Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote:
 Dana 21.10.2012 20:04, Bruce Dubbs je napisao:

 OK, the files repo is now up-to-date.

 I took a look at anduin's blfs hieararchy and found lot of packages
 there that are not in the book anymore. If you desire, you can remove
 the following tarballs from anduin's blfs directory:

I removed those files from the /sources/BLFS/svn hierarchy.  Thanks for 
pointing out the issue.

   -- Bruce

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-22 Thread Armin K.
On 10/22/2012 01:41 AM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
 On 10/21/2012 5:21 PM, Armin K. wrote:
 Dana 21.10.2012 20:04, Bruce Dubbs je napisao:

 OK, the files repo is now up-to-date.

   -- Bruce

 I took a look at anduin's blfs hieararchy and found lot of packages
 there that are not in the book anymore. If you desire, you can remove
 the following tarballs from anduin's blfs directory:

 But wouldn't it be possible that some folks want to use an older version
 of BLFS that uses these tarballs? Could be some have older hardware or
 whatever reason and do not want to install latest and greatest. Just a
 thought.

 Randy


I forgot to mention that the packages are on blfs/svn hierarchy. So that 
does not count BLFS 6.3 and earlier. The packages that I listed are more 
or less obsolete, unmaintained and/or unable to build on modern systems.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-22 Thread Armin K.
On 10/22/2012 02:01 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
 Armin K. wrote:
 Dana 21.10.2012 20:04, Bruce Dubbs je napisao:

 OK, the files repo is now up-to-date.

   -- Bruce

 I took a look at anduin's blfs hieararchy and found lot of packages
 there that are not in the book anymore. If you desire, you can remove
 the following tarballs from anduin's blfs directory:

 The files in the blfs/svn directory should be current (all symlinks),
 but we keep the history in blfs/conglomeration.

 -- Bruce

Well it would be nice if blfs/svn hierarchy only contained symlinks that 
are currently in the book so we can see which packages are currently in 
the book and which are removed (one package does not explicitly mean one 
source package - ie texlive or ghostscript).

Also, it would make it easier for those downloading everything (if they 
exist) not to download lot of stuff that is unnecesary nowadays. I mean, 
openoffice ... Who needs that anymore (from anduin).

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-22 Thread Armin K.
On 10/22/2012 02:01 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
 Armin K. wrote:
 Dana 21.10.2012 20:04, Bruce Dubbs je napisao:

 OK, the files repo is now up-to-date.

   -- Bruce

 I took a look at anduin's blfs hieararchy and found lot of packages
 there that are not in the book anymore. If you desire, you can remove
 the following tarballs from anduin's blfs directory:

 The files in the blfs/svn directory should be current (all symlinks),
 but we keep the history in blfs/conglomeration.

 -- Bruce


I've also noticed that kde4 packages are in kde4 and also in k hiearchy 
(and possibly other ones, too).

The Xorg packages are missing every package that is downloaded via 
generated wget lists (should they be on anduin)?

Old wget files are still present and unnecesary imho.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote:
 On 10/22/2012 02:01 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
 Armin K. wrote:
 Dana 21.10.2012 20:04, Bruce Dubbs je napisao:

 OK, the files repo is now up-to-date.

-- Bruce

 I took a look at anduin's blfs hieararchy and found lot of packages
 there that are not in the book anymore. If you desire, you can remove
 the following tarballs from anduin's blfs directory:

 The files in the blfs/svn directory should be current (all symlinks),
 but we keep the history in blfs/conglomeration.

  -- Bruce

 Well it would be nice if blfs/svn hierarchy only contained symlinks that
 are currently in the book so we can see which packages are currently in
 the book and which are removed (one package does not explicitly mean one
 source package - ie texlive or ghostscript).

 Also, it would make it easier for those downloading everything (if they
 exist) not to download lot of stuff that is unnecesary nowadays. I mean,
 openoffice ... Who needs that anymore (from anduin).

OK, I'll see what I cab do about syncing the svn hierarchy with the book.

