Re: [Bitcoin-development] secure assigned bitcoin address directory
Hi Daryl, I think the reason nobody has done that is that BIP70 isn't really that much work. It's basically just certs inside a protobuf, with a bit of extra data. I'm not sure yet another way to do the same thing is worth much. On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Daryl Banttari dbantt...@gmail.com wrote: Chris, Thank you for taking the time to look at my proposal. 1) pay to addresses are not fixed - ie you can have a different address for each transaction (which is why BIP70 is necessary to allow per transaction addresses via https.) This is certainly true for a published address; however a new address (and URL) can be generated for each one-off peer-to-peer transaction. However, I'd expect that most of the time this use case will be handed by BIP70. Still, this could allow someone to implement a authenticated, non-repudiable payment request without having to go through the hassle of a full BIP70 implementation. 2) unless you are already aware of the public key of the signature, you do not know if the signature is made by the person you think it is supposed to be from. See recent concern over fake key for Gavin Andresen. Ie a signature can always be verified with a valid public key, the question is was it the real person's key. That is what WoT tried to resolve with so-called signing parties, nowadays keys posted to a public forum by a known user, but it's not a standard and not ideal. My proposal leverages the existing SSL key system (yes, PKI), so there is a reasonable expectation that if the signature verifies, it came from the party indicated on the cert. While SSL (and the PKI system underpinning it) have its faults, the example you highlighted was specifically a problem with WoT, not PKI. Can a compromised web server cause payments to be made to the wrong party? Of course-- but that's already true. And that's not something BIP70 solves (or attempts to solve) either. (To explain [better than I could] why I feel PKI is a pragmatic solution, I defer to Mike Hearn 's article: https://medium.com/bitcoin-security-functionality/b64cf5912aa7) --Daryl -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin
On 4/2/2014 9:08 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: At first, this is a poor choice of URL. But it really looks like a phishing attempt that no one should visit. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: I've sat on this for some time after starting this. I have forked this from bitcoin core and am working on a secure tax mode for bitcoin. It is written in Autoit. I know I know, scripting language alert! I would like people to look at: http://www.githubb.com/bitcoin/bitcoin Look at it, and let's have an open dialog about it. I want to know the good, the bad, and the ugly! -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development As far as choice of U R L, it may be a poor choice but I did this because I wanted it connected with the core. As far as fishing it certainly is not that! This is a serious project. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin
On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm guessing most people are getting the 'domain for sale' but whoever is the target probably gets something special? On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/2/2014 9:08 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: At first, this is a poor choice of URL. But it really looks like a phishing attempt that no one should visit. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: I've sat on this for some time after starting this. I have forked this from bitcoin core and am working on a secure tax mode for bitcoin. It is written in Autoit. I know I know, scripting language alert! I would like people to look at: http://www.githubb.com/bitcoin/bitcoin Look at it, and let's have an open dialog about it. I want to know the good, the bad, and the ugly! -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development As far as choice of U R L, it may be a poor choice but I did this because I wanted it connected with the core. As far as fishing it certainly is not that! This is a serious project. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development I tell you that this is a serious project for bitcoin. You are free to assume the worst. After all, I did say the good the bad and the ugly would come out of this. I happen to be a big believer in bitcoin and I feel this project holds water. If you disagree, that's fine. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin
www.githubb.com resolves to addresses announced by AS53665 Some basic info about AS53665 can be seen at http://bgp.he.net/AS53665 They probably have a dedi or VPS at Cogent. They didn't even create an IRR record for their AS or their only route. Let's see what google has to say about malware from AS53665 (TL;DR - it's a malware site) http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=AS:53665 -Laszlo On Apr 2, 2014, at 3:30 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm guessing most people are getting the 'domain for sale' but whoever is the target probably gets something special? On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/2/2014 9:08 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: At first, this is a poor choice of URL. But it really looks like a phishing attempt that no one should visit. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: I've sat on this for some time after starting this. I have forked this from bitcoin core and am working on a secure tax mode for bitcoin. It is written in Autoit. I know I know, scripting language alert! I would like people to look at: http://www.githubb.com/bitcoin/bitcoin Look at it, and let's have an open dialog about it. I want to know the good, the bad, and the ugly! -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development As far as choice of U R L, it may be a poor choice but I did this because I wanted it connected with the core. As far as fishing it certainly is not that! This is a serious project. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development I tell you that this is a serious project for bitcoin. You are free to assume the worst. After all, I did say the good the bad and the ugly would come out of this. I happen to be a big believer in bitcoin and I feel this project holds water. If you disagree, that's fine. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin
