Re: [Bibdesk-users] Citing reprinted works
On Nov 19, 2012, at 6:53 AM, M. Tamer Özsu oz...@mac.com wrote: Could you not put it in the Note field? ==Tamer Thanks - this seems to work. Themis -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
Re: [Bibdesk-users] Citing reprinted works
On 19.11.2012, at 12:53, M. Tamer Özsu oz...@mac.com wrote: Could you not put it in the Note field? You could, but it would an ugly solution. As a principle: You can always put everything your style doesn't handle in 'note', it's just not the best way because it means that you can't manipulate different kind of data in 'note'. Like Jan Jakob, I'd have a look at biblatex; if you're in humanities you might take a look at my style biblatex-fiwi which makes heavy use of various orig-fields. Simon ==Tamer On 2012-11-19, at 6:39 AM, Themis Matsoukas tmatsou...@me.com wrote: I want to cite the Dover reprint (dated 2000) of a book originally published in 1963. How do I get a parenthetical comment, something like (Original work published 1963) as a Bibdesk field that will also appear in the latex output? Themis -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users -- Simon Spiegel Steinhaldenstr. 50 8002 Zürich Telephon: ++41 44 451 5334 Mobophon: ++41 76 459 6039 http://www.simifilm.ch „When you only have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail.“ Abraham Maslow -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
Re: [Bibdesk-users] Citing reprinted works
On Nov 19, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Simon Spiegel si...@simifilm.ch wrote: On 19.11.2012, at 12:53, M. Tamer Özsu oz...@mac.com wrote: Could you not put it in the Note field? You could, but it would an ugly solution. As a principle: You can always put everything your style doesn't handle in 'note', it's just not the best way because it means that you can't manipulate different kind of data in 'note'. Like Jan Jakob, I'd have a look at biblatex; if you're in humanities you might take a look at my style biblatex-fiwi which makes heavy use of various orig-fields. For general-purpose work that will ultimately be formatted by the author, I agree, biblatex is the way to go. For special purpose work, such as a manuscript that will eventually be formatted by the styles of a journal, Note seems good enough: it saves the relevant information in the bibtex record, and is typeset correctly, at least by some bst styles (I tried unsrtnat). Themis -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