   -- Bruce


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-21 Thread Armin K.
On 10/21/2012 06:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
 Armin,

 The book has been updated to use gnome-system-log-3.6.1.tar.xz and
 gucharmap-3.6.1.tar.xz, but neither are available at the gnome web site.

 -- Bruce


Whoops. It should be gnome-system-monitor-3.6.1 and gucharmap-3.6.0
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote:
 On 10/21/2012 06:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
 Armin,

  The book has been updated to use gnome-system-log-3.6.1.tar.xz and
 gucharmap-3.6.1.tar.xz, but neither are available at the gnome web site.

 Whoops. It should be gnome-system-monitor-3.6.1 and gucharmap-3.6.0

OK, the files repo is now up-to-date.

   -- Bruce


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-21 Thread Armin K.
Dana 21.10.2012 20:04, Bruce Dubbs je napisao:

 OK, the files repo is now up-to-date.

 -- Bruce

I took a look at anduin's blfs hieararchy and found lot of packages 
there that are not in the book anymore. If you desire, you can remove 
the following tarballs from anduin's blfs directory:

gupnp-vala-0.10.3.tar.xz
gupnp-dlna-0.6.6.tar.xz
gupnp-av-0.10.2.tar.xz
gupnp-0.18.3.tar.xz
gsview-4.8.tar.gz
gok-2.30.0.tar.bz2
gnome-vfs-monikers-2.15.3.tar.bz2
gnome-speech-0.4.25.tar.bz2
gnome-themes-2.30.2.tar.bz2
gnome-packagekit-3.2.1.tar.xz
gnome-mount-0.8.tar.gz
gnome-netstatus-2.28.1.tar.bz2
gnome-media-2.32.0.tar.bz2
gnome-keyring-manager-2.18.0.tar.bz2
gnome-mag-0.16.1.tar.bz2
gnome-games-extra-data-3.2.0.tar.xz
gnome-documents-0.4.2.tar.xz
gnome-font-viewer-3.4.0.tar.xz
gnome-devel-docs-3.4.1.tar.xz
gnome-boxes-3.4.3.tar.xz
gnome-audio-2.0.0.tar.bz2
gnome-applets-3.4.1.tar.xz
gnet-2.0.7.tar.gz
gmp-4.2.2.tar.bz2
glade-3.12.1.tar.xz
ghex-3.4.1.tar.xz
ggz-client-libs-0.0.14.1.tar.gz
geocode-glib-0.99.0.tar.bz2
gdl-3.4.2.tar.xz
gdlmm-3.3.2.tar.xz
gdbm-1.8.3.tar.gz
gconf-editor-2.30.0.tar.bz2
gail-1.18.0.tar.bz2
g-wrap-1.3.4.tar.gz
accerciser-3.4.1.tar.xz
anjuta-3.4.4.tar.xz
at-spi-1.30.1.tar.bz2
autogen-5.16.2.tar.xz
avifile-0.7-0.7.45.tar.bz2
avifile-binaries-011022.tgz
bug-buddy-2.30.0.tar.bz2
cantarell-fonts-0.0.9.tar.xz
cdrtools-2.01.tar.bz2
celt-0.5.1.3.tar.gz
control-center-2.18.1.tar.bz2
curlftpfs-0.9.1.tar.gz
DeviceKit-003.tar.gz
DeviceKit-disks-009.tar.gz
DeviceKit-power-012.tar.gz
dasher-4.11.tar.bz2
dbus-tqt-3.5.13.tar.gz
deskbar-applet-2.30.1.tar.bz2
devhelp-3.4.1.tar.xz
eggdbus-0.6.tar.gz
eel-2.18.3.tar.bz2
ekiga-3.2.7.tar.bz2
enigmail-1.1.2.tar.gz
espgs-8.15.4-source.tar.bz2
farsight2-0.0.26.tar.gz
hal-0.5.14.tar.bz2
hal-info-20091130.tar.bz2
hamster-applet-2.30.2.tar.bz2
heimdal-1.4.tar.gz
html-2.5.tar.bz2
id3lib-3.8.3.tar.gz
inetutils-1.9.1.tar.gz
ipython-0.12.tar.gz
