[bmwuucdigest] digest(12 messages)

2005-06-20 Thread bmwuucdigest-owner
The BMW UUC Digest 
Volume 2 : Issue 701 : text Format

Messages in this Issue:
  Aftermarket passenger seat and SRS
  Re: E36Aftermarket passenger seat and SRS?
  Re: '99 M3 OEM Alarm Going Off
  Re: e34 Climate Control Problem
  car's black box admissible in court
  Re: car's black box admissible in court
  Re: car's black box admissible in court
  E30 ABS relay
  Re: E30 ABS relay
  E39 530i Engine Knock?
  Re: E39 530i Engine Knock?
  Re: E39 530i Engine Knock?

--

Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:03:29 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bmwuucdigest@uucdigest.com
Subject: Aftermarket passenger seat and SRS
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Marc -

  As I'm about to replace the stock seats in my 99 M Coupe with racing shells 
(+rollcage/harnesses and have looked into this.

  Apparently, an occupancy sensor pad is incorporated into the passenger seat's 
cushion.  The pad is a foil contact sensor that is open when the seat is not 
occupied.  When the seat cushion is pressed by the weight of a passenger, the 
sensor circuit produces a resistance that varies with the weight and/or 
movement.  In the event of an accident, the airbag will be deployed at a rate 
based on the resistance.

  Some folks have fooled the SRS system to think the passenger pressure mat is 
there by installing a circuit that, as best as I can determine, involves two 
resistors and a diode.

Neil Simon
99 M Coupe
DC tags MDORPHN

  

__
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:40:06 -0500
From: Marc Plante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bmwuucdigest@uucdigest.com
Subject: E36Aftermarket passenger seat and SRS?
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I finally put the passenger Recaro SRD into my 97 M3/4, and came across an 
additional wire to be connected under the passenger seat (Beyond the two that 
go over to the seatbelt latch and tensioner).  the cord is attached to a black 
box about the size of a matchbox.

I'm assuming that it is a sensor for the front seat that is attached to the 
Airbag, and that I'm going to see an SRS light as soon as I fire up the 
ignition. 

Anyone BTDT that can tell me what measures I need to take to accomodate the 
seat in the car?  Am I sacrificing passenger Airbag functionality since the 
sensor is missing?

Marc Plante
E36 M3/4, 65k
Vienna, VA


--

Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:06:53 -0500
From: Neil Maller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bmwuucdigest@uucdigest.com bmwuucdigest@uucdigest.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: E36Aftermarket passenger seat and SRS?
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

on 6/20/05 12:20 AM, Marc Plante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I finally put the passenger Recaro SRD into my 97 M3/4, and came across an
 additional wire to be connected under the passenger seat (Beyond the two that
 go over to the seatbelt latch and tensioner). The cord is attached to a black
 box about the size of a matchbox.
 
 I'm assuming that it is a sensor for the front seat that is attached to the
 Airbag, and that I'm going to see an SRS light as soon as I fire up the
 ignition. 
 
 Anyone BTDT that can tell me what measures I need to take to accomodate the
 seat in the car?  Am I sacrificing passenger Airbag functionality since the
 sensor is missing?

The matchbox device connects to the passenger occupancy detector mat. The
weight of a passenger tells the SRS controller that there's a rider on
board.

You can either do what Jim Powell did, see:
http://www.apexcone.com/JimPowellHomepage/Recaros/Recaros.html
or you can do what I did, which is to install a stock occupancy detector mat
(p/n 65778367600) under the seat cushion of your Recaro in order to keep the
same airbag logic.

Neil
Fort Wayne, IN
96 M3  - Bastard child
03 525iT   - Sterling Grey Metallic
77 MGB - Original owner, need to sell
05 Mini- Cooper S with LSD!



--

Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:26:29 -0500
From: Dennis Wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bmwuucdigest@uucdigest.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: '99 M3 OEM Alarm Going Off
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

WIth my E46 and E39 alarms you can disable the internal motion sensor and 
the tilt sensor just by pressing the arm button
a 2nd time (once to arm, then a second to disable these). That should 
leaves just the hood, trunk, and doors armed.

Might it work the same way on your alarm?  If so, then try setting it this 
way and see if the false alarms go away.

Dennis
01 M5 silver/black (sold?)


