stewart, Dept of Plant Pathology, Penn State University - Vine
Decline Research in Pennsylvania and New York

Jim Travis et. al., Dept of Plant Pathology, Penn State University -
Use of Compost in Commercial in Pennsylvania



2:00 Richard Fiegel, Silver
Thread Vineyard, Finger Lakes, NY. Rob Russell - Westport River
Vineyard and Winery, Westport,  MA - Grower Experiences with Organic
Viticulture in the East



3:15 Break



3:30 Vicki Bess - Strategies
for Making Compost Tea



4:15 Don Lotter, Rodale
Institute, Kutztown, PA- Experience with Compost Tea and Organic
Agriculture



5:00 QA - All Speakers



5:30  

[no subject]

2003-01-07 Thread Tara YG Welty



All this talk about using trees as prep broadcasters- 
howdoes this work? Tara


Re: (trees as broadcasters)

2003-01-07 Thread Roger Pye
Tara YG Welty wrote:


All this talk about using trees as prep broadcasters- how does this 
work? Tara


May I prevail upon contributors NOT to send messages with a blank 
subject line please?  That is how may hoax and virus-carrying emails are 
sent and my system is programmed to automatically dump them into the 
trash can (which is where I found this one).

Roger
--
%%
Show gratitude to all living things
%%
Reiki  Earth Healing, Natural Energy Divination
Earthcare Environmental Solutions
PO Box 2057 Queanbeyan NSW 2620 Australia
Ph: +61 2 6255 3824
Fax: +61 2 6255 1028
Mob: +61 410 469 541

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




tree topic

2003-01-07 Thread flylo
My BDNOW (email) folder has over 2495 entries. I was pretty sure 
the topic of trees as broadcasters has been addressed before now, 
but I can't locate it in all the conglomerated mess that is BDNOW 
folder. I DID locate one (off in my Biodynamic folder of documents 
I've saved as Word docs), called 'trees as healers' but it's totally 
blank. (March 4, 1999, also The Cow Being in that same 
timeframe, a blank document too.) These may / may not be 
important documents, but I sure would like to find out what we were 
discussing 'back then'. I remember some of it 'of salmon and 
stream' came from Ferdinand, and some of the cow auras did too. 

I think the old discussions are important so we don't just sit 
around, chewing over the same old ground, and not learning 
anything from the prior postings. 

Interesting and on the topic of trees. Two friends and I took a walk 
last Sunday, looking for likely bridle paths for them to come back 
and ride later on. We walked around my very tiny woodlot (7 
acres), along a dirt road. One lady decided to stop and take a 'pee 
break'. We walked on, letting her conduct herself in private. A few 
steps ahead, we felt a distinctive buzzing, and looked up. A very 
active (for January) bee colony was entering and buzzing around a 
broken limb off an (obviously hollow) tree trunk. We hugged the tree 
and put our ear to the trunk and could feel it alive with the inner 
activity. Darla kept saying, DON'T MAKE THEM MAD... she was in 
a rather 'compromised' position at the time G. But they were 
intent on their own world, and paid us no attention at all. Whenever 
I see bees, especially wild ones,  I always feel enormous hope. 




Re: tree topic

2003-01-07 Thread Moen Creek
Title: Re: tree topic




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 21:27:41 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tree topic

 I always feel enormous hope. 

Hey Sweet Heart
 I'm so glad your back writing Often
In Love 
Markess





From Greg Willis: Fwd: Re: Executive Position

2003-01-07 Thread Allan Balliett
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 10:55:16 -0800
From: Greg Willis [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I was amused to read Mr. Palmer's email.  My, what an extraordinary
command of the English language!  Personal attacks don't replace a
reasoned arguments or refutation of my facts and statements.  He makes
no attempt to
argue his side.  I'm sorry I upset Mr. Palmer so much.  Nevertheless,
the facts are still the facts: nothing
the Anthros have done has moved Steiner's agricultural forward into the
21st Century and nothing they have done has advanced Steiner's remedies
beyond what they were 79 years ago.   Everyone else in the farming world
knows this.  Why don't they?

Steiner envisioned farmers, gardeners and just regular folks using his
remedies over the world.  Has this happened?  No.  Who's to blame?  The
very people who took the responsibility for this to themselves, to the
exclusion of all others in the world - the Anthros and the BDidiots.

Can this be fixed?  Yes.  See my next email.

Greg Willis
Agri-Synthesis®





Re: tree topic

2003-01-07 Thread Lloyd Charles

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 2:27 PM
Subject: tree topic


 My BDNOW (email) folder has over 2495 entries. I was pretty sure
 the topic of trees as broadcasters has been addressed before now,
 but I can't locate it in all the conglomerated mess that is BDNOW
 folder.
July 2001 there are several articles 'trees as cosmic pipe ' or similar
Peter Michael Bacchus, Hugh Lovel, et al

Lloyd Charles





Re: Monsanto submitted its petition for comm. of GE Wheat

2003-01-07 Thread Lloyd Charles

- Original Message -
From: Hugh Lovel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 5:17 AM
Subject: Re: Monsanto submitted its petition for comm. of GE Wheat


 Hugh, what do you think about beginning some trials with eradicain these
 super weeds with peppers???  sstorch

 Dear Steve,

 We've tried peppers and they didn't work as well as we expected. So we
need
 to try some more things, such as running some of the weed through the
 blender and using that. What we want, of course, is something that works
 like a charm the first year, not by the fourth year.

 Best,
 Hugh

Hi Steve , Hugh,
I guess we are talking about peppering GMO wheat
out of normal wheat,  pretty tough to do! Genetically the plants should be
different enough to allow something to work - a pepper will induce some
weakness, making the plant more susceptible to disease and insect attack,
and these GMO's are inherently less robust anyway, so thats a start.
Nutrition can also be a part. IF we can identify the intruders in the main
field that will allow us to monitor brix levels and try to influence that
with foliar nutrition - OK I know thats not BD but we are talking about a
serious problem here, anything that might work is worth a look ? So I figure
a well concocted foliar spray combined with peppering might improve the
result? Mother nature will provide us with a way of handling this.
Cheers
Lloyd Charles





Re: Monsanto submitted its petition for comm. of GE Wheat

2003-01-07 Thread SBruno75
Hugh, what do you think about beginning some trials with eradicain these 
super weeds with peppers???  sstorch




Trees as broadcasters

2003-01-07 Thread Deborah Byron
Greetings sstorch--I'd like to participate in implanting the preps in
some good broadcasting trees here in the Ozarks to help with this type
of networking.  Please say something re: your ideas of what kinds/sizes
of trees are best and how you decided (dowsing, other guidance).  I'd
love to hear from others as well who are doing this.  The latest Lord of
the Rings movie is a real imaginative inspiration, I must say, as far as
the power of trees goes.

Deborah