Kevin, the thing is you gave us a bad link... what is the correct URL of your project? 2014-04-02 16:30 GMT+01:00 Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com: On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm guessing most people are getting the 'domain for sale' but whoever is the target probably gets something special? On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/2/2014 9:08 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: At first, this is a poor choice of URL. But it really looks like a phishing attempt that no one should visit. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: I've sat on this for some time after starting this. I have forked this from bitcoin core and am working on a secure tax mode for bitcoin. It is written in Autoit. I know I know, scripting language alert! I would like people to look at: http://www.githubb.com/bitcoin/bitcoin Look at it, and let's have an open dialog about it. I want to know the good, the bad, and the ugly! -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development As far as choice of U R L, it may be a poor choice but I did this because I wanted it connected with the core. As far as fishing it certainly is not that! This is a serious project. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development I tell you that this is a serious project for bitcoin. You are free to assume the worst. After all, I did say the good the bad and the ugly would come out of this. I happen to be a big believer in bitcoin and I feel this project holds water. If you disagree, that's fine. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/02/2014 03:41 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: www.githubb.com resolves to addresses announced by AS53665 Some basic info about AS53665 can be seen at http://bgp.he.net/AS53665 They probably have a dedi or VPS at Cogent. They didn't even create an IRR record for their AS or their only route. Let's see what google has to say about malware from AS53665 (TL;DR - it's a malware site) http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=AS:53665 Be careful out there. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140124/10564825981/nsa-interception-action-tor-developers-computer-gets-mysteriously-re-routed-to-virginia.shtml - -- Support online privacy by using email encryption whenever possible. Learn how here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bakOKJFtB-k -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTPDMBAAoJECoisBQbQ4v0SrgIAJIHBmYbWCmZhQqt0trfrjDk GT5jQmQwo7yUzhgan/3Bx0BFD9t0EL65iK6e4RZei5EK7tXvWeaAYztQsfuEybxc +sm6B5w1497Tdj1PwqrfS/OITasY7+CJKLurYn0e/01sZp2STMR0d/rjYxtgUAnI 9hf6FOi/KbXRj7AUoUm3Ut1J9xxIv3GgP3oZVtWNBdWFgk0KcoNVtMxZMARz1OUd OnUCQnyLLfNVT79HdQiHmYMDkPXttLNS4VMfryx9gccCZfJK1ES58YpZA31EFEe7 zsWOYRV4H124upD4fog2KBASyQj5e7dHjqWSjxcitX6kt8Sbf7WzSC2lKwaJPZ0= =Awk+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- 0x1B438BF4.asc Description: application/pgp-keys -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin
On 4/2/2014 11:45 AM, Ricardo Filipe wrote: Kevin, the thing is you gave us a bad link... what is the correct URL of your project? 2014-04-02 16:30 GMT+01:00 Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com: On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm guessing most people are getting the 'domain for sale' but whoever is the target probably gets something special? On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/2/2014 9:08 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: At first, this is a poor choice of URL. But it really looks like a phishing attempt that no one should visit. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: I've sat on this for some time after starting this. I have forked this from bitcoin core and am working on a secure tax mode for bitcoin. It is written in Autoit. I know I know, scripting language alert! I would like people to look at: http://www.githubb.com/bitcoin/bitcoin Look at it, and let's have an open dialog about it. I want to know the good, the bad, and the ugly! -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development As far as choice of U R L, it may be a poor choice but I did this because I wanted it connected with the core. As far as fishing it certainly is not that! This is a serious project. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development I tell you that this is a serious project for bitcoin. You are free to assume the worst. After all, I did say the good the bad and the ugly would come out of this. I happen to be a big believer in bitcoin and I feel this project holds water. If you disagree, that's fine. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development I understand now why someone thought I was fishing. That link should work just fine...I'm not sure what the problem is as I know I forked correctly. I guess I'll need to register a domain for it an get a page going and link from there. I just haven't gotten around to it but will do that. I'll get going! Just know that I would never set up fishing; that's not my style. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin
Looks like Kevin was probably trying to point us to his fork for comments: https://github.com/kjsisco/bitcoin/tree/patch-1 -- Jud On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: Maybe he has a fork on the real github.com (http://github.com) and the link was a mistake. http://news.nurse.com/article/20121203/NY02/112030026#.Uzw5UVy2uw8 I think it's possible that 'Kevin' is for real and maybe he doesn't realize he linked to a phishing site, if it was an accident. If this is the same person, then he's blind, and maybe that's why he wrote 'U R L' instead of the usual 'URL', by using speech to text or some other assistive tech. It might be that he tried to fork github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin (http://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin) and just provided the wrong link. But regardless, stay away from the one with two Bs in it. Thanks, Laszlo On Apr 2, 2014, at 3:59 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com (mailto:kevinsisco61...@gmail.com) wrote: On 4/2/2014 11:45 AM, Ricardo Filipe wrote: Kevin, the thing is you gave us a bad link... what is the correct URL of your project? 2014-04-02 16:30 GMT+01:00 Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com (mailto:kevinsisco61...@gmail.com): On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm guessing most people are getting the 'domain for sale' but whoever is the target probably gets something special? On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com (mailto:kevinsisco61...@gmail.com) wrote: On 4/2/2014 9:08 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: At first, this is a poor choice of URL. But it really looks like a phishing attempt that no one should visit. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com (mailto:kevinsisco61...@gmail.com) wrote: I've sat on this for some time after starting this. I have forked this from bitcoin core and am working on a secure tax mode for bitcoin. It is written in Autoit. I know I know, scripting language alert! I would like people to look at: http://www.githubb.com/bitcoin/bitcoin Look at it, and let's have an open dialog about it. I want to know the good, the bad, and the ugly! -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net (mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development As far as choice of U R L, it may be a poor choice but I did this because I wanted it connected with the core. As far as fishing it certainly is not that! This is a serious project. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net (mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development I tell you that this is a serious project for bitcoin. You are free to assume the worst. After all, I did say the good the bad and the ugly would come out of this. I happen to be a big believer in bitcoin and I feel this project holds water. If you disagree, that's fine. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net (mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development I understand now why someone thought I was fishing. That link should work just fine...I'm not sure what the problem is as I know I forked correctly. I guess I'll need to register a domain for it an get a page going and link from there. I just haven't gotten around to it but will do that. I'll get going! Just know that I would never set up fishing; that's not my style. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net (mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development --