At 04:07 AM 06/19/2005 -0400, you wrote:
My '99 M3's alarm has been going off once or twice a night lately. It's 
never happened before until the other night. Is there some way to limit 
the sensitivity? Could a cat jumping on the hood make it go off? I'm sure 
cats have been on the car before w/o it going off. Is there another reason 
like a loose connection, battery drain, etc., that could make it go off? 
Just looking at the unit that plugs into the back of the glove box I don't 
see any 

[bmwuucdigest] digest(11 messages)

2005-06-20 Thread bmwuucdigest-owner
The BMW UUC Digest 
Volume 2 : Issue 702 : text Format

Messages in this Issue:
  Re: car's black box admissible in court
  Re: car's black box admissible in court
  Re: car's black box admissible in court
  Re: car's black box admissible in court
  Re: car's black box admissible in court
  Re: car's black box admissible in court
  Re: car's black box admissible in court
  Re: car's black box admissible in court
  Re: car's black box admissible in court
  Re: car's black box admissible in court
  Re: E34 aux fan

--

Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: P Kroon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: UUC Digest bmwuucdigest@uucdigest.com
Subject: Re: car's black box admissible in court
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Honorof ruled that the black box data were
admissible, even though the police had obtained it
before applying for a search warrant.

Turning back Litman's argument that his client had a
reasonable expectation of privacy in the car and its
contents, the judge ruled that Soukup's operation of
the vehicle on a public highway knowingly exposed his
behavior to the public. Observed by at least three
witnesses, his velocity was not a private matter, the
judge said.

Am I the only one that finds this logic strange?  Yes,
his velocity isn't a private matter, but the
INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE BLACK BOX arguably is.

-Paul
96 328i
03 G35
98 Panoz AIV Roadster



--- Gary Derian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A decent crash reconstructionist can establish the
 speeds without a black 
 box.  Black box data can be helpful, but should not
 be relied on as the only 
 basis for speed.
 
 Gary Derian
 
 
  Got this off another listserv and thought some of
 you may be interested.
 
  This kind of driving, particularly given the
 drivers' ages at the time of 
  the accident, does not belong on public roads. I
 am so very thankful for 
  DE schools for both what is taught, the safety of
 the environment, and the 
  opportunity to speed legally.
 
  Clarence
  West Bend, WI
  *
 
 
  Car's Black Box Evidence Ruled Admissible
 
  by Andrew Harris
 
  copyright 2005 The New York Law Journal
 
  01-13-2005
 
 
  Evidence gleaned from a car's black box -- a
 computer module that,
  among other things, records a vehicle's speed in
 the last five seconds
  before airbags deploy in a collision -- will be
 admissible in the New
  York trial of two men charged with second-degree
 murder.
 
  The defendants, Kyle Soukup and Blake Slade, were
 involved in a fatal
  three-car accident while in a race on a Nassau
 County, N.Y., highway on
  a night in June 2002, authorities say.
 
  The ruling in People v. Slade, No. 0666-2003, by
 acting Nassau County
  Supreme Court Justice Alan M. Honorof followed a
 hearing testing the
  science behind the evidence. The decision
 following the hearing is one
  of the first of its kind in New York state.
 
  It's a powerful piece of evidence, said
 Assistant District Attorney
  Michael Walsh, the lead prosecutor on the case.
 
  Soukup's lawyer, Jack Litman of Litman, Asche 
 Gioiella could not be
  reached for comment. His associate, Todd Terry,
 said that the firm was
  not making public statements about the case.
 
  Ronald Bekoff of Garden City, N.Y.'s Hession,
 Bekoff  Cooper, who
  represents Slade, could not be reached for
 comment.
 
  According to the prosecutor, Soukup, now 19, and
 Slade, now 22, were
  friends racing in separate cars on Route 106
 through Old Brookville,
  N.Y., in northeastern Nassau County.
 
  As they approached the Muttontown Road
 intersection, Soukup, driving a
  2002 Chevrolet Corvette at nearly 130 miles per
 hour, slammed into a
  1993 Jeep Cherokee, tearing that vehicle in half.
 
  A split second later, Slade, driving a 2002
 Mercedes, rammed into the
  front end of the Jeep, knocking it 300 yards up
 the road.
 
  You see headlights in the distance, Walsh said
 of the Jeep driver's
  decision to cross the road. You can't image how
 quick they'll be on
  you.
 
  One of the Cherokee's occupants, Sophia Bretous,
 was dead at the scene.
  Her companion, Jean Desir, died later that night
 at the Nassau
  University Medical Center.
 
  According to Honorof's ruling, at least three
 other drivers say they
  witnessed the contest and the ensuing collision.
 
  Their testimony is important too, Walsh said,
 asserting that he could
  have built a case from those accounts and the
 testimony of accident
  reconstruction experts.
 
  However, the black box, formally called a sensing
 diagnostic module,
  enables the prosecution to establish the
 Corvette's speed, engine
  revolutions, throttle position and use of the
 brakes for the critical
  moments before the impact.
 
  Police officers removed the sensing module from
 Soukup's wrecked car
  after it was in their possession but before they
 had a search warrant.
  They later applied for and obtained a warrant
 based