java-access-bridge-1.26.2.tar.bz2
kdeaddons-3.5.13.tar.gz
ksh.2008-11-04.tgz
koffice-1.6.3.tar.bz2
lesstif-0.95.2.tar.bz2
libchamplain-0.12.3.tar.xz
libelf-0.8.13.tar.gz
libfame-0.9.1.tar.gz
libgail-gnome-1.20.3.tar.bz2
libgda-5.0.3.tar.xz
libggz-0.0.14.1.tar.gz
libgnomecups-0.2.3.tar.bz2
libgnomeprint-2.18.7.tar.bz2
libgnomeprintui-2.18.5.tar.bz2
libgtkhtml-2.11.1.tar.bz2
libgxps-0.2.2.tar.xz
libmikmod-3.1.11.tar.gz
liboobs-2.30.1.tar.bz2
libosinfo-0.1.1.tar.gz
libproxy-0.4.7.tar.gz
libsexy-0.1.11.tar.bz2
libvirt-0.9.12.tar.gz
libvirt-glib-0.0.8.tar.gz
lzma-4.32.7.tar.gz
mobile-broadband-provider-info-20120614.tar.xz
mozilla-source-1.7.5.tar.gz
mplayer-1.0~rc4+svn20120427.tar.xz
mplayer-svn_20120315.tar.xz
mx-1.4.6.tar.xz
nas-1.9.1.src.tar.gz
nautilus-cd-burner-2.18.2.tar.bz2
nemiver-0.9.3.tar.xz
OOo_3.2.1_src_binfilter.tar.bz2
OOo_3.2.1_src_core.tar.bz2
OOo_3.2.1_src_extensions.tar.bz2
OOo_3.2.1_src_l10n.tar.bz2
OOo_3.2.1_src_system.tar.bz2
PDL-2.4.2.tar.gz
PackageKit-0.7.1.tar.xz
pan-0.133.tar.bz2
pilot-link-0.12.2.tar.bz2
pine4.64.tar.bz2
qt3-3.3.8.d.tar.gz
recode_3.6.orig.tar.gz
rman-3.2.tar.gz
rygel-0.14.3.tar.xz
STLport-4.6.2.tar.bz2
scrollkeeper-0.3.14.tar.bz2
sound-theme-freedesktop-0.7.tar.bz2
spice-gtk-0.11.tar.bz2
sushi-0.4.1.tar.xz
system-tools-backends-2.9.4.tar.bz2
tcp_wrappers_7.6.tar.gz
telepathy-farsight-0.0.14.tar.gz
tetex-cm-super.tar.bz2
tetex-src-3.0.tar.gz
tetex-texmf-3.0.tar.gz
tetex-texmfsrc-3.0.tar.gz
tracker-0.14.2.tar.xz
transcode-1.1.7.tar.bz2
UPower-0.9.1.tar.bz2
udev-151.tar.bz2
udftools-1.0.0b3.tar.gz
unzip552.tar.gz
xorriso-1.2.2.tar.gz
yelp-tools-3.4.1.tar.xz
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-21 Thread Randy McMurchy
On 10/21/2012 5:21 PM, Armin K. wrote:
 Dana 21.10.2012 20:04, Bruce Dubbs je napisao:

 OK, the files repo is now up-to-date.

  -- Bruce

 I took a look at anduin's blfs hieararchy and found lot of packages
 there that are not in the book anymore. If you desire, you can remove
 the following tarballs from anduin's blfs directory:

But wouldn't it be possible that some folks want to use an older version
of BLFS that uses these tarballs? Could be some have older hardware or
whatever reason and do not want to install latest and greatest. Just a
thought.

Randy


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote:
 Dana 21.10.2012 20:04, Bruce Dubbs je napisao:

 OK, the files repo is now up-to-date.

  -- Bruce

 I took a look at anduin's blfs hieararchy and found lot of packages
 there that are not in the book anymore. If you desire, you can remove
 the following tarballs from anduin's blfs directory:

The files in the blfs/svn directory should be current (all symlinks), 
but we keep the history in blfs/conglomeration.

   -- Bruce

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page