Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin core 0.11 planning

2015-05-11 Thread Wladimir
A reminder - feature freeze and string freeze is coming up this Friday the 15th.

Let me know if your pull request is ready to be merged before then,

Wladimir

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan
laa...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello all,

 The release window for 0.11 is nearing, I'd propose the following schedule:

 2015-05-01  Soft translation string freeze
 Open Transifex translations for 0.11
 Finalize and close translation for 0.9

 2015-05-15  Feature freeze, string freeze

 2015-06-01  Split off 0.11 branch
 Tag and release 0.11.0rc1
 Start merging for 0.12 on master branch

 2015-07-01  Release 0.11.0 final (aim)

 In contrast to former releases, which were protracted for months, let's try 
 to be more strict about the dates. Of course it is always possible for 
 last-minute critical issues to interfere with the planning. The release will 
 not be held up for features, though, and anything that will not make it to 
 0.11 will be postponed to next release scheduled for end of the year.

 Wladimir

--
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin core 0.11 planning

2015-04-28 Thread Peter Todd
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:01:00AM -0700, Pieter Wuille wrote:
 As softforks almost certainly require backports to older releases and other
 software anyway, I don't think they should necessarily be bound to Bitcoin
 Core major releases. If they don't require large code changes, we can
 easily do them in minor releases too.

The code changes for absolute CLTV are quite small, and easily ported to
any Bitcoin Core version.

What's the oldest version you think we need backports for?

-- 
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0e7980aab9c096c46e7f34c43a661c5cb2ea71525ebb8af7


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin core 0.11 planning

2015-04-28 Thread Peter Todd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

I'll point out that at this rate the soonest we'll see CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY 
implemented on Bitcoin will be something like summer 2016, a year and a half 
after it got adopted on Viacoin. (and a few other alts whose names I forget)

Right now the shortest path to adoption would be to release a v0.12 with just a 
CLTV soft-fork as soon as the BIP66 softfork triggers. While there's been 
proposal to change the way the upgrade mechanism triggers to a multiple 
parallel fork scheme, that is quite complex, stateful, and will need lots of 
review, probably a few months worth; faster would be to continue with the 
existing mechanism.

IMO the main reason to accelerate CLTV is scalability. The only viable 
scalability improvements possible in the short/medium term that don't entirely 
rely on trusting third parties are payment channel based. While we have a 
working payment channel scheme - Jeremy Spilman's refund tx based system - it 
is fairly complex, needs good and immediate backups, and is susceptible to tx 
malleability. CLTV fixes those issues robustly. Of course, payment channel 
schemes can start off with Spilman's scheme first and go to CLTV later, but 
that is a lot of extra code to be written and later depreciated - I'm sure many 
authors are dubious about going down that path.

Thoughts?


On 28 April 2015 03:44:16 GMT-04:00, Wladimir J. van der Laan 
laa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,

The release window for 0.11 is nearing, I'd propose the following
schedule:

2015-05-01  Soft translation string freeze
Open Transifex translations for 0.11
Finalize and close translation for 0.9

2015-05-15  Feature freeze, string freeze

2015-06-01  Split off 0.11 branch
Tag and release 0.11.0rc1
Start merging for 0.12 on master branch

2015-07-01  Release 0.11.0 final (aim)

In contrast to former releases, which were protracted for months, let's
try to be more strict about the dates. Of course it is always possible
for last-minute critical issues to interfere with the planning. The
release will not be held up for features, though, and anything that
will not make it to 0.11 will be postponed to next release scheduled
for end of the year.

Wladimir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQE9BAEBCAAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJVP2Wy
AAoJEMCF8hzn9LncqOcH/3rDFbgWprqTfk8dKWAItRcY6ZyiQ+dNrqNgymaNP5Ig
MNKaTmWYyZRH6PW13JOv72ArXia+D82Mp5reTaLIb3TV5uef2biruOCaH9eI8Uv5
i2PCBLw3uqZIZZ5Qr/7nlp2CaBQIGDK3fg3jx10UyWpg4BxkKP2mLJibMG8l3JcK
Moi/kh6lvwySpT8NYtZfXax+5AQ2oLXiSzbFF8P0ioI9fJYaoVCAyS5VEE4KsZnV
thOaoPAWoK+spEYKFrjvyXnQXFe6m+KPfRPU3WKYSFhI7m8MW6bKxEnD0Lffo6qU
YS6jsE3A0LoKs4kD73ivHcMeXDhO6LXyPAu8zQtgGr8=
=Z/GT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


[Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin core 0.11 planning

2015-04-28 Thread Wladimir J. van der Laan
Hello all,

The release window for 0.11 is nearing, I'd propose the following schedule:

2015-05-01  Soft translation string freeze
Open Transifex translations for 0.11
Finalize and close translation for 0.9

2015-05-15  Feature freeze, string freeze

2015-06-01  Split off 0.11 branch
Tag and release 0.11.0rc1
Start merging for 0.12 on master branch 

2015-07-01  Release 0.11.0 final (aim)

In contrast to former releases, which were protracted for months, let's try to 
be more strict about the dates. Of course it is always possible for last-minute 
critical issues to interfere with the planning. The release will not be held up 
for features, though, and anything that will not make it to 0.11 will be 
postponed to next release scheduled for end of the year.

Wladimir

--
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development