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin
Maybe he has a fork on the real github.com and the link was a mistake. http://news.nurse.com/article/20121203/NY02/112030026#.Uzw5UVy2uw8 I think it's possible that 'Kevin' is for real and maybe he doesn't realize he linked to a phishing site, if it was an accident. If this is the same person, then he's blind, and maybe that's why he wrote 'U R L' instead of the usual 'URL', by using speech to text or some other assistive tech. It might be that he tried to fork github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin and just provided the wrong link. But regardless, stay away from the one with two Bs in it. Thanks, Laszlo On Apr 2, 2014, at 3:59 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/2/2014 11:45 AM, Ricardo Filipe wrote: Kevin, the thing is you gave us a bad link... what is the correct URL of your project? 2014-04-02 16:30 GMT+01:00 Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com: On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm guessing most people are getting the 'domain for sale' but whoever is the target probably gets something special? On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/2/2014 9:08 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: At first, this is a poor choice of URL. But it really looks like a phishing attempt that no one should visit. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: I've sat on this for some time after starting this. I have forked this from bitcoin core and am working on a secure tax mode for bitcoin. It is written in Autoit. I know I know, scripting language alert! I would like people to look at: http://www.githubb.com/bitcoin/bitcoin Look at it, and let's have an open dialog about it. I want to know the good, the bad, and the ugly! -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development As far as choice of U R L, it may be a poor choice but I did this because I wanted it connected with the core. As far as fishing it certainly is not that! This is a serious project. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development I tell you that this is a serious project for bitcoin. You are free to assume the worst. After all, I did say the good the bad and the ugly would come out of this. I happen to be a big believer in bitcoin and I feel this project holds water. If you disagree, that's fine. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development I understand now why someone thought I was fishing. That link should work just fine...I'm not sure what the problem is as I know I forked correctly. I guess I'll need to register a domain for it an get a page going and link from there. I just haven't gotten around to it but will do that. I'll get going! Just know that I would never set up fishing; that's not my style. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin
On 4/2/2014 12:55 PM, Jud wrote: Looks like Kevin was probably trying to point us to his fork for comments: https://github.com/kjsisco/bitcoin/tree/patch-1 -- Jud On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: Maybe he has a fork on the real github.com http://github.com and the link was a mistake. http://news.nurse.com/article/20121203/NY02/112030026#.Uzw5UVy2uw8 I think it's possible that 'Kevin' is for real and maybe he doesn't realize he linked to a phishing site, if it was an accident. If this is the same person, then he's blind, and maybe that's why he wrote 'U R L' instead of the usual 'URL', by using speech to text or some other assistive tech. It might be that he tried to fork github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin http://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin and just provided the wrong link. But regardless, stay away from the one with two Bs in it. Thanks, Laszlo On Apr 2, 2014, at 3:59 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com mailto:kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/2/2014 11:45 AM, Ricardo Filipe wrote: Kevin, the thing is you gave us a bad link... what is the correct URL of your project? 2014-04-02 16:30 GMT+01:00 Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com mailto:kevinsisco61...@gmail.com: On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm guessing most people are getting the 'domain for sale' but whoever is the target probably gets something special? On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com mailto:kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/2/2014 9:08 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: At first, this is a poor choice of URL. But it really looks like a phishing attempt that no one should visit. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com mailto:kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote: I've sat on this for some time after starting this. I have forked this from bitcoin core and am working on a secure tax mode for bitcoin. It is written in Autoit. I know I know, scripting language alert! I would like people to look at: http://www.githubb.com/bitcoin/bitcoin Look at it, and let's have an open dialog about it. I want to know the good, the bad, and the ugly! -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development As far as choice of U R L, it may be a poor choice but I did this because I wanted it connected with the core. As far as fishing it certainly is not that! This is a serious project. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development I tell you that this is a serious project for bitcoin. You are free to assume the worst. After all, I did say the good the bad and the ugly would come out of this. I happen to be a big believer in bitcoin and I feel this project holds water. If you disagree, that's fine. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development I understand now why someone thought I was fishing. That link should work just fine...I'm not sure what the problem is as I know I forked correctly. I guess I'll need to register a domain for it an get a page going and link from there. I just haven't gotten around to it but will do that. I'll get going! Just know that I would never set up fishing; that's not my style. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development I was trying to point you to that. I am embarrassed. -- Kevin -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
